Article published In:
Journal of Pidgin and Creole LanguagesVol. 31:1 (2016) ► pp.113–140
Critical mass in Michif
In this paper, we examine mass and count in Michif, a language often called a mixed language, which has elements from French (and English) and Cree (and Ojibwe). French has an obvious grammatical mass/count distinction (Doetjes 1997); Cree does not. Michif could therefore display a mass/count distinction, like French, or look like it lacks one, like Cree. In fact, the system is mixed (contra Croft 2003: 58): French-derived nominals display an obvious mass/count distinction and the Cree-derived nominals do not. Number, numerals and quantifiers disambiguate within the French-derived part of the grammar but do not in the Cree-derived part. Michif has inherited both the French system and the Cree system, reflected in the behaviour of the nominals.
Keywords: Michif, nominals, mass/count distinction, mixed languages
References (30)
Ahenakew, Freda & H. Christoph Wolfart. 1983. Productive reduplication in Plains Cree. In William Cowan (ed.), Actes du quatorzième congrès des Algonquinistes (Québec, 1982), 369–377. Ottawa: Carleton University.
Bakker, Peter. 1997. A language of our own: The genesis of Michif, the mixed Cree-French language of the Canadian Métis (Oxford Studies in Anthropological Linguistics). New York: Oxford University Press.
Bale, Alan C. & David Barner. 2009. The interpretation of functional heads: Using comparatives to explore the mass/count distinction. Journal of Semantics 261. 217–252. 
. 2012. Semantic triggers, linguistic variation, and the mass-count distinction. In Diane Massam (ed.), Count and mass across languages, 238–260. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bunt, Harry C. 1985. Mass Terms and Model-Theoretic Semantics. Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 42. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen & Rint Sybesma. 1999. Bare and not-so-bare nouns and the structure of NP. Linguistic Inquiry 301. 509–542.
Chierchia, Gennaro. 1998. Plurality of mass nouns and the notion of ‘semantic parameter’. In Susan Rothstein (ed.), Events and grammar, 53–103. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
. 2010. Mass nouns, vagueness and semantic variation. Synthese 174(1). 99–149.
Croft, William. 2003. Mixed languages and acts of identity: An evolutionary approach. In Yaron Matras & Peter Bakker (eds.), The mixed language debate: Theoretical and empirical advances, 41–72. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Deprez, Viviane. 2005. Morphological number, semantic number and bare nouns. Lingua 1151. 857–883.
Doetjes, Jenny. 1997. Quantifiers and selection: On the distribution of quantifying expressions in French, Dutch and English. Leiden, NL: Leiden University dissertation.
Frantz, Donald G & Norma Jean Russell. 1989. Blackfoot dictionary of stems, roots, and affixes. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Gillon, Carrie. 2009. The mass/count distinction and what it tells us about plurality in Innu-aimun. Paper given at
the Semantics of Underrepresented Languages of the Americas V
, May 15-17, 2009, Harvard and MIT.
. 2015. Innu-aimun plurality. Lingua 1621:128–148.
Jackendoff, Ray. 1991. Parts and boundaries. Cognition 411: 9–45.
Jespersen, Otto. 1909. The philosophy of grammar. London: Allen & Unwin.
MacKenzie, Marguerite. 1980. Toward a dialectology of Cree-Montagnaiss-Naskapi. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto dissertation. [available at [URL]]
Mathieu, Éric. 2012. On the mass/count distinction in Ojibwe. In Diane Massam (ed.), Count and mass across languages, 172–198. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pelletier, Francis Jeffry. 1975. Non-singular reference: Some preliminaries. Philosophia 5.
Poplack, Shana. 1993. Variation theory and language contact. In Dennis Preston (ed.), American dialect research, 251–286. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Rhodes, Richard. 1986. Métchif: a second look. Proceedings of the Algonquian Conference 171: 287–96. William Conan, ed. Ottawa: Carleton University.
Rhodes, Richard. A. 1990. Lexical hierarchies and Ojibwa noun derivation. In Savas L. Tsohatzidis (ed.), Meanings and prototypes: Studies in linguistic categorization, 151–158. London: Routledge.
Rosen, Nicole. 2003. Demonstrative position in Michif. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 48(1/2). 39–69.
. 2006. Language contact and Michif stress assignment. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung - Language Typology and Universals (STUF) 59(2). 170–190.
. 2007. Domains in Michif phonology. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto dissertation. Available at: [URL]
Rosen, Nicole & Janelle Brodner. 2012. Vowel space of Michif. Paper presented at 2012 Meeting of the
Society for the Study of the Indigenous Languages of the Americas
, January 5-8, 2012, Portland, OR.
Statistics Canada. 2011. Census of Population, Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 98-314-XCB2011048.
Thomason, Sarah. 2003. Social factors and linguistic processes in the emergence of stable mixed languages. In Yaron Matras & Peter Bakker (eds.), The mixed language debate: Theoretical and empirical advances, 21–39. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Wilhelm, Andrea. 2008. Bare nouns and number in Dëne Sųłiné. Natural Language Semantics 161. 39–68.
Wiltschko, Martina. 2012. Decomposing the mass/count distinction: Evidence from languages that lack it. In Diane Massam (ed.), Count and mass across languages, 146–171. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Meakins, Felicity & Jesse Stewart
2022. Mixed Languages. In The Cambridge Handbook of Language Contact, ► pp. 310 ff. 
[no author supplied]
2022. Contact, Emergence, and Language Classification. In The Cambridge Handbook of Language Contact, ► pp. 255 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.