Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 23:4 (2024) ► pp.588–616

Polarising metaphors in the Venezuelan Presidential Crisis

ORCID logo | Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
ORCID logo | Universidade Católica Portuguesa
The 23rd of January 2019 marked the beginning of the Venezuelan Presidential Crisis, a unique socio-political conflict that confronted Nicolás Maduro, president of Venezuela, to the self-proclaimed leader Juan Guaidó. This paper explores the divisive power of conceptual metaphors in this context through the analysis of polarising metaphors, namely, metaphors that conceptualise ‘Us’ positively and/or ‘Them’ negatively. More specifically, from a corpus-based critical socio-cognitive perspective (Musolff 2016; Soares da Silva 2020; Charteris-Black 2011), this study looks at the main polarising metaphors of Maduro and Guaidó’s political discourses and examines their role in the discursive construction of ideological polarisation, social identities, and legitimacy using a target-based approach (Stefanowitsch and Gries 2006). The results show that both leaders strategically use polarising metaphors, especially those of CONFRONTATION, HUMAN BEING and JOURNEY, to reproduce their ideologies, reinforce their social identities, and legitimise their political positions.
Keywords: polarising metaphor, Venezuela, polarisation, political discourse
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Metaphors and polarisation in discourse
  • 3.Polarising metaphors: A proposal
  • 4.Methodology
    • 4.1Data
    • 4.2Procedure
  • 5.Results and Discussion
    • 5.1Intragroup dimension
    • 5.2Intergroup dimension
  • 6.Conclusion and future directions
  • Declaration of conflicting interests
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 30 November 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.22169.pet
References (65)
References
Ädel, Amelie. 2010. “How to Use Corpus Linguistics in the Study of Political Discourse.” In The Routledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics, edited by Anne O’Keeffe and Michael McCarthy, 591–604. Abingdon: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Adrián, Thays. 2010. “La metáfora conceptual en el discurso político venezolano: Rómulo Betancourt y Hugo Chávez Frías [Conceptual metaphor in Venezuelan political discourse: Rómulo Betancourt and Hugo Chávez Frías].” ALED 10 (1): 9–33.Google Scholar
Al-Ghazzi, Omar. 2021. “We Will Be Great Again: Historical Victimhood in Populist Discourse.” European Journal of Cultural Studies 24 (1): 45–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Atkins, Scott, Ashley Mote, Kimberly Gonzalez, and Krystal Alexander. 2020. “No Sympathy for the Bully: A Metaphor Analysis of Two Speeches on the Topic of Immigration.” Metaphor and the Social World 10 (1): 1–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, Paul, and Tony McEnery, eds. 2015. Corpora and Discourse Studies: Integrating Discourse and Corpora. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boeynaems, Amber, Christian Burgers, Elly A. Konijn, and Gerard J. Steen. 2017. “The Effects of Metaphorical Framing on Political Persuasion: A Systematic Literature Review.” Metaphor and Symbol 32 (2): 118–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bolívar, Adriana. 2018. Political Discourse as Dialogue: A Latin American Perspective. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Breeze, Ruth. 2019. “Emotion in Politics: Affective-Discursive Practices in UKIP and Labour.” Discourse and Society 30 (1): 24–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2020. “Exploring Populist Styles of Political Discourse in Twitter.” World Englishes 39 (4): 550–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Castro Pumarega, Daniel. 2021. “Diccionario de venezolanismos [Dictionary of Venezuelan phrases].” 2021. [URL]
Charaudeau, Patrick. 2019. “El discurso populista como síntoma de una crisis de los poderes [The populist discourse as a symptom of a crisis of the powers].” RÉTOR 9 (2): 96–128.Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2004. Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. Politicians and Rhetoric: The Persuasive Power of Metaphor. 2nd ed. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chilton, Paul. 2004. Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dabrowska, Ewa, and Dagmar Divjak, eds. 2015. Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deignan, Alice. 2010. “The Evaluative Properties of Metaphors.” In Researching and Applying Metaphor in the Real World, edited by Graham Low, Zazie Todd, Alice Deignan, and Lynne Cameron, 357–73. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dijk, Teun A. Van. 1998. Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Thousand Oaks: SAGE. