Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 16:2 (2017) ► pp.242–263

“Contesting the Cynicism of Neoliberalism”

A Corpus-Assisted Discourse Study of Press Representations of the Sino-US Currency Dispute

ORCID logo | Sun Yat-sen University, China
This article aims to expose the hegemony of neoliberalism in media discourse through a corpus-assisted discourse study of the representations of the Sino-US currency dispute in two newspapers – China Daily (CD) from China and The New York Times (NYT) from the US. The findings suggest that while neoliberal ideology can be identified in both CD and NYT, it is articulated and appropriated differently in the two newspapers to construct their respective stance towards the issue. Neoliberal beliefs are found pervading different levels of discourse (i.e., thematic, lexical and grammatical) in NYT to construct a combative stance towards China’s exchange rate policies. However, the hegemony of neoliberalism can also be detected through CD’s ambivalent stance towards change and the seemingly contradictory evaluation of the impact of exchange rate changes.
Keywords: neoliberalism, currency dispute, critical discourse analysis, corpus-assisted discourse study, corpus linguistics
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Neoliberalization in China and the Sino-US currency dispute
  • 3.Theoretical framework
  • 4.Methodology
    • 4.1Data collection
    • 4.2Analytic method
  • 5.Findings
    • 5.1Selective analysis of NYT
      • 5.1.1“Law and order (G2.1)”
      • 5.1.2“Evaluation: Unauthentic (A5.4−)”
      • 5.1.3“Allowed (S7.4+)”
    • 5.2Selective analysis of CD
      • 5.2.1Ambivalent stance towards change
      • 5.2.2Positive self-presentation and negative other-presentation of the impact
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References


This article is currently available as a sample article.

Published online: 21 March 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.15010.liu
References (48)
References
Ayers, David F. 2005. “Neoliberal Ideology in Community College Mission Statements: A Critical Discourse Analysis.” The Review of Higher Education 28(4): 527–549. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013. “From Governance to Competitiveness: A Diachronic Analysis of the Community College Discourse of Local.” Critical Discourse Studies 10(1): 99–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, Paul, Costas Gabrielatos, Majid Khosravinik, Michael Krzyzanowski, Tony McEnery, and Ruth Wodak. 2008. “A Useful Methodological Synergy? Combining Critical Discourse Analysis and Corpus Linguistics to Examine Discourses of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in the UK Press.” Discourse and Society 19(3): 273–306. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barnett, Clive. 2015. “The Consolations of ‘Neoliberalism’.” Geoforum 361: 7–12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Block, David, John Gary, and Marnie Holborow. 2012. “Introduction.” In Neoliberalism and Applied Linguistics, ed. by David Block, John Gary, and Marnie Holborow, 1–13. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Brenner, Neil, and Nik Theodore. 2002. “Cities and the Geographies of ‘Actually Existing Neoliberalism’.” Antipode 341: 349–379. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Castree, Noel. 2006. “From Neoliberalism to Neoliberalization: Consolations, Confusions, and Necessary illusions.” Environmental and Planning A 38(1): 1–6. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crouch, Colin. 2011. The Strange Non-Death of Neoliberalism. Cambridge, England: Polity.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1992. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
. 1995. Media Discourse. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
. 2000. New Labour, New Language? New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2004. “Critical Discourse Analysis in Researching Language in the New Capitalism: Overdetermination, Transdisciplinarity and Textual Analysis.” In Systemic Functional Linguistics and Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by Lynne Young, and Claire Harrison, 103–122. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
. 2005. “Neo-liberalism – A Discourse-analytical Perspective.” Polifonia 10(10): 21–52.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman, and Ruth Wodak. 1997. “Critical Discourse Studies”. In Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction, ed. by Teun A. van Dijk, 258–284. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Fowler, Roger. 1991. Language in the News: Language and Ideology in the Press. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fowler, Roger, Robert Hodge, Gunther Kress, and Tony Trew (eds). 1979. Language and Control. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Gounari, Panayota. 2006. “Contesting the Cynicism of Neoliberal discourse: Moving towards a Language of Possibility.” Studies in Language and Capitalism (1): 77–96.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A.K. 1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 2nd edn. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Harvey, David. 2005. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2007. “Neoliberalism as Creative Destruction.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 610(1): 21–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hasan, Ruqaiya. 2003. “Globalization, Literacy and Ideology.” World Englishes 22(4): 433–448. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holborow, Marnie. 2012. “What is Neoliberalism? Discourse, Ideology and the Real World.” In Neoliberalism and Applied Linguistics, ed. by David Block, John Gray, and Marnie Holborow, 14–32. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
L’ Hôte, Emilie. 2010. “New Labour and Globalization: Globalist Discourse with a Twist?” Discourse and Society 21(4): 355–376. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, Chin-Chuan, Joseph Man Chan, Clement Y.K. So, and Zhongdang Pan (eds). 2002. Global Media Spectacle: News War over Hong Kong. Albany: Sate University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Leys, Colin. 2003. Market-Driven Politics: Neoliberal Democracy and the Public Interest. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Liew, Leong. 2005. “China’s Engagement with Neo-liberalism: Path Dependency, Geography and Party Self-reinvention.” The Journal of Development Studies 41(2): 331–352. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liu, Ming. 2015. “Scapegoat or Manipulated Victim? Metaphorical Representations of the Sino-US Currency Dispute in Chinese and American Financial News.” Text & Talk 35(3): 337–357.Google Scholar
Mulderrig, Jane. 2011. “Manufacturing Consent: A Corpus-based Critical Discourse Analysis of New Labour’s Educational Governance.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 43(6): 562–578. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Partington, Alan. 2004. “Corpora and Discourse, a Most Congruous Beast.” In Corpora and Discourse, ed. by Alan Partington, John Morley, and Louann Haarman, 11–20. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Peck, Jamie. 2013. “Explaining (with) Neoliberalism.” Territory, Politics, Governance 1(2): 132–157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pei, Minxin. 2006. China’s Trapped Transition: The Limits of Developmental Autocracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Phelan, Sean. 2007a. “The Discursive Dynamics of Neo-liberal Consensus: Irish Broadsheet Editorials and the Privatization of Eircom.” Journal of Language and Politics 6(1): 7–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007b. “The Discourses of Neoliberal Hegemony: The Case of the Irish Republic.” Critical Discourse Studies 4(1): 29–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. “Critiquing Neoliberalism: Three Interrogations and a Defense.” In Challenging Communication Research, ed. by Leah A. Lievrouw, 27–41. Pieterlen, Switerland: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Prentice, Sheryl. 2010. “Using Automated Semantic Tagging in Critical Discourse Analysis: A Case Study on Scottish Independence from a Scottish Nationalist Perspective.” Discourse and Society 21(4): 405–437. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rayson, Paul. 2003. “Matrix: A Statistical Method and Software Tool for Linguistic Analysis through Corpus Comparison.” Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Lancaster.Google Scholar
. 2008. “From Key Words to Key Semantic Domains.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 13(4): 519–549. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steger, Manfred B., and Ravi K. Roy. 2010. Neoliberalism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Teo, Peter. 2000. “Racism in the News: A Critical Discourse Analysis of News Reporting in Two Australian Newspapers.” Discourse and Society 11(1): 7–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun A. 1991. Racism and the Press. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
1998. Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Thousand Oaks.Google Scholar
2006. “Ideology and Discourse Analysis.” Journal of Political Ideologies 11(2): 115–140. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Eemeren, Frans H., Grootendorst Rob, and Kruiger Tjark. 1987. Handbook of Argumentation Theory: A Critical Survey of Classical Backgrounds and Modern Studies. Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Venugopal, Rajesh. 2015. “Neoliberalism as Concept.” Economy and Society 44(2): 165–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, Hui. 2003. China’s New Order: Society, Politics, and Economy in Transition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, and Christoph Ludwig. (1999). “Introduction.” In Challenges in a Changing World: Issues in Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by Ruth Wodak, and Christoph Ludwig, 11–19. Vienna: Passagen Verlag.Google Scholar
Wu, Fulong. 2008. “China’s Great Transformation: Neoliberalization as Establishing a Market Society.” Geoforum 39(3): 1093–1096. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. “How Neoliberal is China’s Reform? The Origins of Change during Transition.” Eurasian Geography and Economics 51(5): 619–631. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (13)

