References (93)
Primary sources
Bately, Janet (ed.). 1980. The Old English Orosius . EETS s.s. 6. London: OUP.Google Scholar
Clark, Cecily (ed.). 1958. The Peterborough Chronicle 1070–1154. London: OUP.Google Scholar
Lalou, Elisabeth, Boutet, Dominique & Gaucher, Elisabeth (eds). 2001. Le Roman de Tristan en Prose , chapters 244–319, extracted from the database Corpus de la Littérature Médiévale: En Langue d’Oil des Origines à la Fin du XVe Siècle: Prose Narrative – Poésie – Théâtre . Paris: Champion Electronique.Google Scholar
La Mort Artu : data extracted from the ISWOC corpus (under construction). <[URL]>
Miller, Thomas (ed.). 1890. The Old English Version of Bede’s Ecclesiastical History of the English People . EETS o.s 95, 96. London: Trübner & Co.Google Scholar
Skeat, Walter W. (ed.). 1881–1885. Ælfric’s Lives of Saints, Vol. I, i & ii. EETS o.s. 76, 82. London: Trübner & Co.
Thorpe, Benjamin (ed.). 1834. The Anglo-Saxon Version of the Story of Apollonius of Tyre . London: John and Arthur Arch.Google Scholar
References
Adams, Marianne. 1987. From Old French to the theory of pro-drop. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 5: 1–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1989. Verb second effects in Medieval French. In Studies in Romance Linguistics: Selected Papers from the Seventeenth Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (xvii. lsrl), Rutgers University, 27–29 March 1987 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 60j], Carl Kirschner & Janet Ann DeCesaris (eds), 1–33. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Asher, Nicolas & Lascarides, Alex. 2003. Logics of Conversation . Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Bech, Kristin. 1998. Pragmatic factors in language change: XVS and XSV clauses in Old and Middle English. Folia Linguistica Historica XIX(1–2): 79–102.Google Scholar
. 2001. Word Order Patterns in Old and Middle English: A Syntactic and Pragmatic Study. PhD dissertation, University of Bergen. <[URL]>
. 2005. SXVX clauses in Old and Middle English. In Contexts – Historical, Social, Linguistic. Studies in Celebration of Toril Swan , Kevin McCafferty, Tove Bull & Kristin Killie (eds), 145–162. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
. 2008. Verb types and word order in Old and Middle English. In English Historical Linguistics 2006, Vol. I: Syntax and Morphology , Maurizio Gotti, Marina Dossena & Richard Dury, 49–67. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
. 2012. Word order, information structure, and discourse relations: a study of Old and Middle English verb-final clauses. In Information Structure and Syntactic Change in the History of English , Anneli Meurman-Solin, María José López-Couso & Bettelou Los (eds), 66–86. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. To appear. Tracing the loss of boundedness in the history of English: the anaphoric status of initial prepositional phrases in Old English and late Middle English. Anglia .DOI logo
Benincà, Paola. 2006. A detailed map of the left periphery of Medieval Romance. In Crosslinguistic Research in Syntax and Semantics: Negation, Tense, and Clausal Architecture , Raffaella Zanuttini, Héctor Campos, Elena Herburger & Paul H. Portner (eds), 53–86. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Benincà, Paola & Poletto, Cecilia. 2004. Topic, focus, and V2. In The Structure of CP and IP: Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax , Luigi Rizzi (ed), 52–75. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
den Besten, Hans. 1983. On the interaction of root transformations and lexical deletive rules. In On the Formal Syntax of the Westgermania [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 3], Werner Abraham (ed.), 47–132. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buridant, Claude. 2000. Grammaire nouvelle de l’ancien français . Paris: Sedes.Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna & Starke, Michael. 1999. The typology of structural deficiency: A case study of the three classes of pronuns. In Clitics in the Languages of Europe , Henk van Riemdsijk (ed.), 145–233. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L. 1976. Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics and point of view. In Subject and Topic , Charles N. Li (ed.), 27–55. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1997. Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective [University of Venice: Working Papers in Linguistics 7, 1–2]. Venice: Università Ca’Foscari di Venezia.Google Scholar
. 1990. Types of A’-Dependencies . Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Donaldson, Bryan. 2012a. Diachronic change in Old French clause structure: Effects on initial subordinate clauses. Ms.
. 2012b. Initial subordinate clauses in Old French: Syntactic variation and the clausal left periphery. Lingua 122: 1021–1046. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fiéis, Maria Alexandra. 2003. Ordem de palavras, transitividade e inacusatividade. Reflexão teórica e análise do português dos séculos XIII a XVI. PhD dissertation, Universidade Nova de Lisboa.Google Scholar
Fischer, Olga. 1992. Syntax. In The Cambridge History of the English Language , Norman Blake (ed.), 207–408. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Olga, van Kemenade, Ans, Koopman, Willem, & van der Wurff, Wim. 2000. The Syntax of Early English . Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Foulet, Lucien. 1930. Petite syntaxe de l’ancien francais . Paris: Champion.Google Scholar
Frascarelli, Mara & Hinterhölzl, Roland. 2007. Types of topics in German and Italian. In On Information Structure, Meaning and Form [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 100], Kerstin Schwabe & Susanne Winkler (eds), 87–116. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Galves, Charlotte & de Sousa, Maria Clara Paixão. 2005. Clitic placement and the position of subjects in the history of Portuguese. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2003 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 270], Twan Geerts, Ivo van Ginneken & Haike Jacobs (eds), 97–113. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Grohmann, Kleanthes K. 2000. Copy left dislocation. In Proceedings of the Nineteenth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics , Roger Billerey & Brook Danielle Lillehaugen (eds), 139–152. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
van Gelderen, Elly. Forthcoming. Pro-drop and pronominal subjects: Reanalyzing features in the history of English.
. 2000. A History of English Reflexive Pronouns: Person, self , and Interpretability [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 39]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haeberli, Eric. 2000. Adjuncts and the syntax of subjects in Old and Middle English. In Diachronic Syntax: Models and Mechanisms , Susan Pintzuk, George Tsoulas & Anthony Warner (eds), 109–131. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 2002. Inflectional morphology and the loss of V2 in English. In Syntactic Effects of Morphological Change , David Lightfoot (ed), 88–106. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hasselgård, Hilde. 2010. Adjunct Adverbials in English . Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heggelund, Øystein Imerslund. 2009. Word Order in Old English and Middle English Subordinate Clauses. PhD dissertation, University of Bergen.Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders. In press. Verb second. In Syntax – an International Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Research , Tibor Kiss & Artemis Alexiadou (eds). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Holmberg, Anders & Platzack, Christer. 1995. The Role of Inflection in Scandinavian Syntax . Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard S. 1994. The Antisymmetry of Syntax . Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
van Kemenade, Ans. 1987. Syntactic Case and Morphological Case in the History of English . Dordrecht: Foris.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Kemenade, Ans & Mili?ev, Tanja. 2012. Syntax and discourse in Old and Middle English word order. In Grammatical Change: Origins, Nature, Outcomes , Dianne Jonas, John Whitman & Andrew Garrett (eds), 239–255. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
van Kemenade, Ans & Westergaard, Marit. 2012. Syntax and information Structure: V2 variation in Middle English. In Information Structure and Syntactic Change in the History of English , Anneli Meurman-Solin, María José López-Couso & Bettelou Los (eds), 87–118. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Kemenade, Ans, Mili?ev, Tanja & Baayen, R. Harald. 2007. The balance between syntax and discourse in Old English. In English Historical Linguistics 2006, Vol. I: Syntax and Morphology [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 295], Maurizio Gotti, Marina Dossena & Richard Dury (eds), 3–21. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Koopman, Willem. 1995. Verb-final main clauses in Old English prose. Studia Neophilologica 67:129–144. DOI logo
