Article published In:
Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 20:2 (2021) ► pp.226253
References (67)
Behrend, Tara S., David J. Sharek, Adam W. Meade, and Eric N. Weibe
2011 “The Viability of Crowdsourcing for Survey Research.” Behaviour Research Methods 431: 800–13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boeynaems, Amber, Christian Burgers, Elly A. Konijn, and Gerard J. Steen
2017 “The Effects of Metaphorical Framing on Political Persuasion: A Systematic Literature Review”. Metaphor and Symbol 32 (2): 118–134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buhrmester, Michael, Tracy Kwang, and Samuel D. Gosling
2011 “Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A New Source of Inexpensive, yet High-Quality, Data? Perspectives on Psychological Science 6 (1): 3–5. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Catalano, Theresa and Andreas Musolff
2019 “ ‘Taking the Shackles off’: Metaphor and Metonymy of Migrant Children and Border Officials in the U.S”. 291.Google Scholar
Chandler, Jesse, Pam Mueller, and Gabriele Paolacci
2014Nonnaïveté among Amazon Mechanical Turk Workers: Consequences and Solutions for Behavioral Researchers. Behavior Research Methods 46(1): 112–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Charteris-Black, Jonathan
2004Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006 “Britain as a Container: Immigration Metaphors in the 2005 Election Campaign. Discourse & Society 17(5): 563–581. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chilton, Paul
2005 “Manipulation, Memes and Metaphors: The Case of Mein Kampf.” In Manipulation and Ideologies in the Twentieth Century: Discourse, Language, Mind, edited by Louis de Saussure and Peter Schulz, 15–44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crump, Matthew J. C., John V. McDonnel, and Todd M. Gureckis
2013 “Evaluating Amazon’s Mechanical Turk as a Tool for Experimental Behavioural Research.” PLoS ONE 8 e57410. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeVellis, Robert F.
2012Scale Development: Theory and Applications. 3rd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
de Lavalette, Kiki Y. R., Conia Andone, and Gerard J. Steen
2019a “Figurative Analogies and How They are Resisted in British Public Bill Committee Debates.” Metaphor and the Social World 9(1): 107–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
El Refaie, Elizabeth
2001 “Metaphors We Discriminate by: Naturalized Themes in Austrian Newspaper Articles about Asylum Seekers.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 5 (3): 352–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003 “Understanding Visual Metaphor: The Example of Newspaper Cartoons.” Visual Communication 2 (1): 75–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Entman, Robert M.
1993 “Framing: Toward a Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm.” Journal of Communication 43(4): 51–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004Projections of Power: Framing News, Public Opinion, and US Foreign Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ethical Journalism Network
2015Moving Stories. International Review of How Media Cover Migration. London: Ethical Journalism Network.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman
1989Language and Power. London: Longman.Google Scholar
1995Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles and Mark Turner
2002The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles
1982 “Frame Semantics.” In Linguistics in the Morning Calm, edited by Linguistics Society of Korea, 111–37. Seoul: Hanshin Publishing Co.Google Scholar
1985 “Frames and the Semantics of Understanding.” Quaderni di Semantica VI (2): 222–254.Google Scholar
Fuoli, Matteo and Christopher Hart
2018 “Trust-Building Strategies in Corporate Discourse: An Experimental Study. Discourse & Society 29(5): 514–552. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flusberg, Stephen J., Mark Lauria, and Paul H. Thibodeau
2018 “Metaphor Framing in Multiple Communication Modalities. In Proceedings of the 40th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 374–79. Madison, WI.Google Scholar
Giese, Stephanie and Christian Baden
2014 “Putting the Image back into the Frame: Modelling the Linkage between Visual Communication and Frame-Processing Theory.” Communication Theory 25(1): 46–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Graber, Doris A.
1990 “Seeing is Remembering: How Visuals Contribute to Learning from Television News. Journal of Communication 40 (3): 134–155. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hart, Christopher
2010Critical Discourse Analysis and Cognitive Science: New Perspectives on Immigration Discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017 “Metaphor and Intertextuality in Media Framings of the (1984–85) British Miners’ Strike: A Multimodal Analysis.” Discourse & Communication 11(1): 3–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018a “ ‘Riots Engulfed the City’: An Experimental Study Investigating the Legitimating Effects of Fire Metaphors in Discourses of Disorder.” Discourse & Society 29(3): 279–298. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018b “Event-Frames Affect Blame Assignment and Perception of Aggression: An Experimental Case Study in CDA.” Applied Linguistics 39(3): 400–421.Google Scholar
Hart, Christopher and Matteo Fuoli
2020 “Objectification Strategies Outperform Subjectification Strategies in Military Interventionist Discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics 1621: 17–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hartman, Todd K.
2012 “Toll Booths on the Information Superhighway? Policy Metaphors in the Case of Net Neutrality.” Political Communication 29(3): 278–298. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hauser, David J., Pheobe C. Ellsworth, and Richard Gonzalez
2018 “Are Manipulation Checks Necessary?Frontiers in Psychology 91: 998. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jeffries, Stuart
2014 “ ‘Swamped’ and ‘Riddled’: The Toxic Words that Wreck Public Discourse.” Guardian, Octoboer 27 2014 [URL]
Kampf, Zohar and Yossi David
2019 “Too Good to Be True: The Effect of Conciliatory Message Design on Compromising Attitudes in Intractable Conflicts.” Discourse & Society 30(3): 264–286. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klein, Richard A., Kate A. Ratliff, Michelangelo Vianello, Reginald B. Adams Jr., Štěpán Bahnik, Michael J. Bernstein, Konrad Bocian et al.
2014 “Investigating Variation in Replicability.” Social Psychology 451: 142–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koller, Veronika
2004Metaphor and Gender in Business Media Discourse: A Critical Cognitive Study. Basingstoke: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krzyżanowski, Michal
2018 “Discursive Shifts in Ethno-Nationalist Politics: On Politicization and Mediatization of the ‘Refugee Crisis’ in Poland.” Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies 16(1–2): 76–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2020 “Discursive Shifts and the Normalisation of Racism: Imaginaries of Immigration, Moral Panics and the Discourse of Contemporary Right-Wing Populism.” Social Semiotics 30 (4): 503–527. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson
1980Metaphors We Live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Landau, Mark J., Daniel Sullivan, and Jeff Greenberg
2009 “Evidence that Self-Relevant Motives and Metaphoric Framing Interact to Influence Political and Social Attitudes.” Psychological Science 20 (11): 1421–1426. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Luke, Allan
2002 “Beyond Science and Ideology Critique: Developments in Critical Discourse Analysis.” Annual review of Applied Linguistics 22(1): 96–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mason, Winter and Siddharth Suri
2012 “Conducting Behavioural Research on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk.” Behavioural Research Methods 441: 1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Musolff, Andreas
2004Metaphor and Political Discourse: Analogical Reasoning in Debates about Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016Political Metaphor Analysis: Discourse and Scenarios. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
2014News Consumption in the UK: 2014 Report. [URL]
Paolacci, Gabriele, Jesse Chandler, and Panagiotis G. Ipeirotis
2010 “Running Experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk.” Judgement and Decision Making 51: 411–419.Google Scholar
Peer, Eyal, Laura Brandimarte, Sonam Samat, and Alessandro Acquisti
2017 “Beyond the Turk: Alternative Platforms for Crowdsourcing Behavioral Research.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 701: 153–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reijnierse, W. Gudrun, Christian Burgers, Tina Krennmayr, and Gerard J. Steen
Robins, Shani and Richard E. Mayer
2000 “The Metaphor Framing Effect: Metaphorical Reasoning about Text-Based Dilemmas.” Discourse Processes 30 (1): 57–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Santa Ana, Otto
1999 “ ‘Like an Animal I was Treated’: Anti-Immigrant Metaphor in US Public Discourse.” Discourse & Society 10(2): 191–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002Brown Tide Rising: Metaphors of Latinos in Contemporary American Public Discourse. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Semino, Elena
2008Metaphor in Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shariatmadari, David
2015 “Swarms, Floods and Marauders: The Toxic Metaphors of the Migration Debate.” Guardian, August 10 2015 [URL]
Steen, Gerard J.
2008 “The Paradox of Metaphor: Why We Need a Three-Dimensional Model of Metaphor.” Metaphor and Symbol 231: 213–241. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 “When is Metaphor Deliberate?” In Selected Papers from the Stockholm 2008 Metaphor Festival, edited by Nils-Lennart Johannesson, Christina Alm-Arvius, and David C. Minugh, 43–63. Stockholm: University of Stockholm.Google Scholar
Steen, Gerard J., W. Gudrun Reijnierse, and Christian Burgers
2014 “When Do Natural Language Metaphors Influence Reasoning? A Follow-up Study to Thibodeau and Boroditsky (2013).” PLoS ONE 9(12): e113536. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Subtirelu, Nicholas C. and Shakthidhar R. Gopavaram
2016 “Crowdsourcing Critical Discourse Analysis: Using Amazon’s Mechanical Turk to Explore Readers’ Uptake of Comments about Language on” CADAAD 8 (1): 38–57.Google Scholar
Thibodeau, Paul H.
2016 “Extended Metaphors are the Home Runs of Persuasion: Don’t Fumble the Phrase.” Metaphor and Symbol 31 (2): 53–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thibodeau, Paul H. and Lera Boroditsky
2011 “Metaphors We Think with: The Role of Metaphor in Reasoning.” PLoS ONE 6(2): e16782. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 “Natural Language Metaphors Covertly Influence Reasoning.” PLoS ONE 8(1): e52961. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thibodeau, Paul H. and Lera Borodistky
2015 “Measuring Effects of Metaphor in a Dynamic Opinion Landscape.” PLoS ONE 10(7): e0133939. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Utych, Stephen M.
2018 “How Dehumanization Influences Attitudes toward Immigrants.” Political Research Quarterly 7(2): 440–452. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun A.
1998Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Perspective. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Widdowson, Henry G.
2004Text, Context, Pretext: Critical Issues in Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Woods, Andy T., Carlos Velasco, Carmel A. Levitan, Xiaoang Wan, and Charles Spence
2015 “Conducting Perception Research over the Internet: A Tutorial Review.” Peer J 3 e1058. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018Where the Public Stands on Immigration. [URL]
Cited by (17)

Cited by 17 other publications

Assimakopoulos, Stavros & Anna Piata
2024. Chapter 5. Liquid racism, metaphor and the visual modality. In Exploring the Ambivalence of Liquid Racism [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 341],  pp. 118 ff. DOI logo
Gonçalves, Isabella
2024. Promoting Hate Speech by Dehumanizing Metaphors of Immigration. Journalism Practice 18:2  pp. 265 ff. DOI logo
O’Connell Davidson, Julia
2024. Thinking with space invaders: ‘Freed slaves’, ‘asylum seekers’ and social wastelands. European Journal of Cultural Studies DOI logo
Coschignano, Serena, Gosse Minnema & Chiara Zanchi
2023. Explaining the distribution of implicit means of misrepresentation: A case study on Italian immigration discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 213  pp. 107 ff. DOI logo
Hart, Christopher
2023. Frames, framing and framing effects in cognitive CDA. Discourse Studies 25:2  pp. 247 ff. DOI logo
Heritage, Frazer
2023. Introduction. In Incels and Ideologies [Palgrave Studies in Language, Gender and Sexuality, ],  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
List, Alexandra
2023. Social justice reasoning when students learn about social issues using multiple texts. Discourse Processes 60:4-5  pp. 244 ff. DOI logo
Steen, Gerard J.
2023. Thinking by metaphor, fast and slow: Deliberate Metaphor Theory offers a new model for metaphor and its comprehension. Frontiers in Psychology 14 DOI logo
Zhang, Yan & Wenxing Yang
2023. The landslide’s conceptualizing economic decline and its framing effect: Mandarin evidence. Frontiers in Psychology 14 DOI logo
Benczes, Réka & Bence Ságvári
2022. Migrants are not welcome. Journal of Language and Politics 21:3  pp. 413 ff. DOI logo
Jatileni, Cloneria Nyambali & Shemunyenge Taleiko Hamukwaya
2022. The Use of Animal Metaphors to Reveal Beliefs of Grade Three Namibian Learners Who Experienced Mathematics Learning Difficulties During the COVID-19 Pandemic. In Mathematics Education in Africa,  pp. 243 ff. DOI logo
Porto, M. Dolores
2022. Water Metaphors and Evaluation of Syrian Migration: The Flow of Refugees in the Spanish Press. Metaphor and Symbol 37:3  pp. 252 ff. DOI logo
2021. How We Resist Metaphors. Language and Cognition 13:4  pp. 670 ff. DOI logo
Meluzzi, Chiara, Erica Pinelli, Elena Valvason & Chiara Zanchi
2021. Responsibility attribution in gender-based domestic violence: A study bridging corpus-assisted discourse analysis and readers' perception. Journal of Pragmatics 185  pp. 73 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.