Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages
Vol. 34:2 (2019) ► pp.195–242

The perfect in English-lexifier pidgins and creoles

A comparative study

| Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Munich, Germany
This study investigates the expression of perfect meanings in thirty English-lexifier pidgins and creoles or related varieties, such as African American Vernacular English or Singlish. The data were elicited with the help of sixteen sentences and a short text from Dahl’s (1985: 198–206) typological tense-aspect questionnaire. The perfective, as the perfect’s ‘anti-prototype’ (Dahl 2014: 273), is also considered. The possession of a grammaticalized perfect category is particularly frequent in West Africa, where it is likely to constitute a case of substrate influence; moreover, the gram is considerably less frequent in English-lexifier pidgins and creoles than in non-creole languages, which may be related to recent grammaticalization processes.
Keywords: English-lexifier pidgins and creoles, typology, perfect of result, experiential, persistent situation, recent past, perfective, substrate influence, creole exceptionalism, grammaticalization
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The perfect as a crosslinguistic category
  • 3.Data and method
  • 4.Uses of the perfect in English-lexifier P&Cs
    • 4.1The perfect of result
    • 4.2The experiential perfect
    • 4.3The perfect of persistent situation
    • 4.4The perfect of recent past
  • 5.The perfective in English-lexifier P&Cs
  • 6.Discussion
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 25 November 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.00039.hac
References (86)
References
Aboh, Enoch O., Norval S. H. Smith & Tonjes Veenstra. 2013. Saramaccan. In Susanne Maria Michaelis, Philippe Maurer, Martin Haspelmath & Magnus Huber (eds.). The survey of pidgin and creole Languages. Vol. I1: English based and Dutch based languages, 27–38. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bao, Zhiming. 2005. The aspectual system of Singapore English and the systemic substratist explanation. Journal of Linguistics 411. 237–267. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bickerton, Derek. 1975. Dynamics of a creole system. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 1981. Roots of language. Ann Arbor: Karoma.Google Scholar
Berg, Margot C. van den & Enoch O. Aboh. 2013. Done already? A comparison of completive markers in the Gbe languages and Sranan Tongo. Lingua 121. 150–172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan & Östen Dahl. 1989. The creation of tense and aspect systems in the languages of the world. Studies in Language 131. 51–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca. 1994. The evolution of grammar. Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect. An introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen. 1985. Tense and aspect systems. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 2014. The perfect map: Investigating the crosslinguistic distribution of TAME categories in a parallel corpus. In Benedikt Szmrecsanyi & Bernhard Wälchli (eds.). Aggregating dialectology, typology, and register analysis. Linguistic variation in text and speech, 268–289. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Östen & Eva Hedin. 2000. Current relevance and event reference. In Östen Dahl (ed.). Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe, 385–401. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Östen & Viveka Velupillai. 2013. The perfect. In Matthew Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.). The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. [URL] (November 11, 2017).
Dayton, Elizabeth. 1996. Grammatical categories of the verb in African American Vernacular English. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Devonish, Hubert & Dahlia Thompson. 2013. Creolese. In Susanne Maria Michaelis, Philippe Maurer, Martin Haspelmath & Magnus Huber (eds.). The survey of pidgin and creole languages. Vol. I1: English based and Dutch based languages, 49–60. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
de Wit, Astrid. 2017. The present perfective paradox across languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Durrleman, Stephanie. 2007. Completive aspect in Jamaican Creole: The complete story? GG@G (Generative Grammar in Geneva) 51. 143–157.Google Scholar
Durrleman Tame, Stephanie. 2008. The syntax of Jamaican Creole. A cartographic perspective. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eberle, Nicole & Daniel Schreier. 2013. African Bermudian English and the Caribbean connection. English World Wide 341. 279–304. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Edwards, Walter F. 1991. A comparative description of Guyanese Creole and Black English preverbal aspect marker don . In Walter F. Edwards & Donald Winford (eds.). Verb phrase patterns in English and creole, 240–255. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar
2001. Aspectual dən in African American Vernacular English in Detroit. Journal of Sociolinguistics 51. 413–427. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Escure, Geneviève. 2013. Belizean Creole. In Susanne Maria Michaelis, Philippe Maurer, Martin Haspelmath & Magnus Huber (eds.). The survey of pidgin and creole languages. Vol. I1: English based and Dutch based languages, 92–100. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Faraclas, Nicholas. 2013. Nigerian Pidgin. In Susanne Maria Michaelis, Philippe Maurer, Martin Haspelmath & Magnus Huber (eds.). The survey of pidgin and creole languages. Vol. I1: English based and Dutch based languages, 176–184. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Green, Lisa J. 1993. Topics in African American English: The verb system analysis. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst.Google Scholar
2002. African American English. A linguistic introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hackert, Stephanie. 2004. Urban Bahamian Creole: System and variation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin, Matthew S. Dryer, David Gil & Bernard Comrie (eds.). 2005. The world atlas of language structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva. 2003. On contact-induced grammaticalization. Studies in Language 271. 529–572. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holm, John & Peter L. Patrick. 2007. Comparative creole syntax. Parallel outlines of 18 creole grammars. London: Battlebridge.Google Scholar
Huber, Magnus. 1999. Ghanaian Pidgin English in its West African context. A sociohistorical and structural analysis. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 2002. Event structure and the perfect. In David I. Beaver, Luis D. Casillas Martínez, Brady Z. Clark & Stefan Kaufmann (eds.). The construction of meaning, 113–136. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Kirk, John M. 2017. The present perfect in Irish English. World Englishes 361. 239–253. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kortmann, Bernd. 2004. Do as a tense and aspect marker in varieties of English. In Bernd Kortmann (ed.). Dialectology meets typology: Dialect grammar from a cross-linguistic perspective, 245–275. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kortmann, Bernd & Kerstin Lunkenheimer (eds.). 2012. The Mouton world atlas of variation in English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(eds.). 2013. The electronic world atlas of varieties of English. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. [URL] (August 23, 2015).
Labov, William. 1998. Coexistent systems in African-American Vernacular English. In Salikoko S. Mufwene, John R. Rickford, Guy Bailey & John Baugh (eds.). African-American English: Structure, history and use, 110–153. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Labov, William & Joshua Waletzky. 1967. ‘Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience’. In June Helm (ed.). Essays on the verbal and visual arts: Proceedings of the 1966 annual spring meeting of the American Ethnological Society, 12–44. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Leimgruber, Jakob R. E. 2009. Modelling variation in Singapore English. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Lim, Lisa & Umberto Ansaldo. 2013. Singlish structure dataset. In Susanne Maria Michaelis, Philippe Maurer, Martin Haspelmath & Magnus Huber (eds.). The atlas of pidgin and creole language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. [URL] (January 11, 2016).
Lindstedt, Jouko. 2000. The perfect – aspectual, temporal and evidential. In Östen Dahl (ed.). Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe, 365–383. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
LIRICS (Linguistic InfRastructure for Interoperable ResourCes and Systems) Consortium. N.d. Semantic roles: Definitions, explanations, examples. [URL] (August 27, 2017).
Maddieson, Ian. 2013. Tone. In Matthew Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.). The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. [URL] (November 12, 2017).
Maurer, Philippe. 2013. Present reference of stative verbs and past perfective reference of dynamic verbs. In Susanne Maria Michaelis, Philippe Maurer, Martin Haspelmath & Magnus Huber (eds.). The atlas of pidgin and creole language structures, 200–203. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McWhorter, John H. 2002. What happened to English? Diachronica 191. 217–272. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meyerhoff, Miriam. 2013. Bislama. In Susanne Maria Michaelis, Philippe Maurer, Martin Haspelmath & Magnus Huber (eds.). The survey of pidgin and creole languages. Vol. I1: English based and Dutch based languages, 223–231. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Michaelis, Susanne Maria. 2014. Sampling in contact linguistics: What is a typical creole feature? Paper presented at ‘Time and space in linguistics: Interdisciplinary computational approaches and cross creole comparisons’, Aarhus.
Michaelis, Susanne Maria, Philippe Maurer, Martin Haspelmath & Magnus Huber (eds.). 2013a. The atlas of pidgin and creole language structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(eds.). 2013b. The survey of pidgin and creole languages. Vol. I1: English based and Dutch based languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(eds.). 2013c. The atlas of pidgin and creole language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. [URL] (August 15, 2015).
