Article published In:
Journal of Uralic Linguistics
Vol. 2:2 (2023) ► pp.242283
References
Abbott, Barbara
1996Doing without a partitive constraint. In Jacob Hoeksema (ed.), Partitives: Studies on the syntax and semantics of partitive and related constructions, 25–56. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis, Liliane Haegeman & Melita Stavrou
2007Semi functional categories: the N-of-N construction and the pseudo-partitive construction. In Artemis Alexiadou, Liliane Haegeman & Melita Stavrou (eds.), Noun phrase in the generative perspective, 395–472. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arkhangelskiy, Timofey & Maria Usacheva
2018Case compounding in Beserman Udmurt. Journal of Estonian and Finno-Ugric Linguistics 91. 111–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arkhangelskiy, Timofey
2018Konstrukcija s sopolezhenijem v besermjanskom [A juxtaposition construction in Beserman]. Talk given at Pervaja konferencija po uraljskim, altajskim i paleoaziatskim jazykam pamjati A.P. Volodina [The first conference on Uralic, Altaic and Paleo-Siberian languages in memory of A.P. Volodin]. Saint-Petersburg: Institute of Linguistic Studies.Google Scholar
Arkhangelskiy, Timofey & Maria Usacheva
n.d. Beserman multimedia corpus. Available at [URL] (accessed 02.2022 – 04.2023)
Arkhangelskiy, Timofey, Olga Biryuk, Natalia Serdobolskaya & Maria Usacheva
n.d. Beserman corpus of oral texts. Available at [URL] (accessed 02.2022 – 04.2023)
Bisetto, Antonietta & Sergio Scalise
2005The classification of compounds. Lingue e linguaggio 41. 319–332.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard
1933Language. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Brasoveanu, Adrian
2007Measure noun polysemy and monotonicity: evidence from Romanian pseudopartitives. In Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society 381. 139–150.Google Scholar
Byzova, Anna A.
2023Konstrukcii s imennym sopolozheniem v finno-ugorskih jazykah [Nominal juxtaposition constructions in Finno-Ugric languages]. A course paper. Lomonosov Moscow State University. Ms.Google Scholar
Cavirani-Pots, Cora
2020Roots in progress: Semi-lexicality in the Dutch and Afrikaans verbal domain. PhD dissertation, LOT Dissertation series.
Dékány, Éva K.
2011A profile of the Hungarian DP: The interaction of lexicalization, agreement and linearization with the functional sequence. PhD dissertation. Tromsø: University of Tromsø.
De Hoop, Helen
1997A semantic reanalysis of the partitive constraint. Lingua 1031. 151–174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003Partitivity. In Lisa Lai Shen Cheng & Rint Sybesma (eds.), The second Glot international state-of-the-article book, 179–212. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fejes, László
2005Összetett szavak finnugor nyelvekben [Compound words in the Finno-Ugric languages], PhD dissertation, Eötvös Loránd Tudományegyetem, Budapest.
Hoeksema, Jacob
1996Introduction. In Jacob Hoeksema (ed.), Partitives: Studies on the syntax and semantics of partitive and related constructions, 1–24. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ihsane, Tabea & Elisabeth Stark
2020Introduction: Shades of partitivity: Formal and areal properties. Linguistics 581. 605–619. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klumpp, Gerson
2008Differentielle Objektmarkierung & Informationsstruktur in Dialekten des Komi. Ms, Munich.Google Scholar
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria
2001“A piece of the cake” and “a cup of tea”: Partitive and pseudo-partitive nominal constructions in the Circum-Baltic languages. In Östen Dahl & Maria Koptjevskaja-Tamm (eds.), Circum-Baltic Languages: Volume 2: Grammar and Typology, 523–568. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009A lot of grammar with a good portion of lexicon: Towards a typology of partitive and pseudo-partitive nominal constructions. In Walter Bisang, Hans H. Hock & Werner Winter (eds.), Form and function in language research, 329–347. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koryakov, Yuri B., Tatiana I. Davidyuk, Anastasia P. Evstigneeva & Arzhaana A. Syuryun
2022Spisok jazykov Rossii [List of languages of Russia]. Available at [URL]
Kubinyi, Katalin & Anne Tamm
2022Partitivity in Uralic languages without a designated partitive marker. Talk given at the CIFU III, August 21–27, Vienna.
Kuznetsova, Ariadna I.
2003Kumulacia grammaticheskix znachenij v agglutinativnyx pokazatelax: Deikticheskie funkcii posessiva v uralskix jazykax [Several grammatical meanings in agglutinative markers: Deictic functions of possessive markers in Uralic]. In Ariadna I. Kuznetsova & Natalia V. Serdobol’skaya & Svetlana YU. Toldova & Sergey S. Saj & Elena YU. Kalinina (eds.), Finno-ugorskije jazyki: fragmenty grammaticheskogo opisanija. Formalnyj i funkcionalnyj podkhody [Finno-Ugric languages: Fragments of grammatical description. Formal and functional approaches], 250–262. Moscow: Russkije slovari.Google Scholar
Luraghi, Silvia & Tuomas Huumo
2014Partitive cases and related categories ( EALT 54). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nikolaeva, Irina A.
2003Possessive affixes as markers of information structuring: evidence from Uralic. In Pirkko Suihkonen & Bernard Comrie (eds.), International symposium on deictic systems and quantification in languages spoken in Europe and North and Central Asia. Collection of papers, 130–145. Izhevsk & Leipzig: Udmurt State University & Max Planck Institute of Evolutionary Anthropology.Google Scholar
Pereltsvaig, Asya
2006Small nominals. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 241. 433–500. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pleshak, Polina
2021The exponence of caseless NPs in Moksha. Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America 61. 628–640. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pleshak, Polina & Maria A. Kholodilova
2018Imennaja gruppa [The Noun Phrase.] In Svetlana J. Toldova & Maria A. Kholodilova (eds.), Elementy mokšanskogo jazyka v tipologičeskom osveščenii [Elements of the Moksha language in a typological perspective], 272–310. Moscow: Buki Vedi.Google Scholar
Polinsky, Maria
2018Freezing and phi-feature agreement: On the role of [PERSON]. In Jutta M. Hartmann, Marion Jäger, Andreas Kehl, Andreas Konietzko & Susanne Winkler (eds.), Freezing: Theoretical approaches and empirical domains [Studies in Generative Grammar 130], 284–316. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Privizentseva, Mariia
2020Nominal ellipsis reveals concord in Moksha Mordvin. Paper presented at the 38th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Vancouver: University of British Columbia.
Schlachter, Wolfgang
1960Studien zum Possessivsuffix des Syrjänischen. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Schwarzschild, Roger
2002The grammar of measurement. In Brendan Jackson (ed.), Proceedings of SALT XII1, 225–245, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Selkirk, Elizabeth
1977Some remarks on noun phrase structure. In Peter W. Culicover, Thomas Wasow & Akmajian Adrian (eds.), Formal syntax: Papers from the MSSB-UC Irvine conference on the formal syntax of natural language, 285–316. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Serdobolskaya, Natalia V.
2017Invariant opredelennosti i differencirovannoe markirovanie pryamogo dopolneniya v besermyanskom udmurtskom [The concept of definiteness and differential object marking in Beserman Udmurt]. In Vladimir A. Plungyan, Roman V. Ron’ko, Anton V. Cimmerling (eds.), Issledovaniya po teorii grammatiki [Studies in the theory of grammar]. Vyp. 81: Differencirovannoe markirovanie argumentov: materialy k tipologii [Differential object marking: materials to the typology], 76–122. Saint Petersburg: Nauka.Google Scholar
Serdobolskaya, Natalia, Maria Usacheva & Timofey Arkhangelskiy
2019Grammaticalization of possessive markers in the Beserman dialect of Udmurt. In Lars Johanson, Irina Nevskaya & Lidia F. Mazzitelli (eds.) Linguistic possession: New insights from the languages of Europe and North and Central Asia (Studies in Language Companion Series), 291–311. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Serdobolskaya, Natalia
2020A corpus analysis of differential object marking in Beserman Udmurt. In Linguistica Uralica 561. 275–308. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Serdobolskaya, Natalia, Maria Usacheva, Timofey Arkhangelskiy, Ruslan Idrisov & Vladimir Ivanov
n.d. Besermjanskij Slovar’ [The Beserman dictionary]. Available at [URL]
Seržant, Ilja A.
2012The pragmatics and semantics of the bare partitive genitive in Ancient Greek. STUF 651. 113–136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2021Typology of partitives. Linguistics 591. 881–947. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simonenko, Alexandra
2014Microvariation in Finno-Ugric possessive markers. In Proceedings of the Forty-Third Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society (NELS) 431. 127–140.Google Scholar
Simonenko, Alexandra P. & Alexey P. Leontiev
2012Morfosintaksis imennogo kompleksa v finno-permskih yazykah: analiz v ramkah gipotezy minimalizma [Morphosyntax of the nominal complex in Finno-Permic languages: A minimalist analysis]. In Ariadna I. Kuznetsova & Natalia V. Serdobol’skaya & Svetlana YU. Toldova & Sergey S. Saj & Elena YU. Kalinina (eds.), Finno-ugorskije jazyki: Fragmenty grammaticheskogo opisanija. Formalnyj i funkcionalnyj podxody [Finno-Ugric languages: Fragments of grammatical description. Formal and functional approaches], 262–340. Moscow: Jazyki slavjanskix kultur.Google Scholar
Soloveva, Anita V.
2019Sintaksis i semantika partitivnykh i psevdopartitivnykh kostrukcij v gornomarijskom yazyke [Partitive and pseudo-partitive constructions in Hill Mari: Syntax and semantics]. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana 151. 298–339. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stickney, Helen
2007From pseudopartitive to partitive. In Alyona Belikova & Luisa Meroni & Mari Umeda (eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition North America (GALANA), 406–415. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Tamm, Anne
2014The partitive concept versus linguistic partitives: from abstract concepts to evidentiality in the Uralic languages. In Silvia Luraghi & Tuomas Huumo (eds.) Partitive cases and related categories, 89–153. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Usacheva, Maria, Maria Brykina, & Anna Leontyeva
2022Adjective plural marker in Beserman: two markers, several constructions. Talk given at Syntax of Uralic Languages 4 (SOUL 4), Saint Petersburg/Budapest (online).
Usacheva, Maria
2016Atributivy na -o v besermjanskom udmurtskom [Attributivizers with -o in Beserman Udmurt]. Talk given at 13th Conference on Typology and Grammar for Young Scholars, Saint Petersburg.
Yadroff, Michael
1999Formal properties of functional categories: The minimalist syntax of Russian nominal and prepositional expressions. PhD dissertation. Indiana University, Bloomington.
Yaroslavtseva, Maria
2018Typology of partitive constructions. Master’s thesis. The National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow.
Zubova, Julia
2019Conjunctive and comitative noun phrase coordination in Beserman Udmurt. Linguistica Uralica 551. 285–301. DOI logoGoogle Scholar