Article published In:
Journal of Second Language PronunciationVol. 3:1 (2017) ► pp.9–33
Utilizing electropalatography to train palatalized versus unpalatalized consonant productions by native speakers of American English learning Russian
Previous research has shown that English-speaking learners of Russian, even those with advanced proficiency, often have not acquired the contrast between palatalized and unpalatalized consonants, which is a central feature of the Russian consonant system. The present study examined whether training utilizing electropalatography (EPG) could help a group of Russian learners achieve more native-like productions of this contrast. Although not all subjects showed significant improvements, on average, the Russian learners showed an increase from pre- to post-training in the second formant frequency of vowels preceding palatalized consonants, thus enhancing their contrast between palatalized and unpalatalized consonants. To determine whether these acoustic differences were associated with increased identification accuracy, three native Russian speakers listened to all pre- and post-training productions. A modest increase in identification accuracy was observed. These results suggest that even short-term EPG training can be an effective intervention with adult L2 learners.
Keywords: Russian, electropalatography, palatalization, training study, consonants
This article is currently available as a sample article.
References (40)
Adams, S. G., & Page, A. D. (2000). Effects of selected practice and feedback variables on speech motor learning. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 81, 215–220.
Antonova, D. N. (1988). Fonetika i intonacija. Moscow: Russkij jazyk.
Avanesov, R. I. (1972). Russkoe literaturnoe proiznošenie. Moscow: Prosveščenie.
Babel, M., & Johnson, K. (2007). Cross-linguistic differences in the perception of palatalization. Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of the Phonetic Sciences.
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2012). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [Computer program, version 5.3.23]. Retrieved from: <[URL]>
Bolanos, L. (2013). Perception and production in non-native speech: Russian palatalization. Proceedings of
Meetings on Acoustics. Acoustical Society of America
, 191, 1–7.
Bryzgunova, E. A. (1963). Praktičeskaja fonetika i intonacija russkogo jazyka. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo moskovskogo universiteta.
Cleland, J., Timmins, C., Wood, S. E., Hardcastle, W. J., & Wishart, J. G. (2009). Electropalatographic therapy for children and young people with Down’s syndrome. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 231, 926–939. 
Demenko, G., Wagner, A., & Cylwik, N. (2010). The use of speech technology in foreign language pronunciation training. Archives of Acoustics, 351, 309–329.
Diehm, E. E. (1998). Gestures and linguistic function in learning Russian: Production and perception studies of Russian palatalized consonants. Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University. Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. (Accession Order No. 98339681).
Engwall, O. (2012). Analysis of and feedback on phonetic features in pronunciation training with a virtual teacher. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 251, 37–64.
Fant, G. (1970). Acoustic theory of speech production. The Hague: Mouton De Gruyter.
Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C. (2003). DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 351, 116–124.
Fujiwara, Y. (2007). Electropalatography home training using a portable training unit for Japanese children with cleft palate. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 91, 65–72.
Gibbon, F. (1990). Lingual activity in two speech-disordered children’s attempts to produce velar and alveolar stop consonants: Evidence from electropalatographic (EPG) data. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 251, 329–340.
Gibbon, F. E., & Wood, S. E. (2003). Using electropalatography (EPG) to diagnose and treat articulation disorders associated with mild cerebral palsy: a case study. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 171, 365–374.
Gibbon, F. E., Hardcastle, W. J., & Suzuki, H. (1991). An electropalatographic study of the /r/, /1/ distinction for Japanese learners of English. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 41, 153–171.
Gierut, J. A., & Dinnsen, D. A. (1986). On word-initial voicing: Converging sources of evidence in phonologically disordered speech. Language and Speech, 291, 97–114.
Hacking, J. (2011). The production of palatalized and unpalatalized consonants in Russian by American learners. In Magdalena Wrembel, Małgorzata Kul, & Katarzyna Dziubalska- Kołaczyk (Eds.), Achievements and perspectives in the acquisition of second language speech: New Sounds (pp. 93–101). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Hacking, J., Smith, B., Nissen, S., & Allen, H. (2016). Russian palatalized and unpalatalized coda consonants: An electropalatographic and acoustic analysis of native speaker and L2 learner productions. Journal of Phonetics, 541, 98–108.
Hardison, D. M. (2004). Generalization of computer-assisted prosody training: Quantitative and qualitative findings. Language Learning & Technology, 8(1), 34–52.
