Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Second Language Studies
Vol. 7:1 (2024) ► pp.157–192

VOT for plosives in the indigenous languages of Balochistan

Implications for adult learners of English

ORCID logo | Lasbela University of Agriculture Water and Marine Sciences , Pakistan
ORCID logo | Lasbela University of Agriculture Water and Marine Sciences , Pakistan
Different models of L3 acquisition have different predictions about the cross-linguistic effects of previous learning. The ‘Cumulative Enhancement Model’ predicts that both L1 and L2 have cumulative facilitative effects on L3, but L2 the Status Factor (L2SF) claims that L2 has stronger effects on L3 acquisition. Similarly, while the Typological Primacy Model claims that among the already acquired languages, a typologically similar language transfers more properties to L3, the Linguistic Proximity Model predicts a transfer of structurally similar properties from the previously learnt languages. On the other hand, the Scalpel Model, besides considering linguistic similarity, gives importance to factors such as frequency of use and nature of the input, language dominance, and learning context. The current paper contributes to this debate by presenting data collected from two groups of Balochi learners of English in Balochistan (Pakistan) who were taught British English (BrE) aspiration contrast in plosives at the allophonic level after they had acquired Pakistani English (PakE) as adult L2 learners. Thus, Balochi was L1, PakE L2, and BrE L3 of the learners. After teaching for more than a year, the learners were tested for accuracy in VOTs for BrE plosives. The results support the L2SF and Scalpel Model.
Keywords: allophones, aspiration, Balochi, L3, PakE, VOT
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.VOT Patterns in BrE, Pak-E, and Balochi
    • 2.1Voice onset time for plosives in BrE
    • 2.2VOT for plosives in PakE
    • 2.3VOT for plosives in Balochi
  • 3.Models of L3 acquisition
    • 3.1The Cumulative Enhancement Model (CEM)
    • 3.2The L2 status factor (L2SF)
    • 3.3The Typological Primacy Model (TPM)
    • 3.4The Linguistic Proximity Model (LPM)
    • 3.5The Scalpel Model (SM)
  • 4.The current study
  • 5.Methods of data collection
    • 5.1Participants
      • 5.1.1Monolingual Balochi speakers
      • 5.1.2Teachers
      • 5.1.3Target participants/students
    • 5.2Stimuli
    • 5.3Recording procedure
    • 5.4Acoustic analyses
  • 6.Results
    • 6.1VOT of Balochi L1 plosives
    • 6.2VOT of English plosives produced by Teachers
    • 6.3VOT of English plosives produced by Students
    • 6.4Comparison of Balochi L1 stops with the corresponding L3 English stops
  • 7.Analysis and discussion
    • 7.1Summary of the results
    • 7.2Predictions of the L3 models
    • 7.3Analysis of the results
    • 7.4The remaining issues
  • 8.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 18 January 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.23002.sye
References (86)
References
Alonso, J. G., & Rothman, J. (2017). Coming of age in L3 initial stages transfer models: Deriving developmental predictions and looking towards the future. International Journal of Bilingualism, 21(6), 683–697. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Amaro, J. C. (2012). L3 Phonology: An understudied domain. In S. F. J. C. Amaro, & J. Rothman (Ed.), Third language acquisition in adulthood (pp. 33–60). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Amaro, J. C., & Wrembel, M. (2016). Investigating the acquisition of phonology in a third language – a state of the science and an outlook for the future. International Journal of Multilingualism, 13(4), 395–409. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Angelovska, T., Roehm, D., & Weinmüller, S. (2023). Uncovering transfer effects of dominance and proficiency in L3 English acquisition using the visual moving window paradigm and grammaticality judgments. Applied Linguistics Review, 14(1), 115–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bardel, C., & Falk, Y. (2007). The role of the second language in third language acquisition: The case of Germanic syntax. Second Language Research, 231, 459–484. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2021). L1, L2 and L3: Same or different? Second Language Research, 37(3), 459–464. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benmamoun, E., & Albirini, A. (2018). Is Learning a Standard Variety Similar to Learning a New Language?: Evidence from Heritage Speakers of Arabic. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40(1), 31–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berkes, E., & Flynn, S. (2012). Further evidence in support of the Cumulative-Enhancement Model: CP structure development. In S. F. J. Cabrelli Amaro, & Rothman, J. (Ed.), Third language acquisition in adulthood (pp. 143–164). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Best, C. T. (1995). A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 171–204). Timonium MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Birahimani, A. H. (2021). Reviewing the history and development of aspiration in Eastern Balochi, 11(3), 457–498. Journal of Historical Linguistics, 11(13), 457–498. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2012). Praat: doing phonetics by computer.Google Scholar
Brown, C. A. (1998). The role of the L1 grammar in the L2 acquisition of segmental structure. Second Language Research, 14(2), 136–193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cabrelli, J., & Pichan, C. (2021). Initial phonological transfer in L3 Brazilian Portuguese and Italian. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 111, 131–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cho, T., & Ladefoged, P. (1999). Variation and universals in VOT: evidence from 18 languages. Journal of Phonetics, 27(2), 207–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Colantoni, L., & Steele, J. (2018). The Mixed Effects of Phonetic Input Variability on Relative Ease of L2 Learning: Evidence from English Learners’ Production of French and Spanish Stop-Rhotic Clusters. Languages 2018, 3, 12; DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davenport, M. and Hannahs, S. J. (2010). Introducing Phonetics and Phonology. London: Hodder EducationGoogle Scholar
