Part of
Advances in the Syntax of DPs: Structure, agreement, and case
Edited by Anna Bondaruk, Gréte Dalmi and Alexander Grosu
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 217] 2014
► pp. 129163
Alexiadou, Artemis
2001Functional Structure in Nominals: Nominalization and Ergativity [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 42]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis & Anagnostopoulou, Elena
1998Parametrizing AGR: word order, V-movement and EPP checking. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16: 491–539. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bellert, Irena
1977On semantic and distributional properties of sentential adverbs. Linguistic Inquiry 8(2): 337–351.Google Scholar
Benvieniste, Émile
1966Problèmes de linguistique générale. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Blake, Barry, J
2001Case. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bondaruk, Anna & Charzyńska-Wójcik, Magdalena
2003Expletive pro in impersonals passives in Irish, Polish and Old English. Linguistische Berichte 195: 325–362.Google Scholar
Borer, Hagit
2005aStructuring Sense, Vol. 1: In Name Only. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2005bStructuring Sense, Vol. 2: The Normal Course of Events. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cabredo-Hofherr, Patricia
2006‘Arbitrary’ pro and the theory of pro-drop. In Agreement and Arguments, Peter Ackema, Patrick Brandt, Maaike Schoorlemmer & Fred Weerman, 230–258. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna
1993On the internal structure of DPs. University of Venice Working Papers in Linguistics 3(2): 1–20. Google Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro
1995aIndividual-level predicates as inherent generics. In The Generic Book, Gregory Carlson, Norman & Francis J. Pelletier (eds), 176–223, Chicago IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
1995bThe variability of impersonal subjects. In Quantification in Natural Language, Emmon Bach, Eloise Jelinek, Angelika Kratzer & Barbara Partee (eds), 107–143. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Choi, Jaehoon
2012The locus of person feature, agreement, and DP/CP parallelism. Presented at the 43rd Annual Meeting of North East Linguistic Society (NELS). October 19–21, City University of New York.
Chomsky, Noam
1995The Minimalist Program. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2004Beyond explanatory adequacy. In Structures and Beyond: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 3, Adriana Belletti (ed.), 104–132. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
1988On si constructions and the theory of Arb . Linguistic Inquiry 19(4): 521–581.Google Scholar
Dalmi, Gréte
2013All-in-one: Generic inclusive null subjects in Hungarian. In Proceedings of WCCFL 31 : 115–123, Robert LaBarge (ed.). Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
D’Alessandro, Roberta
2004Impersonal si Constructions: Agreement and Interpretation. PhD dissertation. University of Stuttgart.Google Scholar
2008Impersonal ‘si’ constructions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
D’Alessandro, Roberta & Alexiadou, Artemis
2003Inclusive and exclusive impersonal pronouns: A feature geometrical analysis. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 27: 31–44.Google Scholar
Dalrymple, Mary & Kaplan, Ronald, M
2000Feature indeterminacy and feature resolution. Language 76: 759–798. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diesing, Molly
1992Indefinites. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen
2001Adverbs of quantification and genericity. In Empirical Issues in Formal Syntax and Semantics 4, Claire Beyssade, Olivier Bonami, Patricia Cabredo-Hofherr & Francis Corblin, 27–44. Paris: Sorbonne University Press.Google Scholar
Dotlačil, Jakub & Šimik, Radek
2012Peeling, structural case, and Czech retroactive infinitives. Retrieved from [URL] on 7 August, 2012.
Dziwirek, Katarzyna
1994Polish Subjects. New York NY: Garland.Google Scholar
Egerland, Verner
2003Impersonal pronouns in Scandinavian and Romance. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 71: 75–101.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles
1971/1997 Lectures on Deixis. Stanford CA: CSLI. (originally distributed as Fillmore [1975/1971], Santa Cruz Lectures on Deixis by the Indiana University Linguistics Club).Google Scholar
Frascarelli, Mara
2007Subjects, topics, and the interpretation of referential pro . Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25: 691–734. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frascarelli, Mara & Hinterhölzl, Roland
2007Types of topics in German and Italian. In On Information Structure, Meaning and Form [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 100], Susanne Winkler & Kerstin Schwabe (eds), 87–116. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halle, Morris & Marantz, Alec
1993Distributed Morphology and the pieces of inflection. In The View from Building 20. Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, Kenneth Hale & Jay S. Keyser (eds), 111–176. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi & Ritter, Elizabeth
2002Person and number in pronouns: A feature-geometric analysis. Language 78(3): 482–526. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmberg, Anders
2010aNull subject parameters. In Null Subjects and Parameters in a Minimalist Perspective, Theresa Biberauer, Anders Holmberg, Ian Roberts & Michelle Sheehan (eds), 88–125. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
2010bThe null generic subject pronoun in Finnish: A case of incorporation in T. In Null Subjects and Parameters in a Minimalist Perspective, Theresa Biberauer, Anders Holmberg, Ian Roberts, & Michelle Sheehan (eds), 200–231. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Kamp, Hans
1981A theory of truth and discourse representation. In Formal Methods in the Study of Language, Jeroen Groenendijk, Theo Janssen & Martin Stokhof (eds), 277–322. Amsterdam: Mathematical Center.Google Scholar
Kaplan, David
1989Demonstratives. In Themes from Kaplan, Joseph Almog, John Perry & Howard Wettstein (eds), 483–540. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Kibort, Anna
2004Passive and passive-like constructions in English and Polish. Ms, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
2008Impersonals in Polish: An LFG perspective. Transactions of the Philological Society 106(2): 246–289. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika
1996Severing the external argument from its verb. In Phrase Structure and the Lexicon, Johan Rooryck & Laurie Zaring (eds), 109–138. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krzek, Małgorzata
2013The Syntax of Impersonal Constructions in Polish. PhD dissertation, Newcastle University.Google Scholar
Lavine, James, E
2005The morphosyntax of Polish and Ukrainian –NO/–TO. Journal of Slavic
Linguistics 13(1): 75–117.Google Scholar
Lyons, Christopher
1999Definiteness. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maienborn, Claudia
2001On the position and interpretation of locative modifiers. Natural Language Semantics 9: 191–240. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marantz, Alec
1991Case and licensing. In Proceedings of the Eighth Eastern States Conference on Linguistics (ESCOL) , 234–253. Columbus OH: Ohio State University, Department of Linguistics.Google Scholar
McFadden, Thomas
2004The Position of Morphological Case in the Derivation: A Study on the Syntax-Morphology Interface. PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
2006German inherent datives and argument structure. In Datives and Other Cases: Between Argument Structure and Event Structure [Studies in Language Companion Series 75], Daniel Hole, André Meinunger & Werner Abraham (eds),47–78. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mendikoetxea, Amaya
2008Clitic impersonal constructions in Romance: Syntactic features and semantic interpretation.Transactions of Philological Society 106 (2): 290–336. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moltmann, Friederike
2006Generic one, arbitrary PRO, and the first person. Natural Language Semantics 14: 257–281. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nagórko, Alicja
1997Zarys gramatyki polskiej (Polish Grammar. An Outline), 2nd edn. Warszawa: PWN.Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David & Torrego, Esther
2004The syntax of valuation and interpretability of features. In Phrasal and Clausal Architecture: Syntactic Derivation and Interpretation [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 101], Simin Karimi, Vida Samiian & Wendy K. Wilkins (eds), 262–293. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Progovac, Ljiljana
1998Determiner phrase in a language without determiners. Journal of Linguistics 34(1): 165–179. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Ian
2010A deletion analysis of null subjects. In Null Subjects and Parameters in a Minimalist Perspective, Theresa Biberauer, Anders Holmberg, Ian Roberts & Michelle Sheehan (eds), 58–88. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian & Holmberg, Anders
2010Introduction: Parameters in minimalist theory. In Null Subjects and Parameters in a Minimalist Perspective, Theresa Biberauer, Anders Holmberg, Ian Roberts & Michelle Sheehan (eds), 1–58. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Siewierska, Anna
2008Introduction: impersonalization from a subject-centred vs. agent-centred perspective. Transactions of Philological Society 106(2): 115–137. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann
2003Case: abstract vs. morphological. In New Perspectives on Case Theory, Ellen Brandner & Heike Zinsmeister (eds), 223–268. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
2004The syntax of person, tense and speech features. Italian Journal of Linguistics 16: 219–251. Special issue edited by Valentina Bianchi & Kenneth Safir.Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór, Ármann
2009Remarks on features. In Exploration of Phase Theory: Features and Arguments, Kleanthes Grohmann (ed.), 21–52. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vainikka, Anne
1989Deriving Syntactic Representations in Finnish. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Vendler, Zeno
1976Linguistics in Philosophy. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar