Effective readers consciously or unconsciously use reading strategies to help them process information on what they read.
All readers can benefit from reading strategy instruction but, empirical research on which strategies are effective is lacking. Less is known
about reading strategy effectiveness in a second language (L2). This meta-analysis of 46 L2 reading strategy studies analysed ten reading
strategies, also in combination with a range of pedagogical approaches, and found an overall mean effect size of 0.91,
underscoring the benefits of multi strategy teaching. Effect sizes were calculated for each strategy, as well as the combination of strategy
with approach, instructor type, intervention duration and type of test used. Some strategies were more effective than others. Also,
differences in effect sizes are dependent on the approach used. Some pedagogical approaches are effective for some strategies but not with
all. We recommend further research in L2 reading strategy interventions and instruction.
References marked with an * are studies included in this meta-analysis.
*Abed, T. (2017). The Effects of Using the Summary Strategy on Improving Birzeit University EFL Students"s Reading Comprehension. Unprublished doctoral dissertation. Birzeit University, Palenstine. (2017).
Aghaie, R. & Zhang, L. J. (2012). Effects of explicit instruction in cognitive and metacognitive reading strategies on Iranian EFL students reading performance and strategy transfer. Instructional Science (2012) 401: 1063.
*Akkakoson, S. (2013). The relationship between strategic reading instruction, student learning of L2-based reading strategies and L2 reading achievement. Journal of Research in Reading, 36(4), 422–450.
Alderson, J. C. (2000). Assessing reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
*Alenizi, M. A. K., & Alanazi, M. S. (2016). The effectiveness of metacognitive teaching strategies to enhance elementary school pupils’ reading skills in the northern border areas of Saudi Arabia. International Journal of English Linguistics, 6(4), 213–226.
Ali, A. M., & Razali, A. B. (2019). A Review of Studies on Cognitive and Metacognitive Reading Strategies in Teaching Reading Comprehension for ESL/EFL Learners. English Language Teaching, 12(6), 94–111.
Allen, S. (2003). An analytic comparison of three models of reading strategy instruction. IRAL, 41(4), 319–338.
*Amirabadi, Y., & Biria, R. (2016). Cultivating critical thinking and problem solving in senior translation students reading comprehension through scaffolding and self-regulation. Journal of Global Research in Education and Social Science, 7(3), 75–93.
Anderson, N. J. (2004). Metacognitive reading strategy awareness of ESL and EFL learners. The CATESOL journal, 16(1), 11–27.
Anderson, R. C., Reynolds, R. E., Schallert, D. L., & Goetz, E. T. (1977). Frameworks for comprehending discourse. American Educational Research Journal, 14(4), 367–381.
*Bagheri, S., Sheikh, S., & Aghajanzadeh, M. (2016). The effect of using focused tasks through input flooding on reading comprehension skill of Iranian high school students. Modern Journal of Language Teaching Methods, 6(1), 115–132.
Berkeley, S., Bender, W. N., Gregg Peaster, L., & Saunders, L. (2009). Implementation of response to intervention: A snapshot of progress. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42(1), 85–95.
Berkeley, S., Scruggs, T. E., & Mastropieri, M. A. (2009). Reading comprehension instruction for students with learning disabilities, 1995–2006: A meta-analysis. Remedial and Special Education. 31(6). 423–436.
Bernhardt, E. B. (2011). Second-language reading as a case study of reading scholarship in the 20th century. Handbook of Reading Research. Vol. III1. Routledge Handbooks online (2014).
*Bimmel, P., Bergh, H. van den., & Oostdam, R. (2001). Effects of strategy training on reading comprehension in first and foreign language. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 16(4), 509–529.
Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Bryant, P. (2004). Children’s reading comprehension ability: Concurrent prediction by working memory, verbal ability, and component skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(1), 31.
Chall, J. S., Jacobs, V. A., Baldwin, L. E., & Chall, J. S. (2009). The reading crisis: Why poor children fall behind. Harvard University Press.
Cho, B. Y., Afflerbach, P., & Han, H. (2018). Strategic processing in accessing, comprehending, and using multiple sources online. Handbook of multiple source use, 133–150. Routledge.
Chu, S. K. W., Tse, S. K., & Chow, K. (2011). Using collaborative teaching and inquiry project-based learning to help primary school students develop information literacy and information skills. Library & Information Science Research, 33(2), 132–143.
Cohen, D. K., & Ball, D. L. (1990). Policy and practice: An overview. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12(3), 233–239.
Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159.
Cook, V., & Bassetti, B. (2005). An introduction to researching second language writing systems. Second language writing systems, 1–67.
*Cubukcu, F. (2008). Enhancing vocabulary development and reading comprehension through metacognitive strategies. Issues in Educational Research, 18(1), 1–11.
*Dabarera, C., Renandya, W. A., & Zhang, L. J. (2014). The impact of metacognitive scaffolding and monitoring on reading comprehension. System, 421, 462–473.
Dignath, C., Buettner, G., & Langfeldt, H. P. (2008). How can primary school students learn self-regulated learning strategies most effectively? A meta-analysis on self-regulation training programmes. Review of Educational Research, 3(2), 101–129.
*Dreyer, C., & Nel, C. (2003). Teaching reading strategies and reading comprehension within a technology-enhanced learning environment. System, 31(3), 349–365.
Duke, N. K., & Block, M. K. (2012). Improving reading in the primary grades. The Future of Children, 22(2), 55–72.
Duke, N. K., Pearson, P. D., Farstrup, A. E., & Samuels, S. J. (2002). What research has to say about reading instruction?What research has to say about reading instruction?
Edmonds, M. S., Vaughn, S., Wexler, J., Reutebuch, C., Cable, A., Tackett, K. K., & Schnakenberg, J. W. (2009). A synthesis of reading interventions and effects on reading comprehension outcomes for older struggling readers. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 262–300.
Elbaum, B., Vaughn, S., Hughes, M., Moody, S. W., & Schumm, J. S. (2000). How reading outcomes of students with disabilities are related to instructional grouping formats: A meta-analytic review. Contemporary Special Education Research, 105–135. Eds. Gersten, R., Schiller, E. & Vaughn, S. Routledge.
Enright, M., Grabe, W., Koda, K., Mosenthal, P., Mulcahy-Ernt, P., & Schedl, M. (2000). TOEFL 2000 reading framework. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
*Fatemipour, H., & Hashemi, M. (2016). The effect of cooperative strategies versus concept visualization on reading comprehension ability of intermediate EFL learners. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6(4), 686.
Gajria, M., Jitendra, A. K., Sood, S., & Sacks, G. (2007). Improving comprehension of expository text in students with LD: A research synthesis. Journal of learning disabilities, 40(3), 210–225.
Gelderen, A. van., Schoonen, R., Stoel, R. D., De Glopper, K., & Hulstijn, J. (2007). Development of adolescent reading comprehension in language 1 and language 2: A longitudinal analysis of constituent components. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 477.
*Ghaniabadi, S., Mohammed Reza Amirian, S., Hatami Khalilabad, M., Moulavi Nafchi, A. (2016). The Effect of Multimedia Texts Presented on Interactive Whiteboards on Iranian High School EFL Learners’ Reading Comprehension Performance. International Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies, 3(1), 430–446.
Gorsuch, G., & Taguchi, E. (2008). Repeated reading for developing reading fluency and reading comprehension: The case of EFL learners in Vietnam. System, 36(2), 253–278.
Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (2011). Teaching and Researching Reading (2nd ed.). Harlow: Pearson Education.
Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (2020). Teaching and Researching Reading (3rd ed). Routledge.
Grabe, W. (2010). Fluency in Reading-Thirty-Five Years Later. Reading in a foreign language, 22(1), 71–83.
*Gurk, N. K. A., & Mall-Amiri, B. (2016). The effect of cooperative learning techniques on intermediate Iranian EFL learners’ reading comprehension and reading strategies. Journal of Studies in Education, 6(4), 33–59.
Hall, C., Roberts, G. J., Cho, E., McCulley, L. V., Carroll, M., & Vaughn, S. (2016). Reading instruction for English learners in the middle grades: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 29(1), 1–32.
Harrington, M. (2018). L2 Word Recognition Skill and Its Measurement. Lexical Facility, 45–65. Palgrave Macmillan,
Harvey, S. & Goudvis, A. (2007). Strategies that work, teaching comprehension for understanding and engagement. Ontario: Pembroke Publishers Limited.