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. “Socio-Cognitive Discourse Studies.” In The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies, edited by John Flowerdew and John E. Richardson, 26–43. Abingdon: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Filardo-Llamas, Laura. 2021. “From the War on Covid-19 to Political Wars: Metaphor and Polarization in the Early Stages of the 2020 Pandemic.” In Discursive Approaches to Sociopolitical Polarization and Conflict, edited by Laura Filardo-Llamas and Esperanza Morales-López, 192–212. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Filardo-Llamas, Laura, Esperanza Morales-López, and Alan Floyd, eds. 2021. Discursive Approaches to Socio-Political Polarization and Conflict. Preprint. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flowerdew, John, and John E. Richardson, eds. 2018. The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies. Abingdon: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flusberg, Stephen J., Teenie Matlock, and Paul H. Thibodeau. 2018. “War Metaphors in Public Discourse.” Metaphor and Symbol 33 (1): 1–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
García-Guadilla, María Pilar, and Ana Mallen. 2019. “Polarization, Participatory Democracy, and Democratic Erosion in Venezuela’s Twenty-First Century Socialism.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 681 (1): 62–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geeraerts, Dirk, and Hubert Cuyckens, eds. 2007. The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goatly, Andrew. 2007. Washing the Brain: Metaphor and Hidden Ideology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hampe, Beate, ed. 2005. From Perception to Meaning: Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hart, Christopher. 2010. Critical Discourse Analysis and Cognitive Science: New Perspectives on Immigration Discourse. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hogg, Michael A. 2016. “Social Identity Theory.” In Understanding Peace and Conflict Through Social Identity Theory: Contemporary Global Perspectives, edited by Shelley McKeown, Reeshma Haji, and Neil Ferguson, 3–17. Cham: Springer International Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kilgarriff, Adam, Vít Baisa, Jan Bušta, Miloš Jakubícek, Vojtech Kovár, Jan Michelfeit, Pavel Rychlý, and Vít Suchomel. 2014. “The Sketch Engine: Ten Years On.” Lexicography 1 (1): 7–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koller, Veronika. 2014. “Applying Social Cognition Research to Critical Discourse Studies: The Case of Collective Identities.” In Contemporary Critical Discourse Studies, edited by Christopher Hart and Piotr Cap, 147–66. London: Bloomsbury Academic. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Zoltán. 2010. Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [URL]
Krzyżanowski, Michał. 2020. “Discursive Shifts and the Normalisation of Racism: Imaginaries of Immigration, Moral Panics and the Discourse of Contemporary Right-Wing Populism.” Social Semiotics 30 (4): 503–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krzyżanowski, Michał, and Per Ledin. 2017. “Uncivility on the Web: Populism in/and the Borderline Discourses of Exclusion.” Journal of Language and Politics 16 (4): 566–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. [URL]. DOI logo
. 2016. Moral Politics: How Liberals and Conservatives Think. 3rd ed. University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, Tao, and Yifan Zhu. 2020. “How Does China Appraise Self and Others? A Corpus-Based Analysis of Chinese Political Discourse.” Discourse & Society 31 (2): 153–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lozada, Mireya. 2020. “Neo-autoritarismos y resistencias sociales en Venezuela: Vida cotidiana de la mitología bolivariana [Neo-authoritarianisms and social resistance in Venezuela: Daily life of the Bolivarian mythology].” In Psicologia Dos Extremismos Políticos, edited by Domenico Uhng Hur and José Manuel Sabucedo, 147–75. Petrópolis.Google Scholar
Martín Rojo, Luisa, and Teun A. Van Dijk. 1997. “‘There Was a Problem, and It Was Solved!’: Legitimating the Expulsion of ‘illegal’ Migrants in Spanish Parliamentary Discourse.” Discourse and Society 8 (4): 523–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Masroor, Farzana, Qintarah N. Khan, Iman Aib, and Zulfiqar Ali. 2019. “Polarization and Ideological Weaving in Twitter Discourse of Politicians.” Social Media and Society 5 (4) : 1–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Muelas Gil, María. 2019. “Ideology, Metaphor and Persuasion in Times of Elections: A Corpus-Based Study of British and Spanish Economic Reports.” Complutense Journal of English Studies 271: 223–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Musolff, Andreas. 2004. Metaphor and Political Discourse. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. Political Metaphor Analysis: Discourse and Scenarios. London: Bloomsbury Academic. [URL]
Oddo, John. 2011. “War Legitimation Discourse: Representing ‘Us’ and ‘Them’ in Four US Presidential Addresses.” Discourse and Society 22 (3): 287–314. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Over, Harriet, and Cade McCall. 2018. “Becoming Us and Them: Social Learning and Intergroup Bias.” Social and Personality Psychology Compass 12 (4): 1–13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pantoulas, Dimitris, and Jennifer McCoy. 2019. “Venezuela: An Unstable Equililbrium.” Revista de Ciencia Política 39 (2): 391–408. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peterssen, Silvia. 2022. “Ideological Polarisation in the Venezuelan Presidential Crisis.” Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis Across Disciplines 14 (1): 63–85. [URL]
Piñero Piñero, Gracia. 2018. “Metáfora conceptual y el marco ESPECTÁCULO en el discurso político de los medios de comunicación [Conceptual metaphor and the frame SPECTACLE in political discourse in the media].” Ibérica 36 (2018): 119–42.Google Scholar
Piñero Piñero, Gracia, and John Moore. 2015. “Metaphorical Conceptualization of Migration Control Laws: Narratives of Oppression.” Journal of Language and Politics 14 (4): 577–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Real Academia Española. 2021. “Diccionario de la lengua española [Dictionary of the Spanish language].” 2021. [URL]
Romano, Manuela. 2019. “‘Refugees Are Streaming into Europe’: An Image-Schema Analysis of the Syrian Refugee Crisis in the Spanish and British Press.” Complutense Journal of English Studies 271: 39–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Romano, Manuela, and Maria Dolores Porto, eds. 2016. Exploring Discourse Strategies in Social and Cognitive Interaction: Multimodal and Cross-Linguistic Perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. [URL]. DOI logo
Semino, Elena. 2008. Metaphor in Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 2017. “Corpus Linguistics and Metaphor.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, edited by Barbara Dancygier, 463–76. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sharifian, Farzad. 2011. Cultural Conceptualisations and Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Soares da Silva, Augusto. 2016. “The Persuasive (and Manipulative) Power of Metaphor in ‘Austerity’ Discourse.” In Exploring Discourse Strategies in Social and Cognitive Interaction: Multimodal and Cross-Linguistic Perspectives, 262–79. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2020. “From Economic Crisis to Austerity Policies through Conceptual Metaphor. A Corpus-Based Comparison of Metaphors of Crisis and Austerity in the Portuguese Press.” In The Language of Crisis. Metaphors, Frames and Discourses, edited by Mimi Huang and Lise-Lotte Holmgreen, 51–86. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Soares da Silva, Augusto, Maria Josep Cuenca, and Manuela Romano. 2017. “The Conceptualisation of Austerity in the Portuguese, Spanish and Irish Press.” In Advances in Cultural Linguistics, edited by Farzad Sharifian, 345–68. Singapore: Springer Nature. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steen, Gerard J., Aletta G. Dorst, J. Berenike Herrmann, Anna A. Kaal, Tina Krennmayr, and Trijntje Pasma. 2010. A Method for Linguistic Metaphor Identification: From MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stefanowitsch, Anatol, and Stefan Th. Gries, eds. 2006. Corpus-Based Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. [URL]. DOI logo
Talmy, Leonard. 1988. “Force Dynamics in Language and Cognition.” Cognitive Science 12 (1): 49–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Charlotte, and Anna Marchi, eds. 2018. Corpus Approaches to Discourse. A Critical Review. Abingdon: Routledge. [URL]
Turner, John C., Michael A. Hogg, Penelope J. Oakes, Stephen D. Reicher, and Margaret S. Wetherell. 1987. Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. [URL]
Wirth-Koliba, Victoria. 2016. “The Diverse and Dynamic World of ‘Us’ and ‘Them’ in Political Discourse.” Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines 8 (1): 23–37. [URL]
Wodak, Ruth. 2011. “‘Us’ and ‘Them’: Inclusion and Exclusion – Discrimination via Discourse.” In Identity, Belonging and Migration, edited by Gerard Delanty, Ruth Wodak, and Paul Jones, 54–77. Liverpool University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2021. The Politics of Fear: The Shameless Normalization of Far-Right Discourse. 2nd ed. London: SAGE. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Peterssen, Silvia
2024. Polarisation in Venezuelan presidential tweets. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.