Visual feedback, in which learners visually analyze acoustic speech characteristics, has been shown to significantly improve pronunciation, but extant research has varied widely with respect to the target feature, length of the intervention, and type of intervention. This study presents a comparative analysis of three methods of visual feedback for L2 segmental pronunciation instruction. These methods, all focused on training voice onset time for English-speaking learners of Spanish, differed in duration of instruction (i.e., short and long) and the nature of each intervention (i.e., phonemes presented simultaneously or sequentially). Results show that while all forms of visual feedback significantly improve L2 Spanish pronunciation, evidenced by a reduction in voice onset time, the greatest improvement was found following both longer treatments and a sequential approach. Theoretical and pedagogical implications are discussed.
Akahane-Yamada, R., McDermott, E., Adachi, T., Kawahara, H., & Pruitt, J. S. (1998). Computer-based second language production training by using spectrographic representation and HMM-based speech recognition scores. In Fifth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (pp. 1–4). [URL]
Anderson-Hseih, J. (1992). Using electronic visual feedback to teach suprasegmentals. System, 201, 51–62.
Auer, E. T., Bernstein, L. E., & Tucker, P. E. (2000). Is subjective word familiarity a meter of ambient language? A natural experiment on effects of perceptual experience. Memory & Cognition, 28(5), 789–797.
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2014). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.1-7[URL]
Barr, D., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 681, 255–278.
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2018). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (version 6.0.42) [computer software]. Available from [URL]
Bradlow, A. R., Pisoni, D. B., Akahane-Yamada, R., & Tohkura, Y. I. (1997). Training Japanese listeners to identify English/r/and/l: IV. Some effects of perceptual learning on speech production. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 101(4), 2299–2310.
Carey, M. (2004). CALL Visual feedback for pronunciation of vowels: Kay Sona-Match. CALICO Journal, 21(3), 571–601. [URL]
Cho, T., & Ladefoged, P. (1999). Variation and universals in VOT: Evidence from 18 languages. Journal of Phonetics, 271, 207–229.
Chun, D. (1989). Teaching tone with microcomputers. CALICO Journal, 7(1), 21–47. [URL]
Chun, D. (1998). Signal analysis software for teaching discourse intonation. Language Learning & Technology, 2(1), 61–77. [URL]
Chun, D. (2007). Come ride the wave: But where is it taking us?CALICO Journal, 24(2), 239–252. [URL]
de Bot, K. (1980). Evaluation of intonation acquisition: A comparison of methods. International Journal of Psycholinguistics, 71, 81–92.
de Bot, K. (1983). Visual feedback of intonation: Effectiveness and induced practice behavior. Language and Speech, 261, 331–350.
de Jong, K. J., Hao, Y., & Park, H. (2009). Evidence for featural units in the acquisition of speech production skills: Linguistic structure in foreign accent. Journal of Phonetics, 371, 357–373.
Derwing, T., & Munro, M. (2005). Second language accent and pronunciation teaching: a research-based approach. TESOL Quarterly, 391, 379–397.
Derwing, T., Munro, M., & Wiebe, G. (1998). Evidence in favor of a broad framework for pronunciation instruction. Language Learning, 48(3), 393–410.
Fischer, L. B. (1986). The use of audio/visual aids in the teaching and learning of French. Pine Brook, NJ: Kay Elemetrics Corporation.
Flege, J. E. (1995). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 233–276). Baltimore: York Press.
Flege, J. E., & Wang, C. (1989). Native-language phonotactic constraints affect how well Chinese subjects perceive the word-final /t/–/d/ contrast. Journal of Phonetics, 171, 299–315.
Garcia, C., Kolat, M. & Morgan, T. (2018). Self-correction of second language pronunciation via online, real-time, visual feedback. In J. Levis (Ed.), Proceedings of the 9th Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching Conference (pp. 54–65). Ames, IA: Iowa State University.
Hardison, D. (2004). Generalization of computer assisted prosody training: Quantitative and qualitative findings. Language Learning and Technology, 8(1), 34–52.
Kartushina, N., Hervais-Adelman, A., Frauenfelder, U. H., & Golestani, N. (2015). The effect of phonetic production training with visual feedback on the perception and production of foreign speech sounds. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1381, 817–832.
Lambacher, S. (1999). A CALL tool for improving second language acquisition of English consonants by Japanese learners. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 12(2), 137–156.
Lee, J., Jang, J., & Plonsky, L. (2015). The effectiveness of second language pronunciation instruction: A meta-analysis. Applied Linguistics, 36(3), 345–366.
Lee, J. F., & VanPatten, B. (1995). Making communicative language teaching happen. Volume 1: Directions for language learning and teaching. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Léon, P., & Martin, P. (1972). Applied linguistics and the teaching of intonation. The Modern Language Journal, 56(3), 139–144.
Levis, J. (2005). Changing contexts and shifting paradigms in pronunciation teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 39(3), 369–377.
Levis, J. (2007). Computer technology in teaching and researching pronunciation. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 271, 184–202.
Levis, J., & Pickering, L. (2004). Teaching intonation in discourse using speech visualization technology. System, 321, 505–524.
Lisker, L., & Abramson, A. S. (1964). A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops: Acoustical measurements. Word, 20(3), 384–422.
Lord, G. (2005). (How) can we teach foreign language pronunciation? On the effects of a Spanish phonetics course. Hispania, 88(3), 557–567.
