Cover not available
Part of
Bavarian Syntax: Contributions to the theory of syntax
Edited by Günther Grewendorf and Helmut Weiß
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 220] 2014
► pp. 1–20

Aspects of Bavarian syntax

ORCID logo
Published online: 26 November 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.220.01gre
References (39)
References
Barbiers, Sjef, Koeneman, Olaf, Lekakou, Marika & van der Ham, Margreet (eds). 2008. Microvariation in Syntactic Doubling. Bingley: Emerald. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bayer, Josef. 1984. COMP in Bavarian syntax. The Linguistic Review 3: 209–274. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. Doubly-filled comp, wh head-movement, and derivational economy. Ms, Konstanz University.
. 2013. Das W-Pronomen als Kopf. Handout Workshop Schweizerdeutsche Syntax , Annesso Cartesiano, Villa Salmi, Arezzo.
Bayer, Josef & Brandner, Eleonore. 2008. On wh-head-movement and the doubly-filled-COMP filter. In Proceedings of the 26th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Charles B. Chang & Hannah J. Haynie (eds), 87–95. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Biberauer, Theresa, Holmberg, Anders, Roberts, Ian & Sheehan, Michelle. 2010. Parametric Variation: Null Subjects in Minimalist Theory. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Brandner, Eleonore. 2012. Syntactic microvariation. Language and Linguistics Compass 6(2): 113–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Camacho, José. 2013. Null Subjects. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2000a. Minimalist Inquiries: The framework. In Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, Roger Martin, David Michaels, & Juan Uriagereka (eds), 89–155. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2000b. New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corbett, Greville. 2006. Agreement. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Emonds, Joseph. 2001. The lower operator position with parasitic gaps. In Features and Interfaces in Romance [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 222], Julia Herschensohn, Enrique Mallén & Karon Zagona (eds), 85–106. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giannakidou, Anastasia. 2000. Negative … Concord?. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18: 457–523. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grewendorf, Günther. 2012. Wh-movement as topic movement. In Functional Heads, Laura Brugé, Anna Cardinaletti, Giuliana Giusti, Nicola Munaro, & Cecilia Poletto (eds), 55–68. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013a. Satztypen und die linke/rechte Peripherie. In Satztypen des Deutschen, Jörg Meibauer, Markus Steinbach & Hans Altmann (eds), 652–679. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. 2013b. Double fronting in Bavarian left periphery. In Beyond Functional Sequence, Ur Shlonsky (ed.). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane. 1992. Theory and Description in Generative Syntax: A Case Study in West-Flemish. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane & van Riemsdijk, Henk. 1986. Verb projection raising, scope and the typology of rules affecting verbs. Linguistic Inquiry 17: 417–466.Google Scholar
Hoekstra, Eric. 1993. Dialectal variation inside CP as parametric variation. In Dialektsyntax [Linguistische Berichte, Sonderheft 5], Werner Abraham & Josef Bayer (eds). Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
Jäger, Agnes. 2008. History of German Negation [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 118]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kayne, Richard. 1983. Connectedness and Binary Branching. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Lühr, Rosemarie. 1989. Zu System und Genese der nebensatzeinleitenden Konjunktionen im heutigen Bairischen. In Bayrisch-österreichische Dialektforschung. Würzburger Arbeitstagung 1986, Vol. I, Erwin Koller, Werner Wegstein & Norbert R. Wolf (eds), 264–282. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.Google Scholar
Merkle, Ludwig. 1990. Bairische Grammatik, 4th edn. Munich: Hugendubel.Google Scholar
Poletto, Cecilia. 1999. The Higher Functional Field: Evidence from Northern Italian Dialects [Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax]. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar: A Handbook of Generative Syntax, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saito, Mamuro. 2012. Sentence types and the Japanese right periphery. In Discourse and Grammar. From Sentence Types to Lexical Categories, Günther Grewendorf & Thomas Ede Zimmermann (eds), 147–175. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Suñer, Margarita. 1994. Verb movement and the licensing of argumental Wh-phrases in Spanish. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 12: 335–372. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
von Stechow, Armin & Sternefeld, Wolfgang. 1988. Bausteine syntaktischen Wissens. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weiß, Helmut. 1998. Syntax des Bairischen. Studien zur Grammatik einer natürlichen Sprache. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1999. Duplex negatio non semper affirmat. A theory of double negation. Linguistics 37(5): 819–846.Google Scholar
. 2001. On two types of natural languages. Some consequences for linguistics. Theoretical Linguistics 27(1): 87–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2002. A quantifier approach to negation in natural languages. Or why negative concord is necessary. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 25(2): 125–153. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. A question of relevance. Some remarks on standard languages. In What Counts as Evidence in Linguistics? The Case of Innateness, Martina Penke & Anette Rosenbach (eds). Special issue of Studies in Language 28(3): 648–674, 680–681. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. Inflected complementizers in continental West Germanic Dialects. Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik 72: 148–166.Google Scholar
. 2013. UG und syntaktische (Mikro-)Variation. In Dialektologie in neuem Gewand. Zu Mikro-/Varietätenlinguistik, Sprachenvergleich und Universalgrammatik [Linguistische Berichte, Sonderheft 19], Werner Abraham & Elisabeth Leiss (eds), 173–207. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.Google Scholar
. To appear. The Wackernagel position and complementizer agreement – The emergence of a syntactic particularity at the left edge of the German middle field. In The German Middle Field in a Comparative and Diachronic Perspective, Roland Hinterhölzl, Kristine Bentzen, Augustin Speyer & Luka Szucsich (eds). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Zanuttini, Raffaella. 1991. Syntactic Properties of Sentential Negation. A Comparative Study of Romance Languages. PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Zehetner Ludwig 1985. Das bairische Dialektbuch. Unter Mitarbeit von Ludwig M. Eichinger, Reinhard Rascher, Anthony Rowley, & Christopher J. Wickham,München: Beck.Google Scholar
Zeijlstra, Hedde. 2004. Sentential Negation and Negative Concord. PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam.