Article published In:
Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 3:1 (2004) ► pp.2752
Batson, C.D., Ahmad, N. and Tsang, J.A.
2002Four motives for community involvement. Journal of Social Issues 58(3), 429–445. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bellah, R.N., Madsen, R., Sullivan, W.M., Swidler, A. and Tipton, S.M.
1985Habits of Heart. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. and Finnegan, E
1999Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Biffen, J
1996Inside Westminster. London: André Deutsch Limited.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, L
1933Language. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Brown, G. and Yule, G
1983Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: C.U.P.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, P. and Levinson, S.C.
1987Politeness. Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, R. and Gilman, A
1960The pronouns of power and solidarity. In: T. Sebeok (ed.). Style in Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 253–276.Google Scholar
Connor-Linton, J
1988Author’s style and world-view in nuclear discourse: A quantitative analysis. Multilingua 7(1/2), 95–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duranti, A
1985Sociocultural dimensions of discourse. In: T.A. Van Dijk (ed.). Handbook of Discourse Analysis vol. 1. New York: Academic Press, 193–230.Google Scholar
Fairclough, N
1989Language and Power. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Fortanet, I
2004The Use of “we” in university lectures: Reference and function. English for Specific Purposes 231, 45–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, J.J.
1982Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, J.J. and Cook-Gumperz, J
1982Language and the communication of social identity. In: J.J. Gumperz (ed.). Language and Social Identity. Cambridge: CUP, 1–21.Google Scholar
Gumperz, J.J.
1971Language in Social Groups. Stanford: SUP.Google Scholar
Hansard Parliamentary Debates
House of Commons Official Report. London: HMSO.
Hymes, D
1972Models for the interaction of language and social life. In: J.J. Gumperz and D. Hymes (eds). Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication. New York: Holt, 35–71.Google Scholar
Juviler, P. and Stroschein, S
1999Missing boundaries of comparison: The political community. Political Science Quarterly 114(3), 435–453. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kamio, A
1994The theory of territory of information: The case of Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics 211, 67–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995Territory of information in English and Japanese and psyhological utterances. Journal of Pragmatics241, 235–264. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1997Territory of Information. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001English generic we, you, and they: An analysis in terms of territory of information. Journal of Pragmatics331, 1111–1124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, R.T.
1990Talking Power. The Politics of Language in Our Lives. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Maier, R
1995Argument and community. Communication and Cognition 28(4), 367–386.Google Scholar
1996Forms of identity and argumentation. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 26(1), 35–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maitland, K. and Wilson, J
1987Pronominal selection and ideological conflict. Journal of Pragmatics 111, 495–512. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mason, A
2000Community, Solidarity and Belonging: Levels of Community and their Normative Significance. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pennycook, A
1994The politics of pronouns. ELTJ 48(2), 173–178. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., and Svartvik, J
1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Rees, A
1983Pronouns of Person and Power: A Study of Personal Pronouns in Public Discourse. The University of Sheffield, Department of Linguistics. Unpublished Master’s thesis.
Richards, J.C. and Schmidt, R.W
(eds) 1983Language and Communication. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Roiz, M
1994Técnicas Modernas de Persuasión. Madrid: Eudema.Google Scholar
Sánchez Macarro, A
2002Windows on the World: Media Discourse in English. Valencia: Universitat de València.Google Scholar
Searle, J.R.
1969Speech Acts. An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seidel, G.
1975Ambiguity in political discourse. In: M. Bloch (ed.). Political Language and Oratory in Traditional Society. London: Academic Press, 205–228.Google Scholar
Tonnies, F.
1974Community and Association. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Villegas, J.F.
1989Decisiones sobre las personas: Un análisis psicosocial de los procesos clasificatorios. Revista de Psicología Social 4(1), 25–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wardhaugh, R.
1992An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Blackwells.Google Scholar
Warren, R.
1978The Community in America. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
Wenger, E.
1998Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilson, J.
1990Politically Speaking. Oxford: Blackwells.Google Scholar
Zupnik, Y.
1994A pragmatic analysis of the use of person deixis in political discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 211, 339–383. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 65 other publications

Amaro, Raquel, Susana Correia, Matilde Gonçalves, Chiara Barbero & Miguel Magalhães
2022. Inclusive Host Language Teaching. In Handbook of Research on Policies and Practices for Assessing Inclusive Teaching and Learning [Advances in Educational Marketing, Administration, and Leadership, ],  pp. 183 ff. DOI logo
Beldarrain-Durandegui, Angel
2012. We and them rhetoric in a left-wing secessionist newspaper: a comparative analysis of Basque and Spanish language editorials. Critical Discourse Studies 9:1  pp. 59 ff. DOI logo
Bull, Peter & Anita Fetzer
2006. Who are we and who are you? The strategic use of forms of address in political interviews. Text & Talk - An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse Communication Studies 26:1  pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
Carta, Caterina
2014. Use of metaphors and international discourse: The EU as an Idiot power, a deceptive Pangloss and a Don Juan in his infancy. Cooperation and Conflict 49:3  pp. 334 ff. DOI logo
Carta, Caterina
2015. The swinging “we”. Journal of Language and Politics 14:1  pp. 65 ff. DOI logo
Cheng, Maria
2006. Constructing a new political spectacle: tactics of Chen Shui-bian’s 2000 and 2004 Inaugural Speeches. Discourse & Society 17:5  pp. 583 ff. DOI logo
Chinn, Sedona, Dan Hiaeshutter-Rice & Kaiping Chen
2023. How Science Influencers Polarize Supportive and Skeptical Communities Around Politicized Science: A Cross-Platform and Over-Time Comparison. Political Communication  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Coesemans, Roel & Barbara De Cock
2017. Self-reference by politicians on Twitter: Strategies to adapt to 140 characters. Journal of Pragmatics 116  pp. 37 ff. DOI logo
DeCoursey, C. A. & Ewa B. Krawczyk
2020. The Marshallese look: Clothing, culture and identity in a disappearing world. Clothing Cultures 6:3  pp. 293 ff. DOI logo
Ebner, Johannes
2024. Pronomengebrauch und Konfliktdynamik. Exemplarische Analyse einer Gewalteskalation. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 53:2  pp. 201 ff. DOI logo
Fetzer, Anita
2014. WeandI, andyouandthem: People, power and solidarity. In The Expression of Inequality in Interaction [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 248],  pp. 213 ff. DOI logo
Fetzer, Anita
Formato, Federica
2019. Women in the Public Sphere: Gendered Language. In Gender, Discourse and Ideology in Italian,  pp. 135 ff. DOI logo
Gelabert-Desnoyer, Jaime J.
2022. Not so impersonal. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)  pp. 407 ff. DOI logo
Gonja, Chika & Talaibek Musaev
2024. ‘We’ in English language textbooks for Japanese high school students. World Englishes DOI logo
Green, Seth, Megan Stiles, Katherine Harton, Samantha Garofalo & Donald E. Brown
2017. 2017 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS),  pp. 359 ff. DOI logo
Halmari, Helena
2008. On the language of the Clinton-Dole presidential campaign debates. Journal of Language and Politics 7:2  pp. 247 ff. DOI logo
Hernández-Campoy, J.M. & J.A. Cutillas-Espinosa
2010. Speaker design practices in political discourse: A case study. Language & Communication 30:4  pp. 297 ff. DOI logo
Hernández-Campoy, Juan Manuel
2010. Dialect Contact and Accommodation in a Standard Context. Sociolinguistic Studies 4:1  pp. 201 ff. DOI logo
Ho, Victor
2022. Strategic use of nouns and pronouns in public discourse. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)  pp. 51 ff. DOI logo
2007. The Hoax of War: The Foreign Policy Discourses of Poland and Bulgaria on Iraq, 2003–2005. Journal of Contemporary European Studies 15:3  pp. 377 ff. DOI logo
Lentz, Paula, Kristen Getchell, James Dubinsky & Mary Katherine Kerr
2024. Pronouns, Positioning, and Persuasion in Top Nonprofits’ Donor Appeals. International Journal of Business Communication 61:3  pp. 524 ff. DOI logo
Liu, Jyi-Shane, Ching-Ying Lee & Hua-Yuan Hsueh
2017. Linguistic Features as Evidence for Historical Context Interpretation. In Text, Speech, and Dialogue [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 10415],  pp. 299 ff. DOI logo
Maalej, Zouheir A.
2022. Framing and manipulation of person deixis in Hosni Mubarak’s last three speeches. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)  pp. 633 ff. DOI logo
Mang‐Benza, Carelle & Carol Hunsberger
2020. Wandering identities in energy transition discourses: Political leaders’ use of the “we” pronoun in Ontario, 2009–2019. Canadian Geographies / Géographies canadiennes 64:3  pp. 516 ff. DOI logo
Maslauskienė, Greta
2023. Speaker stance and engagement across disciplines in Lithuanian university lectures: the case of mes ‘we’ in medicine and business administration. Taikomoji kalbotyra :19  pp. 14 ff. DOI logo
Masroor, Farzana & Ummul Khair Ahmad
2017. Directives in English language newspaper editorials across cultures. Discourse, Context & Media 20  pp. 83 ff. DOI logo
Mitchell, Philip & James Stewart
2017. Who are We?. Journalism Practice 11:4  pp. 417 ff. DOI logo
Nikula, Tarja, Taina Saarinen, Sari Pöyhönen & Teija Kangasvieri
2012. Linguistic Diversity as a Problem and a Resource — Multilingualism in European and Finnish Policy Documents. In Dangerous Multilingualism,  pp. 41 ff. DOI logo
Packard, Grant & Jonah Berger
2020. Thinking of You: How Second-Person Pronouns Shape Cultural Success. Psychological Science 31:4  pp. 397 ff. DOI logo
Packard, Grant, Sarah G. Moore & Brent McFerran
2018. (I'm) Happy to Help (You): The Impact of Personal Pronoun Use in Customer–Firm Interactions. Journal of Marketing Research 55:4  pp. 541 ff. DOI logo
Pan, Feng, Yi Fu & Tao Li
2023. Institutional translators’ mediation of CPC Work Reports diachronically through personal pronouns: a corpus-based discourse analysis approach. Perspectives  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Pavlidou, Theodossia-Soula
2014. Constructing collectivity with ‘we’: An introduction. In Constructing Collectivity [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 239],  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Petersoo, Pille
2007. What does ‘we’ mean?. Journal of Language and Politics 6:3  pp. 419 ff. DOI logo
Phanthaphoommee, Narongdej & Jeremy Munday
2024. Pronoun shifts in political discourse. Babel. Revue internationale de la traduction / International Journal of Translation / Revista Internacional de Traducción DOI logo
Riboni, Georgia
2015. Enhancing citizen engagement. In Participation in Public and Social Media Interactions [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 256],  pp. 259 ff. DOI logo
Robinson, Justyna A., Rhys J. Sandow & Roberta Piazza
2023. Introducing the keyconcept approach to the analysis of language: the case of regulation in COVID-19 diaries. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence 6 DOI logo
Räikkönen, Jenni
2023. Chapter 5. Leaving the EU out of the ingroup. In Exploring Language and Society with Big Data [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 111],  pp. 142 ff. DOI logo
Saarinen, Taina
2008. Whose quality? Social actors in the interface of transnational and national higher education policy. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 29:2  pp. 179 ff. DOI logo
Saarinen, Taina
2008. Position of text and discourse analysis in higher education policy research. Studies in Higher Education 33:6  pp. 719 ff. DOI logo
Saft, Scott
2017. Documenting an Endangered Language: The Inclusive First‐Person Plural Pronoun Kākou as a Resource for Claiming Ownership in Hawaiian. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 27:1  pp. 92 ff. DOI logo
Salamurović, Aleksandra
2020. Metonymy and the conceptualisation of nation in political discourse. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association 8:1  pp. 181 ff. DOI logo
Screti, Francesco
2013. Defending Joyagainst thePopular Revolution: legitimation and delegitimation through songs. Critical Discourse Studies 10:2  pp. 205 ff. DOI logo
Smith, Karen
2008. ‘Who do you think you’re talking to?’—the discourse of learning and teaching strategies. Higher Education 56:4  pp. 395 ff. DOI logo
Suzuki, Takafumi
2009. Extracting speaker‐specific functional expressions from political speeches using random forests in order to investigate speakers' political styles. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60:8  pp. 1596 ff. DOI logo
Dr Tanweer Ali, Kotwal, Ashok & Kate Power
2015. Eating words: a discourse historical analysis of the public debate over India’s 2013 National Food Security Act. On the Horizon 23:3  pp. 174 ff. DOI logo
2023. Câteva observații despre... noi. Clusivitatea în limba română. Studii și cercetări lingvistice 2023:2  pp. 306 ff. DOI logo
Van Herck, Rebecca, Babette Dobbenie & Sofie Decock
2021. Person- versus content-oriented approaches in English and German email responses to customer complaints: a cross-cultural analysis of moves and first-person pronouns. Intercultural Pragmatics 18:2  pp. 203 ff. DOI logo
Vaughan, Elaine & Brian Clancy
2013. Small Corpora and Pragmatics. In Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2013 [Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics, 1],  pp. 53 ff. DOI logo
Vertommen, Bram
2022. The strategic value of pronominal choice. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)  pp. 361 ff. DOI logo
Vladimirou, Dimitra
Wang, Xi
2021. Construing Community with a Shared Future in President Xi Jinping’s Diplomatic Discourse (2013–2018): The Role of Personal Pronouns we and they. Critical Arts 35:3  pp. 35 ff. DOI logo
Wang, Xi
2023. Images of China Construed in President Xi Jinping’s Overseas Signed Articles (2014–2021): The Role of Agency. SAGE Open 13:2 DOI logo
Wang, Xinyu, Jiayi Li & Sarah Rajtmajer
2024. ACM Web Science Conference,  pp. 31 ff. DOI logo
Watson, Cate & Aileen Ireland
2021. Boards in action: processes and practices of ‘strategising’ in the Boardroom. Journal of Management and Governance 25:3  pp. 933 ff. DOI logo
Wilson, Nick
2019. Chapter 2. When we means you. In The Social Dynamics of Pronominal Systems [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 304],  pp. 35 ff. DOI logo
Woodhams, Jay M.
2014. ‘We’re the nurses’: Metaphor in the discourse of workplace socialisation. Language & Communication 34  pp. 56 ff. DOI logo
Woodhams, Jay M.
2019. The Political Priest: Multiple Stances, Multiple Selves. In Political Identity in Discourse,  pp. 187 ff. DOI logo
Woodhams, Jay M.
2019. ‘I’m a Greenie’: Stances of Political Self and Other. In Political Identity in Discourse,  pp. 141 ff. DOI logo
Yang, Zheng
2023. How do Chinese scientists maintain their discourse authority? Critical discourse analysis of discourse “boundary work” in genetically modified organisms discussion on a Chinese knowledge-sharing network. Chinese Journal of Communication 16:1  pp. 90 ff. DOI logo
Yeo, Jiin-Yih & Su-Hie Ting
2014. Personal pronouns for student engagement in arts and science lecture introductions. English for Specific Purposes 34  pp. 26 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Haisu & Weizhi Chen
2019. Backer Motivation in Crowdfunding New Product Ideas: Is It about You or Is It about Me?. Journal of Product Innovation Management 36:2  pp. 241 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.