Cited by 13 other publications

Hou, Zhide & Qianni Peng
2023. The national security law for Hong Kong: a corpus-driven comparative study of media representations between China’s and Anglo-American English-language press. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 10:1 DOI logo
Teo, Peter & Huimin Xu
2023. A Comparative Analysis of Chinese and American Newspaper Reports on China’s Belt and Road Initiative. Journalism Practice 17:6 ► pp. 1268 ff. DOI logo
Wang, Guofeng, Yilin Liu & Shengmeng Tu
2023. Discursive use of stability in New York Times’ coverage of China: a sentiment analysis approach. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 10:1 DOI logo
Wu, Yuxi
2023. Corpus-Based Critical Discourse Analysis: Data and Research Methods. In Media Representations of Macau’s Gaming Industry in Greater China, ► pp. 37 ff. DOI logo
Wu, Yuxi
2023. Discussion and Conclusions. In Media Representations of Macau’s Gaming Industry in Greater China, ► pp. 131 ff. DOI logo
Zhao, Xin
2023. Constructing the ‘us’ and ‘them’ dichotomy through the notion of responsibility: An integrated framework. Global Media and Communication 19:1 ► pp. 119 ff. DOI logo
Chen, Fu & Guofeng Wang
2022. A war or merely friction? Examining news reports on the current Sino-U.S. trade dispute in The New York Times and China Daily. Critical Discourse Studies 19:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Liu, Ming
2022. Stancetaking in Hong Kong political discourse. Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 13:1 ► pp. 79 ff. DOI logo
Liu, Ming & Jingyi Huang
2022. “Climate change” vs. “global warming”: A corpus-assisted discourse analysis of two popular terms in The New York Times . Journal of World Languages 8:1 ► pp. 34 ff. DOI logo
Liu, Ming & Jingyi Huang
2024. Framing responsibilities for climate change in Chinese and American newspapers: A corpus-assisted discourse study. Journalism 25:8 ► pp. 1792 ff. DOI logo
Ming, Liu & Jingxue Ma
2022. The politics of fear in Hong Kong protest representations. Journal of Language and Politics 21:1 ► pp. 37 ff. DOI logo
Ming, Liu & Guofeng Wang
2022. An introduction to the special issue on “Language, Politics and Media: The Hong Kong protests”. Journal of Language and Politics 21:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Wang, Guofeng & Xueqin Ma
2021. Representations of LGBTQ+ issues in China in its official English-language media: a corpus-assisted critical discourse study. Critical Discourse Studies 18:2 ► pp. 188 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.