McBride, K. (2015). Which features of Spanish learner’s pronunciation most impact listener evaluations?Hispania 98(1), 14–30. [URL]
Moholt, G. (1988). Computer assisted instruction in pronunciation for Chinese speakers of American English. TESOL Quarterly 22(1), 91–111.
Motohashi-Saigo, M., & Hardison, D. (2009). Acquisition of L2 Japanese geminates training with waveform displays. Language Learning & Technology, 13(2), 29–47. [URL]
Munro, M. J. (2016). Pronunciation learning and teaching: What can phonetics research tell us. In the Proceedings of the International Symposium on Applied Phonetics (p. 26–29).
Munro, M.J., & Derwing, T. (1995). Foreign accent, comprehensibility and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners. Language Learning, 451, 73–97.
Norris, J. M. & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning 50(3), 417–528.
Okuno, T. (2013). Acquisition of L2 vowel duration in Japanese by native English speakers. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.
Offerman, H. M. (2020). (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Effects of pronunciation instruction on L2 learner production and perception in Spanish: A comparative analysis. Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
Offerman, H. M., & Olson, D. J. (2016). Visual feedback and second language segmental production: The generalizability of pronunciation gains. System, 591, 45–60.
Olson, D. J. (2014a). Phonetics and technology in the classroom: A practical approach to using speech analysis software in second-language pronunciation instruction. Hispania, 97(1), 47–68. [URL].
Olson, D. J. (2014b). Benefits of visual feedback on segmental production in the L2 classroom. Language Learning and Technology, 18(3), 173–192. [URL]
Olson, D. J. (2019). Feature acquisition in second language phonetic development: Evidence from phonetic training. Language Learning, 69(2), 366–404.
Olson, D. J. (Under review). Considering the scope of phonetic features in second language acquisition.
Plonsky, L., & Brown, D. (2015). Domain definition and search techniques in meta-analyses of L2 research (Or why 18 meta-analyses of feedback have different results). Second Language Research, 31(2), 267–278.
Plonsky, L. & Oswald, F. (2014). How big is “big” Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Language Learning, 64(4), 878–912.
R Core Team (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. [URL]
Revelle, W. (2018). psych: Procedures for Personality and Psychological Research. R package version 1.8.4. [URL]
Ruellot, V. (2011). Computer-assisted pronunciation learning of French /u/ and /y/ at the intermediate level. In J. Levis & K. LeVelle (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching Conference (pp. 199–213). Ames, IA: Iowa State University.
Saito, K. (2007). The influence of explicit phonetic instruction on pronunciation teaching in EFL settings: The case of English vowels and Japanese learners of English. The Linguistics Journal, 3(3), 16–40.
Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129–159.
Schmidt, R. (1995). Consciousness and foreign language learning: A tutorial on the role of attention and awareness in learning. In R. W. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (pp. 1–63). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.
Spaai, G. W., & Hermes, D. J. (1993). A visual display for the teaching of intonation. Calico Journal 10(3), 19–30. [URL]
Sturm, J., Miyamoto, M., & Suzuki, N. (2019). Pronunciation in the L2 French classroom: Student and teacher attitudes. The French Review, 92(3), 60–78.
Thomson, R. I., & Derwing, T. M. (2015). The effectiveness of L2 pronunciation instruction: A narrative review. Applied Linguistics, 36(3), 326–344.
Tyler, M. (2019). PAM-L2 and phonological category acquisition in the foreign language classroom. In A. M. Nyvad, M. Hejná, A. Højen, A. B. Jespersen, & M. Hjortshøj Sørensen (Eds.) A sound approach to language matters – In honor of Ocke-Schwen Bohn (pp. 607–630). Department of English, School of Communication & Culture, Aarhus University.
Cited by (13)
Cited by 13 other publications
Dmitrieva, Olga
2024. The Phonetics and Phonology of Adult L2 Learners in the Classroom. In The Cambridge Handbook of Bilingual Phonetics and Phonology, ► pp. 521 ff.
Levis, John M. & Charlie Nagle
2024. Bridging the Gap between Bilingual Phonetic Research and Pronunciation Teaching. In The Cambridge Handbook of Bilingual Phonetics and Phonology, ► pp. 791 ff.
2024. The Impact of Visual Corrective Feedback on Pronunciation Accuracy in L2 Sound Production. In Exploring Contemporary English Language Education Practices [Advances in Educational Technologies and Instructional Design, ], ► pp. 158 ff.
Nagle, Charlie & Phil Hiver
2024. Optimizing second language pronunciation instruction: Replications of Martin and Sippel (2021), Olson and Offerman (2021), and Thomson (2012). Language Teaching 57:3 ► pp. 419 ff.
Nagle, Charlie L., Amanda Huensch & Germán Zárate–Sández
2023. Exploring phonetic predictors of intelligibility, comprehensibility, and foreign accent in L2 Spanish speech. The Modern Language Journal 107:1 ► pp. 202 ff.
2022. The Laboratory, the Classroom, and Online. In Second Language Pronunciation, ► pp. 254 ff.
Bogach, Natalia, Elena Boitsova, Sergey Chernonog, Anton Lamtev, Maria Lesnichaya, Iurii Lezhenin, Andrey Novopashenny, Roman Svechnikov, Daria Tsikach, Konstantin Vasiliev, Evgeny Pyshkin & John Blake
2021. Speech Processing for Language Learning: A Practical Approach to Computer-Assisted Pronunciation Teaching. Electronics 10:3 ► pp. 235 ff.
O’Brien, Mary Grantham
2021. Ease and Difficulty in L2 Pronunciation Teaching: A Mini-Review. Frontiers in Communication 5
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.