Introduction
Cognitive perspectives on political discourse
Article outline
- 1.Conceptual metaphor and the evolution of CL
- 2.Framing and mental models
- 3.Categorization and denotational boundaries
- 4.The contributions to this issue
- Notes
-
References
References (89)
References
Ahrens, Kathleen (ed.). 2009. Politics, Gender and Conceptual Metaphors. Basingstoke: Palgrave. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Aitchison, Jean. 2003. Words in the Mind: An Introduction to the Mental Lexicon. 3rd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Balkin, Jack M. 1998. Cultural Software: A Theory of Ideology. New Haven: Yale University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Barcelona, Antonio. 2000. “Introduction: The Cognitive Theory of Metaphor and Metonymy.” In Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads, ed. by Antonio Barcelona, 1–28. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bultinck, Bert. 1998. Metaphors We Die By: Conceptualizations of Death in English and their Implications for the Theory of Metaphor. Antwerpen: Universiteit van Anwerpen.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Burkhardt, Armin. 1987a. “Metaphors We Die by: Die tödliche Metaphorik von Rüstungswerbung, Innen- und Militärpolitik.” In Germanistik und Deutschunterricht im Zeitalter der Technologie: Selbstbestimmung und Anpassung. Vorträge des Germanistentages Berlin 1987. Bd. 2: Politische Aufgaben und soziale Funktionen von Germanistik und Deutschunterricht, ed. by Norbert Oellers, 74–90. Tübingen: Niemeyer.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Burkhardt, Armin. 1987b. “Wie die ‘Wahre Welt’ endlich zur Metapher wurde: Zur Konstitution, Leistung und Typologie der Metapher.” Conceptus XXI (52): 39–67.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2004. Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2006. Politicians and Rhetoric: The Persuasive Power of Metaphor. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chilton, Paul, and Mikhail Ilyin. 1993. “Metaphor in Political Discourse: The Case of the ‘Common European House’.” Discourse & Society 4 (1): 7–31. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chilton, Paul, and George Lakoff. 1995. “Foreign Policy by Metaphor.” In Language and Peace, ed. by Christina Schäffner, and Anita L. Wenden, 37–59. Aldershot: Dartmouth Publishing.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chilton, Paul. 1988. “Metaphors and Models of International Relations.” Englisch-Amerikanische Studien: Zeitschrift für Unterricht, Wissenschaft und Politik (EAST) 3/4 (88): 396–406.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chilton, Paul. 1994. “ ‘La plaie qu’il convient de fermer …’: Les metaphores du discours raciste.” Journal of Pragmatics 21 (6): 583–619. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chilton, Paul. 1996. Security Metaphors: Cold War Discourse from Containment to Common House. New York: Lang.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chilton, Paul. 2004. Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cienki, Alan. 2005. “Metaphor in the ‘Strict Father’ and ‘Nurturant Parent’ Cognitive Models: Theoretical Issues Raised in an Empirical Study.” Cognitive Linguistics 16 (2): 279–312. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Collet, Tanja. 2009. “Civilization and Civilized in Post-9/11 US Presidential Speeches.” Discourse & Society 20 (4): 455–475. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dirven, René, Bruce Hawkins, and Esra Sandikcioglu (eds). 2001. Language and Ideology. Vol. I: Theoretical Cognitive Approaches. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dirven, René, Frank Polzenhagen, and Hans-Georg Wolf. 2007. “Cognitive Linguistics, Ideology, and Critical Discourse Analysis.” In The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, ed. by Dirk Geeraerts, and Hubert Cuyckens, 1222–1240. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eubanks, Philip. 2005. “Globalization, ‘Corporate Rule,’ and Blended Words: A Conceptual-Rhetorical Analysis of Metaphor, Metonymy, and Conceptual Blending.” Metaphor and Symbol 20 (3): 173–197. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Evans, Vyvyan, Benjamin K. Bergen, and Jörg Zinken. 2007. “The Cognitive Linguistics Enterprise: An Overview.” In The Cognitive Linguistics Reader, ed. by Vyvyan Evans, Benjamin K. Bergen, and Jörg Zinken, 2–36. London: Equinox.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Evans, Vyvyan, and Stéphanie Pourcel. 2009. “Introduction.” In New Directions in Cognitive Linguistics, ed. by Vyvyan Evans, and Stéphanie Pourcel, 1–11. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fairclough, Norman. 2001. Language and Power. 2nd ed. Harlow: Pearson Education Ltd.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fillmore, Charles J. 1987. “Scenes-and-Frames Semantics.” In Fillmore’s Case Grammar: A Reader, ed. by René Dirven, and Günter Radden, 79–87. Heidelberg: Groos.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fischer, Pascal. 2008. “Trouble in the Family: Neoconservative Discourse on Transatlantic Relations.” In Anglistentag 2007 Münster: Proceedings, ed. by Klaus Stierstorfer, 245–254. Trier: WVT.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fowler, Roger, Bob Hodge, Gunther Kress, and Tony Trew (eds). 1979. Language and Control. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Geeraerts, Dirk. 2007. “Where Does Prototypicality Come from?” In The Cognitive Linguistics Reader, ed. by Vyvyan Evans, Benjamin K. Bergen, and Jörg Zinken, 168–185. London: Equinox.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Geeraerts, Dirk, Gitte Kristiansen, and Yves Peirsman (eds). 2010. Advances in Cognitive Sociolinguistics. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Glucksberg, Sam. 2001. Understanding Figurative Language: From Metaphors to Idioms. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Glucksberg, Sam, and Boaz Keysar. 1993. “How Metaphors Work.” In Metaphor and Thought, 2nd ed., ed. by Andrew Ortony, 401–424. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Glucksberg, Sam, and Matthew S. McGlone. 1999. “When Love is not a Journey: What Metaphors Mean.” Journal of Pragmatics 311: 1541–1558. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goatly, Andrew. 1996. “Green Grammar and Grammatical Metaphor, or Language and the Myth of Power, or Metaphors We Die by.” Journal of Pragmatics 25 (4): 537–560. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. New York: Harper and Row.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hart, Christopher, and Dominik Lukeš (eds). 2007. Cognitive Linguistics in Critical Discourse Analysis. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Horowitz, Franklin E. 2002. “Metaphors We Die By: George Lakoff’s ‘Metaphors Of Terror’.” Columbia University Working Papers in TESOL & Applied Linguistics 2 (1). [URL] Last accessed October 8, 2012.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Housley, William, and Richard Fitzgerald. 2009. “Membership Categorization, Culture and Norms in Action.” Discourse & Society 20 (3): 345–362. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jäkel, Olaf. 1999. “Kant, Blumenberg, Weinrich: Some Forgotten Contributions to the Cognitive Theory of Metaphor.” In Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics: Selected Papers from the Fifth International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, Amsterdam, July 1997, ed. by Gerard Steen, and Raymond W. Gibbs, 9–27. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jäkel, Olaf. 2010. “Questions of Life and Death: Denotational Boundary Disputes.” In Cognitive Foundations of Linguistic Usage Patterns, ed. by Hans-Jörg Schmid, and Susanne Handl, 33–61. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Johnson, Mark. 1987. The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kendall, Shari. 2004. “Framing Authority: Gender, Face, and Mitigation at a Radio Network.” Discourse & Society 15 (1): 55–79. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Koller, Veronika, and Paul Davidson. 2008. “Social Exclusion as Conceptual and Grammatical Metaphor: A Cross-genre Study of British Policy-making.” Discourse & Society 19 (3): 307–331. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Koller, Veronika, and Elena Semino. 2009. “Metaphor, Politics and Gender: A Case Study from Germany.” In Politics, Gender and Conceptual Metaphors, ed. by Kathleen Ahrens, 9–35. Basingstoke: Palgrave.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Koller, Veronika. 2004. Metaphor and Gender in Business Media Discourse: A Critical Cognitive Study. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Koller, Veronika. 2005. “Critical Discourse Analysis and Social Cognition: Evidence from Business Media Discourse.” Discourse & Society 16 (2): 199–224. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Koller, Veronika. 2009. “Corporate Self-presentation and Self-centredness: A Case for Cognitive Critical Discourse Analysis.” In Language and Social Cognition: Expression of the Social Mind, ed. by Hanna Pishwa, 267–287. Berlin: de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kövecses, Zoltán. 2005. Metaphor in Culture: Universality and Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kress, Gunther, and Robert Hodge. 1979. Language as Ideology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lakoff, George, and John Halpin. 2005. “Framing Katrina.” The American Prospect, 7 October 2005. [URL]. Last accessed October 8, 2012.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lakoff, George. 1991. “Metaphor in Politics: An Open Letter to the Internet.” [URL]. [inactive]
Lakoff, George. 1992. “Metaphor and War: The Metaphor System Used to Justify War in the Gulf.” In Thirty Years of Linguistic Evolution: Studies in Honour of René Dirven, ed. by Martin Pütz, 463–481. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lakoff, George. 1996. Moral Politics: What Conservatives Know That Liberals Don’t. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lakoff, George. 2001. “Metaphors of Terror.” In These Times, 29 October 2001 [URL] Last accessed October 8, 2012.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lakoff, George. 2003. “Metaphor and War, Again.” [URL] Last accessed October 8, 2012.
