Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Second Language Pronunciation
Vol. 3:2 (2017) ► pp.218–241

Individual developmental trajectories in the L2 acquisition of Spanish spirantization

| Iowa State University |
In Spanish, voiced stops weaken to approximants and display variables degrees of lenition according to the context in which the stop occurs, making them a complex pronunciation feature. Accumulated findings from cross-sectional research on second language (L2) speakers suggests that many L2 learners struggle to produce the approximants even at the most advanced levels of study. The present study offers a new perspective on the approximants by studying individual learners’ production of Spanish [β] over time and across phonetic contexts. Twenty-six English-speaking learners of L2 Spanish recorded two speaking tasks five times over a yearlong period corresponding to their second and third semesters of college-level language instruction. Mixed-effects models were fit to learners’ C:V intensity ratio data to examine development, and stress and task type were included as substantive predictors. Although the group trajectory was flat, many learners displayed substantial change over time, including positive and negative trajectories.
Keywords: Spanish, approximants, growth curve modeling, longitudinal research, individual trajectories
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Production of medial stops in native English and Spanish
    • 1.2Second language acquisition of Spanish approximants
    • 1.3The present study
  • 2.Method
    • 2.1Participants
    • 2.2Spanish target items
    • 2.3Tasks and procedure
    • 2.4Coding
    • 2.5Summary of growth curve modeling
  • 3.Results
    • 3.1L2 Spanish speakers
    • 3.2Native Spanish speakers
  • 4.Discussion
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 4 December 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.3.2.03nag
References (38)
References
Alvord, S. M., & Christiansen, D. E. (2012). Factors influencing the acquisition of Spanish voiced stop spirantization during an extended stay abroad. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 5(2), 239–276. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barlow, J. A. (2003). The stop-spirant alternation in Spanish: Converging evidence for a fortition account. Southwest Journal of Linguistics, 22(1), 51–86.Google Scholar
Bates, D., Maechler, M. Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2014). _lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4_. R package version 1.1.-7. Retrieved from 〈[URL]〉Google Scholar
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2012). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 5.3.38). Retrieved from 〈[URL]〉
Bouavichith, D., & Davidson, L. (2013). Segmental and prosodic effects on intervocalic voiced stop reduction in connected speech. Phonetica, 70(3), 182–206. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chang, C. (2010). The implementation of laryngeal contrast in Korean as a second language. Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics, 131, 91–104.Google Scholar
Cole, J., Hualde, J. I., & Iskarous, K. (1999). Effects of prosodic and segmental context on /g/ deletion in Spanish. In O. Fujimura, B. D. Joseph, & B. Palek (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth Linguistics and Phonetics Conference (pp. 575–589). Prague: The Karolinum Press.Google Scholar
Colantoni, L., & Marinescu, I. (2010). The scope of stop weakening in Argentine Spanish. In M. Ortega-Llebaria (Ed.), Selected Proceedings of the Fourth Conference on Laboratory Approaches to Spanish Phonology (pp. 100–114). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project. Retrieved from 〈[URL]〉Google Scholar
Cunnings, I., & Finlayson, I. (2015). Mixed effects modeling and longitudinal data analysis. In L. Plonsky (Ed.), Advancing quantitative methods in second language research (pp. 159–181). New York, NY: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Curran, P. J., Obeidat, K., & Losardo, D. (2010). Twelve frequently asked questions about growth curve modeling. Journal of Cognition and Development, 11(2), 121–136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Derwing, T. M. (2010). Utopian goals for pronunciation teaching. In J. Levis & K. LeVelle (Eds.), Proceedings of the First Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching Conference (pp. 24–37). Ames, IA: Iowa State University.Google Scholar
Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (2013). The development of L2 oral language skills in two L1 groups: A 7-year study. Language Learning, 63(2), 163–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Derwing, T. M., Munro, M. J., & Thomson, R. I. (2008). A longitudinal study of ESL learners’ fluency and comprehensibility development. Applied Linguistics, 29(3), 359–380. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Díaz-Campos, M. (2004). Context of learning in the acquisition of Spanish second language phonology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(2), 249–273. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006). The effect of style in second language phonology: An analysis of segmental acquisition in study abroad and regular-classroom students. In C. A. Klee & T. L. Face (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 7th Conference on the Acquisition of Spanish and Portuguese as First and Second Languages (pp. 26–39). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Eddington, D. (2011). What are the contextual phonetic variants of in colloquial Spanish? Probus, 23(1), 1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Face, T. L., & Menke, M. R. (2009). Acquisition of the Spanish voiced spirants by second language learners. In J. Collentine, M. García, B. Lafford, & F. Marcos Marín (Eds.), Selected Proceedings of the Eleventh Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp. 39–52). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project. Retrieved from 〈[URL]〉Google Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1991). Age of learning affects the authenticity of voice-onset time (VOT) in stop consonants produced in a second language. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89(1), 395–411. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Freed, B. F., Dewey, D. P., Segalowitz, N., & Halter, R. (2004). The language contact profile. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(02), 349–356. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holliday, J. (2015). A longitudinal study on the second language acquisition of a three-way stop contrast. Journal of Phonetics, 501, 1–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hualde, J. I., Simonet, M., & Nadeu, M. (2011). Consonant lenition and phonological recategorization. Laboratory Phonology, 2(2), 301–329. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lavoie, L. M. (2001). Consonant strength: Phonological patterns and phonetic manifestations. New York, NY: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Linck, J. A., & Cunnings, I. (2015). The utility and application of mixed-effects models in second language research. Language Learning, 65(S1), 185–207. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lord, G. (2010). The combined effects of immersion and instruction on second language pronunciation. Foreign Language Annals, 43(3), 488–503. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M. (2006). The functional load principle in ESL pronunciation instruction: An exploratory study. System, 34(4), 520–531. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008). Segmental acquisition in adult ESL learners: A longitudinal study of vowel production. Language Learning, 58(3), 479–502. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009). Putting accent in its place: Rethining obstacles to communication. Language Teaching, 42(4), 476–490. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Munro, M. J., Derwing, T. M., & Thomson, R. I. (2015). Setting segmental priorities for English learners: Evidence from a longitudinal study. IRAL, 53(1), 39–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Munro, M. J., Derwing, T. M., Thomson, R. I., & Elliot, D. (2013). Naturalistic L2 segment development: Implications for pedagogy. Paper presented at the Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching Conference, Ames, IA.Google Scholar
Murakami, A. (2016). Modeling systematicity and individuality in nonlinear second language development: The case of English grammatical morphemes. Language Learning. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nagle, C., Morales-Front, A., Moorman, C., & Sanz, C. (2016). Pronunciation development in the study abroad context: Methodological and programmatic considerations. In D. M. Velliaris (Ed.), Handbook of research on study abroad programs and outbound mobility (pp. 673–695). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ortega-Llebaria, M. (2004). Interplay between phonetic and inventory constraints in the degree of spirantization of voiced stops: Comparing intervocalic /b/ and intervocalic /g/ in Spanish and English. In T. L. Face (Ed.), Laboratory approaches to Spanish phonology (pp. 237–253). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
R Core Team. (2015). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. 〈[URL]〉
Rogers, B. M. A., & Alvord, S. M. (2014). The gradience of spirantization: Factors affecting L2 production of intervocalic Spanish [β δ γ]. Spanish in Context, 11(3), 402–424. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shea, C. E., & Curtin, S. (2011). Experience, representations and the production of second language allophones. Second Language Research, 27(2), 229–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shively, R. L. (2008). L2 acquisition of [β], [ð], and [ɣ] in Spanish: Impact of experience, linguistic environment and learner variables. Southwest Journal of Linguistics, 27(2), 79–114.Google Scholar
Singer, J. D., & Willet, J. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zampini, M. L. (1994). The role of native language transfer and task formality in the acquisition of Spanish spirantization. Hispania, 77(3), 470–481. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (15)

Cited by 15 other publications

Goodale, Brandon, Rajiv Rao & Erwin Lares
2024. The effects of a Spanish-language house on L2 phonology: A longitudinal study of Spanish /b d ɡ/. In Spanish as a second and third language [Romanistik, 42], ► pp. 91 ff. DOI logo
Colantoni, Laura, Alexei Kochetov & Jeffrey Steele
2023. Articulatory Insights into the L2 Acquisition of English-/l/ Allophony. Language and Speech DOI logo
Nagle, Charlie L., Amanda Huensch & Germán Zárate–Sández
2023. Exploring phonetic predictors of intelligibility, comprehensibility, and foreign accent in L2 Spanish speech. The Modern Language Journal 107:1 ► pp. 202 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Linxi, Alfonso Morales-Front & Cristina Sanz
2023. Dynamics in cross-linguistic influence. In L3 Development After the Initial State [Studies in Bilingualism, 65], ► pp. 121 ff. DOI logo
Gordon, Joshua
2022. Making the Teaching of Segmentals Purposeful. In Second Language Pronunciation, ► pp. 61 ff. DOI logo
Face, Timothy L.
2021. Chapter 7. What does advanced L2 pronunciation look like?. In Advancedness in Second Language Spanish [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 31], ► pp. 144 ff. DOI logo
Casillas, Joseph V.
2020. The Longitudinal Development of Fine‐Phonetic Detail: Stop Production in a Domestic Immersion Program. Language Learning 70:3 ► pp. 768 ff. DOI logo
Henriksen, Nicholas, Stephen Fafulas & Erin O'Rourke
2020. Chapter 6. Intervocalic phonemic stop realization in Amazonian Peru. In Spanish Phonetics and Phonology in Contact [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 28], ► pp. 141 ff. DOI logo
Levis, John
2020. Changes in L2 pronunciation. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation 6:3 ► pp. 277 ff. DOI logo
Levis, John M.
2018. Technology and second language pronunciation. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation 4:2 ► pp. 173 ff. DOI logo
Levis, John M.
2018. Plenary talk. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation 4:2 ► pp. 260 ff. DOI logo
Levis, John M.
2022. Foreword. Evolution of L2 pronunciation research and teaching. In The Evolution of Pronunciation Teaching and Research [Benjamins Current Topics, 121], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
NAGLE, CHARLES
2018. Motivation, Comprehensibility, and Accentedness in L2 Spanish: Investigating Motivation as a Time‐Varying Predictor of Pronunciation Development. The Modern Language Journal 102:1 ► pp. 199 ff. DOI logo
NAGLE, CHARLES, REBECCA SACHS & GERMÁN ZÁRATE–SÁNDEZ
2018. Exploring the Intersection Between Teachers’ Beliefs and Research Findings in Pronunciation Instruction. The Modern Language Journal 102:3 ► pp. 512 ff. DOI logo
Nagle, Charles L.
2018. Examining the Temporal Structure of the Perception–Production Link in Second Language Acquisition: A Longitudinal Study. Language Learning 68:1 ► pp. 234 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.