Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Second Language Studies
Vol. 3:1 (2020) ► pp.1–30

The role of verbal working memory in L2 sentence comprehension

Evidence from advanced German learners of English

| RWTH Aachen University
| University of Amsterdam
Considerable variability has been observed in sentence comprehension abilities in both native speakers and second language (L2) learner populations. While it has long been established that, in native speakers, this variability is closely linked to individual differences (IDs) in verbal working memory (vWM), previous research on the role of vWM in L2 sentence comprehension has produced mixed results. Moreover, there is an accumulating body of evidence demonstrating that the relationship between vWM and native language comprehension abilities is mediated by language experience. However, to our knowledge, until now, no attempt has been made to integrate language experience measures into the vWM-L2 sentence comprehension relationship. The goal of the present study is twofold: (1) to determine whether and to what extent vWM – as gauged by a reading span (RSPAN) task – correlates with IDs in two proxy estimates of L2 experience and (2) to investigate the effects of vWM on L2 comprehension of three different types of complex sentences. Thirty-four German advanced learners of English participated in this study. Significant positive correlations were found between the RSPAN scores and both proxy estimates of L2 experience. Mixed-effects modeling revealed that vWM exerted a significant effect on L2 sentence comprehension that was not modulated by sentence type. Taken together, these results provide additional evidence in support of the involvement of vWM in L2 sentence comprehension and, to our knowledge, first evidence for the contribution of L2 experience to RSPAN task performance.
Keywords: (verbal) working memory, language experience, individual differences, second language sentence comprehension, experience-based models
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Working memory capacity and native language (L1) sentence comprehension
    • 1.2Working memory in second language (L2) sentence comprehension
    • 1.3The present study
  • 2.Method
    • 2.1Participants
    • 2.2Materials and procedure
      • 2.2.1L2 sentence comprehension
      • 2.2.2L2 vocabulary task
      • 2.2.3Verbal working memory capacity
  • 3.Results
    • 3.1Goal 1: Correlational evidence for the contribution of L2 experience to working memory
    • 3.2Goal 2: Effects of verbal working memory (vWM) on L2 sentence processing ability
  • 4.Discussion
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 10 April 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.18022.ker
References (83)
References
Baddeley, A. (1986). Working memory. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
(2003). Working memory: looking back and looking forward. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4(10), 829–839. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007). Working memory, thought, and action. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caplan, D., & Waters, G. (2013). Memory mechanisms supporting syntactic comprehension. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20(2), 243–268. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caplan, D., & Waters, G. S. (1999). Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(1), 77–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chang, F., Dell, G. S., & Bock, K. (2006). Becoming syntactic. Psychological Review, 113(2), 234–272. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: The MIT press.Google Scholar
Coady, J. (1993). Research on ESL/EFL vocabulary acquisition: Putting it in context. Second Language Reading and Vocabulary Learning, 31, 3–23.Google Scholar
Conway, A. R., Kane, M. J., Bunting, M. F., Hambrick, D. Z., Wilhelm, O., & Engle, R. W. (2005). Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and users guide. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(5), 769–786. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dabrowska, E. (2008). Questions with long-distance dependencies: A usage-based perspective. Cognitive Linguistics, 19(3), 391–425. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dabrowska, E., Rowland, C., & Theakston, A. (2009). The acquisition of questions with long-distance dependencies. Cognitive Linguistics, 20(3), 571–597. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19(4), 450–466. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Daneman, M., & Merikle, P. M. (1996). Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3(4), 422–433. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dussias, P. E., & Pinar, P. (2010). Effects of reading span and plausibility in the reanalysis of wh-gaps by Chinese-English second language speakers. Second Language Research, 26(4), 443–472. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Engle, R. W., Tuholski, S. W., Laughlin, J. E., & Conway, A. R. (1999). Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: A latent-variable approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128(3), 309–331. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Farmer, T. A., Christiansen, M. H., & Monaghan, P. (2006). Phonological typicality influences on-line sentence comprehension. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103(32), 12203–12208. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Farmer, T. A., Fine, A. B., Misyak, J. B., & Christiansen, M. H. (2016). Reading span task performance, linguistic experience, and the processing of unexpected syntactic events. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70(3), 413–433. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Farmer, T. A., Misyak, J. B., & Christiansen, M. H. (2012). Individual differences in sentence processing. In M. Spivey, M. Joanisse, & K. McRae (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 353–364). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Felser, C., & Roberts, L. (2007). Processing wh-dependencies in a second language: A cross-modal priming study. Second Language Research, 23(1), 9–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Felser, C., Roberts, L., Marinis, T., & Gross, R. (2003). The processing of ambiguous sentences by first and second language learners of english. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24(3), 453–489. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frazier, L., & Fodor, J. D. (1978). The sausage machine: A new two-stage parsing model. Cognition, 6(4), 291–325. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Friedman, N. P., & Miyake, A. (2004). The reading span test and its predictive power for reading comprehension ability. Journal of Memory and Language, 51(1), 136–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2005). Comparison of four scoring methods for the reading span test. Behavior Research Methods, 37(4), 581–590. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gathercole, S. E., & Baddeley, A. D. (2014). Working memory and language. New York, NY: Psychology Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibson, E. (1998). Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition, 68(1), 1–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Havik, E., Roberts, L., Van Hout, R., Schreuder, R., & Haverkort, M. (2009). Processing subject-object ambiguities in the L2: A self-paced reading study with German L2 learners of Dutch. Language Learning, 59(1), 73–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopp, H. (2015). Individual differences in the second language processing of object–subject ambiguities. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36(2), 129–173. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iacobucci, D., Schneider, M. J., Popovich, D. L., & Bakamitsos, G. A. (2016). Mean centering helps alleviate “micro” but not “macro” multicollinearity. Behavior Research Methods, 48(4), 1308–1317. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, R. (2007). A parallel architecture perspective on language processing. Brain Research, 11461, 2–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackson, C. N., & Van Hell, J. G. (2011). The effects of L2 proficiency level on the processing of wh-questions among Dutch second language speakers of English. IRAL-International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 49(3), 195–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jaeger, T. F., & Tily, H. (2011). On language utility: Processing complexity and communicative efficiency. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 2(3), 323–335.Google Scholar
Juffs, A. (2004). Representation, processing and working memory in a second language. Transactions of the Philological Society, 102(2), 199–225. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2005). The influence of first language on the processing of wh-movement in English as a second language. Second Language Research, 21(2), 121–151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006). Processing reduced relative vs. main verb ambiguity in English as a second language: a replication study with working memory. In S. M. R. Slabakova & P. Prevost (Eds.), Inquiries in Linguistic Development in Honor of Lydia White (pp. 213–232). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Juffs, A., & Harrington, M. (1995). Parsing effects in second language sentence processing: Subject and object asymmetries in wh-extraction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17(4), 483–516. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1996). Garden path sentences and error data in second language sentence processing. Language Learning, 46(2), 283–323. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011). Aspects of working memory in L2 learning. Language Teaching, 44(2), 137–166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99(1), 122–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kane, M. J., Hambrick, D. Z., Tuholski, S. W., Wilhelm, O., Payne, T. W., & Engle, R. W. (2004). The generality of working memory capacity: a latent-variable approach to verbal and visuospatial memory span and reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(2), 189–217. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kidd, E. (2013). The role of verbal working memory in children’s sentence comprehension: A critical review. Topics in Language Disorders, 33(3), 208–223. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim, J. H., & Christianson, K. (2017). Working memory effects on L1 and L2 processing of ambiguous relative clauses by Korean L2 learners of English. Second Language Research, 33(3), 365–388. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuznetsova, A., Bruun Brockhoff, P., & Haubo Bojesen Christensen, R. (2017). lmerTest: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models [Computer software manual].Google Scholar
Lemhöfer, K., & Broersma, M. (2012). Introducing LexTALE: A quick and valid lexical test for advanced learners of english. Behavior Research Methods, 44(2), 325–343. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lewis, R. L., Vasishth, S., & Van Dyke, J. A. (2006). Computational principles of working memory in sentence comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(10), 447–454. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Linck, J. A., Hughes, M. M., Campbell, S. G., Silbert, N. H., Tare, M., Jackson, S. R., … Doughty, C. J. (2013). Hi-LAB: A new measure of aptitude for high-level language proficiency. Language Learning, 63(3), 530–566. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Linck, J. A., Osthus, P., Koeth, J. T., & Bunting, M. F. (2014). Working memory and second language comprehension and production: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(4), 861–883. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacDonald, M. C. (2015). The emergence of language comprehension. In B. MacWhinney & W. O’Grady (Eds.), The handbook of language emergence (pp. 81–92). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
MacDonald, M. C., & Christiansen, M. H. (2002). Reassessing working memory: comment on Just and Carpenter (1992) and Waters and Caplan (1996). Psychological Review, 109(1), 35–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (2012). The logic of the unified model. In Susan M. Gass & Alison Mackey (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 211–227). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mathot, S., Schreij, D., & Theeuwes, J. (2012). Opensesame: An open-source, graphical experiment builder for the social sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 44(2), 314–324. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McKeown, M. G., Beck, I. L., Omanson, R. C., & Perfetti, C. A. (1983). The effects of long-term vocabulary instruction on reading comprehension: A replication. Journal of Reading Behavior, 15(1), 3–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ministerium für Schule und Weiterbildung des Landes Nordrhein-Westphalen. (2014). Kernlehrplan für die Sekundarstufe ii Gymnasium in Nordrhein-Westphalen: Englisch. Retrieved from: <[URL]> (9 June, 2018).
