References (21)
REFERENCES
Beaugrande, R. A. de, & Dressier, W. U. (1981). Introduction to text linguistics. London: Longman. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dressier, W. U. (1972). Einfuhrung in die Textlinguistik [Introduction to textlinguistics]. Tübingen, Germany: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
(1980). Disturbi linguistici del riassunto nell’afasia [Linguistic impairments of story recall]. Acta Phoniatrica Latina, 21, 19–22.Google Scholar
(1983). Textlinguistik unter Berucksichtigung der Patholinguistik [Textlinguistics with an emphasis on pathological linguistics]. In W. Kühlwein (Ed.), Texte in Sprachwissenschaft, Sprachunterricht, Sprachtherapie (pp. 15–23). Tübingen, Germany: Narr.Google Scholar
(1989). Semiotische Parameter einer textlinguistischen Naturlichkeitstheorie [Semiotic parameters of a textlinguistic theory of naturalness]. Vienna: Verlag der Osterreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
(1996). Parallelism between natural textlinguistics and other components of natural linguistics. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung, 491, 295–311.Google Scholar
Dressier, W. U., & Pleh, Cs. (1988). On text disturbances in aphasia. In W. U. Dressier & J. A. Stark (Eds.), Linguistic analyses of aphasic language (pp. 151–178). New York: Springer-Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dressier, W. U., Stark, H. K., Vassilakou, M., Rauchensteiner, D., Tošic, J., Weitzenauer, S., Wasner, P., Hirsch, A., Pons, C., Stark, J., & Brunner, G. (in press). Textpragmatic impairments of figure-ground distinction in right-brain-damaged stroke patients compared with aphasics and healthy controls. Journal of Pragmatics.
Firbas, J. (1992). Functional sentence perspective in written and spoken communication. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Joanette, Y., & Brownell, H. H. (Eds.). (1989). Discourse ability and brain damage. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1972). Language in the inner city. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Labov, W., & Fenshel, D. (1977). Therapeutic discourse. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Labov, W., & Waletzky, J. (this issue). Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. In J. Helm (Ed.), Essays on the verbal and visual arts: Proceedings of the 1966 Annual Spring Meeting of the American Ethnological Society (pp. 12–44). Seattle: University of Washington Press. (Original work published 1967)
McCarthy, R. A., & Warrington, E. A. (1990). Cognitive neuropsychology. San Diego, CA: Academic.Google Scholar
Parkin, A. J., & Leng, N. R. C. (1993). Neuropsychology of the amnesic syndrome. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
Polanyi, L. (1985). Telling the American story: A structural and cultural analysis of conversational storytelling. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Stark, H. K., Bruck, J., & Stark, J. A. (1988). Verbal and nonverbal aspects of text production in aphasia. In E. Scherzer, R. Simon, & J. Stark (Eds.), Proceedings of the first European conference on aphasiology (pp. 121–129). Vienna: Allgemeine Unfallversicherungsanstalt.Google Scholar
Stark, J. A., & Stark, H.K. (1991). Storungen der Textverarbeitung bei Aphasie [Disturbances in text processing in aphasics]. In G. Blanken (Ed.), Einfuhrung in die linguistische Aphasiologie (pp. 231–285). Freiburg, Germany: HochschulVerlag.Google Scholar
van de Velde, R. (1981). Interpretation, Kohärenz und Inferenz [Interpretation, coherence, and inference]. Hamburg, Germany: Buske.Google Scholar
(1992). Text and thinking. Berlin, Germany: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Dijk, T. A. (1980). Textwissenschaft [The science of texts]. Tübingen, Germany: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by