Hassan, F. (2017). Metacognitive strategy awareness and reading comprehension. The English Teacher, 32(1). 16–33.
Hebert, M., Zhang, X., & Parrila, R. (2018). Examining reading comprehension text and question answering time differences in university students with and without a history of reading difficulties. Annals of Dyslexia, 68(1), 15–24.
Hedgcock, J. S., & Ferris, D. R. (2018). Teaching readers of English: Students, Texts, and Contexts. Routledge.
*Hind, A. (2016). A blended learning program to improve the reading skills of the middle-stage pupils in Iraq Republic. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Iraq: Mansoura University.
Hinkel, E. (Ed.). (2011). Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (Vol. 2). Routledge.
Huang, W., & Chang, T. (2019). Impacts of English Learning Strategies, Interests, and Anxieties on English Learning Achievements: Taking Example from Chinese College Students. In 2019 International Conference on Pedagogy, Communication and Sociology (ICPCS 2019). Atlantis Press.
IMSS & PIRLS. (2011). Relationship report reading, mathematics and science achievement. M. O’ Martin and I. V.S. Mullis. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. Amsterdam. The Netherlands.
*Jafari, B., & Biria, R. (2016). Utility of Concept Orientated Reading Instruction in Improving Management of Student’s L2 Reading Comprehension and Lexical Growth. Journal of Global Research in Education and Social Science. 7(1): 55–65.
*Kadkhodaee, S., & Tamjid, N. (2016). The effect of Iranian EFL learners self-generated vs group-generated text-based questions on their reading comprehension. The Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(16), 95–109.
Kamil, M. L. (1995). Some alternatives to paradigm wars in literacy research 1. Journal of Reading Behavior, 27(2), 243–261.
*Karbalaei, A. (2011). Assessing reading strategy training based on CALLA model in EFL and ESL context. Íkala, revista de lenguaje y cultura, 16(27), 167–187.
*Karimi, M. N. (2016). Prior topical knowledge and L2 proficiency as determinants of strategic processing in English for academic purposes multi-texts comprehension. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, (2016) 1–12.
*Karizak, A. F., & Khojasteh, L. (2016). The effect of three kinds of reading strategies on EFL learners’ reading comprehension and gender difference using think-aloud protocol. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 5(5), 6–14.
Kato, M. (2018). Exploring the Transfer Relationship of Summarizing Skills in L1 and L2. English Language Teaching, 11(10), 75–87.
Khataee, E. (2019). The Effect of THIEVES Strategy on EFL Learners’ Reading Comprehension. International Journal of Instruction, 12(2), 667–682.
Klinger, J. K., & Vaughn, S. (2000). Students’ perceptions of instruction in inclusion classrooms: Implications for students with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 66(1), 23–37.
Koda, K. (1996). L2 word recognition research: A critical review. The Modern Language Journal, 80(4), 450–460.
Koda, K. (2005). Insights into second language reading: A cross-linguistic approach. Cambridge University Press.
Koda, K. (2007). Reading and language learning: Crosslinguistic constraints on second language reading development. Language learning, 571, 1–44.
Koda, K., & Reddy, P. (2008). Cross-linguistic transfer in second language reading. Language Teaching, 41(4), 497–508.
Kordes, J., Bolsinova, M., Limpens, G., & Stolwijk, R. (2013). Resultaten PISA-2012: Praktische kennis en vaardigheden van 15-jarigen [Results PISA-2012: Practical knowledge and skills of 15-year olds]. Arnhem: CITO.
Lee, C. D., & Spratley, A. (2010). Reading in the disciplines. The challenges of adolescent literacy. Carnegie Corporation of New York.
*Lee, S. K. (2007). Effects of textual enhancement and topic familiarity on Korean EFL students’ reading comprehension and learning of passive form. Language Learning, 57(1), 87–118.
*Lestari, N. F. (2016). Using visual scaffolding strategy for teaching reading in junior high school. ELT Perspective, 4(2), 131–138.
Lesnick, J., George, R. M., Smithgall, C. & Gwynne, J. (2010). A Longitudinal Analysis of Third-Grade Students in Chicago in 1996–97 and Their Educational Outcomes. Chicago. Chopin Hall.
Linehan, C., & McCarthy, J. (2001). Reviewing the “community of practice” metaphor: An analysis of control relations in a primary school classroom. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 8(2), 129–147.
Macaro, E. (2001). Learning strategies in second and foreign language classrooms. Continuum.
*Macaro, E., & Erler, L. (2008). Raising the achievement of young-beginner readers of French through strategy instruction. Applied Linguistics, 29(1), 90–119.
*McElvain, C. M. (2010). Transactional literature circles and the reading comprehension of English learners in the mainstream classroom. Journal of Research in Reading, 33(2), 178–205.
*McKeown, R. G., & Gentilucci, J. L. (2007). Think-aloud strategy: Metacognitive development and monitoring comprehension in the middle school second-language classroom. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 51(2), 136–147.
*McNeil, L. (2011). Investigating the contributions of background knowledge and reading comprehension strategies to L2 reading comprehension: An exploratory study. Reading and Writing, 24(8), 883–902.
Mokhtari, K., Reichard, C. A., & Sheorey, R. (2008). Metacognitive awareness and use of reading strategies among adolescent readers. Reading Strategies of first-and second-language learners: See how they read, 99–112.
Morris, S. B. (2008). Estimating effect sizes from pretest-posttest-control group designs. Organizational Research Methods, 11(2), 364–386.
*Mozafari, A., & Barjesteh, H. (2016). Enhancing literary competence through critical oriented reading strategies. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 5(7), 168–177.
*Nassaji, H. (2003). L2 vocabulary learning from context: Strategies, knowledge sources, and their relationship with success in L2 lexical inferencing. TESOL Quarterly, 37(4) winter 2003. 645–670.
*Ntereke, B., & Ramoroka, B. (2016). Reading competency of first year undergraduate students at University of Botswana: a case study. Reading and Writing, Journal of the Reading Association of South Africa. 8 (1) January 2017. 1–12.
*Olson, C. B., Kim, J. S., Scarcella, R., Kramer, J., Pearson, M., van Dyk, D. A., & Land, R. E. (2012). Enhancing the interpretive reading of mainstreamed English learners in secondary school: Results from a randomized field trial using a cognitive strategies approach. American Educational Research Journal, 49(2), 323–355.
*Olson, M. W., & Land, R. (2008). Taking a Reading / Writing Intervention for Secondary English Language Learners on the Road: lessons Learned from the Pathway Project. Research in the Teaching of English, 42(3), 259–269.
Olson, M. W., & Gee, T. C. (1991). Content reading instruction in the primary grades: Perceptions and strategies. The Reading Teacher, 45(4), 298–307.
Oxford, R. L. (2016). Teaching and researching language learning strategies: Self-regulation in context. Taylor & Francis.
*Pappa, E., Zafiropoulou, M., & Metallidou, P. (2003). Intervention on strategy use and on motivation of Greek pupils’ reading comprehension in English classes. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 96(3), 773–786.
Paris, S. G., & Paris, A. H. (2001). Classroom applications of research on self-regulated learning. Educational psychologist, 36(2), 89–101.
Park, J., & Kang, Y. (2018). Prediction Abilities vs. Content Schema in Explaining Korean EFL Learners’ Reading Comprehension. English Teaching, 73(3), 77–94.
Pickering, M. J., & Gambi, C. (2018). Predicting while comprehending language: A theory and review. Psychological Bulletin, 144(10), 1002–1044.
Pinninti, L. R. (2016). Metacognitive awareness of reading strategies: An Indian context. The Reading Matrix: 16 (1). 179–193.
Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33.
Plonsky, L., & Gass, S. (2011). Quantitative research methods, study quality, and outcomes: The case of interaction research. Language Learning, 61(2), 325–366.
Plonsky, L., & Oswald, F. L. (2012). How to do a meta-analysis. Research methods in Second Language Acquisition: A Practical Guide, 275–295. Ed. Alison Mackey and Susan M. Gass. West Sussex, 2012. Wiley-Blackwell.
Prentice, D. A., & Miller, D. T. (1992). When small effects are impressive. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 160–164.
Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. Routledge.
Pritchard, R. (1990). The effects of cultural schemata on reading processing strategies. Reading Research Quarterly. 25(4). 273–295.
*Proctor, C. P., Dalton, B., Uccelli, P., Biancarosa, G., Mo, E., Snow, C., & Neugebauer, S. (2009). Improving comprehension online; effects of deep vocabulary instruction with bilingual fifth graders. Reading and Writing, 24(5), 517–544.
*Quanwal, S., & Karim, S. (2014). Identifying correlation between reading strategies instruction and L2 text comprehension. Journal of Language, Teaching and Research, 5(5), 1019–1032.
*Rakhshan, A., & Moghaddam, M. Y. (2015). Intervention analysis in teaching reading comprehension through dynamic assessment: Heron’s perspective. Journal of Language and Translation, 5(2), 23–41.
Reiche, B. S., Neeley, T. B., & Overmeyer, N. (2017). The Language of Global Success: How a Common Tongue Transforms Multinational Organizations. Organization Science, 301, 1252–1269.
Riffert, F. (2005). The use and misuse of standardized testing: A Whiteheadian point of view. Interchange, 36(1), 231–252.
Rijlaarsdam, G., & Janssen, T. (2018). Reporting Design Principles for Effective Instruction of Writing: Interventions as Constructs. L1 Research Archives Online
*Rodriguez, G., & Martin, F. (2016). Text –based questioning to promote reading comprehension and critical thinking skills. Unpublished Master thesis: University of Sabana, Columbia.
Rosenshine, B., Meister, C., & Chapman, S. (1996). Teaching students to generate questions: A review of the intervention studies. Review of Educational Research, 66(2), 181–221.
*Safarpoor, L., Ghaniabadi, S., & Nafchi, A. M. (2015). The effect of the self-questioning strategy as a generative learning strategy on Iranian intermediate EFL learners’ reading comprehension. The Asian Journal of English Language & Pedagogy, 31(2015), 66–87.
*Salataci, R. (2002). Possible effects of strategy instruction on L1 and L2 reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 14(1), 1–17.
Scott, V. M., & Fuente, M. J. D. L. (2008). What’s the problem? L2 learners’ use of the L1 during consciousness-raising, form-focused tasks. The Modern language journal, 92(1), 100–113.
*Shang, H. F. (2010). Reading strategy use, self-efficacy and EFL reading comprehension. Asian EFL Journal, 12(2), 18–42.
Sheorey, R. & Mokhtari, K. (2008). Differing perceptions of reading strategy use between native and non-native college students. In: Mokhtari, K., Sheorey, R. (eds) Reading Strategies of first-and second language learners. Norwood, MA. Christopher Gordon, 24–42.
Sinatra, R., & Dowd, C. A. (1991). Using syntactic and semantic clues to learn vocabulary. Journal of Reading, 35(3), 224–229.
Solórzano-Restrepo, J., & López-Vargas, O. (2019). Differential effect of a metacognitive scaffolding in a e-Learning environment over cognitive load, learning achievement and metacognitive consciousness. Suma Psicológica, 26(1), 37–45.
*Spörer, N., & Brunstein, J. C. (2009). Fostering the reading comprehension of secondary school students through peer-assisted learning: Effects on strategy knowledge, strategy use, and task performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34(4), 289–297.
*Suk, N. (2016). The effects of extensive reading on reading comprehension, reading rates, and vocabulary acquisition. Reading Research Quarterly, 52(1), 73–89.
Swanson, H. L. (1999). Reading research for students with LD: A meta-analysis of intervention outcomes. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32(6), 504–532.
Teng, F. (2020). The benefits of metacognitive reading strategy awareness instruction for young learners of English as a second language. Literacy, 54(1), 29–39.
*Trendak, O. (2014). Strategy training and its application in the process of foreign language learning. Classroom-oriented Research (pp. 69–84). Second Language Learning and Teaching. Eds. Pawlak, Mroslaw., Brelak, Jakub, and Mystkowska-Wiertelak, Anna. Springer Publishing.
*Urlaub, P. (2012). Reading strategies and literature instruction: Teaching learners to generate questions to foster literary reading in the second language. System, 40(2), 296–304.
*Vaughn, S., Klingner, J. K., Swanson, E. A., Boardman, A. G., Roberts, G., Mohammed, S. S., & Stillman-Spisak, S. J. (2011). Efficacy of collaborative strategic reading with middle school students. American Educational Research Journal, 48(4), 938–964.
*Vaughn, S., Martinez, L. R., Linan-Thompson, S., Reutebuch, C. K., Carlson, C. D., & Francis, D. J. (2009). Enhancing social studies vocabulary and comprehension for seventh-grade English language learners: findings from two experimental studies. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2(4), 297–324.
Vaughn, S., Wanzek, J., Wexler, J., Barth, A., Cirino, P. T., Fletcher, J., & Francis, D. (2010). The relative effects of group size on reading progress of older students with reading difficulties. Reading and Writing, 23(8), 931–956.
*Wettlaufer, J. R. (2016). The effect of balanced strategy instruction on English language learner literacy. Unpublished MA Thesis. Wilfrid Laurier University, paper 1818. [URL]
Wharton-McDonald, R. M. (2018). The Role of Word Recognition in Beginning Reading. Pivotal Research in Early Literacy: Foundational Studies and Current Practices, 1421. 142–159.
Wigfield, A., Gladstone, J. R., & Turci, L. (2016). Beyond cognition: Reading motivation and reading comprehension. Child development perspectives, 10(3), 190–195.
Wu, S. (2016). The use of L1 cognitive resources in L2 reading by Chinese EFL learners. London, UK: Routledge.
Yang, Y. F. (2006). Reading strategies or comprehension monitoring strategies. Reading Psychology, 27(4), 313–343.
*Yapp, D. (2015). Improving reading performance of 5th year Dutch secondary school students with reading strategies given through a CLIL approach. (Unpublished doctoral study). Open University, UK.
Yapp, D., de Graaff, R., & van den Bergh, H. (2021) Effects of reading strategy instruction in English as a second language on students’ academic reading comprehension. Language Teaching Research 24(1), 1–24. .
Yoshikawa, L., & Leung, C. Y. (2020). Transitional Shift of Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategy along with L2-English Reading Proficiency. The Reading Matrix: An International Online Journal, 20(1). 36–44.
Zhang, Z. (1993). Literature review on reading strategy research. Paper presented at The Annual Conference of Mid-South Educational Research Association (New Orleans), LA, November 10–12, 1993. ERIC number. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED 366 908).
Cited by (8)
Cited by eight other publications
Jeon, Eun-Hee & Junko Yamashita
2024. A Review of Meta-Analyses of Correlation Coefficients on L2 Reading Comprehension. Education Sciences 14:7 ► pp. 715 ff.
Thumbeck, Sarah‐Maria, Philipp Schmid, Sophie Chesneau & Frank Domahs
2024. Efficacy of reading strategies on text‐level reading comprehension in people with post‐stroke chronic aphasia: A repeated measures study. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders 59:3 ► pp. 1066 ff.
Bogaert, Rielke, Emmelien Merchie, Kim Van Ammel & Hilde Van Keer
2023. The Impact of a Tier 1 Intervention on Fifth and Sixth Graders’ Reading Comprehension, Reading Strategy Use, and Reading Motivation. Learning Disability Quarterly► pp. 073194872211456 ff.
Busse, Vera & Ilonca Hardy
2023. Literalität und Mehrsprachigkeit: Begriffsklärungen, Förderansätze und Forschungsbefunde. Unterrichtswissenschaft 51:2 ► pp. 149 ff.
Cohen, Andrew D., Peter Yongqi Gu, Martha Nyikos, Luke Plonsky, Vee Harris, Pamela Gunning, Isobel Kai-Hui Wang, Mirosław Pawlak, Zoe Gavriilidou, Lydia Mitits, Julie M. Sykes & Xuesong (Andy) Gao
2023. Tangible insights on the strategizing of language learners and users. Language Teaching 56:3 ► pp. 313 ff.
Wang, Ying
2023. Enhancing English reading skills and self-regulated learning through online collaborative flipped classroom: a comparative study. Frontiers in Psychology 14
Yang, Lei, Ying Xiong & Qi Chen
2023. The role of linguistic and cognitive skills in reading Chinese as a second language: A path analysis modeling approach. Frontiers in Psychology 14
Bita Moradi
2022. Intervention in EFL Learners’ Reading Comprehension, Motivation, and Anxiety: A Team-Based Multi-Strategy Instruction. International Journal of Research in English Education 7:3 ► pp. 16 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.