Hardy, J. E. (1993). Phonological learning and retention in second language acquisition. In F. R. Eckman (Ed.), Confluence: Linguistics, L2 acquisition and speech pathology (pp. 235–248). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kartushina, N., Hervais-Adelman, A., Frauenfelder, U. H., & Golestani, N. (2015). The effect of phonetic production training with visual feedback on the perception and production of foreign speech sounds. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1381, 817–832.
Kavitskaya, D. (2006). Perceptual salience and palatalization in Russian. Laboratory phonology 81, 589–610.
Kavitskaya, D., Iskarous, K., Noiray, A., & Proctor, M. (2009). Trills and palatalization: Consequences for sound change. Proceedings of the Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics, 171, 97–110.
Kochetov, A. (2006). Testing licensing by cue. Phonetica, 631, 113–148.
Lohmander, A., Henriksson, C., & Havstam, C. (2010). Electropalatography in home training of retracted articulation in a Swedish child with cleft palate: Effect on articulation pattern and speech. International journal of speech-language pathology, 121, 483–496.
Maas, E., Robin, D. A., Hula, S. N. A., Freedman, S. E., Wulf, G., Ballard, K. J., & Schmidt, R. A. (2008). Principles of motor learning in treatment of motor speech disorders. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 171, 277–298.
Machovikov, A., Stolyarov, K., Chernov, M., Sinclair, I., & Machovikova, I. (2002). Computer-based training system for Russian word pronunciation. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 151, 201–214.
Massaro, D. W., Liu, Y., Chen, T. H., & Perfetti, C. (2006). A multilingual embodied conversational agent for tutoring speech and language learning. Proceedings of
Interspeech
20061 (pp. 825–828).
McAuliffe, M. J., & Cornwell, P. L. (2008). Intervention for lateral/s/using electropalatography (EPG) biofeedback and an intensive motor learning approach: a case report. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 431, 219–229.
Nordberg, A., Carlsson, G., & Lohmander, A. (2011). Electropalatography in the description and treatment of speech disorders in five children with cerebral palsy. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 251, 831–852.
Ordin, M. (2010). Palatalization and temporal organization of CVC clusters in Russian. Russian Linguistics, 341, 57–65.
Patten, I., & Edmonds, L. A. (2015). Effect of training Japanese L1 speakers in the production of American English /r/ using spectrographic visual feedback. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 281, 241–259.
Purcell, E.T. (1979). Formant frequency patterns in Russian VCV utterances. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 661, 1691–1702.
Ruellot, V. (2011). Computer-assisted pronunciation learning of French /u/ and /y/ at the intermediate level. In Proceedings of the
2nd Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching Conference
(pp. 199–213).
Schmidt, A. M. (2012). Effects of EPG treatment for English consonant contrasts on L2 perception and production. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 261, 909–925.
Schmidt, A. M., & Beamer, J. (1998). Electropalatography treatment for training Thai speakers of English. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 121, 389–403.
Smith, B. L., Hillenbrand, J., & Ingrisano, D. (1986). A comparison of temporal measures of speech using spectrograms and digital oscillograms. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 291, 270–274.
Timm, L. A. (1977). A child’s acquisition of Russian phonology. Journal of Child Language, 41, 329–339.
Cited by (8)
Cited by eight other publications
Fouz-González, Jonás
2024. Chapter 13. Using technology to facilitate the integration of pronunciation into the classroom. In La integración de la pronunciación en el aula de ELE [IVITRA Research in Linguistics and Literature, 42], ► pp. 207 ff. 
Nissen, Shawn L., Rachel Kemmey & K. James Hartshorn
2024. Perceptual ratings of pronunciation for L2 learners of English as a function of task type, word position, and listener expertise. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 34:2 ► pp. 550 ff.
Steele, Jeffrey
2024. Acquisition of Segmental Phonology in Adult Bilingualism. In The Cambridge Handbook of Bilingual Phonetics and Phonology, ► pp. 448 ff.
Levis, John
2021. L2 pronunciation research and teaching. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation 7:2 ► pp. 141 ff.
Roon, Kevin D., Jaekoo Kang & D.H. Whalen
2020. Effects of Ultrasound Familiarization on Production and Perception of Nonnative Contrasts. Phonetica 77:5 ► pp. 350 ff.
Levis, John M.
Levis, John M.
2018. Technology and second language pronunciation. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation 4:2 ► pp. 173 ff.
Levis, John M.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.