Phase Theory
This book provides a detailed and up to date review of the framework of phases (Chomsky 2000 and subsequent work). It explores the interaction between the narrow syntactic computation and the external systems from a minimalist perspective. As has sometimes been noted, Phase Theory is the current way to study the cyclic nature of the system, and 'phases' are therefore the natural locality hallmark, being directly relevant for phenomena such as binding, agreement, movement, islands, reconstruction, or stress assignment. This work discusses the different approaches to phases that have been proposed in the recent literature, arguing in favor of the thesis that the points of cyclic transfer are to be related to uninterpretable morphology (the Φ-features on the heads C and v*). This take on phases is adopted in order to investigate raising structures, binding, subjunctive dependents, and object shift (word order) in Romance languages, as well as the nature of islands.
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 152] 2010. xii, 365 pp.
Publishing status:
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
-
Preface | pp. ix–x
-
Introduction | pp. xi–xii
-
The framework: Operations and cyclic architecture | pp. 1–50
-
Phase Theory and Phase Sliding | pp. 51–142
-
Microvariation in null subject languages | pp. 143–252
-
Phases and islands | pp. 253–334
-
Beyond phases | pp. 335–340
-
-
Language index | pp. 361–362
-
Subject index | pp. 363–366
“Phase Theory makes a valuable contribution to the theoretical literature, and Mininalis syntacticians of all levels of expertise will benefit from reading it.”
Luis Vicente, University of Potsdam, in Journal of Linguistics 47: 719-724, 2011
Cited by (87)
Cited by 87 other publications
Casalicchio, Jan & Peter Herbeck
Chen, Xu
Ershova, Ksenia
Kim, Young-Hoon
Lee, Tommy Tsz-Ming & Ka-Fai Yip
Shi, Edward Ruoyang
Tagarro, Pablo M. & Vincenzo Verbeni
Ótott-Kovács, Eszter
Fritzsche, Rosa
Ahmed, Amer & Iryna Lenchuk
Bauke, Leah S.
2022. Linguistic extravagance in compounds and idioms – an analysis of morphological marking. In Extravagant Morphology [Studies in Language Companion Series, 223], ► pp. 132 ff.
Groothuis, Kim A.
Jung, Wonsuk
Jung, Wonsuk
McInnerney, Andrew
Toquero-Pérez, Luis Miguel
2022. Revisiting extraction and subextraction patterns from arguments. Linguistic Variation 22:1 ► pp. 123 ff.
Toquero-Pérez, Luis Miguel
Alahdal, Ameen & Jeroen Van De Weijer
Guekguezian, Peter Ara
Hein, Johannes
Hsu, Brian
Ledgeway, Adam
2021. The syntactic distribution of raddoppiamento fonosinttatico in Cosentino. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2017 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 355], ► pp. 206 ff.
Naya, Ares Llop
2021. Chapter 4. A microsyntactic study of Pyrenean negative emphatic polarity particles with the help of data from linguistic atlases. In Syntactic Geolectal Variation [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 34], ► pp. 109 ff.
Anagnostopoulou, Elena & Christina Sevdali
Davis, Colin
Ganenkov, Dmitry
Ganenkov, Dmitry
Greco, Matteo
Hughes, Thomas J.
Oikonomou, Despina, Felix Golcher & Artemis Alexiadou
Clemens, Lauren
Holmberg, Anders, Michelle Sheehan & Jenneke van der Wal
Klævik-Pettersen, Espen
Miyagawa, Shigeru, Danfeng Wu & Masatoshi Koizumi
Özgen, Murat
ÖZGEN, Murat
Citko, Barbara, Allison Germain & Jacek Witkoś
Dékány, Éva
Haegeman, Liliane & Ciro Greco
Harizanov, Boris
Kush, Dave, Terje Lohndal & Jon Sprouse
McFadden, Thomas & Sandhya Sundaresan
Rizzi, Luigi
2018. Chapter 10. A note on left-peripheral maps and interface properties. In Structuring Variation in Romance Linguistics and Beyond [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 252], ► pp. 149 ff.
Torrego, Esther
Wolfe, Sam
Corver, Norbert
Erlewine, Michael Yoshitaka
Krivochen, Diego Gabriel
Punske, Jeffrey
Rezac, Milan
2016. Gaps and stopgaps in Basque finite verb agreement*. In Microparameters in the Grammar of Basque [Language Faculty and Beyond, 13], ► pp. 139 ff.
Rezac, Milan
Trotzke, Andreas & Stefano Quaglia
You, Eunjung
Antonelli, André Luis
2015. The structure of complementizerless clauses in Classical Portuguese. In Romance Linguistics 2012 [Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory, 7], ► pp. 185 ff.
Bayer, Josef & Andreas Trotzke
2015. The derivation and interpretation of left peripheral discourse particles*. In Discourse-oriented Syntax [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 226], ► pp. 13 ff.
Ciutescu, Elena
2015. Romance causatives and object shift. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2013 [Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory, 8], ► pp. 21 ff.
Harley, Heidi & Hyun Kyoung Jung
Harwood, William
Harwood, William
Herbeck, Peter
2015. Overt PRO in Romance. In Hispanic Linguistics at the Crossroads [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 4], ► pp. 25 ff.
Herbeck, Peter
Herbeck, Peter
Murphy, Elliot
Alexiadou, Artemis, Elena Anagnostopoulou & Christina Sevdali
Kosta, Peter & Diego Gabriel Krivochen
2014. Flavors of movement. In Minimalism and Beyond [Language Faculty and Beyond, 11], ► pp. 236 ff.
Marchis Moreno, Mihaela
2014. ‘Minimal link constraint’ violations. In Variation within and across Romance Languages [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 333], ► pp. 213 ff.
Sichel, Ivy
Wurmbrand, Susi
2014. The Merge Condition. In Minimalism and Beyond [Language Faculty and Beyond, 11], ► pp. 130 ff.
Gallego, Ángel J.
Gallego, Ángel J.
2017. Multiple Wh-Movement in European Spanish. In Boundaries, Phases and Interfaces [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 239], ► pp. 196 ff.
Etxepare, Ricardo
Rouveret, Alain
Stepanov, Arthur
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
Main BIC Subject
CFK: Grammar, syntax
Main BISAC Subject
LAN009000: LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General