References (93)
References
Abels, Klaus & Neeleman, Ad. 2008. Universal 20 without the LCA. Ms, CASTL/UCL.Google Scholar
Anderson, John. 1993. Parameters of syntactic change: A notional view. In Historical Linguistics: Problems and Perspectives , Charles Jones (ed.), 1–42. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Bailyn, John. 2003. Does Russian scrambling exist? In Word Order and Scrambling , Simin Karimi (ed.), 156–176. Oxford: Blackwell.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bayer, Josef. 1996. Directionality and Logical Form: On the Scope of Focusing Particles and wh -in-situ . Dordrecht: Kluwer.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bech, Kristin. 1998. Pragmatic factors in language change: XVS and XSV clauses in Old and Middle English. Folia Linguistica Historica 19: 79–102.Google Scholar
. 2001. Word Order Patterns in Old and Middle English: A Syntactic and Pragmatic Study. PhD dissertation, University of Bergen. <[URL]>
Behaghel, Otto. 1948. Heliand und Genesis , 6th edn. Halle: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Belletti, Adriana. 2001. Inversion as focalization. In Subject Inversion in Romance and the Theory of UG , Aafke Hulk & Jean-Yves Pollock (eds), 60–90. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 2004. Aspects of the low IP area. In The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 2: The Structure of IP and CP , Luigi Rizzi (ed.), 16–51. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
den Besten, Hans. 1977. On the interaction of root transformations and lexical deletive verbs. Ms, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Biberauer, Theresa, Holmberg, Anders & Roberts, Ian. 2010. A syntactic universal and its consequences. Ms, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Biberauer, Theresa & van Kemenade, Ans. 2011. Subject positions and information-structural diversification in the history of English. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 10: 17–69.Google Scholar
Biberauer, Theresa & Roberts, Ian. 2005. Changing EPP parameters in the history of English: Accounting for variation and change. English Language and Linguistics 9: 5–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. Cascading parameter changes: Internally-driven change in Middle and Early Modern English. In Grammatical Change and Linguistic Theory: The Rosendal Papers [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 113], Thórhallur Eythórsson (ed), 79–114. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. The return of the Subset Principle: A diachronic perspective. In Historical Syntax and Linguistic Theory , Paola Crisma & Giuseppe Longobardi (eds), 58–74. Oxford: OUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biberauer, Theresa & Walkden, George (eds). To appear. Syntax over Time: Lexical, Morphological and Information-structural Interactions . Oxford: OUP.DOI logo
Bies, Ann Elizabeth. 1996. Syntax and Discourse Factors in Early New High German: Evidence for Verb-final Word Order. MA dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Birner, Betty. 2006. Inferential relations and noncanonical word order. In Drawing the Boundaries of Meaning: Neo-Gricean Studies in Pragmatics and Semantics in Honor of Laurence R. Horn [Studies in Language Companion Series 80], Betty Birner & Gregory Ward (eds), 31–51. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bošković, Željko. 2005. On the locality of left branch extraction and the structure of NP. Studia Linguistica 59: 1–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burridge, Kate. 1993. Syntactic Change in Germanic [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 89]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Callaway, Morgan. 1913. The Infinitive in Anglo-Saxon . Washington DC: Carnegie.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A Life in Language , Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), 1–53. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-linguistic Perspective . Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Cruschina, Silvio. 2006. Informational focus in Sicilian and the left periphery. In Phases of Interpretation , Mara Frascarelli (ed.), 363–385. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Danckaert, Lieven. To appear. The decline of Latin left-peripheral presentational foci: Causes and consequences. In Biberauer & Walkden (eds), to appear.
Davies, Mark. 2008–. The Corpus of Contemporary American English: 425 million words, 1990-present. <[URL]> (11 May 2012).
