Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Second Language Pronunciation
Vol. 7:3 (2021) ► pp.343–369

The interplay of proficiency and study abroad experience on the prosody of L2 speech acts

ORCID logo | Northern Arizona University
 | California State Polytechnic University, Pomona
 | Northern Arizona University
Adopting Brazil’s (1997) prosodic framework, this study examined whether proficiency and study abroad experience impact second language (L2) English learners’ spoken production of speech acts. Twenty-four native English speakers and 64 Japanese learners of L2 English participated in the study. The L2 learner group was divided into three sub-groups: (1) high proficiency learners with study abroad (SA) experience (2) low proficiency learners with no SA experience, and (3) high proficiency learners without SA experience. Participants completed an oral discourse completion task that assessed their ability to produce two speech acts (requests and opinions) in high- and low-imposition situations. Prosodic features including intonation, pitch range, and sentence prominence were analyzed via PRAAT. The findings revealed a complex interplay between proficiency and SA experience on pragma-prosodic production. Implications suggest that SA may have the added benefit of providing the backdrop for authentic contextual functions of prosody in high- and low- imposition situations.
Keywords: pragmatics, prosody, speech acts, study abroad
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Literature review
    • Effects of proficiency and study abroad on pragmatic competence
    • Prosody and pragmatics
    • Prosody and pragmatics in L2 speech production
    • The present study
  • Methods
    • Participants and research site
    • Instrument: Spoken discourse completion task
    • Data collection
    • Data analyses
      • Prosodic analyses
      • Statistical analyses
  • Results
    • Analysis of intonation patterns by situation type
    • Analysis of pitch patterns by situation type
    • Analysis of prominence by situation type
  • Discussion
  • Implications and future directions
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 27 July 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.20024.kan
References (53)
References
Aijmer, K. (1996). Apologies. In K. Aijmer (Ed.), Conversational routines in English: Convention and creativity (pp. 80–123). London, UK: Longman.Google Scholar
Barth-Weingarten, D., Reber, E., & Selting, M. (Eds.). (2010). Prosody in interaction (Vol. 231). John Benjamins Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2016). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 6.0.11) [Software]. Available from [URL]
Brazil, D. (1997). The communicative value of intonation in English. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bryant, G. A., & Fox Tree, J. E. (2005). Is there an ironic tone of voice? Language and Speech, 48(3), 257–277. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cauldwell, R. (2013). Phonology for listening: Teaching the stream of speech. Birmingham, UK: Speech in Action.Google Scholar
Cheng, W., Greaves, C., & Warren, M. (2008). A corpus-driven study of discourse intonation: The Hong Kong corpus of spoken English (prosodic) (Vol. 321). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cheng, W., & Warren, M. (2005). Can I help you? The use of rise and rise-fall tones in the Hong Kong Corpus of Spoken English. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 10(1), 85–107. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, E. (1993). English speech rhythm: Form and function in everyday verbal interaction (Vol. 251). John Benjamins Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009). Prosody. In S. D’hondt, J. Östman, J., & J. Verschueren, J. (Eds.), The pragmatics of interaction (Handbook of Pragmatics Highlights, vol. 4) (pp. 174–189). Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011). Pragmatics and prosody: Prosody as social action. In W. Bublitz & N. Norrick (Eds.), Foundations of Pragmatics (pp. 491–510). De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, E. & Selting, M. (1996). Prosody in conversation: Interactional studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, E., & Ford, C. E. (Eds.). (2004). Sound patterns in interaction: Cross-linguistic studies from conversation (Vol. 621). John Benjamins Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication Ltd.Google Scholar
Hewings, M. (1995). Tone choice in the English intonation of nonnative speakers. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 33(3), 251–266.Google Scholar
Hahn, L. D. (2004). Primary stress and intelligibility: Research to motivate the teaching of suprasegmentals. TESOL Quarterly 381, 201–223. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kang, O. (2010). Relative salience of suprasegmental features on judgments of L2 comprehensibility and accentedness. System, 38(2), 301–315. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kang, O., & Johnson, D. (2018). Contribution of suprasegmental to English speaking proficiency: Human rater and automated scoring system. Language Assessment Quarterly, 15(2), 150–168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kang, O. & Kermad, A. (2019). Prosody in L2 pragmatics. In N. Taguchi (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of SLA and pragmatics (pp. 78–92). England: Routledge – Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Kang, O., Rubin, D., Pickering, L. (2010). Suprasegmental measures of accentedness and judgments of English language learner proficiency in oral English. Modern Language Journal, 94(4), 554–566. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kang, O., Thomson, R., & Moran, M. (2018). Empirical approaches to measuring intelligibility of different varieties of English, Language Learning, 68(1), 115–146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kermad, A. (2021). “From the Sound, it Look Like He Said it from the Deep in his Heart”: How do English Learners Make Judgments of Pragma-Prosodic Meaning? Teaching English as a Second Language Electronic Journal (TESL-EJ), 25(1). [URL]
Knowles, G. (2016). Patterns of spoken English: An introduction to English phonetics. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ladd, D. R. (1996). Intonation prosody. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Matsumura, S. (2003). Modelling the relationships among interlanguage pragmatic development, L2 proficiency, and exposure to L2. Applied Linguistics, 241, 465–491. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perez-Vidal, C. & Shively, R. (2019). L2 pragmatic development in study abroad settings. In N. Taguchi (Ed.), Routledge handbook of SLA and pragmatics (pp. 355–371). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pickering, L. (2001). The role of tone choice in improving ITA communication in the classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 35(2), 233–255. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018). Discourse Intonation: A discourse-pragmatic approach to teaching the pronunciation of English. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pickering, L., Hu, G., & Baker, A. (2012). The pragmatic function of intonation: Cueing agreement and disagreement in spoken English discourse and implications for ELT. In J. Romero-Trillo (Ed.), Pragmatics, prosody and English language teaching (pp. 199–218). New York, NY: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roever, C. (2005). Testing ESL Pragmatics. Frankfurt: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Romero-Trillo, J. (2012). Pragmatics and prosody in English language teaching. New York: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Selting, M. (1992). Prosody in conversational questions. Journal of Pragmatics, 17(4), 315–345. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shively, R., Menke, M., & Manzón-Omundson, S. (2008). Perception of irony by L2 learners of Spanish. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 16(2). 101–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Szczepek Reed, B. (2007). Prosodic orientation in English conversation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010). Speech rhythm across turn transitions in cross-cultural talk-in-interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(4), 1037–1059. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011). Analysing conversation: An introduction to prosody. Macmillan International Higher Education. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012a). A conversation analytic perspective on teaching English pronunciation: The case of speech rhythm. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 22(1), 67–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012b). Prosody in conversation: Implications for teaching English pronunciation. In J. Romero-Trillo (Ed.), Pragmatics, prosody and English language teaching (pp. 147–168). New York, NY: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Staples, S. (2015). The discourse of nurse-patient interactions: Contrasting the communicative styles of US and international nurses. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taguchi, N. (2011a). The effect of L2 proficiency and study-abroad experience in pragmatic comprehension. Language Learning, 611, 904–939. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011b). Do proficiency and study-abroad experience affect speech act Production?: Analysis of appropriateness, accuracy, and fluency. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 491, 265–293. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013). Production of routines in L2 English: Effect of proficiency and study-abroad experience. System, 411, 109–121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017). Contexts and pragmatics learning: Findings and implications of study abroad research. Language Teaching, 511, 124–137. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taguchi, N., Gomez-Laich, P. M., & Arrufat-Marqués, M. J. (2016). Comprehension of indirect meaning in Spanish as a foreign language. Foreign Language Annals, 491, 677–698. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taguchi, N., & Roever, C. (2017). Second language pragmatics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ward, N. (2019). Prosodic patterns in English conversation. London, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wennerstrom, A. (1994). Intonational meaning in English discourse: A study of nonnative speakers. Applied Linguistics, 15(4), 399–421. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1997). Discourse intonation in Second Language Acquisition: Three genre-based studies (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Washington, Seattle: WA.Google Scholar
(2001). The music of everyday speech: Prosody and discourse analysis. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wichmann, A. (2005). Please-from courtesy to appeal: the role of intonation in the expression of attitudinal meaning. English Language and Linguistics, 9(2), 229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Xiao, F. (2015). Proficiency, learning context and pragmatic development. Unpublished dissertation. Carnegie Mellon University. Pittsburgh, U.S.A.Google Scholar
Xu, W., Case, R. E., & Wang, Y. (2009). Pragmatic and grammatical competence, length of residence, and overall L2 proficiency. System, 371, 205–216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Kostromitina, Maria
2024. An exploratory study of intonational variation in L1 and L2 English speakers’ pragmatic production of high imposition requests and refusals. Applied Pragmatics 6:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Kostromitina, Maria & Alyssa Kermad
2023. Prosody and Pragmatics in Applied Linguistics. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Nightingale, Richard & Eva Alcón-Soler
2023. Chapter 11. Investigating pragmatic development in study abroad contexts. In Methods in Study Abroad Research [Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 4], ► pp. 265 ff. DOI logo
Taguchi, Naoko
2023. Collecting and AnalyzingL2Pragmatics Data. In Current Approaches in Second Language Acquisition Research, ► pp. 195 ff. DOI logo
Taguchi, Naoko, Kevin Hirschi & Okim Kang
2022. LONGITUDINAL L2 DEVELOPMENT IN THE PROSODIC MARKING OF PRAGMATIC MEANING. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 44:3 ► pp. 843 ff. DOI logo
Taguchi, Naoko & Soo Jung Youn
2022. Chapter 7. Pragmatics. In Instructed Second Language Acquisition Research Methods [Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 3], ► pp. 149 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.