Lakoff, George. 2004. Don’t Think of an Elephant: Know Your Values and Frame the Debate. Vermont: Chelsea Green.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lakoff, George. 2006. Whose Freedom? The Battle over America’s Most Important Idea. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lakoff, George. 2009. The Political Mind: A Cognitive Scientist’s Guide to Your Brain and Its Politics. New York and London: Penguin Books.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Leudar, Ivan, Victoria Marsland, and Jiří Nekvapil. 2004. “On Membership Categorization: ‘Us’, ‘Them’ and ‘Doing Violence’ in Political Discourse.” Discourse & Society 15 (2–3): 243–266. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Marín-Arrese, Juana I. 2008. “Cognition and Culture in Political Cartoons.” Intercultural Pragmatics 5 (1): 1–18. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Minsky, Marvin. 1975. “A Framework for Representing Knowledge.” In The Psychology of Computer Vision, ed. by Patrick Henry Winston, 211–280. New York: McGraw-Hill.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Musolff, Andreas, and Jörg Zinken (eds). 2009. Metaphor and Discourse. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Musolff, Andreas. 2004. Metaphor and Political Discourse: Analogical Reasoning in Debates about Europe. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Musolff, Andreas. 2010a. Metaphor, Nation and the Holocaust: The Concept of the Body Politic. New York and London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
O’Halloran, Kieran. 2003. Critical Discourse Analysis and Language Cognition. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Opp de Hipt, Manfred. 1987. Denkbilder in der Politik. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pancake, Ann S. 1993. “Taken by Storm: The Exploitation of Metaphor in the Persian Gulf War.” Metaphor and Symbol 8 (4): 281–295. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Romaine, Suzanne. 1996. “War and Peace in the Global Greenhouse: Metaphors We Die By.” Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 11 (3): 175–194. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rosch, Eleanor. 2000. “Categorization.” In Handbook of Pragmatics: 1998 Installment, ed. by Jef Verschueren, Jan-Ola Ostman, Jan Blommaert, and Chris Bulcaen, 1–14. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sacks, Harvey. 1972. “On the Analyzability of Stories by Children.” In Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication, ed. by John Joseph Gumperz, and Dell Hymes, 325–345. New York: Holt, Reinhart and Winston.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sandikcioglu, Esra. 2000. “More Metaphorical Warfare in the Gulf: Orientalist Frames in News Coverage.” In Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads, ed. by Antonio Barcelona, 299–320. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stockwell, Peter. 2000. “Towards a Critical Cognitive Linguistics?” Nottingham ePrints [URL] Last accessed October 8, 2012.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Taylor, John R. 2003. Linguistic Categorization. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Underhill, James. 2011. Creating Worldviews: Metaphor, Ideology and Language. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van Dijk, Teun A. 1998. Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Sage.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van Dijk, Teun A. 2008. Discourse and Context: A Sociocognitive Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van Dijk, Teun A. 2009. “Critical Discourse Studies: A Sociocognitive Approach.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, 2nd ed., ed. by Ruth Wodak, and Michael Meyer, 62–86. London: Sage.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1977. Philosophische Untersuchungen. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wodak, Ruth. 2008. “The Contribution of Critical Linguistics to the Analysis of Discriminatory Prejudices and Stereotypes in the Language of Politics.” In Handbook of Communication in the Public Sphere, ed. by Ruth Wodak, and Veronika Koller, 291–315. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wodak, Ruth, and Michael Meyer. 2009. “Critical Discourse Analysis: History, Agenda, Theory and Methodology.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, 2nd ed., ed. by Ruth Wodak, and Michael Meyer, 1–33. London: Sage.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Rafoss, Tore Witsø
2019.
Enemies of freedom and defenders of democracy: The metaphorical response to terrorism.
Acta Sociologica 62:3
► pp. 297 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.