Editorial published In:
Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 4:2 (2005) ► pp.169171
References (5)
References
Sum, Ngai-Ling and Jessop, Robert. 2003. Pre- and post-disciplinarity perspective in (cultural) political economy. Économies et Societés 391, 993–1016.Google Scholar
Van Leeuwen, Theo. 2005. Three models of interdisciplinarity. In: Ruth Wodak and Paul Chilton (eds.) 2005. A New Agenda in (Critical) Discourse Analysis. Theory, Methodology and Interdisciplinarity. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 3–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weiss, Gilbert and Wodak, Ruth (eds) 2003. Critical Discourse Analysis. Theory and Inter-disciplinarity. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth. 2005. Gender mainstreaming and the European Union: Interdisciplinarity, gender studies and CDA. In: Michelle Lazar (ed.) Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis. Gender, Power and Ideology in Discourse. London: Palgrave, 90–113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wodak, Ruth and Chilton, Paul (eds.) 2005. A New Agenda in (Critical) Discourse Analysis. Theory, Methodology and Interdisciplinarity. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Dr Tanweer Ali, Kotwal, Ashok & Kate Power
2015. Eating words: a discourse historical analysis of the public debate over India’s 2013 National Food Security Act. On the Horizon 23:3  pp. 174 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Qing
2010. The discursive construction of the social stratification order in reforming China. Journal of Language and Politics 9:4  pp. 508 ff. DOI logo
Wodak, Ruth
2006. Critical Linguistics and Critical Discourse Analysis. In Handbook of Pragmatics,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.