Cover not available
Article published In:
Arabic-based Pidgins and Creoles
Edited by Stefano Manfredi and Mauro Tosco
[Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 29:2] 2014
► pp. 437–455

Creoles and typology

Problems of sampling and definition

 | Aarhus University
Published online: 30 September 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.29.2.09bak
References (29)
Bailey, Charles J. & Karl Maroldt. 1977. The French lineage of English. In Jürgen Meisel (ed.), Langues en contact – Pidgins – Creoles, 21–53. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Bakker, Peter. 2008. Pidgins versus creoles and pidgincreoles. In Silvia Kouwenberg & John Singler (eds.), The handbook of pidgin and creole studies, 130–157. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bakker, Peter, Aymeric Daval-Markussen, Mikael Parkvall & Ingo Plag. 2011. Creoles are typologically distinct from noncreoles. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 26(1). 5–42. Reprinted in 2013 in: Parth Bhatt & Tonjes Veenstra (eds.), Creole languages and linguistic typology, 9–45. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 9-45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Braunmüller, Kurt. 2002. The Ancient Nordic linguistic system from a typological point of view: Phonology, graphemics, morphology, syntax, and word order. In Oskar Bandle, Kurt Braunmüller, Ernst Håkon Jahr, Allan Karker, Hans-Peter Naumann, Ulf Telemann, Lennart Elmevik, & Gun Widmark (eds.), The Nordic languages. An international handbook of the history of the North Germanic languages, 649–656. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cabral, Ana Suelly de Arruda Câmara & Aryon Dall’Igna Rodrigues. 2003. Evidências de crioulização abrupta em kokáma? Papia 131. 180–186.Google Scholar
Domingue, Nicole Z. 1977. Middle English: Another Creole? Journal of Creole Studies 11. 89–100.Google Scholar
Chien, Yuehchen & Shinji Sanada. 2010. Yilan creole in Taiwan. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 25(2). 350–357. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chinuk Wawa Dictionary Project. 2012. Chinuk Wawa / kakwa nsayka ulman-tilixam łaska munk-kəmtəks nsayka / As our elders teach us to speak it. Grand Ronde: Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde Community of Oregon.Google Scholar
Daval-Markussen, Aymeric. 2014. First steps towards a typological profile of creoles. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia: International Journal of Linguistics. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Da Cruz, Aline. 2011. Fonologia e Gramática do Nheengatú. A língua geral falada pelos povos Baré, Warekena e Baniwa. Utrecht: LOT Dissertations.Google Scholar
DeGraff, Michel. 2005. Linguists’ most dangerous myth. The fallacy of Creole Exceptionalism. Language in Society 341. 533–591. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeGraff, Michel, Trevor Bass, & Robert Berwick. 2013. Computational phylogenetics, creole languages, and family values. Paper presented at International Congress of Linguists, July 21 to July 27, Geneva. Abstract: [URL] Accessed 25 July 2014.
Dutton, Thomas E. & C.L. Voorhoeve. 1974. Beginning Hiri Motu. Canberra: ANU RSPAS. Pacific Linguistics D 24.Google Scholar
Grimes, Barbara F. 1988. Ethnologue: Languages of the world, 11th edition. Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Hall, Robert A., Jr. 1959. Neo-Melanesian and Glottochronology. International Journal of American Linguistics 25(4). 265–267. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holm, John & Peter L. Patrick (eds.). 2007. Comparative creole syntax. London: Battlebridge.Google Scholar
Horvath, Julia & Paul Wexler. 1997. Relexification in creole and non-creole languages. With special attention to Haitian Creole, Modern Hebrew, Romani, and Rumanian. Wiesbaden, Germany: Otto Harrassowitz Publishers.Google Scholar
Høyrup, Jens. 1992. Sumerian: The descendant of a proto-historical creole? An alternative approach to the ‘Sumerian problem’. Annali del Dipartimento di Studi del Mondo Classico e del Mediterraneo Antico. Sezione linguistica. Istituto Universitario Orientale 141. 21–72. [URL] Accessed 25 July 2014.Google Scholar
Kouwenberg, Silvia. 1994. A grammar of Berbice Dutch creole. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lefebvre, Claire (ed.). 2011. Creoles, their substrates, and language typology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Michaelis, Susanne. 2014. Sampling in contact linguistics: What is a typical creole feature? Paper presented at Time and Space in Linguistics, and Cross-Creole comparisons . Aarhus University, January 2014.
Michaelis, Susanne, Philippe Maurer, Martin Haspelmath & Magnus Huber (eds.). 2013. The atlas of pidgin and creole structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Moore, Denny, Sidney Facundes, & Nádia Pires. 1993. Nheengatu (Lingua Geral Amazönica) its history, and effects of language contact. Proceedings of the Meeting of the Society for the Study of the Indigenous Languages of the Americas 2(4)1. 93–118.Google Scholar
Pentland, David H. 2006. Algonquian and Ritwan languages. In Keith Brown (ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics, 161–166. Amsterdam: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rijkhoff, Jan & Dik Bakker. 1998. Language sampling. Linguistic Typology 21. 263–314. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Soosaar, S.-E. 2000. The relation of Samoyed languages to the neighbouring languages. Études Finno-Ougriennes 311. 157–166.Google Scholar
Southworth, Franklin. 1971. Detecting prior creolization: An analysis of the historical origins of Marathi. In Dell Hymes (ed.), Pidginization and Creolization of Languages, 255–276. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stassen, Leon. 2013. Predicative possession. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online at [URL], Accessed 25 February, 2014.)Google Scholar
Wiik, Kalevi. 2002. Suomalaisten juuret [Finnish Roots]. Jyväskylä: Atena.Google Scholar
Cited by (13)

Cited by 13 other publications

Agostinho, Ana Lívia
2023. Word prosody of African versus European-origin words in Afro-European creoles. Linguistic Typology 27:2 ► pp. 481 ff. DOI logo
Jourdan, Christine
2021. Pidgins and Creoles: Debates and Issues. Annual Review of Anthropology 50:1 ► pp. 363 ff. DOI logo
Jourdan, Christine
2023. Creolization: Its Context, Power, and Meaning. In A New Companion to Linguistic Anthropology, ► pp. 33 ff. DOI logo
Laub, Robert W.
2021. The effects of language ecology on syntactic structure. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2017 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 355], ► pp. 193 ff. DOI logo
Voort, Hein van der
2021. Línguas indígenas. LIAMES: Línguas Indígenas Americanas 21 ► pp. e021013 ff. DOI logo
Kouwenberg, Silvia & John Victor Singler
2020. Are creoles a special type of language?. In Advances in Contact Linguistics [Contact Language Library, 57], ► pp. 108 ff. DOI logo
Bakker, Peter & Aymeric Daval-Markussen
2017. Creole typology I. In Creole Studies – Phylogenetic Approaches, ► pp. 79 ff. DOI logo
Borchsenius, Finn, Aymeric Daval-Markussen & Peter Bakker
2017. Phylogenetics in biology and linguistics. In Creole Studies – Phylogenetic Approaches, ► pp. 35 ff. DOI logo
Daval-Markussen, Aymeric & Peter Bakker
2017. Creole typology II. In Creole Studies – Phylogenetic Approaches, ► pp. 103 ff. DOI logo
Goldshtein, Yonatan
2017. The simple emerging from the complex. In Creole Studies – Phylogenetic Approaches, ► pp. 193 ff. DOI logo
Bakker, Peter
2015. Creoles, creole studies and sign languages. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 30:2 ► pp. 357 ff. DOI logo
Bakker, Peter
2017. Feature pools show that creoles are distinct languages due to their special origin. In Creole Studies – Phylogenetic Approaches, ► pp. 369 ff. DOI logo
Bakker, Peter
2020. The quest for non-European creoles. In Advances in Contact Linguistics [Contact Language Library, 57], ► pp. 86 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 january 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.