Cover not available
Part of
Adjectives in Germanic and Romance
Edited by Petra Sleeman, Freek Van de Velde and Harry Perridon
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 212] 2014
► pp. 35–72

The adjective-adverb interface in Romance and English

| University of Graz
Hengeveld classifies English as a ‘differentiated’ language that uses two morphological word-classes for adjective and (manner) adverb. The paper shows that English is instead a language where ‘differentiation’ coexists and competes with ‘flexibility’ (one word-class for adjective and adverb). English shares this feature with Romance, whereas it is distinctive with regard to other Germanic languages. The paper therefore aims at investigating the parallels that can be seen between English and Romance in both, synchrony and diachrony. It will be shown that variationist data are crucial for the understanding of this situation. Shared traditions of linguistic standardization in English and Romance explain common features that cannot be reduced to the typological and functional aspects.
Published online: 18 February 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.212.02hum
References (128)
References
Adams, James N. 2007. The Regional Diversification of Latin 200 BC – AD 600. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bäcklund, Ulf. 1973. The Collocation of Adverbs of Degree in English. Uppsala: Uppsala Reprotryck.Google Scholar
Banniard, Michel. 1992. Viva Voce. Communication Ecrite et Communication Orale du IVe au IXe Siècle en Occident latin. Paris: Institut des Études Augustiniennes.Google Scholar
Bartsch, Renate 1976. The Grammar of Adverbials. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Bauche, Henri. 1951. Le Langage Populaire. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie & Valera, Salvador. 2005. Conversion or zero-derivation: An introduction. In Approaches to Conversion / Zero-derivation, idem (eds), 7–17. Münster: Waxmann.Google Scholar
Baugh, Albert C. & Cable, Thomas. 1986. A History of the English Language, 3rd edn. London: Routledge & Kegan.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas. 1988. Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English, Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Biese, Yrjoe M. 1941. Origin and Development of Conversions in English, Helsinki: Annales Academiae Scientiarum Fennicae.Google Scholar
Bischoff, Heinrich. 1970. Setzung und Transposition des-mente-Adverbs als Ausdruck der Art und Weise im Französischen und Italienischen mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Transposition in Adjektive. Zürich: Juris Druck.Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight. 1972. Degree Words. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borst, Eugen. 1902. Die Gradadverbien im Englischen. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Breivik, Leiv Egil & Swan, Toril. 1994. Initial adverbials and word order in English with special reference to the Early Modern English. In Studies in Early Modern English, Dieter Kastovsky (ed.), 11–43. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Broccias, Cristiano. 2011. Motivating the flexibility of oriented –ly adverbs. In Motivation in Grammar and the Lexicon [Human Cognitive Processing 27], Klaus-Uwe Panther & Günter Radden (eds), 71–87. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buysschaert, Joost. 1982. Criteria for the Classification of English Adverbials. Brussels: Paleis der Academiën.Google Scholar
Campbell, Alistair. 1977. Old English Grammar. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, George. 1776. The Philosophy of Rhetoric, 2 Vols. London: Strahan.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L. 1982. Integration and involvement in speaking, writing, and oral literature. In Spoken and Written Language: Exploring Orality and Literacy, Deborah Tannen (ed.), 35–53. Norwood NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Chircu, Adrian. 2008. L’adverbe dans les Langues Romanes. Études Etymologique, Lexicale et Morphologique: français, roumain, italien, espagnol, portugais, catalan, provençal. Cluj Napoca: Casa C?r?ii de ?tiin??.Google Scholar
. 2011. Dinamica Adverbului Românesc. Ieri ?i azi. Cluj Napoca: Casa C?r?ii de ?tiin??.Google Scholar
