Adopting Brazil’s (1997) prosodic framework, this study examined whether proficiency and study abroad experience impact second language (L2) English learners’ spoken production of speech acts. Twenty-four native English speakers and 64 Japanese learners of L2 English participated in the study. The L2 learner group was divided into three sub-groups: (1) high proficiency learners with study abroad (SA) experience (2) low proficiency learners with no SA experience, and (3) high proficiency learners without SA experience. Participants completed an oral discourse completion task that assessed their ability to produce two speech acts (requests and opinions) in high- and low-imposition situations. Prosodic features including intonation, pitch range, and sentence prominence were analyzed via PRAAT. The findings revealed a complex interplay between proficiency and SA experience on pragma-prosodic production. Implications suggest that SA may have the added benefit of providing the backdrop for authentic contextual functions of prosody in high- and low- imposition situations.
Couper-Kuhlen, E. (2009). Prosody. In S. D’hondt, J. Östman, J., & J. Verschueren, J. (Eds.), The pragmatics of interaction (Handbook of Pragmatics Highlights, vol. 4) (pp. 174–189). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Couper-Kuhlen, E. (2011). Pragmatics and prosody: Prosody as social action. In W. Bublitz & N. Norrick (Eds.), Foundations of Pragmatics (pp. 491–510). De Gruyter Mouton.
Couper-Kuhlen, E. & Selting, M. (1996). Prosody in conversation: Interactional studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication Ltd.
Hewings, M. (1995). Tone choice in the English intonation of nonnative speakers. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 33(3), 251–266.
Hahn, L. D. (2004). Primary stress and intelligibility: Research to motivate the teaching of suprasegmentals. TESOL Quarterly 381, 201–223.
Kang, O. (2010). Relative salience of suprasegmental features on judgments of L2 comprehensibility and accentedness. System, 38(2), 301–315.
Kang, O., & Johnson, D. (2018). Contribution of suprasegmental to English speaking proficiency: Human rater and automated scoring system. Language Assessment Quarterly, 15(2), 150–168.
Kang, O. & Kermad, A. (2019). Prosody in L2 pragmatics. In N. Taguchi (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of SLA and pragmatics (pp. 78–92). England: Routledge – Taylor & Francis.
Kang, O., Rubin, D., Pickering, L. (2010). Suprasegmental measures of accentedness and judgments of English language learner proficiency in oral English. Modern Language Journal, 94(4), 554–566.
Kang, O., Thomson, R., & Moran, M. (2018). Empirical approaches to measuring intelligibility of different varieties of English, Language Learning, 68(1), 115–146.
Kermad, A. (2021). “From the Sound, it Look Like He Said it from the Deep in his Heart”: How do English Learners Make Judgments of Pragma-Prosodic Meaning?Teaching English as a Second Language Electronic Journal (TESL-EJ), 25(1). [URL]
Knowles, G. (2016). Patterns of spoken English: An introduction to English phonetics. New York, NY: Routledge.
Ladd, D. R. (1996). Intonation prosody. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Matsumura, S. (2003). Modelling the relationships among interlanguage pragmatic development, L2 proficiency, and exposure to L2. Applied Linguistics, 241, 465–491.
Perez-Vidal, C. & Shively, R. (2019). L2 pragmatic development in study abroad settings. In N. Taguchi (Ed.), Routledge handbook of SLA and pragmatics (pp. 355–371). New York: Routledge.
Pickering, L. (2001). The role of tone choice in improving ITA communication in the classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 35(2), 233–255.
Pickering, L. (2018). Discourse Intonation: A discourse-pragmatic approach to teaching the pronunciation of English. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
Pickering, L., Hu, G., & Baker, A. (2012). The pragmatic function of intonation: Cueing agreement and disagreement in spoken English discourse and implications for ELT. In J. Romero-Trillo (Ed.), Pragmatics, prosody and English language teaching (pp. 199–218). New York, NY: Springer.
Roever, C. (2005). Testing ESL Pragmatics. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Romero-Trillo, J. (2012). Pragmatics and prosody in English language teaching. New York: Springer.
Selting, M. (1992). Prosody in conversational questions. Journal of Pragmatics, 17(4), 315–345.
Shively, R., Menke, M., & Manzón-Omundson, S. (2008). Perception of irony by L2 learners of Spanish. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 16(2). 101–132.
Szczepek Reed, B. (2007). Prosodic orientation in English conversation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Szczepek Reed, B. (2010). Speech rhythm across turn transitions in cross-cultural talk-in-interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(4), 1037–1059.
Szczepek Reed, B. (2011). Analysing conversation: An introduction to prosody. Macmillan International Higher Education.
Szczepek Reed, B. (2012a). A conversation analytic perspective on teaching English pronunciation: The case of speech rhythm. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 22(1), 67–87.
Szczepek Reed, B. (2012b). Prosody in conversation: Implications for teaching English pronunciation. In J. Romero-Trillo (Ed.), Pragmatics, prosody and English language teaching (pp. 147–168). New York, NY: Springer.
Taguchi, N. (2011a). The effect of L2 proficiency and study-abroad experience in pragmatic comprehension. Language Learning, 611, 904–939.
Taguchi, N. (2011b). Do proficiency and study-abroad experience affect speech act Production?: Analysis of appropriateness, accuracy, and fluency. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 491, 265–293.
Taguchi, N. (2013). Production of routines in L2 English: Effect of proficiency and study-abroad experience. System, 411, 109–121.
Taguchi, N. (2017). Contexts and pragmatics learning: Findings and implications of study abroad research. Language Teaching, 511, 124–137.
Taguchi, N., Gomez-Laich, P. M., & Arrufat-Marqués, M. J. (2016). Comprehension of indirect meaning in Spanish as a foreign language. Foreign Language Annals, 491, 677–698.
Taguchi, N., & Roever, C. (2017). Second language pragmatics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ward, N. (2019). Prosodic patterns in English conversation. London, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Wennerstrom, A. (1994). Intonational meaning in English discourse: A study of nonnative speakers. Applied Linguistics, 15(4), 399–421.
Wennerstrom, A. (1997). Discourse intonation in Second Language Acquisition: Three genre-based studies (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Washington, Seattle: WA.
Wennerstrom, A. (2001). The music of everyday speech: Prosody and discourse analysis. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Wichmann, A. (2005). Please-from courtesy to appeal: the role of intonation in the expression of attitudinal meaning. English Language and Linguistics, 9(2), 229.
Xiao, F. (2015). Proficiency, learning context and pragmatic development. Unpublished dissertation. Carnegie Mellon University. Pittsburgh, U.S.A.
Xu, W., Case, R. E., & Wang, Y. (2009). Pragmatic and grammatical competence, length of residence, and overall L2 proficiency. System, 371, 205–216.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.