Falk, Y., & Bardel, C. (2010). The study of the role of the background languages in third language acquisition: The state of the art. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 481, 185–220. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Falk, Y., Lindqvist, C., & Bardel, C. (2015). The role of L1 explicit metalinguistic knowledge in L3 oral production at the initial state. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18(2), 227–235. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fallah, N., & Jabbari, A. A. (2018). L3 acquisition of English attributive adjectives: Dominant language of communication matters for syntactic cross-linguistic influence. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 8(2), 193–216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fallah, N., Jabbari, A. A., & Fazilatfar, A. M. (2016). Source(s) of syntactic cross-linguistic influence (CLI): The case of L3 acquisition of English possessives by Mazandarani-Persian bilinguals. Second Language Research, 32(2), 225–245. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Felge, J. E., & Wayland, R. (2019). The role of input in native Spanish Late learners’ production and perception of English phonetic segments. Journal of Second Language Studies, 2(1), 1–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1995). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 233–277). New York: Timonium, MD.Google Scholar
(2009). Give input a chance. In T. Piske & M. Young-Scholten (Eds.), Input matters in SLA (pp. 175–190). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E., Aoyama, K., & Bohn, O. S. (2021). The Revised Speech Learning Model (SLM-r) Applied. In R. Wayland (Ed.), Second Language Speech Learning: Theoretical and Empirical Progress (pp. 3–83). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flynn, S., Foley, C., & Vinnitskaya, I. (2004). The cumulative-enhancement model for language acquisition: Comparing adults’ and children’s patterns of development in first, second and third language acquisition of relative clauses. International Journal of Multilingualism, 11, 3–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foulkes, P., Docherty, G., & Jones, M. J. (2010). Analyzing Stop. In P. Foulkes, G. Docherty & M. J. Jones (Eds.), Sociophonetics: a student’s guide (pp. 58–71). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
German, J. G., Carlson, K., & Pierrehumbert, J. B. (2013). Reassignment of consonant allophones in rapid dialect acquisition Journal of Phonetics, 41(3), 228–248. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guo, Y., & Yuan, B. (2020). L3 acquisition of Mandarin sentence-final particle clusters by English-Cantonese bilinguals. 3 (2), 262–291. Journal of Second Language Studies, 3(2), 262–291. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geiss, M., Gumbsheimer, S., Lloyd-Smith, A., Schmid, S., & Kupisch, T. (2022). Voice onset time in multilingual speakers: Italian heritage speakers in Germany with L3 English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 44(2), 435–459. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hammarberg, B. (2009). Processes in Third Language Acquisition. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hanzawa, K. (2018). The development of voice onset time (VOT) in a content-based instruction university program by Japanese learners of English: A longitudinal study. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 74(501–522). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hermas, A. (2010). Language acquisition as computational resetting: Verb movement in L3 initial state. International Journal of Multilingualism, 7(4), 343–362. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014). Multilingual transfer: L1 morphosyntax in L3 English. International Journal of Language Studies, 8(2), 1–24.Google Scholar
Honeybone, P. (2005). Diachronic evidence in segmental phonology: The case of laryngeal specifications. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hsu, Y. Y., & Lee, K. K. (2020). Similarities and Differences of Dou in Mandarin and Cantonese. In Q. Su & W. Zhan (Eds.), From Minimal Contrast to Meaning Construct. Singapore: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iverson, P., Ekanayake, D., Hamann, S., Sennema, A., & Evans, B. G. (2008). Category and perceptual interference in second-language phoneme learning: An examination of English /w/-/v/ learning by Sinhala, German, and Dutch speakers. Journal of experimental psychology: human perception and performance, 34(5), 1305–1316.Google Scholar
Jahani, C. (2019). A Grammar of Modern Standard Balochi. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.Google Scholar
Jin, F. (2009). Third language acquisition of Norwegian objects: Interlanguage transfer or l1 influence? In Y-k. I. Leung (Ed.), Third language acquisition and Universal Grammar (pp. 144–161). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. [URL]. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, K., & Babel, M. (2010). On the perceptual basis of distinctive features: Evidence from the perception of fricatives by Dutch and English speakers. Journal of Phonetics, 38(1), 127–136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Khan, S., Ali, S., Mustafa, S., Habib Ali, N., Sher, Z., & Azeem, Z. (2014). VOT for English Plosives by speakers of Balochi. Unpublished thesis. Department of English Language and Literature. LUAWMS. Uthal.
