Formal properties of event-reporting sentences in Old High German and Old French
This article investigates the interplay between syntax and information structure by comparing the discourse conditions under which a special class of root clauses in two Old High German (OHG) and Old French (OF) texts occur. The focus is on sentences with post-verbal subjects and either the inflected verb or an adverbial phrase in sentence initial position. The empirical investigation shows that this pattern is preferred over the canonical SV orders in contexts which disfavour a topic–comment division in the clause.
References (58)
References
Text editions
OHG
Isidor
Der althochdeutsche Isidor. Nach der Pariser Handschrift und den Monseer Fragmenten
, ed. H. Eggers. Tübingen: Niemeyer. 1964.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tatian
Die lateinisch-althochdeutsche Tatianbilingue Stiftsbibliothek St. Gallen Cod. 56,
ed. A. Masser. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. 1994.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
OF
Villehardouin
Josfroi de Villehardouin: La Conqueste de Costentinoble: d’après le manuscrit no. 2137 de laB.N., C.R.A.L.; Nancy,
1978.
Secondary literature
Adams, Marianne. 1987. From Old French to the theory of pro-drop. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 5: 1–32. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Adams, Marianne. 1988. Parametric change: empty subjects in Old French. In
Advances in Romance Linguistics
, David Birdsong & Jean-Pierre Montreuil (eds), 1–16. Dordrecht: Foris.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Asher, Nicholas & Lascarides, Alex. 2003.
Logics of Conversation
. Cambridge: CUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Axel, Katrin. 2009. The verb-second property in Old High German: different ways of filling the pre-field. In
New Approaches to Word Order Variation and Change in the Germanic Languages,
Roland Hinterhölzl & Svetlana Petrova (eds), 17–44. Berlin: De Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clark, Robin & Roberts, Ian. 1993. A computational model of language learnability and language change.
Linguistic Inquiry
24(2): 299–345.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Costa, João. 2004.
Subject Positions and Interfaces: The Case of European Portuguese
. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Diez, Friedrich. 1877.
Grammatik der romanischen Sprachen
, Vol. 3. Bonn: Weber.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Donhauser, Karin & Petrova, Svetlana. 2009. Die Rolle des Adverbs tho bei der Generalisierung von Verbzweit im Deutschen. In
Gesprochen – geschrieben – gedichtet. Variation und Transformation von Sprache,
Monika Dannerer, Peter Mauser, Hannes Scheutz & Andreas E. Weiss (eds), 11–24. Berlin: Erich Schmidt.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eide, Kristine. 2006. Word Order Structures and Unaccusative Verbs in Classical and Modern Portuguese. The Reorganisation of Information Structure. PhD dissertation, University of Oslo, Universitetsforlaget.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Endriss, Cornelia & Gärtner, Hans-Martin. 2005. Relativische Verb-Zweit Sätze und Definitheit. In
Proceedings of the Symposium Deutsche Syntax: Empirie und Theorie
, Franz-Josef d’Avis (eds), 195–220. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Elsig, Martin & Rinke, Esther. 2007. Les adverbes et l’inversion en ancien français. Le Nouveau Corpus d’Amsterdam soumis à l’analyse linguistique. In
Le Nouveau Corpus d’Amsterdam. Actes de l’atelier de Lauterbad, 23–26 février
2006, Pierre Kunstmann & Achim Stein (eds), 161–180. Stuttgart: Steiner.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fanselow, Gisbert. 2003. Münchhausen-style head movement and the analysis of verb second. In
Syntax at Sunset: Head Movement and Syntactic Theory
, Anoop Mahajan (ed.), 40–76. Los Angeles: UCLA Working Papers in Linguistics.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fanselow, Gisbert. 2004. Cyclic phonology-syntax-interaction: Movement to first position in German.
Interdisciplinary Studies in Information Structure (ISIS)
1:1–42.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ferraresi, Gisella & Goldbach, Maria. 2002. Particles and sentence structure: a historical perspective. In
Syntactic Structures and Morphological Information
, Uwe Junghanns & Luka Szucsich (eds), 101–127. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fleischer, Jürg, Hinterhölzl, Roland, & Solf, Michael. 2008. Zum Quellenwert des AHD-Tatian für die Syntaxforschung: Überlegungen auf der Basis von Wortstellungsphänomenen. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik 36: 210–239. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Frey, Werner. 2004. The grammar-pragmatics interface and the German prefield.
Sprache und Pragmatik
52: 1–39.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Groenendijk, Jeroen & Roelofsen, Floris. 2009. Inquisitive semantics and pragmatics? Stanford Workshop on Language, Communication and Rational Agency, May 30–31, 2009.
Haider, Hubert. 1997. Projective economy. In
German: Syntactic Problems – Problematic Syntax
, Werner Abraham & Elly van Gelderen (eds), 83–103. Tübingen: Niemeyer.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hinterhölzl, Roland & Petrova, Svetlana. 2011. Rhetorical relations and verb placement in Old High German Tatian. In Salience. Multidisciplinary Perspectives on its Function in Discourse, Christian Chiarcos, Berry Claus & Michael Grabski (eds), 173–201. Berlin: De Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hopper, Paul J. 1979b. Aspect and Foregrounding in discourse. In
Syntax and Semantics
, Talmy Givón (ed.), 213–241. San Diego CA: Academic Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jacobs, Joachim. 2001. The dimensions of topic–comment. In
Linguistics. An Interdisciplinary Journal of the Language Sciences
39(4) :641–681.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kaiser, Georg. 2002. Verbstellung und Verbstellungswandel in den romanischen Sprachen. Tübingen: Niemeyer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van Kemenade, Ans. 1987.
Syntactic Case and Morphological Case in the History of English
. Dordrecht: Foris.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Klein, Wolfgang. 1994.
Time in Language
. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Klein, Wolfgang & von Stutterheim, Christiane. 1987. Quaestio und referentielle Bewegung in Erzählungen.
Linguistische Berichte
109: 163–183.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Klein, Wolfgang & von Stutterheim, Christiane. 1992. Textstruktur und referentielle Bewegung.
Zeitschrift für Literatur und Linguistik
86: 67–92.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Klein, Wolfgang & von Stutterheim, Christiane. 2006. How to solve a complex verbal task. Text structure, referential movement and the quaestio.
Aquisição de Linguas Estrangeiras
30–31: 29–67.
van Kuppevelt, Jan. 1995. Discourse structure, topicality, and questioning. Journal of Linguistics 31: 109–147. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kuroda, Sige-Yuki. 1972. The categorical and the thetic judgment. Evidence from Japanese Syntax.
Foundations of Language
9: 153–185.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information Structure and Sentence Form. Topic, Focus and the Mental Representation of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: CUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Marchello-Nizia, Christiane. 1999.
Le français en diachronie: Douze siècles d’évolution
. Gap: Ophrys.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Martins, Ana Maria. 1994. Cliticos na história do português. PhD dissertation, Universidade de Lisboa.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Molnár, Valéria. 1993. Zur Pragmatik und Grammatik des TOPIK-Begriffs. In Wortstellung und Informationsstruktur, Marga Reis (ed.), 155–202. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Petrova, Svetlana. 2006. A discourse-based approach to verb placement in early West-Germanic. In
Interdisciplinary Studies on Information Structure (ISIS)
5, Shinichiro Ishihara, Michaela Schmitz & Anne Schwarz (eds), 153–185. Potsdam: Universitätsverlag.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Petrova, Svetlana. 2011. Modeling word order variation in discourse: On the pragmatic properties of VS order in Old High German. In
Indo-European Syntax and Pragmatics: Comparative Approaches
, Eirik Welo (ed.), special issue of Oslo Studies in Language
3(3), 209–228.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Petrova, Svetlana & Solf, Michael. 2010. Pronominale Wiederaufnahme im älteren Deutsch. Personal- vs. Demonstrativpronomen im Althochdeutschen. In Historische Textgrammatik und historische Syntax des Deutschen. Traditionen, Innovationen, Perspektiven, Arne Ziegler & Christian Braun (eds), 339–364. Berlin: De Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Petrova, Svetlana, Solf, Michael, Ritz, Julia, Chiarcos, Christian & Zeldes, Amir. 2009. Building and using a richly annotated interlinear diachronic corpus: The case of Old High German Tatian.
Traitement Automatique des Langues
50(2) : 47–71.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van Reenen, Pieter & Schøsler, Lene. 2001. The pragmatic functions of the Old French particles AINZ, APRES, DONC, LORS, OR, PUIS, and SI, In
Textual Parameters in Older Languages
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 195], Susan C. Herring, Pieter van Reenen & Lene Schøsler (eds), 59–106. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Reinhart, Tanya. 1981. Pragmatics and linguistics: An analysis of sentence topics.
Philosophica
27: 53–94.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Richter, Elise. 1903.
Zur Entwicklung der romanischen Wortstellung aus der lateinischen
. Halle: Niemeyer.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rinke, Esther. 2003. On the licensing of null-subjects in Old French. In Syntactic Structures and Morphological Information, Uwe Junghanns & Luka Szucsich (eds), 217–249. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rinke, Esther &. Meisel, Jürgen M. 2009. Subject-inversion in Old French: Syntax and information structure. In
Proceedings of the Workshop “Null-subjects, Expletives, and Locatives in Romance”
, Georg Kaiser and Eva-Maria Remberger (eds), 93–130. Konstanz: Universitätsverlag.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Roberts, Ian. 1993.
Verbs and Diachronic Syntax A Comparative History of English and French
. Dordrecht: Kluwer.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Santorini, Beatrice. 1989. The Generalization of the Verb-second Constraint in the History of Yiddish. PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sasse, Hans-Jürgen. 1987. The thetic/categorical distinction revisited. Linguistics 25: 511–580. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sasse, Hans-Jürgen. 1995. “Theticity” and VS order: a case study.
Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung
48(1–2): 3–23.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sigurðsson, Halldór Armann. 1990. V1 declaratives and verb raising in Icelandic. In
Modern Icelandic Syntax,
Joan Maling & Annie Zaenen (eds), 41–69. San Diego CA: Academic Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sitaridou, Ioanna. 2012. A comparative study of word order in Old Romance.
Folia Linguistica
46(2): 553–604.
Special issue The Pace of Grammaticalisation in Romance
, Anne Carlier, Béatrice Lamiroy & Walter De Mulder (eds). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sternefeld, Wolfgang. 2007.
Syntax. Eine morphologisch motivierte generative Beschreibung des Deutschen
, Vol. 1. 2nd edn. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
von Stutterheim, Christiane & Klein, Wolfgang. 1989. Text structure and referential movement. In
Language Processing in Social Context,
Rainer Dietrich & Carl F. Graumann (eds), 39–76. Amsterdam: North-Holland.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vance, Barbara. 1997. Syntactic Change in Medieval French: Verb-second and Null-subjects. Dordrecht: Kluwer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zeldes, Amir, Ritz, Julia, Lüdeling, Anke & Chiarcos, Christian. 2009. ANNIS: A Search Tool for Multi-Layer Annotated Corpora. In
Proceedings of Corpus Linguistics
2009. Liverpool.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Karen De Clercq, Liliane Haegeman, Terje Lohndal & Christine Meklenborg
2023.
Adverbial Resumption in Verb Second Languages,
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.