Company Company, Concepción. Forthcoming. Los adverbios en –mente . In Sintaxis Histórica de la Lengua Española, 3a parte, Concepción Company Company (ed.). México: Universidad Autónoma de México, Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Croft, William, 1990. Typology and Universals. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Crystal, David. 1995. The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Dal, Georgette. 2007. Les adverbes de manière en –ment du français: Derivation ou flexion?”. In Morphologie à Toulouse, Nabil Hathout & Fabio Montermini (eds), 121–147. München: Lincom.Google Scholar
Diepeveen, Ariane. 2012. Modifying Words. Dutch Adverbial Morphology in Contras. PhD dissertation, FU Berlin.Google Scholar
Diepeveen, Janneke & Van de Velde, Freek. 2010. Adverbial morphology: How Dutch and German are moving away from English. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 22(4): 381–402. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dietrich, Wolf. 1995. Griechisch und Romanisch . Parallelen und Divergenzen in Entwicklung, Variation und Strukturen. Münster: Nodus.Google Scholar
Donner, Morton. 1991. Adverb form in Middle English. English Studies 72: 1–11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Downing, Angela. 2006. The English pragmatic marker surely and its functional counterparts in Spanish. In Pragmatic Markers in Contrast, Karin Aijmer & Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen (eds), 39–58. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Drieman, G.H.J. 1962. Differences between spoken and written languages: an exploratory study. Acta Pschologica 20: 36–57, 78–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duden. Die Grammatik. 2009. Mannheim: Dudenverlag.Google Scholar
Dürscheid, Christa & Hefti, Inga. 2006. Syntaktische Merkmale des Schweizer Standarddeutsch. In Schweizer Standarddeutsch, Christa Dürscheid & Martin Businger (eds), 131–161.Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, Peter. 2002. Morphologie und Distribution. Zur Morphosyntax von Adjektiv und Adverb im Deutschen. In Das Adverb – Zentrum und Peripherie einer Wortklasse, Frederike Schmöe (ed.), 61–76. Wien: Präsens.Google Scholar
Erdmann, Peter. 1997. Supplementive adjective clauses in English. In Language History and Linguistic Modeling, Vol. 2: Linguistic Modeling, Raymond Hickey & Stanislaw Puppel (eds), 1433–1451. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas & Levinson, Stephen C. 2009. The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31: 429–492. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fortson IV, Benjamin W. 2004. Indo-European Language and Culture. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Giegerich, Heinz. 2012. The morphology of ly and the categorial status of ‘adverbs’ in English. English Language and Linguistics 16(3): 341–359. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giger, Nadio. 2011. Gut, gibt es einen wie Oliver Kahn. Zum Phänomen rechtsexponierter Verberstnebensätze im Schweizerhochdeutsch. In Sprachvergleich und Sprachdidaktik, Martin Joachim Kümmel, (ed.), 43–65. Hamburg: Kova?.Google Scholar
Görlach, Manfred. 1991. Colonial lag? The alleged conservative character of American English and other ‘colonial’ varieties. In Englishes [Varieties of English Around the World G9], Manfred Görlach (ed.), 90–107. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greenbaum, Sidney. 1969. Studies in English Adverbial Usage. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Guimier, Claude. 1985. On the origin of the suffix –ly . In Historical Semantics. Historical Word-formation, Jacek Fisiak (ed.), 155–170. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1991. Sur l’adverbe orienté vers le sujet. In Les Etats de l’adverbe, Travaux linguistiques du CERLICO n° 3, Claude Guimier & Pierre Larcher (eds), 97–114. Rennes: Presses Universitaires.Google Scholar
. 1996. Les Adverbes du Français: Le Cas des Adverbes en –ment. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1996. Word-class-changing inflectional and morphological theory. In Yearbook of Morphology 1995, Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds), 43–66. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees. 1992. Non-verbal Predication. Theory, Typology, Diachrony. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees, Rijkhoff, Jan & Siewierska, Anna. 2004. Parts-of-speech systems and word order. Journal of Linguistics 40(3): 527–570. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees & van Lier, Eva. 2010. An implicational map of parts of speech. Linguistic Discovery 8(1): 129–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hennemann, Anja. 2012. The epistemic and evidential use of Spanish modal adverbs and verbs of cognitive attitude. Folia Linguistica 46(1): 133–170. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huang, Shuan-Fan. 1975. A Study of Adverbs. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Hummel, Martin. 2000. Adverbale und adverbialisierte Adjektive im Spanischen. Konstruktionen des Typs Los niños duermen tranquilos und María corre rápido. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
. 2002. Considerações sobre os tipos Ela fala esquisito e Ela chega cansada no português coloquial e literário do Brasil e de Portugal. Confluência 24: 43–70.Google Scholar
. 2007. Adjetivos adverbializados y otros atributos directos del verbo en el habla oral informal de Chile. In Vernetzungen . Bedeutung in Wort, Satz und Text. Festschrift für Gerd Wotjak zum 65. Geburtstag, Vol. 1, Juan Cuartero Otal & Martina Emsel (eds), 221–233. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
. 2008. La predicación secundaria en el habla oral informal de Chile. ELUA 22: 129–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. La expansión de las unidades atributivas a las circunstancias de lugar y de tiempo. In La lingüística como reto epistemológico y como acción social. Estudios dedicados al Profesor Ángel López García con ocasión de su sexagésimo aniversario, Vol. 1, Montserrat Veyrat Rigat & Enrique Serra Alegre, (eds), 463–480. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar
. 2010. La función atributiva cuantitativa en el habla oral informal de Chile. In De Arte Grammatica. Festschrift für Eberhard Gärtner zu seinem 65. Geburtstag Cornelia Döll, Christine Hundt & Axel Schönberger (eds), 221–250. Frankfurt: Valentia.Google Scholar
. 2012a. Polifuncionalidad, Polisemia y Estrategia Retórica. Los Signos Discursivos con Base Atributiva entre Oralidad y Escritura. Acerca de Esp. bueno, claro, total, realmente, etc. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012b. Polyfunctionality, polysemy, and rhetorical strategy. The functional, semantic and pragmatic motivation of discourse functions. <[URL]>
. 2013. Attribution in Romance: Reconstructing the oral and written tradition. Folia Linguistica Historica 34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hummel, Martin & Andrea Kröll. 2011. Vite et vitement . Une étude de diachronie variationnelle. <[URL]>
Hummel, Martin & Karin Stiegler. 2005. Dictionnaire historique de l’adjectif-adverbe. Database. <[URL]>
Jespersen, Otto. 1974. A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles, 7 Vols. London and Copenhagen: Allen & Unwin and Munksgaard (reprint).Google Scholar
. 1992 [1924]. The Philosophy of Grammar. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ježek, Elisabetta & Ramat, Paolo. 2009. On parts-of-speech transcategorization. Folia Linguistica 43(2): 391–416.Google Scholar
Karlsson, Keith E. 1981. Syntax and Affixation. The Evolution of MENTE in Latin and Romance. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kirchner, Gustav. 1955. Gradadverbien: Restriktiva und Verwandtes im heutigen Englisch. Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Kloss, Heinz. 1967. Abstand languages and Ausbau languages. Anthropological Linguistics 9: 29–41.Google Scholar
Kofler, Michaela. 2007. Der Gebrauch der Modaladverbien in drei französischsprachigen Romanen von Andreï Makine, Philippe Djian und Alphonse Boudard. MA thesis, Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz.Google Scholar
Koktova, Eva. 1986. Sentence Adverbials in a Functional Description [Pragmatics & Beyond VII:2]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krahe, Hans & Meid, Wolfgang. 1969. Germanische Sprachwissenschaft, Vol. 2. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kraschl, Carmen Therese. 2008. Adverbien auf –mente im gesprochenen Spanisch. Eine Analyse anhand von C-ORAL-ROM. MA thesis, Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz.Google Scholar
