Editorial published In:
Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 4:2 (2005) ► pp.169171
References (5)
Sum, Ngai-Ling and Jessop, Robert
2003Pre- and post-disciplinarity perspective in (cultural) political economy. Économies et Societés 391, 993–1016.Google Scholar
Van Leeuwen, Theo
2005Three models of interdisciplinarity. In: Ruth Wodak and Paul Chilton (eds.) 2005 A New Agenda in (Critical) Discourse Analysis. Theory, Methodology and Interdisciplinarity. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 3–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weiss, Gilbert and Wodak, Ruth
(eds) 2003Critical Discourse Analysis. Theory and Inter-disciplinarity. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth
2005Gender mainstreaming and the European Union: Interdisciplinarity, gender studies and CDA. In: Michelle Lazar (ed.) Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis. Gender, Power and Ideology in Discourse. London: Palgrave, 90–113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wodak, Ruth and Chilton, Paul
Cited by (3)

Cited by 3 other publications

Dr Tanweer Ali, Kotwal, Ashok & Kate Power
2015. Eating words: a discourse historical analysis of the public debate over India’s 2013 National Food Security Act. On the Horizon 23:3  pp. 174 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Qing
2010. The discursive construction of the social stratification order in reforming China. Journal of Language and Politics 9:4  pp. 508 ff. DOI logo
Wodak, Ruth
2006. Critical Linguistics and Critical Discourse Analysis. In Handbook of Pragmatics,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.