Krifka, Manfred. 2007. Basic notions of information structure. Interdisciplinary Studies on Information Structure 6: 13–55.Google Scholar
Labelle, Marie. 2007. Clausal architecture in Early Old French. Lingua 117: 289–316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labelle, Marie & Hirschbühler, Paul 2005. Changes in clausal organization and the position of clitics in Old French. In Grammaticalization and Parametric Change , Montse Batllori, Maria-Lluisa Hernanz, Carme Picallo & Francesc Roca (eds), 60–71. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information Structure and Sentence Form . Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ledgeway, Adam. 2008. Satisfying V2 in early Romance: Merge vs. Move. Journal of Linguistics 44(2): 437–470. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lightfoot, David. 1979. Principles of Diachronic Syntax . Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
. 1999. The Development of Language. Acquisition, Change and Evolution . Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Los, Bettelou. 2009. The consequences of the loss of verb-second in English: information structure and syntax in interaction. English Language and Linguistics 13(1): 97–125. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. The loss of verb-second and the switch from bounded to unbounded systems. In Information Structure and Syntactic Change in the History of English , Anneli Meurman-Solin, María José López-Couso & Bettelou Los (eds), 21–46. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Los, Bettelou & Dreschler, Gea. 2012. The loss of local anchoring: From adverbial local anchors to permissive subjects. In The Oxford Handbook of the History of English , Terttu Nevalainen & Elizabeth Closs Traugott (eds), 859–872. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marchello-Nizia, Christiane. 2000. Le décumul du “thème” dans l’evolution du français. Français Moderne 68(1): 31–40.Google Scholar
Mathieu, Éric. 2006. Stylistic Fronting in Old French. Probus 18: 219–266. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. The left-periphery in Old French. In Research on Old French: The State of the Art , Deborah Arteaga (ed.), 327–350. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Petrova, Svetlana & Solf, Michael. 2008. Rhetorical relations and verb placement in the early Germanic languages. In ‘Subordination’ versus ‘Coordination’ in Sentence and Text: A Cross-linguistic Perspective [Studies in Language Companion Series 98], Cathrine Fabricius-Hansen & Wiebke Ramm (eds), 329–351. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Petrova, Svetlana & Speyer, Augustin. 2011. Focus movement and focus interpretation in Old English. Lingua 121: 1751–1765. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pintzuk, Susan. 1993. Verb-seconding in Old English: verb movement to Infl. The Linguistic Review 10: 5–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1999. Phrase Structures in Competition: Variation and Change in Old English Word Order . New York NY: Garland.Google Scholar
Pintzuk, Susan & Haeberli, Eric. 2008. Structural variation in Old English root clauses. Language Variation and Change 20: 367–407. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Platzack, Christer. 1995. The loss of verb second in English and French. In Clause Structure and Language Change , Adrian Battye & Ian Roberts (eds), 200–226. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Poletto, Cecilia. 2002. The left-periphery of V2-Rhaetoromance dialects: a new view on V2 and V3. In Syntactic Microvariation [The Meertens Institute Electronic Publications in Linguistics (MIEPiL) 2], Susanne van der Kleij, Sjef Barbiers & Leonie Cornips (eds). Amsterdam: Meertens Institute. <[URL]>
. 2006. Parallel phases: A study on the high and low left periphery of Old Italian. In Phases of Interpretation , Mara Frascarelli (ed.), 261–294. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. Topics (and focus) in Old Italian Syntax. Ms.
Prévost, Sophie. 2001. La postposition du sujet en français aux 15ème et 16ème siècles: Une approche sémantico-pragmatique . Paris: Editions du CNRS.Google Scholar
. 2009. Topicalisation, focalisation et constructions syntaxiques en français médiéval. In Les linguistiques du détachement: Actes du Colloque International de Nancy , Denis Apothéloz, Bernard Combettes & Franck Neveu (eds), 427–439. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Radwan, Sonja. 2011. L’ordre des mots en ancien français – La syntaxe et la structure informationnelle de la zone préverbale. MA thesis, University of Oslo.Google Scholar
Ribeiro, Ilza. 1995. Evidence for a verb-second phase in Old Portuguese. In Clause Structure and Language Change , Adrian Battye & Ian Roberts (eds), 110–139. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Rinke, Esther. 2007. Syntaktische Variation aus synchronischer und diachronischer Perspektive: Die Entwicklung der Wortstellung im Portugiesischen . Frankfurt: Vervuert.Google Scholar
Rinke, Esther & Meisel; Jürgen M. 2009. Subject inversion in Old French: Syntax and information structure. In Proceedings of the Workshop “Null-subjects, Expletives, and Locatives in Romance” , Georg A. Kaiser & Eva Maria Remberger (eds), 93–130. Constance: Universität Konstanz.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar: Handbook of Generative Syntax , Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Ian G. 1993. Verbs and Diachronic Syntax: A Comparative History of English and French . Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Salvesen, Christine Meklenborg. 2009. Le CP interrogatif: Une étude diachronique du français. PhD dissertation, University of Oslo.Google Scholar
. 2011. Stylistic fronting and remnant movement in Old French. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2009. Selected Papers from “Going Romance” Nice 2009 [Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 3], Janine Berns, Haike Jacobs & Tobias Scheer (eds), 323–342. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salvesen, Christine Meklenborg. 2013. Topics and the left periphery: A comparison of Old French and Modern Germanic. In In Search of Universal Grammar: From Old Norse to Zoque [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 202], Terje Lohndal (ed.), 131–172. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salvi, Giampaolo. 2004. La formazione della struttura di frase romanza: Ordine delle parole e clitici dal latino alle lingue romanze antiche . Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, Bonnie D. & Vikner, Sten. 1996. The verb always leaves IP in V2 clauses. In Parameters and Functional Heads: Essays in Comparative Syntax , Luigi Rizzi & Adriana Belletti (eds), 244–302. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Speyer, Augustin. 2008. Topicalization and Clash Avoidance in the History of English, with a Few Glimpses at German. PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Taylor, Ann & Pintzuk, Susan. 2011. The interaction of syntactic change and information status in the change from OV to VO in English. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 10: 71–94.Google Scholar
. 2012. The effect of information structure on object position in Old English. In Information Structure and Syntactic Change in the History of English , Anneli Meurman-Solin, María José López-Couso & Bettelou Los (eds), 47–65. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. To appear. Verb order, object position and information status in Old English. In Syntax over Time: Lexical, Morphological and Information-structural Interactions , Theresa Biberauer & George Walkden (eds). Oxford: OUP.
Thurneysen, Rudolf. 1892. Zur Stellung des Verbums im Altfranzösischen. Zeitschrift für Romanische Philologie XVI: 289–307.Google Scholar
Vance, Barbara S. 1997. Syntactic Change in Medieval French: Verb-Second and Null Subjects . Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walkden, George Lee. 2012. Syntactic Reconstruction and Proto-Germanic. PhD dissertation, Cambridge University.Google Scholar
Walkden, George. In press. Verb-third in early West Germanic: a comparative perspective. In Peripheries Past and Present: The Interaction of Information Structure, Prosody and Syntax , Theresa Biberauer & George Walkden (eds). Oxford: OUP.DOI logo
Warner, Anthony. 2007. Parameters of variation between verb-subject and subject-verb order in late Middle English. English Language and Linguistics 11(1): 81–111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zwart, C. Jan-Wouter. 1997. Morphosyntax of Verb Movement: A Minimalist Approach to the Syntax of Dutch . Dordrecht: Kluwer.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Jurczyk, Rafał
2021. Between feature mapping and thematic prominence: Old englishse-demonstratives and pronouns in discourse. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 57:4  pp. 573 ff. DOI logo
Cognola, Federica
2019. On the left periphery of three languages of Northern Italy. Linguistic Variation 19:1  pp. 82 ff. DOI logo
Eric Mathieu & Robert Truswell
2017. Micro-change and Macro-change in Diachronic Syntax, DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.