Kruisinga, Etsko. 1927. On the history of conversion in English. English Studies 9: 103–108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laberge, Suzanne & Sankoff, Gillian. 1979. Anything you can do. In Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 12: Discourse and Syntax, Talmy Givón (ed.), 419–440. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ledgeway, Adam. 2000. A Comparative Syntax of the Dialects of Southern Italy: A Minimalist Approach. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 2011. Adverb agreement and split intransitivity: Evidence from Southern Italy. Archivio Glottologico Italiano 1: 31–66.Google Scholar
Liu, Mingya. 2012. Multidimensional Semantics of Evaluative Adverbs. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Löfstedt, Bengt. 1967. Bemerkungen zum Adverb im Lateinischen. Indogermanische Forschungen 72: 79–109.Google Scholar
Lutzky, Ursula. 2012. Discourse Markers in Early Modern English [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 227]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maas, Utz. 2008. Können Sprachen einfach sein? Grazer Linguistische Studien 69: 1–44.Google Scholar
. 2010. Literat und orat. Grundbegriffe der Analyse geschriebener und gesprochener Sprache. Grazer Linguistische Studien 73: 21–150.Google Scholar
. 2012. Was ist Deutsch? Die Entwicklung der Sprachlichen Verhältnisse in Deutschland. München: Fink.Google Scholar
Marchand, Hans. 1969. The Categories and Types of Present-day English Word-formation. München: Beck.Google Scholar
Martínez Vázquez, Montserrat. 1991. Sintaxis Inglesa: La Atribución. Estudio Sintáctico-semántico de las Estructuras Atributivas en Inglés Contemporáneo. Cáceres: Universidad de Extremadura.Google Scholar
Martínez, José A. 1994. La ‘función incidental’ y su conexión con otras construcciones del español. In Cuestiones Marginadas de Gramática Española, José A. Martínez (ed.), 225–283. Madrid: Istmo.Google Scholar
Mencken, Henry Louis. 1961. The American Language, Supplement II. New York NY: Knopf.Google Scholar
Miller, Gary D. 2012. External Influences on English. From its Beginnings to the Renaissance. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moignet, Gérard. 1981. Systématique de la Langue Française, 2 vols. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Molinier, Christian. 1985. Remarques sur une sous-classe d’adverbes en -ment orientés vers le sujet et leurs adjectifs sources. Linguisticæ Investigationes 9: 321–341. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mustanoja, Tauno F. 1960. A Middle English Syntax, Vol. 1: Parts of Speech. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu. 1994. Aspects of adverbial change in Early Modern English. In Studies in Early Modern English, Dieter Kastovsky (ed.), 243–259. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1997. The processes of adverb derivation in Late Middle and Early Modern English. In Grammaticalization at Work, Matti Rissanen, Matti, Merja Kytö & Kirsi Heikkonen (eds), 145–189. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nilsen, Don Lee Fred. 1972. English Adverbials, The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Nist, John. 1966. A Structural History of English. New York NY: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Onions, Charles T. 1983. The Oxford Dictionary of English Etymology. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Opdahl, Lise. 2000. Ly or Zero Suffix? A Study in Variation of Dual-form Adverbs in Present-day English, 2 vols. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary, 2nd edn, online version June 2012, <[URL]> (September 2012).
Peters, Hans. 1994. Degree adverbs in Early Modern English. In Studies in Early Modern English, Dieter Kastovsky (ed.), 269–288. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pinkster, Harm. 1972. On Latin Adverbs. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Pinsker, Hans Ernst. 1969. Historische englische Grammatik, 3. Auflage. München: Hueber.Google Scholar
Plag, Ingo. Forthcoming. 133. English. In Word-Formation. An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe, Series Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft : HSK, Peter O. Müller & Ingeborg Ohnheiser, Susan Olsen & Franz Rainer (eds). Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.
Pounder, Amanda. 2001. Adverb?marking in German and English. System and standardization. Diachronica 18(2): 301–358. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pountain, Christopher J. 2011. Latin and the structure of written Romance. In The Cambridge History of the Romance Languages, Vol. 1: Structures, Martin Maiden, John Charles Smith & Adam Ledgeway (eds), 606–659. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Prins, Anton A. 1952. French Influence in English Phrasing. Leiden: Universitaire Pers Leiden.Google Scholar
Pulgram, Ernst. 1968. A socio?linguistic view of innovation: ‐ly and ‐wise. Word 24: 380–391. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pullum, Geoffrey K. & Huddleston, Rodney. 2002. Adjectives and adverbs. In The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language, Rodney Huddleston & Geoffrey K. Pullum (eds), 525–595. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan. 1995 [1991]. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language, London: Longman.Google Scholar
Radouant, René. 1922. Grammaire Française. Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar
Ramaglia, Francesca. 2011. Adjectives at the Syntax-Semantics Interface. München: Lincom.Google Scholar
Ramat, Paolo. 2008. Les adverbes latins du point de vue de l’indo-européen. In Adverbes et Evolution Linguistique en Latin, Michèle Fruyt & Sophie Van Laer, 13–24. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Ramat, Paolo & Ricca, Davide. 1994. Prototypical adverbs: On the scalarity/radiality of the notion of adverb. Rivista di Linguistica 6(2): 289–326.Google Scholar
Ramat, Paulo & Ricca, Davide. 1998. Sentence adverbs in the languages of Europe. In Adverbial Constructions in the Languages of Europe, Johan van der Auwera (ed.), 187–275. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ricca, Davide. 1998. La morfologia avverbiale tra flessione e derivazione. In Ars Linguistica, Giuliano Bernini, Pierluigi Cuzzolin Piera Molinelli, (eds), 447–466. Roma: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
Robertson, Stuart & Frederic G. Cassidy. 1954. The Development of Modern English. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Rohlfs, Gerhard. 1954. Historische Grammatik der italienischen Sprache und ihrer Mundarten, Vol. 3. Bern: Francke.Google Scholar
Ruge, Hans. 1997. Grammatik des Neugriechischen. Lautlehre, Formenlehre, Syntax. Köln: Romiosini.Google Scholar
Salazar García, Ventura. 2007. Flexibilidad categorial y adverbios de manera en español: un enfoque funcional. In Estudios Lingüísticos, Literarios e Históricos. Homenaje a Juan Martínez Marín, Pedro Barros García, Gonzalo Águila Escobar & Esteban Tomás Montoro del Arco, 309–326. Granada: Universidad de Granada.Google Scholar
. 2013. Los adjetivos en la lengua izí de Nigeria: Impliaciones para una teoría functional de las partes de la oración. In De Lingüística, Traducción y Léxico-fraseología: Homenaje a Juan de Dios Luque Durán, Antonio Pamies Bertrán (ed.), 51–64. Granada: Comares.Google Scholar
Sonntag, Eric. 2005. Lexeme, Morpheme und Kategoreme. Die Wortkategorie Adverb und die adverbialen Wortklassen des Französischen und Spanischen. Aachen: Shaker.Google Scholar
Štekauer, Pavol. Forthcoming. 15. The delimitation of derivation and inflection. In Word-Formation. An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe, Series Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft: HSK , Peter O. Müller & Ingeborg Ohnheiser, Susan Olsen & Franz Rainer (eds). Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. DOI logo
Strang, Barbara M.H. 1970. A History of English. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Strang, Barabara M.H. 1978. Modern English Structure. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Swan, Toril. 1991. Adverbial shifts: evidence from Norwegian and English. In Historical English Syntax, Dieter Kastovsky, (ed.), 409–438. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali & Ito, Rika. 2002: Think really different: Continuity and specialization in the English dual‐form adverbs. Journal of Sociolinguistics 6(2): 236–266. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Teyssier, Jacques. 1968. Notes on the syntax of the adjective in Modern English. Lingua 20: 225–249. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Uhler, Karl. 1926. Die Bedeutungsgleichheit der altenglischen Adjektiva und Adverbia mit und ohne –lic: lice. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Valera Hernández, Salvador. 1996. Adjetivos y Adverbios en Inglés: La Relación de Homomorfia. Granada: Universidad de Granada.Google Scholar
. 1998. On subject-orientation in English –ly adverbs. English Language and Linguistics 2(2): 263–282.Google Scholar
Van Goethem, Kristel. 2010. The French construction nouveau + past participle revisited: Arguments in favour of a prefixoid analysis of nouveau . Folia Linguistica 44(1): 163–178.Google Scholar
Cited by (17)

Cited by 17 other publications

Wissner, Inka
2024. L’adverbial prépositionnel à base adjectivale en français en Amérique du Nord : diachronie, vitalité, diversité. Langue française N° 221:1 ► pp. 107 ff. DOI logo
Cruschina, Silvio
2023. L’espressione dell’epistemicità e dell’evidenzialità in siciliano. Gli avverbi in -ca . Cuadernos de Filología Italiana 30 ► pp. 63 ff. DOI logo
Métairy, Justine
2022. Verb Classes in the Resultative Construction in Germanic and Romance Languages. Transactions of the Philological Society 120:2 ► pp. 246 ff. DOI logo
Prendes Alvargonzález, Lucía
2021. Alternancia de adjetivos, adverbios y grupos preposicionales en la expresión de la circunstancia de manera. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 85 ► pp. 89 ff. DOI logo
Lauwers, Peter
2019. Répondre présent/absent. Revue Romane. Langue et littérature. International Journal of Romance Languages and Literatures 54:2 ► pp. 278 ff. DOI logo
Abeillé, Anne, Olivier Bonami, Danièle Godard & Michèle Noailly
2017. Chapter 4. Adjectives and adverbs in the Grande grammaire du français . In Adjective Adverb Interfaces in Romance [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 242], ► pp. 113 ff. DOI logo
Cruschina, Silvio & Eva-Maria Remberger
2017. Chapter 3. Before the complementizer. In Adjective Adverb Interfaces in Romance [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 242], ► pp. 81 ff. DOI logo
Hummel, Martin
2017. La structure “verbe + adjectif”. Revue Romane. Langue et littérature. International Journal of Romance Languages and Literatures ► pp. 261 ff. DOI logo
Hummel, Martin
2017. Chapter 1. Adjectives with adverbial functions in Romance. In Adjective Adverb Interfaces in Romance [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 242], ► pp. 13 ff. DOI logo
Hummel, Martin
2018. Baseline elaboration and echo-sounding at the adjective adverb interface. Cognitive Linguistics 29:3 ► pp. 407 ff. DOI logo
Kocher, Anna
2017. From verum to epistemic modality and evidentiality. Journal of Historical Linguistics 7:1-2 ► pp. 77 ff. DOI logo
Ledgeway, Adam
2017. Chapter 2. Parameters in Romance adverb agreement. In Adjective Adverb Interfaces in Romance [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 242], ► pp. 47 ff. DOI logo
Mîrzea Vasile, Carmen & Blanca Croitor
2017. Chapter 8. Properties of Romanian adverbs and adjectives from a categorial status perspective. In Adjective Adverb Interfaces in Romance [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 242], ► pp. 227 ff. DOI logo
Suñer, Ave lina
2017. Chapter 12. Adverbial adjectives and the decomposition of event predicates. In Adjective Adverb Interfaces in Romance [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 242], ► pp. 329 ff. DOI logo
Van Raemdonck, Dan
2017. Chapter 5. Are intrapredicative adjectives adverbs?. In Adjective Adverb Interfaces in Romance [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 242], ► pp. 141 ff. DOI logo
Silvestri, Giuseppina
2016. Adverb and participle agreement. In Theoretical Approaches to Linguistic Variation [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 234], ► pp. 89 ff. DOI logo
Silvestri, Giuseppina
2017. Chapter 6. Adverb agreement in the dialects of the Lausberg Area. In Adjective Adverb Interfaces in Romance [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 242], ► pp. 173 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.