Cover not available
Article published In:
The Soft Power of War: Legitimacy and community in Iraq war discourses
Edited by Lilie Chouliaraki
[Journal of Language and Politics 4:1] 2005
► pp. 93–117

The Iraq war as curricular knowledge

From the political to the pedagogic divide

 | National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
 | Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
The paper deals with educational discourse concerning the recent Iraq war in an attempt to explore how broader political issues, such as the Iraq war, are materialised in everyday classroom practices. It analyses lesson plans, aimed to be used by US educators of primary and secondary schools, from two Internet sites: one supporting the official position of US to go to war and the other taking a position against the war. The paper suggests that the lesson plans in the two sites constitute materialisations of two general approaches to education, the dominant and the critical, which do not simply adopt opposing views concerning the war but which, most importantly, contribute to the construction of different pedagogic subjects: in one case, there is an attempt towards ‘compulsory patriotism’, whereas in the other an attempt towards a ‘compulsory’ challenging of the war. The ideals which are in fact recontextualised here are that of nation and justice, the pedagogisation of which seems to raise much more questions than to provide answers.
Keywords: dominant and critical pedagogy, pedagogic subjects, on-line educational materials, lesson plans, pedagogisation of war, genre realisations, national standards, grand narratives
Published online: 8 June 2005
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.4.1.05mit
References (31)
References
Apple, Michael W. 1993. The politics of official knowledge: Does a national curriculum make sense? Teachers College Records 95(2), 222–241.Google Scholar
. 1996. Being popular about national standards: A review of National Standards in American Education: A Citizen’s Guide . Education Policy Analysis Archives, 4(10). http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v4n10.html(retrieved 6/11/2003).
Apple, Micheal W. 2002. Pedagogy, patriotism, and democracy: On the educational meanings of 11 September 2001. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 23(3), 299–308.Google Scholar
Atkinson, Dwight. 1997. A critical approach to critical thinking in TESOL. TESOL Quarterly 31(1), 71–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, Basil. 1996. Pedagogy, Symbolic Control and Identity. Theory, Research, Critique. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Chilton, Paul. 2002. Do something! Conceptualising responses to the attacks of 11 September 2001. Journal of Language and Politics 1(1), 181–195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chouliaraki, Lilie and Fairclough, Norman. 1999. Discourse in Late Modernity. Rethinking Critical Discourse Analysis. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Dendrinos, Bessie. 2001. European discourses of homogenization in the discourse of language planning. In: Bessie Dendrinos (ed.) The Politics of ELT. Athens: The University of Athens Publications, 30–42. It also appears in Macedo Donaldo, Dendrinos Bessie and Gounari Panayota. 2003. The Hegemony of English. Colorado: Paradigm Publishers, 45–59.Google Scholar
Ellis, Dave. 1997. Becoming a Master Student. Boston & New York: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Gee, James P. 1996. Social Linguistics and Literacies. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K 1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Halpern, Diane F.1996. Thought and Knowledge: An Introduction to Critical Thinking. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Harris, Theodore L. and Hodges, Richards E. 1981. A Dictionary of Reading and Related Terms. Newark, NJ: International Reading Association. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holly, Mary L. 1984. Keeping a Personal-Professional Journal. Deakin: Deakin University Press.Google Scholar
Kirst, Michael W. andGuthrie, James W. 1994. Goals 2000 and a reauthorized ESEA: National standards and accompanying controversies. In:Nina Cobb (ed.) The Future of Education: Perspectives on National Standards in America. The National Center for Cross-Disciplinary Teaching and Learning: College Board, 157–173.Google Scholar
Koutsogiannis, Dimitris. 2004. Critical techno-literacy and ‘weak’ languages. In: Ilana Snyder and Catherine Beavis (eds.) Doing Literacy Online: Teaching, Learning and Playing in an Electronic World. New Jersey: Hampton Press, 163–184.Google Scholar
Kress, Gunther. 1996. Representational resources and the production of subjectivity: Questions for the theoretical development of Critical Discourse Analysis in a multicultural society. In: Carmen Rosa Caldas-Coulthard and Malcolm Coulthard (eds.) Texts and Practices. London and New York: Routledge, 15–31.Google Scholar
Kurland, Daniel J. 1995. I Know What it Says…What does it Mean? Critical Skills for Critical Reading. CA: Wadsworth Publishing.Google Scholar
Lankshear, Colin. 1997. Changing Literacies. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Luke, Allan. 1996. Genres of power? Literacy education and the production of capital. In: Ruqaiya Hasan and Geoff Williams (eds). Literacy in Society. London and New York: Longman, 308–338.Google Scholar
Martin, Jim R. 1992. Critical thinking for a humane world. In: Stephen P. Norris (ed.) The Generalizability of Critical Thinking. Multiple Perspectives on an Educational Ideal. New York: Teachers College Press, 163–180.Google Scholar
McDonough, Jo and McDonough, Steven. 1997. Research Methods for English Language Teachers. London and New York: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Muspratt, Sandy H., Luke, Allan and Freebody, Peter (eds.) 1997. Constructing Critical Literacies. New Jersey: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
Pennycook, Alastair. 2001. Critical Applied Linguistics: A Critical Introduction. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Richards, Jack C. and Lockhart, Charles. 1994. Reflective Teaching in Second Language Classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rhoads, Melanie, Sieber, Ron and Slayton, Susan. 1996. Examining national standards. http://horizon.unc.edu/projects/issues papers/National_Standards(retrieved 6/11/2003)Google Scholar
Street, Brian. 1995. Social Literacies: Critical Approaches to Literacy in Development, Ethnography and Education. London and New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Tyler, William. 1999. Pedagogic identities and educational reform in the 1990s: The cultural dynamics of national curricula. In: . Frances Christie (ed.). Pedagogy and the Shaping of Consciousness. London and New York: Cassell, 262–289.Google Scholar
Volosinov, V. N 1986. Marxism and the Philosophy of Language. Trans. L. Matejka and I. R Titunik. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wallace, Michael J. 1998. Action Research for Language Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Walters, Kerry 1994. Critical thinking, rationality and the vulcanization of students. In: Kerry Walters (ed.) Re-thinking Reason: New Perspectives on Critical Thinking. Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 1–22.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Archakis, Argiris & Villy Tsakona
2009. Parliamentary discourse in newspaper articles. Journal of Language and Politics ► pp. 359 ff. DOI logo
Archakis, Argiris & Villy Tsakona
2010. ‘The wolf wakes up inside them, grows werewolf hair and reveals all their bullying’: The representation of parliamentary discourse in Greek newspapers. Journal of Pragmatics 42:4 ► pp. 912 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.