References (26)
References
Amossy, Ruth. 2012. “Les enjeux du « déraisonnable »: rhétorique de la persuasion et rhétorique du dissensus.” In Chaïm Perelman (1912–2012). De la Nouvelle Rhétorique à la Logique Juridique, ed. by Benoît Frydman, and Michel Meyer, 17–37. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Aristoteles. 2002. Rhetorik. Transl. and comm. by Christoph Rapp. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Chilton, Paul. (2004). Analysing Political Discourse. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H., and Rob Grootendorst. (2004). A Systematic Theory of Argumentation. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H. (2010). Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H., and Peter Houtlosser. 2002. “Strategic Maneuvering with the Burden of Proof.” In Advances in Pragma-Dialectics, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren, 13–28. Amsterdam: SicSat.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. (2000). New Labour, New Language? London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Garssen, Bart, and Manfred Kienpointner. 2011. “Figurative Analogy in Political Argumentation.” In Keeping in Touch with Pragma-Dialectics, ed. by Eveline Feteris, Bart Garssen, and Francisca Snoeck-Henkemans, 39–58. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1988. Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. 11. Bd. Frankfurt/M., 47.Google Scholar
Kienpointner, Manfred. (1992). Alltagslogik. Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar
. 1993. “The Empirical Relevance of Ch. Perelman’ s New Rhetoric.” Argumentation 7 (4): 419–437. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00711059Google Scholar
. 1998. “Inventio.” In Historisches Wörterbuch der Rhetorik, Vol. 41, ed. by Gert Ueding, 561–587, especially 564–567. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
. 2003. “Perelman on Causal Arguments: The Argument of Waste.” In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Argumentation, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren et al., 611–616. Amsterdam: SicSat.Google Scholar
Kienpointner, Manfred, and Anna Orlandini. 2005. “La doxa de la justice à travers les langues et les époques.” Revue Internationale des droits de l’antiquité 521: 181–206.Google Scholar
Klein, Josef. 1995. “Asyl-diskurs. Konflikte und blockaden in politik, medien und alltagswelt.” In Sprache im Konflikt, ed. by Ruth Reiher, 15–71. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. 2003. “Politische Rede.” In Historisches Wörterbuch der Rhetorik, Vol. 61, ed. by Gert Ueding, 1465–1521. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Kopperschmidt, Josef. 2006. “Die Idee des ,,universalen Publikums”. In Die Neue Rhetorik. Studien zu Chaim Perelman, ed. by Josef Kopperschmidt, 227–279. München: Fink.Google Scholar
Perelman, Chaim. [1945] 1990. “De la justice.” In Éthique et droit, ed. by Chaim Perelman, 13–86. Bruxelles: Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles.Google Scholar
Perelman, Chaim, and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca. (1983). Traité de L’Argumentation: La Nouvelle Rhétorique. Bruxelles: Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. (1999). A Theory of Justice. Revised edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak. (2001). Discourse and Discrimination. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Walton, Douglas N. 1996. Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning. Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum, 38ff. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808630Google Scholar
. (2008). Informal Logic: A Pragmatic Approach. 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wengeler, Martin. (2003). Topos und Diskurs. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth. (2011). The Discourse of Politics in Action. 2nd edition. London: Palgrave Macmillan. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230316539Google Scholar
Zagar, Igor. 2011. “The Use and Misuse of Topoi: Critical Discourse Analysis and Discourse-historical Approach.” In Proceedings of the 7th Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren et al., 2032–2046. Amsterdam: SicSat.Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Moradi-Joz, Rasool, Saeed Ketabi & Mansoor Tavakoli
2019. On conductive argumentation. Journal of Language and Politics 18:1  pp. 83 ff. DOI logo
O’Halloran, Kieran
2014. Counter-discourse corpora, ethical subjectivity and critique of argument. Journal of Language and Politics 13:4  pp. 781 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.