Dunbar, Richard. 1979. Discourse Pragmatics and Subordinate Clause Word Order in German: An Explanation of Related Main Clause Phenomena in German and English clauses. PhD dissertation, University of Wisconsin, Madison.Google Scholar
Erickson, Jon. 1997. Some observations on word order in Old Saxon. In Sprache im Fokus: Festschrift für Heinz Vater zum 65. Geburtstag , Christa Dürscheid, Karl Heinz Ramers & Monika Schwarz (eds), 95–105. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Fischer, Olga, van Kemenade, Ans, Koopman, Willem & van der Wurff, Wim. 2000. The Syntax of early English . Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Fox, Danny. 2000. Economy and Semantic Interpretation . Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fuß, Eric & Trips, Carola. 2002. Variation and change in Old and Middle English: On the validity of the Double Base Hypothesis. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 4: 171–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haeberli, Eric. 1999a. Features, Categories and the Syntax of A-positions. PhD dissertation, University of Geneva.Google Scholar
. 1999b. On the word order ‘XP-subject’ in the Germanic languages. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 3: 1–36.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2002. Inflectional morphology and the loss of V2 in English. In Syntactic Effects of Morphological Change , David Lightfoot (ed.), 88–106. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. Review of Roberts, Ian. 2007. Diachronic Syntax . Oxford: OUP. Lingua 118: 1998–2007. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haeberli, Eric, & Pintzuk, Susan. 2012. Revisiting verb (projection) raising in Old English. In Grammatical Change: Origins, Nature, Outcomes , Dianne Jonas, John Whitman & Andrew Garrett (eds), 219–238. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane. 2003. Conditional clauses: External and internal syntax. Mind and Language 18: 317–339. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. The internal syntax of adverbial clauses. Lingua 120: 628–648. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane & Ürögdi, Barbara. 2010. Referential CPs and DPs: An operator movement account. Theoretical Linguistics 36: 111–152.Google Scholar
Hinterhölzl, Roland. 2009. The role of information structure in word order variation and word order change. In Information Structure and Language Change: New Approaches to Word Order Variation in Germanic , Roland Hinterhölzl & Svetlana Petrova (eds), 45–66. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hinterhölzl, Roland & Petrova, Svetlana. 2009. From V1 to V2 in West Germanic. Lingua 120: 315–328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmberg, Anders. 2000. Scandinavian stylistic fronting: How any category can become an expletive. Linguistic Inquiry 31: 445–483. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hróarsdóttir, Þorbjörg. 2000. Word Order Change in Icelandic: From OV to VO [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 35]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Jarad, Najib I. 2003. The Old English to-infinitive: Its status and recategorisation. Journal of Language & Linguistics 2: 57–104.Google Scholar
Johnson, Daniel E. 2009. Getting off the GoldVarb standard: Introducing Rbrul for mixed effects variable rule analysis. Language & Linguistics Compass 3: 359–383. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Karttunen, Lauri. 1976. Discourse referents. In Syntax and Semantics, 7: Notes from the Linguistic Underground , James D. McCawley (ed.), 363–385. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard S. 1994. The Antisymmetry of Syntax . Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
van Kemenade, Ans. 1987. Syntactic Case and Morphological Case in the History of English . Dordrecht: Foris.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Kemenade, Ans & Tanja Milićev. 2012. Syntax and discourse in Old and Middle English word order. In Grammatical Change: Origins, Nature, Outcomes , Dianne Jonas, John Whitman & Andrew Garrett (eds), 219–238. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Kiss, Katalin É. 1998. Identificational focus vs. information focus. Language 74: 245–273.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koopman, Willem. 1995. Verb-final main clauses in Old English prose. Studia Neophilologica 67: 129–144. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1997. Another look at clitics in Old English. Transactions of the Philological Society 95: 73–93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1998. Inversion after single and multiple topics in Old English. In Advances in English Historical Linguistics , Jacek Fisiak & Marcin Krygier (eds), 135–149. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lenerz, Jürgen. 1984. Syntaktischer Wandel und Grammatiktheorie: Eine Untersuchung an Beispielen aus der Sprachgeschichte des Deutschen . Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lightfoot, David. 1979. Principles of Diachronic Syntax . Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Linde, Sonja. 2009. Aspects of word order and information structure in Old Saxon. In Information Structure and Language Change: New Approaches to Word Order Variation in Germanic , Roland Hinterhölzl & Svetlana Petrova (eds), 367–389. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Los, Bettelou. 1998. The rise of the to-infinitive as verb complement. English Language and Linguistics 2: 1–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. The Rise of the to-infinitive . Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, Thomas. 1890. The Old English Version of Bede’s Ecclesiastical History of the English People . London: Trübner.Google Scholar
. 1898. A Collation of Four MSS. of the Old English Version of Bede’s Ecclesiastical History of the English People . London: Kegan Paul, Trench & Trübner.Google Scholar
Nunes, Jairo. 2002. VO or OV? That’s the underlying question: Commentary on Pintzuk. In Syntactic Effects of Morphological Change , David Lightfoot (ed.), 300–306. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pintzuk, Susan. 1993. Verb seconding in Old English: Verb movement to Infl. The Linguistic Review 10: 5–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1999. Phrase Structures in Competition: Variation and Change in Old English Word Order . New York NY: Garland.Google Scholar