Khezri, F., Razmi, M. H., Jabbari, A. A., & Ghadaki, H. (2020). Acquisition of French (L3) Prepositions by Iranian Learners of English. Applied Linguistics Research Journal, 4(4), 41–56.Google Scholar
Kokaislova, P. (2012). Ethnic Identity of the Baloch People. Central Asian and the Caucasus Journal of Social and Political Studies, ( 3 ), 45–55.Google Scholar
Kopečková, R., & Wrembel, M. (2022). Phonological cross-linguistic influence at the initial stages of L3 acquisition. Second Language Research, 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leung, Y.-k. I. (2005). L2 vs. L3 initial state: A comparative study of the acquisition of French DPs by Vietnamese monolinguals and Cantonese–English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 8(1), 39–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lisker, L., & Abramson, A. (1964). A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops: acoustical measurements. Word, 20(3), 384–422. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Llama, R., & Cardoso, W. (2018). Revisiting (Non-)Native Influence in VOT Production: Insights from Advanced L3 Spanish. Languages, 3(3), 1–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Llama, R., Cardoso, W., & Collins, L. (2010). The influence of language distance and language status on the acquisition of L3 phonology. International Journal of Multilingualism, 7(1), 39–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Llama, R., & López-Morelos, L. P. (2016). VOT production by Spanish heritage speakers in a trilingual context. International Journal of Multilingualism, 131, 444–458. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lombardi, L. (2003). Second language data and constraints on Manner: explaining substitutions for the English interdentals. Second Language Research, 19(3), 225–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mahboob, A., & Ahmar, N. H. (2004). Pakistani English: Phonology. In E. W. Schneider (Ed.), A Handbook of Varieties of English: A Multimedia Reference Tool (pp. 1003–1015). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Mayans, D. (2015). Transfer in third language phonology: Does l3 typological proximity play a role? 61, 273–288. Revista de Filologia, 61, 273–288. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moyer, A. (2009). Input as a critical means to an end: Quantity and quality in L2 phonological attainment. In T. Piske & M. Young-Scholten (Eds.), Input matters in SLA (pp. 159–174). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Na Ranong, S., & Leung, Y-k. I. (2009). Null objects in L1 Thai-L2 English-L3 Chinese: An empiricist take on a theoretical problem. In Y-k. I. Leung (Ed.), Third language acquisition and Universal Grammar (pp. 162–191). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. [URL]. DOI logo
Paradis, M. (2009). Declarative and procedural determinants of second languages. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Puig-Mayenco, E., Alonso, J. G., & Rothman, J. (2020). A systematic review of transfer studies in third language acquisition. Second Language Research, 36(1), 31–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pyun, K.-S. (2005). A model of interlanguage analysis – the case of Swedish by Korean speakers. In B. H. R. Fouser (Ed.), Introductory Readings in L3 (pp. 55–70). Tübingen: Stauffenberg Verlag.Google Scholar
Rahman, T. (2020). Pakistani English. In W. B. K. Bolton & A. Kirkpatrick (Eds.), The Handbook of Asian Englishes (pp. 279–296). New York: Wiley Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Regan, B. (2023). Individual differences in the acquisition of language-specific and dialect-specific allophones of intervocalic/d/by L2 and heritage Spanish speakers studying abroad in Sevilla. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 45 (1), 65–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rothman, J. (2011). L3 syntactic transfer selectivity and typological determinacy: The typological primacy model. Second Language Research, 27(1), 107–127. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013). Cognitive economy, non-redundancy and typological primacy in L3 acquisition: Evidence from initial stages of L3 Romance. In S. Baauw, F. Dirjkoningen & M. Pinto (eds.), Romance languages and linguistic theory 2011 (pp. 217–247). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015). Linguistic and cognitive motivations for the Typological Primacy Model (TPM) of third language (L3) transfer: Timing of acquisition and proficiency considered. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18(2), 179–190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rothman, J., González, A. J., & Puig-Mayenco, E. (2019). Third language acquisition and linguistic transfer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, B. D., & Sprouse, R. A. (2021). The Full Transfer/Full Access model and L3 cognitive states. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 11(1), 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slabakova, R. (2017). The scalpel model of third language acquisition. International Journal of Bilingualism, 21(6), 651–665. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slabakova, R., & Mayo, M. P. G. (2015). The L3 syntax–discourse interface. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18(2), 208–226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shea, C. E., & Curtin, S. (2010). Discovering the relationship between context and allophones in a second language: Evidence for distribution-based learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32 (4), 581–606. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stevens, K. N., Keyser, S. J., & Kawasaki, H. (1986). Toward a Phonetic and Phonological Theory of Redundant Features. In J. S. Perkell & D. H. Klatt (Eds.), Invariance and variability in speech processes (pp. 426–463). New York: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Syed, N. A. (2013). The acquisition of English consonants by Pakistani learners. (Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation), University of Essex, Colchester.
