Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 19:4 (2020) ► pp.563–582

“So my position is…”

So-prefaced answers and epistemic authority in British news interviews

ORCID logo | University of York
This article examines the interactional functions of the so-prefaced answer, when used by interviewees in news and other political discussion broadcasts. Using the methods of conversation analysis, based on a data corpus of recent broadcasts from British mainstream television, the analysis shows that the so-preface functions in a cluster of related ways within the question-answer discourse structure of the political news interview. Specifically, it is used to reset or reframe the prior question from a standpoint of epistemic authority, enabling the interviewee to answer on their terms rather than the interviewer’s.
Keywords: conversation analysis, epistemics, evasion, news interviews, so-preface, turn-initial particles
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Pragmatics of news interviews
  • 3.“So” as a turn-initial particle
  • 4.Data
  • 5.So-prefacing in context
  • 6.Explanatory answers and epistemic privilege
  • 7.Agenda resets and position-avowals
  • 8.Evasive action
  • 9.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
Published online: 24 March 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.19089.hut
References (24)
References
Bolden, Galina. 2006. “Little words that matter: Discourse markers ‘so’ and ‘oh’ and the doing of other-attentiveness in social interaction.” Journal of Communication, 56 (4): 661–688. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bull, Peter. 2008. “Slipperiness, evasion and ambiguity.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 27 (4): 333–344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clayman, Steven, and John Heritage. 2002. The News Interview. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Judy. 1984. “Subsequent versions of invitations, offers, requests, and proposals dealing with potential or actual rejection.” In Structures of Social Action, ed. by J. M. Atkinson and John Heritage, 102–28. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 2000. New Labour, New Language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Greatbatch, David. 1986. “Aspects of topical organisation in news interviews: The use of agenda-shifting procedures by interviewees.” Media, Culture and Society, 8 (4): 441–455. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1988. “A turn-taking system for British news interviews.” Language in Society, 171: 401–430. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harris, Sandra. 1991. “Evasive action: How politicians respond to questions in political interviews.” In Broadcast Talk, ed. by Paddy Scannell, 76–99. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Heritage, John. 1984. “A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement.” In Structures of Social Action, ed. by J. M. Atkinson and John Heritage, 299–345. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 1985. “Analysing news interviews: Aspects of the production of talk for an overhearing audience.” In Handbook of Discourse Analysis, Volume 3: Discourse and Dialogue, ed. by Teun A. van Dijk, 95–119. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
. 2013. “Turn-initial position and some of its occupants.” Journal of Pragmatics, 571: 331–337. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen (eds). 2018. Between Turn and Sequence: Turn-Initial Particles Across Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hutchby, Ian. 2011. “Non-neutrality and argument in the Hybrid Political Interview.” Discourse Studies, 13 (3): 349–366. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. “Obama in the No Spin Zone.” In Media Talk and Political Elections in Europe and the USA, ed. by Mats Ekstrom and Andrew Tolson, 41–62. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
James, Oliver. 2013. “So, here’s a carefully packaged sentence that shows me in my best light.” The Guardian, Friday 26 July.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail. 2004. “Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction.” In Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, ed. by Gene H. Lerner, 13–23. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Michael. 1999. The New New Thing: A Silicon Valley Story. London: Hodder and Stoughton.Google Scholar
Montgomery, Martin. 2011. “The accountability interview, politics and change in UK public service broadcasting.” In Talking Politics in the Broadcast Media, ed. by Mats Ekstrom and Mariana Patrona, 33–55. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nunberg, Geoff. 2015. “So, what’s the big deal with starting a sentence with ‘so’?” [URL]
Pomerantz, Anita. 1984. “Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn-shapes.” In Structures of Social Action, ed. by J. M. Atkinson and John Heritage, 79–112. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 1989. “Constructing skepticism: Four devices used to engender the audience’s skepticism.” Research on Language and Social Interaction, 221: 293–314. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. and Gene Lerner. 2009. “Beginning to respond: Well-prefaced responses to wh-questions.” Research on Language and Social Interaction, 421: 91–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sterbenz, Christina. 2014. “So here’s why everyone is starting sentences with the word ‘so’.” Business Insider, May 12 2014.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Hutchby, Ian
2024. Prospective expertise: The use of ‘listen’ in the discourse of television sports pundits. Discourse Studies DOI logo
Tůma, František, Leila Kääntä & Teppo Jakonen
2023. L2 grammar‐for‐interaction: Functions of “and”‐prefaced turns in L2 students’ collaborative talk. The Modern Language Journal 107:4 ► pp. 991 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.