Article published In:
Korean Linguistics
Vol. 16:1 (2014) ► pp.1850
Bickel, Balthasar.
1997Aspectual scope and the difference between logical and semantic representation. Lingua 102.2/3:115–131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Binnick, Robert I.
2006Aspect and aspectuality. The Handbook of English Linguistics ed. by Bas Aarts & April McMahonm, 244–268. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Breu, Walter.
1994Interactions between lexical, temporal, and aspectual meaning. Studies in Language 18.11: 23–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chung, Taegoo.
2007Kwuke concay kwumwunuy uymiwa saken kwuco [An event structure approach to the Korean existential construction]. Ene [Korean Journal of Linguistics] 32.4: 779–801.Google Scholar
Croft, William.
2012Verbs: Aspect and Causal Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, William & Alan D. Cruse.
2004Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Östen.
1985Tense and Aspect System. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
de Swart, Henriëtte.
1998Aspect shift and coercion. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16.2: 347–385. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dowty, David.
1979Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Han, Dong-Wan.
1999‘ko iss’ kwusenguy cwunguysengey tayhaye [On the ambiguity of the ‘-ko iss’ construction]. Hanwuke uymihak [Korean Semantics] 51: 215–248.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth C. Traugott.
2003Grammaticalization, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johanson, Lars.
1996Terminality operators and their hierarchical status. Complex Structures: A Functionalist Perspective ed. by Betty Devriendt, Louis Goossens & Johan van der Auwera, 229–258. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000Viewpoint operators in European languages. Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe ed. by Östen Dahl, 27–187. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kim, Jong-Bok.
2011Ambiguities in the Korean -KO ISSTA imperfective construction. Korean Journal of Linguistics 36.4: 863–885. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim, Min-Joo,
2009A fresh look at the ambiguity puzzle of KO ISS imperfective in Korean. Simon Fraser University Working Papers in Linguistics: Proceedings of the 2nd Annual International Conference on East Asian Linguistics . [URL] (accessed 30 July 2013).
Kim, Min-Joo.
2011The imperfect puzzle in Korean. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 18 ed. by William McClure & Marcel den Dikken, 266–277. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Kim, Minju.
2011Grammaticalization in Korean: The Evolution of the Existential Verb. London: Saffron Books.Google Scholar
Kim, Namkil.
1986The progressive in Korean. Studies in Korean Language and Linguistics ed. by Namkil Kim, 97–117. LA: East Asian Studies Center, USC.Google Scholar
Kwon, Iksoo.
2012Viewpoints in the Korean Verbal Complex: Evidence, Perception, Assessment, and Time. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.
1987Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. 1, Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
1991Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. 2, Descriptive Application. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
2008Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009Investigations in Cognitive Grammar. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, EunHee.
2006Stative progressives in Korean and English. Journal of Pragmatics 38.5: 695–717. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008Argument structure and event structure: the case of Korean imperfective constructions. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 17.2: 117–139. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, Hyo Sang.
1991Tense, Aspect, and Modality: A Discourse-pragmatic Analysis of Verbal Affixes in Korean from a Typological Perspective. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Lee, Kee Dong.
1978 Cotongsa isstauy uymi yenkwu [On the semantic nature of the auxiliary iss-ta]. Nwunmoy Huh Wung paksa hwankap nonmwuncip [Essays in Commemorating the 60th Anniversary of Nwunmoy, Dr. Wung Huh] ed. by The Festschrift Committee, 359–387. Seoul, Korea: Kwahaksa.Google Scholar
1993A Korean Grammar on Semantic-pragmatic principles. Seoul, Korea: Hankwuk Mwunhwasa.Google Scholar
Lee, Nam-Sun.
1981Hyentay kwukeuy siceywa sangey tayhan yenkwu [Research on tense and aspect of Modern Korean]. Master Thesis, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth & Malka Rappaport Hovav.
1995Unaccusative: At the Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface. MA, Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2005Argument Realization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Michaelis, Laura A.
2004Type shifting in construction grammar: an integrated approach to aspectual coercion. Cognitive Linguistics 15.1: 1–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Okuda, Yasuo.
1978aAsupekuto no kenkyuu o megutte, zyoo [On the study of aspect, I], Kyooiku Kokugo 531: 33–44. Recited from Shirai (1998).Google Scholar
1978bAsupekuto no kenkyuu o megutte, ge [On the study of aspect, II], Kyooiku Kokugo 541: 14–27. Recited from Shirai (1998).Google Scholar
Park, Yang-Kyu.
1985Kwukeuy caykwui tongsaey kwanhaye [On Korean reflexive verbs]. Kwukehak [Korean Linguistics] 141: 361–382.Google Scholar
Rhee, Seongha.
1996Semantics of Verbs and Grammaticalization: The Development in Korean from a Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Seoul, Korea: Hankwuk Mwunhwasa.Google Scholar
Sasse, Hans-Jürgen.
2002Recent activity in the theory of aspect: Accomplishments, achievements, or just non-progressive state? Linguistic Typology61: 199–271. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, Carlota.
1991The Parameter of Aspect. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Talmy, Leonard.
1983How language structures space. Spatial Orientation: Theory, Research, and Application ed. by Herbert L. Pick & Linda P. Acredolo, 225–282. New York: Plenum Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vendler, Zeno.
1967Verbs and times. Linguistics in Philosophy ed. by Zeno Vendler, 97–121. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yang, Jeong-Suk.
2004‘-ko iss-’kwa ‘-e iss-’uy sangposeng yepwu kemthowa kwumwun kyuchik kiswul [An examination of the complementary distribution between ‘-ko iss-’ and ‘-a iss-‘ constructions and their rule descriptions]. Hangul [The Korean Writing System] 2661: 105–136.Google Scholar
Wako, Masakazu, Shigeru Sato & Kaoru Horie.
2003From progressive to perfect: A corpus-based study of the “perfect” meaning of the Korean progressive form. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 12 ed. by William McClure, 64–74. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 6 other publications

Chae, Hee-Rahk
2018. The structural ambiguity of the (im)perfective [V-ko iss-] in Korean. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 27:4  pp. 377 ff. DOI logo
Chae, Hee-Rahk
2020. Constraints on the Perfective [V-ko (iss-)] in Korean:With Reference to a Present State Reading. Lanaguage Research 56:3  pp. 309 ff. DOI logo
Chae, Hee-Rahk
2020. Constraints on the Perfective [V-ko (iss-)] in Korean:With Reference to a Present State Reading. Lanaguage Research 56:3  pp. 309 ff. DOI logo
Ogihara, Toshiyuki & Eun-Hae Park
2019. Aspect shift without coercion: continuous causative verbs in Japanese and Korean. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 28:2  pp. 107 ff. DOI logo
2016. Resultative Readings in -ko issta Construction. Studies in Generative Grammar 26:4  pp. 453 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. Syntax–Semantics Interface. In Korean,  pp. 245 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 may 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.