(2015). The Role of Teacher in Second Language Learning. The NUML Journal of Linguistic Inquiry, 13(1), 71–91.Google Scholar
Syed, N. A., & Bibi, S. (2022). The emergence of a new phonological feature in Pakistan English: Focusing on the allophonic split in VOT of coronal stops in PakE. English Today, 38(4), 278–283. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Syed, N. A., & Hasan, G. (2014). An acoustic analysis of speech of London-based Baloch learners of English. Balochistan Review, 31(2), 91–104.Google Scholar
Tremblay, M. C. (2007). L2 influence on L3 pronunciation: Native-like VOT in the L3 Japanese of English-French bilinguals. Paper presented at the L3 Phonology Satellite Workshop of ICPhS XVI, Freiburg, Germany.
Westergaard, M. (2021a). L3 acquisition and cross-linguistic influence as co-activation: Response to commentaries on the keynote ‘Microvariation in multilingual situations: The importance of property-byproperty acquisition’. Second Language Research, 37(3), 501–518. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2021b). Microvariation in multilingual situations: The importance of property-by-property acquisition. Second Language Research, 37(3), 379–407. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Westergaard, M., Mitrofanova, N., Mykhaylyk, R., & Rodina, Y. (2017). Cross-linguistic influence in the acquisition of a third language: The Linguistic Proximity Model. International Journal of Bilingualism, 211, 666–682. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Westergaard, M., Mitrofanova, N., Rodina, Y., & Slabakova, R. (2023). Full Transfer Potential in L3/Ln acquisition: Cross-linguistic influence as a property-by-property process. In C.-O. A. Cabrelli J, González, Alonso J., et al. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of third language acquisition and processing (pp. 219–242). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wrembel, M. (2009). The impact of voice quality resetting on the perception of a foreign accent in third language acquisition. In M. A. W. A. S. Rauber, & B. O. Baptista (Ed.), Recent Research in Second Language Phonetics and Phonology: Perception and Production (pp. 291–307). New Castle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
(2010). L2-accented speech in L3 production. International Journal of Multilingualism, 71, 75–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014). VOT Patterns in the Acquisition of Third Language Phonology. Concordia Working Papers in Applied Linguistics, 751–771.Google Scholar
(2015). In Search of a New Perspective: Cross-Linguistic Influence in the Acquisition of Third Language Phonology. Poznan: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.Google Scholar
Wrembel, M., Marecka, M., & Kopeckova, R. (2019). Extending perceptual assimilation model to L3 phonological acquisition. International Journal of Multilingualism, 16(4), 513–533. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Williams, S., & Hammarberg, B. (1998). Language switches in L3 production: Implications for a polyglot speaking model. Applied Linguistics, 191, 259–333. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wunder, E.-M. (2011). Cross-linguistic Influence in Multilingual Language Acquisition: Phonology in Third or Additional Language Acquisition. In G. d. A. a. J.-M. Dewaele (Ed.), In New Trends in Cross-linguistic Influence and Multilingualism Research (pp. 105–128). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Xu, Y. (2013). ProsodyPro – A Tool for Large-scale Systematic Prosody Analysis. TRASP.Google Scholar
Zhang, X. (1998). Dialect MT: a case study between Cantonese and Mandarin. Paper presented at The 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics.