Grammar as Processor

A Distributed Morphology account of spontaneous speech errors

Author
ORCID logoRoland Pfau | University of Amsterdam
HardboundAvailable
ISBN 9789027255204 | EUR 110.00 | USD 165.00
 
e-Book
ISBN 9789027289636 | EUR 110.00 | USD 165.00
 
Google Play logo
Spontaneous speech errors provide valuable evidence not only for the processes that mediate between a communicative intention and the articulation of an utterance but also for the types of grammatical entities that are manipulated during production. This study proposes an analysis of speech errors that is informed by grammar theory. In particular, it is shown how characteristic properties of erroneous German utterances can be accounted for within Distributed Morphology (DM). The investigation focuses on two groups of errors: Errors that result from the manipulation of semantic and morphosyntactic features, and errors which appear to involve the application of a post-error repair strategy. It is argued that a production model which incorporates DM allows for a straightforward account of the attested, sometimes complex, error patterns. DM mechanisms, for instance, render unnecessary the assumption of repair processes. Besides providing an account for the attested error patterns, the theory also helps us in explaining why certain errors do not occur. In this sense, DM makes for a psychologically real model of grammar.
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 137] 2009.  xiii, 372 pp.
Publishing status: Available
Table of Contents
“Pfau's work unites the 'theoretical' and 'psycholinguistic' sides of language study in a truly unprecedented way. He shows how a theoretical proposal developed for modelling complex morphological phenomena in the abstract, as it were, can also provide a sophisticated and precise model of the specific steps involved in actual speech production in real-time, extending its scope to an entirely new type of data. The proposal is both visionary and deeply explanatory, and represents a real step forward in understanding how language is actually instantiated in the minds of speakers.”
Cited by

Cited by 22 other publications

Aboh, Enoch O.
2020. Lessons From Neuro-(a)-Typical Brains: Universal Multilingualism, Code-Mixing, Recombination, and Executive Functions. Frontiers in Psychology 11 DOI logo
Alexiadou, Artemis
2016. Code-blending and Distributed Morphology. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 6:6  pp. 756 ff. DOI logo
Alqarni, Muteb
2022. Word-formation and reduplication in standard Arabic: A new distributed morphology approach. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 58:3  pp. 381 ff. DOI logo
Archangeli, Diana & Douglas Pulleyblank
2016. Emergent morphology. In Morphological Metatheory [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 229],  pp. 237 ff. DOI logo
Armstrong, Grant & Jason Doroga
2015. Fue muerto. In Hispanic Linguistics at the Crossroads [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 4],  pp. 89 ff. DOI logo
Balduino, Amanda Macedo, Shirley Freitas & Mayara Espadaro
2022. Aspectos fonológicos dos lapsos de fala. Cadernos de Estudos Linguísticos 64  pp. e022009 ff. DOI logo
Caha, Pavel, Karen De Clercq & Guido Vanden Wyngaerd
2019. The Fine Structure of the Comparative. Studia Linguistica 73:3  pp. 470 ff. DOI logo
Cruz, Abel
2021. A syntactic approach to gender assignment in Spanish–English bilingual speech. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 6:1 DOI logo
Don, Jan
2023. Category Change without Overt Marking. In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Morphology,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Fornasiero, Elena
2021. Description and analysis of evaluative constructions in Italian Sign Language (LIS). Sign Language & Linguistics 24:1  pp. 97 ff. DOI logo
Haugen, Jason D. & Daniel Siddiqi
2013. Roots and the Derivation. Linguistic Inquiry 44:3  pp. 493 ff. DOI logo
Kilbourn-Ceron, Oriana, Heather Newell, Máire B. Noonan & Lisa deMena Travis
2016. Phase domains at PF. In Morphological Metatheory [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 229],  pp. 121 ff. DOI logo
Kramer, Ruth
2016. The location of gender features in the syntax. Language and Linguistics Compass 10:11  pp. 661 ff. DOI logo
Lillo-Martin, Diane, Ronice Müller de Quadros & Deborah Chen Pichler
2016. The development of bimodal bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 6:6  pp. 719 ff. DOI logo
López, Luis
2020. Bilingual Grammar, DOI logo
Mao, Jian, Ziwen Liu, Qixiao Lin & Zhenkai Liang
2022. Semantic-Fuzzing-Based Empirical Analysis of Voice Assistant Systems of Asian Symbol Languages. IEEE Internet of Things Journal 9:12  pp. 9151 ff. DOI logo
NISHIYAMA, KUNIO
2010. Syntax within the Word: Economy, Allomorphy, and Argument Selection in Distributed Morphology. ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 27:2  pp. 492 ff. DOI logo
Oglezneva, Elena, Tatyana Petrova & Jiang Ying
2016. Features of Language Communication in a Multicultural Community: Russian Texts of Advertising Signboards in the Border Cities of China. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 236  pp. 194 ff. DOI logo
Paspali, Anastasia & Theodoros Marinis
2020. Gender Agreement Attraction in Greek Comprehension. Frontiers in Psychology 11 DOI logo
Pfau, Roland
2016. Switching, blending … and slipping. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 6:6  pp. 802 ff. DOI logo
Siddiqi, Daniel
2010. Distributed Morphology1. Language and Linguistics Compass 4:7  pp. 524 ff. DOI logo
Wolf, Matthew
2013. Candidate chains, unfaithful spell-out, and outwards-looking phonologically-conditioned allomorphy. Morphology 23:2  pp. 145 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 february 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Subjects

Main BIC Subject

CFD: Psycholinguistics

Main BISAC Subject

LAN009000: LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General
ONIX Metadata
ONIX 2.1
ONIX 3.0
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  2008044246 | Marc record