Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 22:4 (2023) ► pp.458–484

Emergent Twitter publics through political scandal

An example from the Covid-19 Crisis in the UK

ORCID logo | University of Strathclyde
| University of Sunderland
| University of Strathclyde
This study examines how emergent Twitter publics are organised and engage with political scandal and personalisation during Covid-19 in the UK. The analysis is centred on a series of media events around Chief Adviser to the then-UK Prime Minister, running from May 2020 to May 2021. The samples comprises original tweets that contain key hashtags, amounting to 38,326 items. These are subject to topic model analysis to identify semantic fields, before using critical discourse analysis. We find hashtags help constitute emergent Twitter publics, and that tweets follow conversational patterns and conspire in tactics of intertextuality. Dissention to government conduct engages resourcefully with the affordances of Twitter: constituting publics, shaping discourse, and articulating with parallel discussions on political performance. Further, a computational approach can systematise the identification of domains of discourse and relevant lexical sets, providing an evidence-based understanding of even novel and emergent political discourses in online discussion.
Keywords: computational discourse analysis, political personalisation, Twitter, semantic fields, topic models
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Personalisation and political scandal
  • 3.The analysis of Twitter
  • 4.The use of hashtags
  • 5.Semantic fields
  • 6.Gathering the data
  • 7.Analytical approach
    • 7.1Coherence and prevalence of topics
  • 8.Discussion
    • 8.1Joining the Fray: Conversationalisation and intertextuality
    • 8.2Semantic fields and intertextuality: The use of ‘ladies and gentlemen’
    • 8.3Hashtags and Punning: Creative expansions
    • 8.4Towards shared creative descriptive practices amongst publics
  • 9.Conclusion
  • References
Published online: 9 May 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.22028.rat
References (51)
References
Abidin, Crystal, and Jing Zeng. 2020. “Feeling Asian Together: Coping with #COVIDRacism on Subtle Asian Traits.” Social Media and Society 6 (3). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Babvey, Pouria, Fernanda Capela, Claudia Cappa, Carlo Lipizzi, Nicole Petrowski, and Jose Ramirez-Marquez. 2020. “Using Social Media Data for Assessing Children’s Exposure to Violence during the COVID-19 Pandemic.” Child Abuse and Neglect 1161. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
BBCNews. 2020a. “Coronavirus: I Don’t Regret What I Did, Says Dominic Cummings.” [URL]
. 2020b. “Dominic Cummings: Fact-Checking the Row.” [URL]
. 2021. “Dominic Cummings Launches Attack on Boris Johnson’s Integrity.” [URL]
Blei, David M. 2012. “Probabilistic Topic Models.” Communications of the ACM 55 (4): 77–84. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blei, David M., Andrew Y. Ng, and Michael I. Jordan. 2003. “Latent Dirichlet Allocation.” Journal of Machine Learning Research 31: 993–1022.Google Scholar
Bode, Leticia, and Emily K. Vraga. 2021. “Correction Experiences on Social Media during COVID-19.” Social Media and Society 7 (2). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boorstin, Daniel J. 1963. The Image, or What Happened to the American Dream. New York: Atheneum.Google Scholar
Boulianne, Shelley, Karolina Koc-Michalska and Bruce Bimber. 2020. “Right-wing populism, social media and echo chambers in Western democracies.” New Media and Society 22 (4): 683–699. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boyd, Danah, and Kate Crawford. 2012. “Critical Questions for Big Data: Provocations for a Cultural, Technological, and Scholarly Phenomenon.” Information Communication & Society 15 (5): 662–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. 2000. The Structure of Modern English: A Linguistic Introduction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bruns, Axel, and Jean Burgess. 2011. “The Use of Twitter Hashtags in the Formation of Ad Hoc Publics.” In Paper Presented at the 6th European Consortium for Political Research General Conference. University of Iceland, Reykjavik.Google Scholar
Committees.parliament.uk. 2021. “Oral Evidence: Coronavirus: Lessons Learnt, HC 95.” 2021. [URL]
Couldry, Nick, Andreas Hepp and Friedrich Krotz. eds. 2010. Media Events in a Global Age. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cristian, Joe. 2020. “Topic Modeling LDA Using TextmineR and Tidytext.” [URL]
Cummings, Dominic. 2020. “‘Two hands are a lot’ — we’re hiring data scientists, project managers, policy experts, assorted weirdos…”, January 2, [URL]
D’heer, Evelien, and Pieter Verdegem. 2014. “Conversations about the Elections on Twitter: Towards a Structural Understanding of Twitter’s Relation with the Political and the Media Field.” European Journal of Communication 29 (6): 720–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dahlgren, Peter. 2005. “The Internet, Public Spheres, and Political Communication: Dispersion and Deliberation.” Political Communication 22 (2): 147–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dayan, Daniel and Elihu Katz. 1992. Media Events: the Live Broadcasting of History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drake, Philip and Michael Higgins. 2006. I’m a celebrity, get me into politics, In Framing Celebrity: New Directions in Celebrity Culture, edited by Su Holmes and Sean Redmond, 87–100. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Evans, Brynn M., and Ed H. Chi. 2008. “Towards a Model of Understanding Social Search.” Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW, 485–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1992. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
. 1995. Media Discourse. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Freiling, Isabelle, Nicole M. Krause, Dietram A. Scheufele, and Dominique Brossard. 2021. “Believing and Sharing Misinformation, Fact-Checks, and Accurate Information on Social Media: The Role of Anxiety during COVID-19.” New Media and Society 25 (1): 141–162. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garland, Ruth. 2018. “Is post-truth another word for political spin or a radical departure from it? Evidence from behind the scenes in UK government communications, 1997–2015.” International Journal of Media and Cultural Politics 14 (3): 333–50. [URL]. DOI logo
Gannon, Peter, and Pam Czerniewska. 1980. Using Linguistics: An Educational Focus. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Guardian. 2020a. “Boris Johnson Boots out Top Adviser Dominic Cummings.” Guardian, The. [URL]
. 2021. “Cummings Lambasts Johnson in Damning Account of Covid Crisis.” [URL]
Gupta, Marichi, Aditya Bansal, Bhav Jain, Jillian Rochelle, Atharv Oak, and Mohammad S. Jalali. 2021. “Whether the Weather Will Help Us Weather the COVID-19 Pandemic: Using Machine Learning to Measure Twitter Users’ Perceptions.” International Journal of Medical Informatics 1451. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Higgins, Michael. 2019. “The Donald: celebrity, authenticity and accountability”, In Trump’s Media War edited by Catherine Happer, Andrew Hoskins and William Merrin, pp. 129–141. Basingstoke: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Higgins, Michael and Angela Smith. 2014. “Disaffiliation and belonging: Twitter and its agonistic publics”, Sociologia e Politiche Sociali 17(2): 77–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Honeyman, Victoria. 2022. “The Johnson factor: British national identity and Boris Johnson.” British Politics [URL]
Hou, Keke, Tingting Hou and Lili Cai. 2021. “Public attention about COVID-19 on social media: An investigation based on data mining and text analysis,” Personality and Individual Differences 175(January), 110701. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jones, Nick. 2000. Sultans of Spin, London: Gollancz.Google Scholar
Jones, Tommy. 2017. “Question: Which Coherence Measure Used? Useful for Topic Model Validation?” [URL]
. 2019. “A Coefficient of Determination for Probabilistic Topic Models.” [URL]
Koh, Jing Xuan, and Tau Ming Liew. 2020. “How Loneliness Is Talked about in Social Media during COVID-19 Pandemic: Text Mining of 4,492 Twitter Feeds.” Journal of Psychiatric Research 1451: 317–324. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moffitt, Benjamin. 2016. The Global Rise of Populism: Performance, Political Style, and Representation. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Schneiker, Andrea. 2019. “Telling the Story of the Superhero and the Anti-Politician as President: Donald Trump’s Branding on Twitter.” Political Studies Review 17 (3): 210–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, Angela and Michael Higgins. 2020. “Tough guys and little rocket men: @RealDonaldTrump’s Twitter feed and the normalisation of banal masculinity.” Social Semiotics 30 (4): 547–562. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stolee, Galen and Steve Caton. 2018. “Twitter, Trump, and the base: a shift to a new form of presidential talk?” Signs and Society 6 (1): 147–165. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, John B. 2000. Political Scandal: Power and Visibility in the Media Age. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Wheeler, Mark. 2013. Celebrity Politics. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth and Michael Meyer. 2016. “Critical discourse studies: history, agenda, theory and methodology”, In Methods of Critical Discourse Studies (3rd edition), 2–22 edited by Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer. Sage.Google Scholar
Wong, Adrian, Serene Ho and David Lyness. 2021. “The use of social media and online communications in times of pandemic Covid-19,” Journal of the Intensive Care Society 22 (3): 255–260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zappavigna, Michele. 2018. Searchable Talk: Hashtags and Social Media Metadiscourse. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Zhao, Sumin, and Theo van Leeuwen. 2014. “Understanding Semiotic Technology in University Classrooms: A Social Semiotic Approach to PowerPoint-Assisted Cultural Studies Lectures.” Classroom Discourse 5 (1): 71–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar