Review published In:
Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages
Vol. 37:2 (2022) ► pp.416421
References (10)
References
Adamou, Evangelia. 2021. The adaptive bilingual mind: Insights from endangered languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bakker, Peter. 2017. Typology of mixed languages. In Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. & R. M. W. Dixon (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of linguistic typology (pp. 217–253). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, William. 2000. Explaining language change. An evolutionary approach. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Lipski, J. 2020. Palenquero and Spanish in contact: Exploring the interface. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matras, Yaron. 2000. Mixed languages: A functional-communicative approach. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 3 1: 79–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meakins, Felicity. 2013. Mixed languages. In Matras, Yaron & Peter Bakker (eds.). Contact languages: A comprehensive guide (pp. 159–228). Berlin: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. Mixed languages. In Mark Aronoff (eds.), Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics (pp. 1–29). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Muysken, Pieter. 2008. Functional categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Natvig, David, Erin Pretorius, Michael T. Putnam, and Matthew Carlson. To appear. Representing and resolving conflicts: The impact of bilingualism on formal analysis. In Page, B. Richard & Michael T. Putnam (eds.), Contact varieties of German: Studies in honor of William D. Keel. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Putnam, Michael T., Matthew Carlson, & David Reitter. 2018. Integrated, not isolated. Defining typological proximity in an integrated multilingual architecture. Frontiers in Psychology. 8(2212). DOI logoGoogle Scholar