Introduction
Pink Dot: Ten years on
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Language and sexuality in Singapore
- 3.The special issue
-
References
This article is available free of charge.
References
References
Boellstorff, Tom
2004a ‘Authentic, of course’: Gay language in Indonesia and cultures of belonging. In
Speaking in Queer Tongues: Globalization and Gay Language,
William Leap &
Tom Boellstorff (eds), 181–201. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Boellstorff, Tom
2004b Playing back the nation: Waria, Indonesian transvestites.
Cultural Anthropology 19(2): 159–195.
Boellstorff, Tom
2005 The Gay Archipelago: Sexuality and Nation in Indonesia. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Heng, Geraldine & Devan, Janadas
1995 The politics of nationalism, sexuality, and race in Singapore. In
Bewitching Women, Pious Men: Gender and Body Politics in Southeast Asia,
Aihwa Ong &
Michael Peletz (eds), 195–215. Berkeley: University of California Press.
The Independent
2019 PM Lee: Whatever your sexual orientation, you’re welcome to work in Singapore.
[URL] (
October 19 2020)
Lazar, Michelle M.
2017 Homonationalist discourse as a politics of pragmatic resistance in Singapore’s Pink Dot movement: Towards a southern praxis.
Journal of Sociolinguistics 21(3): 420–441.
Lazar, Michelle M.
2020 Linguistic (homo)nationalism, legitimacies, and authenticities in Singapore’s Pink Dot discourse.
World Englishes 39(4): 653–666.
Offord, Baden
1999 The burden of (homo)sexual identity in Singapore.
Social Semiotics 9(3): 301–316.
Ng, Yi-Sheng
2017 Pride versus prudence: The precarious queer politics of Pink Dot.
Inter- Asia Cultural Studies 18(2): 238–250.
Oswin, Natalie
2010 Sexual tensions in modernizing Singapore: The postcolonial and the intimate.
Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 28(1): 128–141.
Oswin, Natalie
2014 Queer time in global city Singapore: Neoliberal futures and the ‘freedom to love’.
Sexualities 17(4): 412–433.
Phillips, Robert
2012 “Singaporean by birth, Singaporean by faith”: Queer Indians, internet technology, and the reconfiguration of sexual and national identity. In
Queer Singapore: Illiberal Citizenship and Mediated Cultures,
Audrey Yue &
Jun Zubillaga-Pow (eds), 187–196. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
Phillips, Robert
2014 “And I am also gay”: Illiberal pragmatics, neoliberal homonormativity and LGBT activism in Singapore.
Anthropologica 56(1): 45–54.
Phillips, Robert
2020 Virtual Activism: Sexuality, the Internet, and a Social Movement in Singapore. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Prankumar, Sujith Kumar, Aggleton, Peter & Bryant, Joanne
2021 Belonging, citizenship and ambivalence among young gay, bisexual and queer Indian Singaporean men.
Asian Studies Review 45(1): 1–20.
Rowlett, Benedict
2019 Mobility, immobility, and sexual transaction: Dirty socio-pragmatics in Cambodia.
The 16th International Pragmatics Conference. Retrieved from
[URL]
Tan, Chris K. K.
2015 Pink Dot: Cultural and sexual citizenship in gay Singapore.
Anthropological Quarterly 88(4): 969–996.
Tan, Chris K. K.
2016 A ‘great affective divide’: How gay Singaporeans overcome their double alienation.
Anthropological Forum 26(1): 17–36.
Tang, Shawna
2012 Transnational lesbian identities: Lessons from Singapore? In
Queer Singapore: Illiberal Citizenship and Mediated Cultures,
Audrey Yue &
Jun Zubillaga-Pow (eds), 83–96. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
Tang, Shawna
2016 Postcolonial Lesbian Identities in Singapore: Re-thinking Global Sexualities. New York: Taylor & Francis.
Tang, Shawna & Quah, Sharon E. L.
2018 Heteronormativity and sexuality politics in Singapore: The female-headed households of divorced and lesbian mothers.
Journal of Sociology 54(4): 647–664.
Yue, Audrey
2007 Creative queer Singapore: The illiberal pragmatics of cultural production.
Gay and Lesbian Issues and Psychology Review 3(3): 149–160.
Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
Pak, Vincent
2023.
Lighting, signing, showing: The circulability of Pink Dot's counterpublic discourse in Singapore.
Journal of Sociolinguistics 27:1
► pp. 24 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.