Article published In:
Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages
Vol. 35:1 (2020) ► pp.136
References (59)
References
Aboh, Enoch O. & Smith, Norval. 2009. Simplicity, simplification, complexity and complexification: where have the interfaces gone? In Aboh, Enoch, Smith, Norval (eds.), Complex processes in new languages, 1–25. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aboh, Enoch O. & DeGraff, Michel. 2014. Some notes on bare noun phrases in Haitian Creole and in Gungbe: a transatlantic sprachbund perspective. In Åfarli Tor Anders & Mæhlum, Brit (eds.), The sociolinguistics of grammar, 203–236. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aboh, Enoch O. 2015. The emergence of hybrid grammars: contact, change and creation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016. Creole distinctiveness: a dead end. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 311. 400–418. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Albers, Ulrike. 2019. Le syntagme nominal en créole réunionnais : forme et interprétation. Marseille: Aix-Marseille UniversityGoogle Scholar
Allan, Keith. 1980. Nouns and countability. Language 561. 541–567. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alleesaib, Muhsina. 2012. Le groupe nominal en créole mauricien : études syntaxiques. Saint-Denis: Université de Paris VIII.Google Scholar
Armand, Alain. 2014. Dictionnaire kréol / français Dictionnaire kréol rénioné français. Saint-Denis: Epica.Google Scholar
Beyssade, Claire. 2011. Bare nouns in predicate position in French. In Pogodalla, Sylvain; Quatrini, Myriam & Rétoré Christian (eds.), Logic and grammar: essays dedicated to Alain Lecomte on the occasion of his 60th birthday, 1–16. Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Back to uniqueness presupposition. Recherches Linguistiques de Vincennes 421. 123–139 [URL] (16 March, 2018).
Bollée, Annegret. 2013a. Reunion Creole. In Michaelis, Susanne; Maurer, Philippe; Haspelmath, Martin & Huber, Magnus (eds.), The survey of pidgin and creole languages. Vol. II: Portuguese-based, Spanish-based and French-based languages, 241–249. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
. 2013b. Reunion Creole structure dataset. In Michaelis, Susanne; Maurer, Philippe & Haspelmath, Martin & Huber, Magnus (eds.), Atlas of pidgin and creole language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, [URL] (16 March, 2018).
Borik, Olga & Gehrke, Berit. 2015. An introduction to the syntax and semantics of pseudo-incorporation. In Borik, Olga & Gehrke, Berit. The syntax and semantics of pseudo-incorporation, 1–43. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borthen, Kaja. 2003. Norwegian bare singulars. Oslo: Norvegian University of Science and Technology.Google Scholar
Bouchard, Denis. 2003. Les SN sans déterminant en français et en anglais. In Miller, Philip H. & Zribi-Hertz, Anne, Essais sur la grammaire comparée du français et de l’anglais, 55–95. Saint-Denis: Presses Universitaires de Vincennes.Google Scholar
Carlson, Gregory N. 1977. A unified analysis of the English bare plural. Linguistics and Philosophy 11. 413–457. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carlson, Greg & Sussman, Rachel. 2005. Seemingly indefinite definites. In Kepsar, Stephan & Reis, Marga (eds.), Linguistic evidence: empirical, theoretical, and computational perspectives, 26–30. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cellier, Pierre. 1985. Description syntaxique du créole réunionnais : Essai de standardisation. Lille: ANRT Lille 3.Google Scholar
Chaudenson, Robert. 1974. Le Lexique du parler créole de La Réunion. Saint-Denis: H. Champion.Google Scholar
. 2007. Bare nouns in Réunionnais Creole. In Baptista, Marlyse & Guéron, Jacqueline (eds.), Noun phrases in creole languages: a multi-faceted approach, 226–242. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro. 1998. Reference to kinds across languages. Natural Language Semantics 6 (4). 339–400. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Christophersen, Paul. 1939. The articles: a study of their theory and use in English. Copenhagen: Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville. 2000. Number. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Déprez, Viviane. 1999. De la nature sémantique des nominaux sans déterminant en créole haïtien. Langues 2 (4). 289–300.Google Scholar
. 2005. Morphological number, semantic number and bare nouns. Lingua 115 (6). 857–883. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. On the conceptual role of number. In Nishida Chiyo & J. P. Montreuil (eds), New perspectives on romance languages, 61–85. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. Implicit determination and plural. In Baptista, Marlyse & Guéron, Jacqueline (eds.), Noun phrases in creole languages: a multi-faceted approach, 301–336. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Robert & Aikhenvald, Alexandra (eds.). 2003. Word: A cross-linguistic typology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen & Laca, Brenda. 2003. Les noms sans déterminant dans les langues romanes. In Godard, Danièle (eds.), Les Langues romanes. Problèmes de la phrase simple, 235–281. Paris: CNRS Editions.Google Scholar
Donnellan, Keith S. 1966. Reference and definite descriptions. The Philosophical Review 75 (3). 281–304. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ebert, Karen H. 1970. Referenz, Sprechsituation und die bestimmten Artikel in einem nordfriesischen Dialekt. Bräist/Bredstedt: Nordfriisk Instituut.Google Scholar
Espinal, M. Teresa & McNally, Louise. 2011. Bare nominals and incorporating verbs in Spanish and Catalan. Journal of Linguistics 47 (1). 87–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1978. How does a language acquire gender markers? In Ferguson, Charles A. & all. (eds.), Universals of Human Language 3: Word Structure, 47–82. Stanford University Press, Stanford.Google Scholar
Grice, H. Paul. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Cole, Peter & Morgan, Jerry (eds.), Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech acts, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2011. The gradual coalescence into ‘words’ in grammaticalization. In Narrog, Heiko, & Heine, Bernd (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 342–355. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heim, Irene. 1982. The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. 2001. Articles. In Haspelmath, Martin & all. (eds.), Language typology and language universals: An international handbook 201, 831–841. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ileana, Paul. 2009. On the presence versus absence of determiners in Malagasy. In Jila Ghomeshi, Ileana Paul & Martina Wiltschko (eds.), Determiners: Universals and variation, 215–242. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Ionin, Tania. 2006. This is definitely specific: specificity and definiteness in article systems. Natural language semantics 14 (2). 175–234. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 1991. Parts and boundaries. Cognition 41 (1). 9–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jean-Louis, Loïc & Zribi-Hertz, Anne. 2014. From noun to name: definiteness marking in modern Martinikè. In Cabredo Hofherr, Patricia & Zribi-Hertz, Anne (eds.), Crosslinguistic studies on noun phrase structure and reference, 269–315. Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Löbner, Sebastian. 1985. Definites. Journal of semantics 4 (4). 279–326. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1998. Definite associative anaphora. In S. Botley (eds.), Approaches to discourse anaphora: proceedings of DAARC96 – Discourse anaphora and Resolution Colloquium. Lancaster: Lancaster University.Google Scholar
. 2011. Concept types and determination. Journal of Semantics 28 (3). 279–333. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. Functional concepts and frames. In Gamerschlag & all., Meaning, frames, and conceptual representation, 15–42. Düsseldorf: dup.Google Scholar
Lyons, Christopher. 1999. Definiteness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norde, Muriel. 2002. The final stages of grammaticalization: affixhood and beyond. Typological Studies in Language 491. 45–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paul, Moles; Zribi-Hertz, Anne & Glaude, Herby (in press). Countability and number in a language without number inflection: evidence from Haitian Creole. In Cabredo Hofherr, Patricia & Doetjes, Jenny, Handbook of grammatical number. New York: Oxford University Press.
Pelletier, Francis J. 1979. Non-singular reference: Some Preliminaries. In Pelletier, Francis J. (eds.), Mass terms: some philosophical problems, 1–14. Dordrecht: D. Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph; Greenbaum, Sidney; Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand. 1905. On denoting, Mind 56 (14). 479–493. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwarz, Florian. 2013. Two kinds of definites cross-linguistically. Language and Linguistics Compass 10 (7). 534–559. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Staudacher-Valliamée, Gillette. 2004. Grammaire du créole réunionnais. Saint-Denis: SEDES – Université de La Réunion.Google Scholar
Trommer, Jochen. 2008. Case suffixes, postpositions and the phonological word in Hungarian. Linguistics 461. 403–438. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Véronique, Georges Daniel. 2002. Spécificités du syntagme nominal dans les créoles atlantiques. Faits de Langues 201. 207–17.Google Scholar
Villoing, Florence. 2012. Contraintes de taille dans les mots composés : quand la phonologie entre en concurrence avec les contraintes morphologiques. In Neveu, Frank & all. (eds.), Actes du 3ème congrès mondial de linguistique française, 1425–1440. Paris: EDP Sciences.Google Scholar
Watbled, Jean-Philippe. 2015. Les particularités morphosyntaxiques du créole réunionnais. Etudes Créoles 33 (2). 111–125.Google Scholar
Wespel, Johannes. 2008. Descriptions and their domains : the patterns of definiteness marking in French-related creoles. Stuttgart: Universität Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Wiesinger, Evelyn. 2017. Nom sans déterminant vs. roun/oun/n N. Une étude de cas en créole guyanais. In Prescod, Paula (eds.), Approches plurielles du nom sans déterminant. Distributions, interprétations, fonctions, 229–250. Frankfurt: Lang.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Albers, Ulrike
2024. A three-way distinction in definiteness: sortal, individual, and functional concepts in Réyoné. Linguistics 62:5  pp. 1185 ff. DOI logo
Albers, Ulrike
2024. What’s specific about bann ? Le lien entre « spécificité » et interprétation exclusive. Études créoles 41 | 1-2 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.