Unn Røyneland | Department of Linguistics and Scandinavian Studies, University of Oslo
This paper considers the most recent developments in Norwegian language policy and planning, focusing in particular on the latest Nynorsk language reform proposal (2011). A key objective of this language reform was to include “the voice from below” (e.g. Linn 2010) in all stages of the process in order to ensure democratic legitimacy and user acceptance of the proposed reforms. It is thus important to ask whether, and to what extent, this intention has actually been realized. The argument made here is that the answer significantly depends on the extent to which the openness of the process is traceable in the content of the proposal.
2020. Writing practice in a society with codified variation: a correspondence analysis of writing practice in New Norwegian/Nynorsk. Corpora 15:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Berezkina, Maimu
2018. Managing multilingualism on state websites: how institutional employees explain language choice. Current Issues in Language Planning 19:1 ► pp. 98 ff.
Berezkina, Maimu
2018. ‘Language is a costly and complicating factor’: a diachronic study of language policy in the virtual public sector. Language Policy 17:1 ► pp. 55 ff.
Arya, Diana J., Nicola A. McClung, Noah Katznelson & Lyn Scott
2016. Language ideologies and literacy achievement: six multilingual countries and two international assessments. International Journal of Multilingualism 13:1 ► pp. 40 ff.
Lane, Pia
2015. Minority language standardisation and the role of users. Language Policy 14:3 ► pp. 263 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.