Misyak, J. B., & Christiansen, M. H. (2012). Statistical learning and language: An individual differences study. Language Learning, 62(1), 302–331. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ouellette, G. P. (2006). What’s meaning got to do with it: The role of vocabulary in word reading and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(3), 554–566. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Payne, B. R., Gao, X., Noh, S. R., Anderson, C. J., & Stine-Morrow, E. A. L. (2012). The effects of print exposure on sentence processing and memory in older adults: Evidence for efficiency and reserve. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 19(1–2), 122–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perez-Vidal, C. (2014). Language acquisition in study abroad and formal instruction contexts (AILA Applied Linguistics Series 13). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perfetti, C. A., Wlotko, E. W., & Hart, L. A. (2005). Word learning and individual differences in word learning reflected in event-related potentials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(6), 1281–1292.Google Scholar
R Core Team. (2017). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing [Computer software manual]. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
Roberts, L. (2012). Individual differences in second language sentence processing. Language Learning, 62(s2), 172–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013). Sentence processing in bilinguals. In R. P. van Gompel (Ed.), Sentence processing (pp. 233–258). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, L., & Felser, C. (2011). Plausibility and recovery from garden paths in second language sentence processing. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32(2), 299–331. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robinson, P. (2001). Individual differences, cognitive abilities, aptitude complexes and learning conditions in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 17(4), 368–392. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2002). Individual differences and instructed language learning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rodrıguez, G. A. (2008). Second language sentence processing: Is it fundamentally different? (Unpublished PhD dissertation). University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.Google Scholar
Sharwood-Smith, M. (2017). Working with working memory and language. Second Language Research, 33(3), 291–297. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shipley, W. C. (1940). A self-administering scale for measuring intellectual impairment and deterioration. The Journal of Psychology, 9(2), 371–377. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P. (2002). Theorizing and updating aptitude. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 69–93). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1989). Exposure to print and orthographic processing. Reading Research Quarterly, 24(4), 402–433. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stone, J. M., & Towse, J. (2015). A working memory test battery: Java-based collection of seven working memory tasks. Journal of Open Research Software, 31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trueswell, J. C., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Garnsey, S. M. (1994). Semantic influences on parsing: Use of thematic role information in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language, 331, 285–318. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Turner, M. L., & Engle, R. W. (1989). Is working memory capacity task dependent? Journal of Memory and Language, 28(2), 127–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verhoeven, L., & Van Leeuwe, J. (2008). Prediction of the development of reading comprehension: A longitudinal study. Applied Cognitive Psychology: The Official Journal of the Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 22(3), 407–423. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Von Bastian, C. C., Locher, A., & Ruflin, M. (2013). Tatool: A java-based open-source programming framework for psychological studies. Behavior Research Methods, 45(1), 108–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Waters, G. S., & Caplan, D. (1996a). The capacity theory of sentence comprehension: critique of just and carpenter (1992). Psychological Review, 103(4), 761–772. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1996b). The Measurement of Verbal Working Memory Capacity and Its Relation to Reading Comprehension. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 49(1), 51–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2003). The reliability and stability of verbal working memory measures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35(4), 550–564. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wells, J. B., Christiansen, M. H., Race, D. S., Acheson, D. J., & MacDonald, M. C. (2009). Experience and sentence processing: Statistical learning and relative clause comprehension. Cognitive Psychology, 58(2), 250–271. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wen, Z. (2016). Working memory and second language learning: Towards an integrated approach. Bristol: Multilingual matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wen, Z., Mota, M. B., & McNeill, A. (2015). Working memory in second language acquisition and processing. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Williams, J. N. (2012). Working memory and SLA. In S. M. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Zhou, H., Rossi, S., & Chen, B. (2017). Effects of working memory capacity and tasks in processing L2 complex sentence: evidence from Chinese-English bilinguals. Frontiers in Psychology, 81, 595. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Chen, Lijuan, Yiyi Lu & Xiaodong Xu
2022. Understanding Temporal Relations in Mandarin Chinese: An ERP Investigation. Brain Sciences 12:4 ► pp. 474 ff. DOI logo
Mueller, Charles M. & Peter Richardson
2022. Talking about oneself. Journal of Second Language Studies 5:2 ► pp. 344 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.