Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages
Vol. 29:1 (2014) ► pp.157–171

The case was never closed

McWhorter misinterprets the ecological approach to the emergence of creoles

| University of Chicago
Published online: 7 February 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.29.1.06muf
References (40)
Aboh, Enoch O. 2009. Competition and selection: That’s all! In Enoch O. Aboh & Norval Smith (eds.), Complex processes in new languages , 317–344. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aboh, Enoch O. & Norval Smith (eds.). 2009. Complex processes in new languages . Amsterdam: John Benjamins.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ascoli, Graziadio Isaia. 1867. Studj ario-semitici. Memorie del Reale Istituto Lombardo , cl. II, 101. 1–36.Google Scholar
Baker, Philip. 1995. Some developmental inferences from the historical studies of pidgins and creoles. In Jacques Arends (ed.), The early stages of creolization , 1–24. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Chaudenson, Robert. 1992. Des îles, des hommes, des langues: Essais sur la créolisation linguistique et culturelle . Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
. 2001. Creolization of language and culture . London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Corne, Chris. 1999. From French to Creole: The development of new vernaculars in the French colonial world . London: University of Westminster Press.Google Scholar
DeGraff, Michel. 1997. Nominal predication in Haitian and in Irish. In Emily Curtis, James Lyle & Gabriel Webster (eds.), The proceedings of the sixteenth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics , 113–128. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
. 2001a. On the origin of creoles: A Cartesian critique of neo-Darwinian linguistics. Linguistic Typology 51. 213–310.Google Scholar
. 2001b. Morphology in creole genesis: Linguistics and ideology. In Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language , 53–121. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2009. Language acquisition in creolization and, thus, language change: Some Cartesian-Uniformitarian boundary conditions. Language and Linguistic Compass 3–4. 888–971. DOI logo
Faraclas, Nicholas. 2012. Marginalized peoples and creole genesis: Sociétés de cohabitation and the Founder Principle. In Nicholas Faraclas (ed.), Agency in the emergence of creole languages , 215–223. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Good, Jeff. 2012. Typological grammatical complexities: Or why creoles may be paradigmatically simple but syntagmatically average. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 27(1). 1–47.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hancock, Ian F. 1986. The domestic hypothesis, diffusion, and componentiality: An account of Atlantic Anglophone creole origins. In Pieter Muysken & Norval Smith (eds.), Substrata versus universals in creole genesis , 71–102. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jourdan, Christine. 2009. Complexification and regularization of paradigms: The case of prepositional verbs in Solomon Islands Pidgin. In Enoch O. Aboh & Norval Smith (eds.), Complex processes in new languages , 159–170. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kouwenberg, Silvia. 1994. A grammar of Berbice Dutch Creole. Berlin: Mouton De Greuter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kouwenberg, Silvia & John Victor Singler (eds.). 2009. The handbook of pidgin and creole studies . New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
McWhorter, John H. 1998. Identifying the creole prototype: Vindicating a typological class. Language 741. 788–818. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000. The missing Spanish creoles: Recovering the birth of plantation contact languages . Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
2001. The power of Babel: A natural history of language . New York: Times Books.Google Scholar
McWhorter, John. 2012. Case closed? Testing the feature pool hypothesis. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 27(1). 171–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko S. 1981. Non-individuation and the count/mass distinction. In Roberta Hendrick, Carrie Masek, & Mary Frances Miller (eds.), Papers from the Seventeenth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 221–238. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
1986. The universalist and substrate hypotheses complement one another. In Pieter Muysken & Norval Smith (eds.), Substrata versus universals in creole genesis , 129–162. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1989a. Colonial, hypermetropic, and wishful linguistics. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 4(2). 241–254. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1989b. La créolisation en bantou: Les cas du kituba, du lingala urbain, et du swahili du Shaba. Etudes Créoles 121. 74–106.Google Scholar
1989c. Equivocal structures in some Gullah complex sentences. American Speech 64(4). 304–326. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994. Restructuring, feature selection, and markedness: From Kimanyanga to Kituba. In Kevin E. Moore, David A. Peterson & Comfort Wentum (eds.), Historical issues in African linguistics , 67–90. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
1996. Creolization and grammaticization: What creolistics could contribute to research on grammaticization. In Philip Baker & Anand Syea (eds.), Changing meanings, changing functions... , 5–28. London: University of Westminster Press.Google Scholar
1997. Kituba. In Sarah G. Thomason (ed.), Contact languages: A wider perspective , 173–208. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001. The ecology of language evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003. Genetic linguistics and genetic creolistics. A response to Sally Thomason’s column. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 18(2). 273–288. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006. How Bantu is Kiyansi? A re-examination of its verbal inflections. In F. K. Erhard Voeltz (ed.), Studies in African linguistic typology , 329–337. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008. Language evolution: Contact, competition, and change . London: Continuum Press.Google Scholar
2009a. Restructuring, hybridization, and complexity in language evolution. In Enoch O. Aboh & Norval Smith (eds.), Complex processes in new languages , 367–400. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009b. The indigenization of English in North America. In Thomas Hoffmann & Lucia Siebers (eds.), World Englishes: Problems, properties, prospects. Selected Papers from the 13th IAWE Conference , 353–368. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010. Second language acquisition and the emergence of creoles. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 32(3). 1–42.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perdue, Clive. 1995. L’acquisition du français et de l’anglais par des adultes: Former des énoncés . Paris: CNRS.Google Scholar
Plag, Ingo. 2008a. Creoles as interlanguages: Inflectional morphology. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 23(1). 114–135. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008b. Creoles as interlanguages: Syntactic structures. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 23(2). 307–328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wartburg, Walther von. 1934. Évolution et structure de la langue française . Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Cited by (12)

Cited by 12 other publications

Parkvall, Mikael & Bart Jacobs
2023. Returning a maverick creole to the fold: the Berbice Dutch enigma revisited. Folia Linguistica 57:1 ► pp. 177 ff. DOI logo
Silva, Glauber Romling da
2023. Aspectos sintáticos dos adjetivos em kheuól do Uaçá. LIAMES: Línguas Indígenas Americanas 23 ► pp. e023007 ff. DOI logo
Mufwene, Salikoko S. & Anna María Escobar
2022. Language Contact in Population Structure. In The Cambridge Handbook of Language Contact, ► pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
Mufwene, Salikoko S.
2020. Genetic Creolistics as Part of Evolutionary Linguistics. In The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, ► pp. 393 ff. DOI logo
Sessarego, Sandro
2020. Not all grammatical features are robustly transmitted during the emergence of creoles. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 7:1 DOI logo
Aceto, Michael
2019. English in the Caribbean and the Central American Rim. In The Cambridge Handbook of World Englishes, ► pp. 185 ff. DOI logo
McWhorter, John
2019. Contact languages: A comprehensive guide. Edited by Peter Bakker and Yaron Matras. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 34:1 ► pp. 171 ff. DOI logo
McWhorter, John H.
2018. Why neither demographics nor feature pools can explain the missing Spanish plantation creoles. Lingua 202 ► pp. 4 ff. DOI logo
Spolsky, Bernard
2018. Language policy in French colonies and after independence. Current Issues in Language Planning 19:3 ► pp. 231 ff. DOI logo
Baptista, Marlyse
2016. Stepping back to move forward. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 31:1 ► pp. 184 ff. DOI logo
Good, Jeff
2015. Paradigmatic complexity in pidgins and creoles. Word Structure 8:2 ► pp. 184 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. Introduction. In The Cambridge Handbook of Language Contact, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.