Migge, Bettina. 2003. Creole formation as language contact. The case of the Suriname creoles. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Nengee. In Susanne Maria Michaelis, Philippe Maurer, Martin Haspelmath & Magnus Huber (eds.). The survey of pidgin and creole languages. Vol. I1: English based and Dutch based languages, 39–48. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Migge, Bettina & Isabelle Léglise. 2013. Exploring language in a multilingual context: Variation, interaction and ideology in language documentation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mosel, Ulrike. 1980. Tolai and Tok Pisin: The influence of the substratum on the development of New Guinea Pidgin. Pacific Linguistics B-73. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Mühlhäusler, Peter. 2013. Norf’k. In Susanne Maria Michaelis, Philippe Maurer, Martin Haspelmath & Magnus Huber (eds.). The survey of pidgin and creole languages. Vol. I1: English based and Dutch based languages, 232–240. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rappaport Hovav, Malka. 2008. Lexicalized meaning and the internal temporal structure of events. In Rothstein, Susan (ed.). Theoretical and crosslinguistic approaches to the semantics of aspect, 13–42. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Agnes. 2012. Typological profile: Pidgins and creoles. In Bernd Kortmann & Kerstin Lunkenheimer (eds.). 2012. The Mouton world atlas of variation in English, 874–904. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W. 2007. Postcolonial English. Varieties around the world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. The consequences of migration and colonialism II: Overseas varieties. In Peter Auer & Jürgen Erich Schmidt (eds.). Language and space: Theories and methods. An international handbook of linguistic variation (Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 30.1), 451–467. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Schröder, Anne. 2013. Cameroon Pidgin English. In Susanne Maria Michaelis, Philippe Maurer, Martin Haspelmath & Magnus Huber (eds.). The survey of pidgin and creole languages. Vol. I1: English based and Dutch based languages, 185–193. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schultze Berndt, Eva, Felicity Meakins & Denise Angelo. 2013. Kriol. In Susanne Maria Michaelis, Philippe Maurer, Martin Haspelmath & Magnus Huber (eds.). The survey of pidgin and creole languages. Vol. I1: English based and Dutch based languages, 241–250. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schütz, Albert J. 1969. Nguna grammar. Oceanic Linguistics Special Publications 5. University of Hawai’i Press.Google Scholar
Schwenter, Scott A. 1994. Hot news and the grammaticalization of the perfect. Linguistics 321. 995–1028. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siegel, Jeff. 2000. Substrate influence in Hawai‘i Creole English. Language in Society 291. 197–236. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008a. Pidgins/creoles and second language acquisition. In Silvia Kouwenberg & John Victor Singler (eds.). The handbook of pidgin and creole studies, 189–218. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 2008b. The emergence of pidgin and creole languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2010. Contact languages of the Pacific. In Raymond Hickey (ed.). The handbook of language contact, 814–836. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Singler, John Victor. 1984. Variation in tense aspect modality in Liberian English. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Smith, Carlota S. 1997. The parameter of aspect. 2nd ed. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, Geoff P. & Jeff Siegel. 2013. Tok Pisin. In Susanne Maria Michaelis, Philippe Maurer, Martin Haspelmath & Magnus Huber (eds.). The survey of pidgin and creole languages. Vol. I1: English based and Dutch based languages, 214–222. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Ian. 2008. Pidgins, creoles, and Bazaar Hindi. In Braj B. Kachru, Yamuna Kachru & S. N. Sridhar (eds.). Language in South Asia, 253–268. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, Peter & Jean Hannah. 2008. International English. A guide to the varieties of standard English. 5th ed. Hodder Education.Google Scholar
Vander Klok, Jozina & Lisa Matthewson. 2015. Distinguishing already from perfect aspect: A case study of Javanese wis . Oceanic Linguistics 541. 172–205. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vate, Marleen Susanne van der. 2011. Tense, aspect and modality in a radical creole. The case of Saamáka. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Tromsø.Google Scholar
Vendler, Zeno. 1957. Verbs and times. The Philosophical Review 661. 143–160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Velupillai, Viveka. 2003. Hawai’i Creole English: A typological analysis of the tense-mood-aspect system. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. The ‘had VERB’ construction in Hawai’i Creole English. GAGL 531. 119–138.Google Scholar
. 2012. An introduction to linguistic typology. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. Pidgins, creoles, and mixed languages. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Werner, Valentin. 2014. The present perfect in World Englishes: Charting unity and diversity. Bamberg: University of Bamberg Press.Google Scholar
Winford, Donald. 1993. Predication in Caribbean English creoles. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. Creole languages. In Robert I. Binnick (ed.). The Oxford handbook of tense and aspect, 428–457. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Winford, Donald & Bettina Migge. 2007. Substrate influence on the emergence of the TMA systems of the Surinamese creoles. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 221. 73–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Winford, Donald & Ingo Plag. 2013. Sranan. In Susanne Maria Michaelis, Philippe Maurer, Martin Haspelmath & Magnus Huber (eds.). The survey of pidgin and creole languages. Vol. I1: English based and Dutch based languages, 15–26. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Yakpo, Kofi. 2009. A grammar of Pichi. Berlin/Accra: Isimu Media.Google Scholar
. 2013. Pichi. In Susanne Maria Michaelis, Philippe Maurer, Martin Haspelmath & Magnus Huber (eds.). The survey of pidgin and creole languages. Vol. I1: English based and Dutch based languages, 194–205. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Hackert, Stephanie
2021. Creole Distinctiveness?. In English and Spanish, ► pp. 92 ff. DOI logo
Danae Perez, Marianne Hundt, Johannes Kabatek & Daniel Schreier
2021. English and Spanish, DOI logo
Yakpo, Kofi
2021. Creole Prosodic Systems Are Areal, Not Simple. Frontiers in Psychology 12 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.