Part of
Weak Referentiality
Edited by Ana Aguilar-Guevara, Bert Le Bruyn and Joost Zwarts
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 219] 2014
► pp. 287310
References (22)
References
Aguilar-Guevara, A. & Zwarts, J. 2010. Weak definites and reference to kinds. In Proceedings of SALT 20, N. Li & D. Lutz (eds), 179–196. Ithaca NY: CLC Publications.Google Scholar
Abbott, B. 2004. Definiteness and indefiniteness. In Handbook of Pragmatics, L.R. Horn & G. Ward (eds), 122–149. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Barbier, I. 2000. An experimental study of scrambling and object shift in the acquisition of Dutch. In The Acquisition of Scrambling and Cliticization, S.M. Powers & C. Hamann (eds), 41–69. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Bergen, G. & de Swart, P. 2010. Scrambling in spoken Dutch: Definiteness versus weight as determinants of word order variation. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 6(2): 267–295. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carlson, G. & Sussman, R. 2005. Seemingly indefinite definites. In Linguistic Evidence: Empirical, Theoretical, and Computational Perspectives, S. Kepser & M. Reis (eds), 71–86. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carlson, G., Sussman, R., Klein, N. & Tanenhaus, M. 2006. Weak definite NPs. In Proceedings of NELS 36, C. Davis, A.R. Deal & Y. Zabbal (eds). Amherst MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
CGN. 2006. Corpus Gesproken Nederlands, Version 2.0. Electronic Resource. [URL].Google Scholar
Diesing, M. & Jelinek, E. 1995. Distributing Arguments. Natural Language Semantics 3(2): 123–176. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van der Does, J. & de Hoop, H. 1998. Type-shifting and scrambled definites. Journal of Semantics 15(4): 393–416. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Farkas, D. 2002. Specificity distinctions. Journal of Semantics 19: 1–13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Farkas, D. & de Swart, H. 2007. Article choice in plural generics. Lingua 117(9): 1657–1676. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haeseryn, W., Romijn, K., Geerts, G., de Rooij, J., & van den Toorn, M.C. 1997. Algemene Nederlandse Spraakkunst. Groningen & Deurne: Martinus Nijhoff uitgevers & Wolters Plantyn. Online edition (e-ANS) [URL]Google Scholar
Hawkins, J.A. 1991. On (in)definite articles: Implicatures and (un)grammaticality prediction. Journal of Linguistics 27: 405–442. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lyons, C. 1999. Definiteness. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schaeffer, J.C. 2000a. The Acquisition of Direct Object Scrambling and Clitic Placement: Syntax and Pragmatics [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 22]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000b. Scrambling and specificity in Dutch child language. In The Acquisition of Scrambling and Cliticization, S.M. Powers & C. Hamann (eds), 71–93. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scholten, J. & Aguilar-Guevara, A. 2010. Assessing the discourse referential properties of weak definite NPs. In Linguistics in the Netherlands 27, J. van Kampen & R. Nouwen (eds), 115–128. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Solomon, E. & Pearlmutter, N. 2004. Semantic integration and syntactic planning in language production. Cognitive Psychology 49: 1–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Swart, P. & van Bergen, G. 2011+. Definiteness and Adverb-Object Order in Dutch. Ms, University of Groningen/Université Catholique de Louvain.
Unsworth, S. 2005. Child L2, Adult L2, Child L1: Differences and Similarities. A Study on the Acquisition of Direct Object Scrambling in Dutch. PhD dissertation, Utrecht University. Utrecht: LOT Publications.
. 2007. L1 and L2 acquisition between sentence and discourse: Comparing production and comprehension. Lingua 117: 1930–1958. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wasow, T. & Arnold, J. 2003. Post-verbal constituent ordering in English. In Determinants of Grammatical Variation in English, G. Rohdenburg & B. Mondorf (eds), 119–154. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar