Cover not available
Article published In:
Language Contact with Chinese
Edited by Zhiming Bao
[Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 38:1] 2023
► pp. 14–40

Converbs of Sinitic varieties in Qīnghǎi‑Gānsù linguistic area

 | Sun Yat-Sen University, China
 | Peking University, China
This article discusses the semantic and syntactic properties of converb markers =Shi, =Zhe, and =Tala in Sinitic varieties in the Qīnghǎi-Gānsù Linguistic Area (qgla), and defines them as converb enclitics rather than conjunctions, modal particles, or other functional words. =Shi is a conditional converb enclitic while =Tala is a terminative converb enclitic; both enclitics derive their respective properties from Altaic languages. The enclitic =Zhe expresses the coordinative and narrative functions, derived from its Altaic source, and the conjunctional function, which is an innovation. The productive use of the converbs coincides with the sharp decline of serial verbs in Sinitic varieties in qgla, and such a phenomenon emerges through intense contact among the Altaic, Sinitic and Tibetan languages in the area.
Keywords: converbs, Qīng-Gān linguistic area, Sinitic languages, morphosyntactic
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Clause combination and converbs
  • 3.Morphosyntactic and semantic properties of Sinitic converbs in qgla
    • 3.1Sinitic converbs in qgla: Background and review
    • 3.2Syntax and semantics of Sinitic converbs
      • i.Converb enclitic =Zhe
      • ii.Converb enclitic =Shi
      • iii.Converb enclitic =Tala
      • iv.Converb enclitic or not: =Le
  • 4.Converb clauses and language contact
    • 4.1Independent innovation or contact-induced grammaticalization
    • 4.2Grammatical borrowing or grammatical replication
  • 5.Interaction between converbs and serial verbs
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 5 May 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.00102.sha
References (64)
References
Bickel, Balthasar. 1998. Review article: converbs in cross-linguistic perspective. Linguistic Typology 2 (3). 381–97.Google Scholar
Bisang, Walter. 1995. Verb serialization and converbs: differences and similarities. In Martin Haspelmath and Ekkehard König (eds.), Converbs in cross-linguistic perspective: Structure and meaning of adverbial verb forms, 137–188. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cáo, Guǎngshùn (曹广顺). 2012. Xibeifangyan teshu yufa xianxiang yu Hanyushi zhong yuyanjiechu yinfa de yufa gaibian – yi Ge fanchou weili 西北方言特殊语法现象与汉语史中语言接触引发的语法改变—以“格”范畴为例. [Special grammatical constructions in northwestern Chinese and the contact-induced grammatical change in historical Chinese: an example of case] Lishi Yuyanxue Yanjiu 2012(5).271–278.Google Scholar
Chén, Nǎixióng (陈乃雄). 1982. Wutunhua chutan 五屯话初探. [An introduction to Wutun Dialect] Minzu Yuwen 1982(2).10–18.Google Scholar
Coupe, Alexander R. 2007. A grammar of Mongsen Ao. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dede, Keith. 2007. The origin of the anti-ergative [xa] in Huangshui Chinese. Language and Linguistics 8(4).863–881.Google Scholar
Dwyer, Arienne M. 1992. Altaic elements in the Línxià dialect: contact-induced Change on the Yellow River Plateau. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 20(1).160–179.Google Scholar
Field, Kenneth L. 1997. A grammatical overview of Santa Mongolian. Ann Arbor: The University of California (Santa Barbara) dissertation.
Fried, Robert. W. 2010. A grammar of Bao’an Tu, a Mongolic language of northwest China. Buffalo: State University of New York MA Thesis.
Georg, Stefan. 2003. Mongghul. In Janhunen, Juha, (ed.) The Mongolic languages, 286–306. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Guō, Yánbīng (郭延兵). 2006. Linxiafangyan zhong teshu Shi ziju fenxi 临夏方言中特殊“是”字句分析. [Analyzing the Shi-sentences in Linxia dialect] Gansu Guangbo Dianshi Daxue Xuebao 2006(4).29–31.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1995. The converb as a cross-linguistically valid category. In Martin Haspelmath & Ekkehard König (eds), Converbs in cross-linguistic perspective: structure and meaning of adverbial verb forms, 1–55. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin and Ekkehard König (eds.). 1995. Converbs in cross-linguistic perspective: structure and meaning of adverbial verb forms. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva. 2003. On contact-induced grammaticalization. Studies in Language 27(3).529–572. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. Language contact and grammatical change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Janhunen, Juha. 2003. Proto-Mongolic. In Juha Janhunen (ed.), The Mongolic Languages, 1–29. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2007. Typological interaction in the Qinghai linguistic complex. Studia Orientalia 1011.85–102.Google Scholar
Jiǎ, Xīrú (贾晞儒). 1993. Qinghai Hanhua de Zhe yu Qinghai Mengguyu de -dʒ 青海汉话的“着”与青海蒙古语的-dʒ. [The “zhe” in Qinghai Chinese and -dʒ in Qinghai Mongolian] Xibei Minzu Yanjiu 1993(1).267–273.Google Scholar
. 1994. Cong Qinghai Hanyu de jige fangyan ci kan yuyan jian de jiechu yingxiang 从青海汉语的几个方言词看语言间的接触影响. [The influence of language contact: from serveral words in Qinghai Chinese] Minzu Yuwen 1994(4).57–63.Google Scholar
Kawasumi, Tetsuya (川澄哲也). 2010. Xining fangyan de xiaoju lianjie biaoji Zhe 西宁方言的小句连接标记“着”. [Clause linkage marker =zhe in the Xīníng dialect of Mandarin (Qinghai Province)] アジア言語論叢, Kobe City University of Foreign Studies, Research in Asian Languages 8 (76).83–93.Google Scholar
. 2014. Xining fangyan li biaoshi dongzuo cixu de He 西宁方言里表示动作次序的“嗬”. [The sequential action marker =ho in Xīníng dialect] Fukuoka University Review of Literature & Humanities 46(2).351–361.Google Scholar
Kim, Stephen S. 2003. Santa. In Juha Janhunen (ed.), The Mongolic languages, 346–363. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Léi, Hànqīng (雷汉卿). 2017. Qinghai Ledu fangyan de yuqi zhuci Ha 青海乐都方言的语气助词“哈”. [The modal particle =xa in Ledu dialect of Qinghai Province] Fangyan 39(4).487–495.Google Scholar
Liú, Xūnníng (刘勋宁). 1991. Qinghai Xininghua biaoshi jiashe de yuqici [·xɔ] yu jindai Baihua de He 青海西宁话表示假设的语气词[·xɔ]与近代白话的“呵”. [The hypothetical mood particle =·xɔ Xining dialect (Qinghai) and the particle =he in Modern Chinese] In Jinian Wangli xiansheng jiushi danchen wenji 纪念王力先生九十诞辰文集 [Collected works commemorating the ninetieth birthday of Li Wang], 371–376. Jinan: Shandong Jiaoyu Chubanshe.Google Scholar
Liú, Zhàoxióng (刘照雄). 2009. Dongxiangyu jianzhi 东乡语简志. [An Outline of Santa Grammar] Beijing: Minzu Chubanshe.Google Scholar
Mǎ, Mènglíng (马梦玲). 2009. Xining fangyan SOV jushi yu jingnei aertai zhu yuyan yufa bijiao. 西宁方言SOV句式与境内阿尔泰诸语言语法比较. [The comparison of Xining dialect SOV sentences with the Altai language grammar] Qinghai Shifan Daxue Xuebao 2009(2). 107–112.Google Scholar
Mǎ, Shùjūn (马树钧). 1984. Hanyu Hezhouhua yu Aertai yuyan 汉语河州话与阿尔泰语言. [The Hezhou dialect and Altaic languages] Minzu Yuwen 1984(2).50–55.Google Scholar
Mǎ, Wěi (马伟). 1994. Xunhua Hanyu de Shi yu Salayu de sa/se yufa gongneng bijiao 循化汉语的“是”与撒拉语的“sa/se”语法功能比较. [The comparison on grammar functions of ‘Shi’ in Xunhua Chinese and ‘sa/se’ in Salar] Qinghai Minzu Yanjiu 1994(3).69–79.Google Scholar
. 1997. Shitan Hezhouhua de chansheng jichu 试探河州话的产生基础. [A study on how Hezhou dialect was formed] Qinghai Minzu Yanjiu 1997(2).26–33.Google Scholar
Mǐn, Chūnfāng (敏春芳). 2013. Yuyan jiechu shiyu xia Dongxiangyu Fudongci yanjiu 语言接触视域下东乡语副动词研究. [A study on the converbs of Dongxiang language from the perspective of language contact] Gansu Gaoshi Xuebao 18(6).31–34.Google Scholar
Mǐn, Chūnfāng (敏春芳), and Yáo Chéng (程瑶). 2015. Yuyan jiechu shiyu xia Linxiahua Shi ziju teshu yongfa yanjiu 语言接触视域下临夏话“是”字句特殊用法研究. [The origin and complex implications of =Shi in Linxia dialect] Lanzhou Daxue Xuebao 43(6).54–60.Google Scholar
Mǐn, Chūnfāng (敏春芳), and Bīngxīn Dù (杜冰心). 2020. Yuyan jiechu shiye xia Ganqing Hehuang fangyan Zhe ziju yanjiu 语言接触视野下甘青河湟方言“着”字句研究. [The study of =Zhe in Ganqing Hehuang dialect from the perspective of language contact] Shanxi Daxue Xuebao 43(2).33–40.Google Scholar
Mǐn, Shēngzhì (敏生智). 1989. Hanyu Qinghai fangyan yu Zangyu Anduo fangyan 汉语青海方言与藏语安多方言. [The Qinghai Sinitic varieties and Amdo Tibetan] Qinghai Minzu Xueyuan Xuebao 1989(3).77–87.Google Scholar
Mò, Chāo (莫超). 2004. Bailongjiang liuyu Hanyu fangyan yufa yanjiu 白龙江流域汉语方言语法研究. [A study on grammar of Sinitic varieties in Bailongjiang Valley] Beijing: Zhongguo Shehui Kexue Chubanshe.Google Scholar
. 2018. Yuyan jiechu yu Hezhou fangyan de xingcheng 语言接触与河州方言的形成. [Language contact and the Origin of Hezhou dialect] Zhongguo Yuyan Xuebao 181.241–255.Google Scholar
Nedjalkov, Vladimir P. 1995. Some typological parameters of converbs. In Martin Haspelmath & Ekkehard König (eds.), Converbs in cross-linguistic perspective: Structure and meaning of adverbial verb forms, 97–136. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nugteren, Hans and Marti Roos. 2006. Prolegomena to the classification of Western Yugur. In Marcel Erdal and Irina Nevskaya (eds.), Exploring the Eastern Frontiers of Turkic, 99–130. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.Google Scholar
Peyraube, Alain. 2017. The case system in three Sinitic languages of the Qinghai-Gansu linguistic area. In Xu Dan and Li Hui (eds.), Language and Gene in Northwestern China, 121–139. Singapore: Springer Nature. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. On some endangered Sinitic languages spoken in Northwestern China. European Review 26(1).130–146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Qīnggéěrtài(清格尔泰). 1991. Mengguyu yufa 蒙古语语法. [A grammar of Mongolian]. Huhehaote: Neimenggu Renmin Chubanshe.Google Scholar
Rénzēng, Wàngmǔ (仁增旺姆). 1991. Hanyu Hezhouhua yu Zangyu de juzi jiegou bijiao 汉语河州话与藏语的句子结构比较. [Comparative study on structures in Hezhou dialect and Tibetan] Minzu Yuwen 1991(1).12–18.Google Scholar
Rybatzki, Volker. 2003. Intra-Mongolic taxonomy. In Janhunen & Juha (ed.), The Mongolic Languages, 364–390. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sandman, Erika. 2016. A grammar of Wutun. Helsinki: University of Helsinki dissertation.
Shào, Míngyuán (邵明园). 2018. Hexi zoulang binwei Zangyu Dongnahua yanjiu 河西走廊濒危藏语东纳话研究. [A study on the endangered Dongna Tibetan in Hexi Corridor] Guangzhou: Zhongshan Daxue Chubanshe.Google Scholar
Shěn, Jiāxuān (沈家煊). 2019. Chaoyue zhuwei jiegou 超越主谓结构. [Beyond predication] Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan.Google Scholar
Slater, Keith W. 2003. A grammar of Mangghuer: a Mongolic language of China’s Qinghai-Gansu Sprachbund. Routledge Curzon Asian linguistics series. London: Routledge Curzon.Google Scholar
Wáng, Shuāngchéng (王双成). 2012. Xining fangyan de jieci leixing 西宁方言的介词类型. [The pattern of the adpositions in the Xi’ning dialect] Zhongguo Yuwen 2012(5).469–478.Google Scholar
Wú, Fúxiáng (吴福祥). 2005. Hanyu tibiaoji Le/Zhe weishenme buneng qiangzhixing shiyong 汉语体标记“了”“着”为什么不能强制性使用. [Why the Chinese aspect marker =le and =zhe cannot be used compulsively] Dandai Yuyanxue (3). 237–250.Google Scholar
Xiè, Xiǎo’ān (谢晓安), et al. 1996. Gansu Linxia Hanyu fangyan yufa zhong de Anduo Zangyu xianxiang 甘肃临夏汉语方言语法中的安多藏语现象. [The Influence of Amdo Tibetan on the Grammar of Linxia Chinese Dialect, Gansu Province] Zhongguo Yuwen 1996(4).273–280.Google Scholar
Xú, Dān (徐丹). 2014. Tangwanghua yanjiu 唐汪话研究. [Studies in Tangwang] Beijing: Minzu Chubanshe.Google Scholar
. 2015. The Role of Geography in the Northwest China Linguistic Area. In: Dan Xu, Jingqi Fu (eds) Space and Quantification in Languages of China, 57–74. New York: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Xú, Dān (徐丹) and Peyraube, A. (贝罗贝). 2018. Zhongguo jingnei Gansu Qinghai yidai de yuyan quyu 中国境内甘肃青海一带的语言区域. [Linguistic Area of Gansu-Qinghai in China] Hanyu Xuebao 2018(3).2–15.Google Scholar
Yáng, Yǒnglóng (杨永龙). 2014. Qinghai Minhe Gangouhua de duogongneng gebiaoji Ha 青海民和甘沟话的多功能格标记“哈”. [The Multi-functional Case Marker Xa 哈 of Gangou Chinese Dialect in Minhe Hui Autonomous County] Fangyan 2014(3).230–241.Google Scholar
. 2015. Qinghai Gangouhua de fanshen lingshu biaoji Nang – zhuanyong daozhi de ganrao de gean yanjiu 青海甘沟话的反身领属标记“囊”—“转用导致的干扰”的个案研究. [The reflexive possessive marker -naŋ(囊) in Gāngōu Chinese dialect in Qinghai Province: a case of shift-induced interference in language contact] Yuyan Yanjiu 35(3).48–55.Google Scholar
. 2019. Ganqing Hehuanghua de hunhexing tezheng jiqi chansheng tujing 甘青河湟话的混合性特征及其产生途径. [The mixed grammatical features of Hehuang Chinese dialects in Gansu and Qinghai Provinces and their genesis routes] Minzu Yuwen 2019(2).10–24.Google Scholar
. 2022. Qinghai Gangouhua Zuo yi dongci yong zuo chixuti zhudongci 青海甘沟话“坐”义动词用作持续体助动词. [SIT verbs as continuous auxiliaries in Qinghai Gan’gou dialect] Zhongguo Yuwen 2022(4).427–438.Google Scholar
Yáng, Yǒnglóng, and Zhāng, jìngtíng (杨永龙、张竞婷). 2016. Qinghai Minhe Gangouhua de gebiaoji xitong 青海民和甘沟话的格标记系统. [The case system in Gangou dialect (Qinghai, Minhe)] Minzu Yuwen 2016(5).25–38.Google Scholar
Yú, Zhìhóng (余志鸿). 1999. Yuandai Hanyu jiasheju de houzhi biaoji .元代汉语假设句的后置标记. [The postposed marker of hypothetical clauses in Yuan dynasty Chinese] Yuwen Yanjiu 1999(1).3–5.Google Scholar
Zeisler, Bettina. 2007. Sentence patterns and pattern variation in Ladakhi: A field report. In Roland Bielmeier & Felix Haller (eds.), Linguistics of the Himalayas and Beyond, 399–425. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhāng, Jìngtíng (张竞婷), and Yǒnglóng Yáng (杨永龙). 2017. Qinghai Minhe Gangouhua de zhuangyu congju biaoji Shi jiqi laiyuan 青海民和甘沟话的状语从句标记“是”及其来源. [The adverbial clause marker “Shi” and its origin in Gangou dialect (Minghe, Qinghai)] Yuwen Yanjiu 2017(2).53–59.Google Scholar
Zhào, Lǜyuán (赵绿原). 2015. Gangou fangyan de dongci houfu chengfen – jian lun jiechu beijing xia de shiti xitong 甘沟方言的动词后附成分—兼论接触背景下的时体系统. [The proclitics on verbs in Gangou dialect: discuss the tense-aspect system under language contact] Beijing: Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences Thesis.
Zhōu, Chénlěi (周晨磊). 2017. Xianhe fanchou de ruohua: yuyan jiechu de shijiao 显赫范畴的弱化: 语言接触的视角. [The weakening of mighty categories under the perspective of language contact] Yuyan Yanjiu Jikan 181.47–62.Google Scholar
. 2019. Ganqing fangyan gebiaoji [ha] de laiyuan. 甘青方言格标记[哈]的来源. [The origin of the dative-accusative marker =xa in Qīng-Gān dialects] Language and Linguistics 20(3).494–514.Google Scholar