. 2002. Verb–object order in Old English: Variation as grammatical competition. In Syntactic effects of Morphological Change , David Lightfoot (ed), 276–299. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. Arguments against a universal base: Evidence from Old English. English Language and Linguistics 9: 115–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pintzuk, Susan & Taylor, Ann. 2006. The loss of OV order in the history of English. In The Handbook of the History of English , Ans van Kemenade & Bettelou Los (eds), 249–278. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Poletto, Cecilia. 2006. Parallel phases: a study on the high and low left periphery of Old Italian. In Phases of Interpretation , Mara Frascarelli (ed.), 261–294. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rathofer, Johannes. 1962. Der Heliand: Theologischer Sinn als tektonische Form . Köln: Böhlau.Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya. 1995. Interface strategies. OTS Working Papers in Linguistics . Utrecht: University of Utrecht.Google Scholar
Rietveld, Toni, van Hout, Roeland & Ernestus, Mirjam. 2004. Pitfalls in corpus research. Computers and the Humanities 38: 343–362. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar , Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. On the position ‘int(errogative)’ in the left periphery of the clause. In Current Studies in Italian Syntax: Essays Offered to Lorenzo Renzi , Guglielmo Cinque & Giampaolo Salvi (eds), 267–296. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian. 1996. Remarks on the Old English C-system and the diachrony of V2. In Language Change and Generative Grammar [Linguistische Berichte, Sonderheft 7], Ellen Brandner & Gisela Ferraresi (eds), 154–164. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1997. Directionality and word order change in the history of English. In Parameters of Morphosyntactic Change , Ans van Kemenade & Nigel Vincent (eds), 397–426. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Ross, John Robert. 1967. Constraints on Variables in Syntax. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Salvesen, Christine Meklenborg. 2011. Stylistic Fronting and Remnant Movement in Old French. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2009: Selected Papers from ‘Going Romance’, Nice 2009 , Janine Berns, Haike Jacobs & Tobias Scheer (eds), 323–342. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sapp, Christopher D. 2013. OHG subordinate clauses: A continuation of Proto-Germanic word order. Paper presented at Historical Syntax of German: Typological Perspectives, Bamberg, May 2013.Google Scholar
Scheer, Tobias. 2011. A Guide to Morphosyntax-phonology Interface Theories: How Extra-phonological Information is Treated in Phonology since Trubetzkoy’s Grenzsignale. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Sitaridou, Ioanna. 2011. Word order and information structure in Old Spanish. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 10: 159–184.Google Scholar
Somers, Katarina & Dubenion-Smith, Shannon. 2011. Disambiguating clausal status in the Old Saxon Heliand . Ms, Queen Mary University London.Google Scholar
Szmrecsányi, Benedikt. 2004. On operationalizing syntactic complexity. In Le poids des mots. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Textual Data Statistical Analysis , Gérard Purnelle, Cédrick Fairon & Anne Dister (eds), 1032–1039. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar
Taylor, Ann & Pintzuk, Susan. 2010. Object position and information structure in Old English: an experiment in annotation. Paper presented at the Symposium on the History of English Syntax, York, May 2010.Google Scholar
. To appear. Verb order, object position and information status in Old English. In Biberauer & Walkden (eds), to appear.DOI logo
Taylor, Ann, Warner, Anthony, Pintzuk, Susan & Beths, Frank. 2003. York-Toronto-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Old English Prose . <[URL]>
Walkden, George. 2011. HeliCoPTER (Heliand Corpus: A Partially Tagged Excel Resource). <[URL]> (11 May 2012).
. To appear. Verb-third in early West Germanic: A comparative perspective. In Biberauer & Walkden (eds), to appear.
. 2012. Syntactic Reconstruction and Proto-Germanic. PhD dissertation, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Wallenberg, Joel C. 2009. Antisymmetry and the Conservation of c-command. PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
. To appear. Antisymmetry and Heavy NP Shift across Germanic. In Biberauer & Walkden (eds), to appear. <DOI logo>
Warner, Anthony. 1993. English Auxiliaries: Structure and History . Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wasow, Thomas, & Jennifer Arnold. 2003. Post-verbal constituent ordering in English. In Determinants of Grammatical Variation in English , Günter Rohdenburg & Britta Mondorf (eds), 119–154. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wurff, Wim van der. 1997. Deriving object-verb order in late Middle English. Linguistics 33, 485–509.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1999. Objects and verbs in modern Icelandic and fifteenth-century English: A word order parallel and its causes. Lingua 109, 237–265. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

STRUIK, TARA & GERT-JAN SCHOENMAKERS
2023. When information structure exploits syntax: The relation between the loss of VO and scrambling in Dutch. Journal of Linguistics 59:3  pp. 655 ff. DOI logo
Catasso, Nicholas, Marco Coniglio & Chiara De Bastiani
2022. Interface phenomena and language change. In Language Change at the Interfaces [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 275],  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Lash, Elliott
2020. Transitivity and Subject Positions in Old Irish. Transactions of the Philological Society 118:1  pp. 94 ff. DOI logo
Taylor, Ann
2020. Treebanks in Historical Syntax. Annual Review of Linguistics 6:1  pp. 195 ff. DOI logo
Sundquist, John D.
2019. What’s the Point? Syntax, Meter and Punctuation in the Old Saxon ›Hêliand‹. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur 141:4  pp. 449 ff. DOI logo
Sapp, Christopher
Walkden, George
2016. The HeliPaD. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 21:4  pp. 559 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.