Part of
Advances in the Syntax of DPs: Structure, agreement, and case
Edited by Anna Bondaruk, Gréte Dalmi and Alexander Grosu
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 217] 2014
► pp. 95116
References (35)
Bobaljik, Jonathan D
2008Where's phi? Agreement as a post-syntactic operation. In Phi-theory: Phi Features Across Interfaces and Modules, Daniel Harbour, David Adger & Susana Béjar (eds), 295–328. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Bock, Kathryn, Cutler, Anne, Eberhard, Kathleen M., Buttefield, Sally, Cutting, J. Cooper & Humphreys, Karin R
2006Number agreement in British and American English: Disagreeing to agree collectively. Language 82(1): 64–113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1986Knowledge of Language. New York NY: Praeger.Google Scholar
2000Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Step by Step: Essays in Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, Roger Martin, David Michaels & Juan Uriagereka (eds), 89–155. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2001Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A Life in Language, Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), 1–52. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville G
1979The agreement hierarchy. Journal of Linguistics 15: 203–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Danon, Gabi
2011Agreement and DP-internal feature distribution. Syntax 14(4): 297–317. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012Nothing to agree on: Non-agreeing subjects of copular clauses in Hebrew. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 59(1–2): 85–108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013Agreement alternations with quantified nominals in Modern Hebrew. Journal of Linguistics 49(1): 55–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
In press. ma ze ze? nituax taxbiri šel ha-oged "ze" ba-ivrit ha-modernit (What's ze? A syntactic analysis of the copula "ze" in Modern Hebrew). To appear in Hebrew Linguistics.
Davies, Mark
2013Corpus of Global Web-Based English: 1.9 billion words from speakers in 20 countries. [URL]
den Dikken, Marcel
2001‘Pluringulars’, pronouns and quirky agreement. The Linguistic Review 18: 19–41.Google Scholar
Doron, Edit
1983Verbless Predicates in Hebrew. PhD dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Dowty, David & Jacobson, Pauline
1988Agreement as a semantic phenomenon. In Proceedings of ESCOL , Joyce Powers & Kenneth de Jong (eds), 95–108. Columbus OH: Ohio State University, Department of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Elbourne, Paul
1999Some correlations between semantic plurality and quantifier scope. In NELS 29: Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society , Pius Tamanji, Masako Hirotani & Nancy Hall (eds), 81–92. Amherst MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Geist, Ljudmila
2007Predication and equation in copular sentences: Russian vs. English. In Existence: Semantics and Syntax, Ileana Comorovski & Klaus Heusinger (eds), 79–105. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Yael
2008Predication and equation in Hebrew (nonpseudocleft) copular sentences. In Current Issues in Generative Hebrew Linguistics [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 134], Sharon Armon-Lotem, Gabi Danon & Susan Rothstein (eds), 161–196. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hellan, Lars
1986The headedness of NPs in Norwegian. In Features and Projections, Pieter Muysken & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds), 89–122. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Heller, Daphna
2002On the relation of connectivity and specificational pseudoclefts. Natural Language Semantics 10: 243–284. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Josefsson, Gunlög
2009Peas and pancakes: On apparent disagreement and (null) light verbs in Swedish. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 32(1): 35–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kathol, Andreas
1999Agreement and the syntax-morphology interface in HPSG. In Studies in Contemporary Phrase Structure Grammar, Robert D. Levine & Georgia M. Green (eds), 223–274. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Kim, Jong-Bok
2004Hybrid agreement in English. Linguistics 42(6): 1105–1128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Landau, Idan
2013Agreement at PF: An argument from partial control. Ms, Ben-Gurion University. [URL]Google Scholar
Levin, Magnus
2001Agreement With Collective Nouns in English. Lund: Lund University Press.Google Scholar
Markman, Vita G
2008Pronominal copula constructions are what? Reduced specificational pseudo-clefts. In Proceedings of the 26th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics , Charles B. Chang & Hannah J. Haynie (eds), 366–374. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Partee, Barbara & Borschev, Vladimir
2008Existential sentences, BE and GEN NEG in Russian. In Existence: Semantics and Syntax, Ileana Comorowski & Klaus von Heusinger (eds), 147–191. New York NY: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pollard, Carl & Sag, Ivan A
1994Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Reeve, Matthew
2010Clefts. PhD dissertation, University College London.Google Scholar
Reid, Wallis
1991Verb and Noun Number in English: A Functional Explanation. London: Longman.Google Scholar
2011The communicative function of English verb number. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 29(4): 1087–1146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sauerland, Uli
2004A team definitely. Snippets 9: 11–12.Google Scholar
Smith, Peter W
2013Collective (dis)agreement: On a 3/4 pattern of British English collective NPs. In Proceedings of ConSOLE XX , Enrico Boone, Martin Kohlberger & Maartje Schulpen (eds), 229–253. Leiden: Universiteit Leiden.Google Scholar
Wechsler, Stephen & Zlatić, Larisa
2000A theory of agreement and its application to Serbo-Croatian. Language 76(4): 799–832. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003The Many Faces of Agreement. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Wechsler, Stephen
2011The structure of Swedish pancakes. Paper presented at CSSP 2011, Université Paris 8.