Gaps and parasitic gaps in Bavarian
This paper explores a syntactic configuration of Bavarian (“Bavarian extraction” (BE)) in which an XP is extracted from a fronted embedded clause and placed in a position in front of that clause. In addition to the gap in the fronted embedded clause, a further gap may be licensed in this construction that represents a position in the matrix clause. It will be argued that the extracted element remains within the embedded clause and does not target a position in the matrix clause. This analysis raises the question as to how the gap in the matrix clause can be licensed. Comparing this configuration with parasitic gap constructions, I will show that contrary to what has been assumed in the literature, the BE does not involve the occurrence of a parasitic gap (neither in the embedded nor in the matrix clause). I further argue that crucial properties of BE, such as obligatory fronting of the embedded clause, can be accounted for in terms of a theory of phases, where movement is triggered by the need to dislocate elements with unvalued features to the edge of a phase. The curious appearance of a matrix gap that seems to lack a licensing element is analyzed as an instance of topic drop since the gap in the matrix clause shares crucial properties with a dropped pronominal.
References (36)
References
Altmann, Hans. 1981. Formen der “Herausstellung” im Deutschen. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Bayer, Josef. 2001. Asymmetry in emphatic topicalization. In Audiatur Vox Sapientiae. A Festschrift for Arnim von Stechow, Caroline Féry & Wolfgang Sternefeld (eds), 15–47. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.
Bayer, Josef. 2006. A note on targets of A′ -movement in the left periphery of German sentences. In Form, Structure, and Grammar. A Festschrift to Günther Grewendorf on Occasion of His 60th Birthday, Patrick Brandt & Erich Fuss (eds), 119–128. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
Benincà, Paolo & Poletto, Cecilia. 2004. Topic, focus and V2: Defining the CP sublayers. In The Structure of CP and IP, Luigi Rizzi (ed.), 52–75. Oxford: OUP.
Bresnan, Joan. 1977. Variables in the theory of transformations. In Formal Syntax, Peter William Culicover, Tom Wasow & Adrian Akmajian (eds), 157–196. New York NY: Academic Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 1982. Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Barriers. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Step by Step, Roger Martin, David Michaels & Juan Uriagereka (eds), 89–155. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 2008. On phases. In Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory, Robert Freidin, Carlos Otero & Maria-Luisa Zubizaretta (eds), 133–166. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam & Lasnik, Howard. 1977. Filters and control. Linguistic Inquiry 8: 425–504.
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1990. Types of A′ -dependencies. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Emonds, Joseph. 2001. The lower operator position with parasitic gaps. In Features and Interfaces in Romance [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 222], Julia Herschensohn, Enrique Mallén & Karen Zagona (eds), 85–106. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Engdahl, Elisabet. 1983. Parasitic gaps. Linguistics and Philosophy 6: 5–34.
Felix, Sascha. 1985. Parasitic gaps in German. In Erklärende Syntax des Deutschen, Werner Abraham (ed.), 173–200. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
von Fintel, Kai. 1994. Restrictions on Quantifier Domains. PhD dissertation, University of Amherst.
Fuß, Eric & Grewendorf, Günther. 2014. Freie Relativsätze mit d-Pronomen. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft (in press).
Grewendorf, Günther. 2013. Double fronting in Bavarian left periphery, Ms, forthcoming in Beyond Functional Sequence, Ur Shlonsky (ed.). Oxford: OUP.
Grewendorf, Günther & Groat, Erich. 2013. Licensing null heads in free relatives. Ms, University of Frankfurt.
Günthner, Susanne. 1999.
Wenn-Sätze im Vor-Vorfeld: Ihre Formen und Funktionen in der gesprochenen Sprache. InLiSt 11: 1–33.
Haegeman, Liliane. 1997. Verb second, the split CP and null subjects in early Dutch finite clauses. Geneva Generative Papers (GenGenP) 4: 133–175.
Haegeman, Liliane. 2002. Anchoring to speaker, adverbial clauses and the structure of CP. Georgetown University Working Papers in Theoretical Linguistics 2: 117–180.
Haegeman, Liliane. 2004. The syntax of adverbial clauses and its consequences for topicalization. Antwerp Papers in Linguistics 107: 61–90.
Kayne, Richard Stanley. 1983. Connectedness and Binary Branching. Dordrecht: Foris.
Lutz, Ulrich. 1993. Zur Extraktion aus Adjunktsätzen im Deutschen. In Extraktion im Deutschen I [Arbeitspapiere des Sonderforschungs-bereichs 340, Nr. 34], Franz Josef d’Avis, Sigrid Beck, Ulrich Lutz, Jürgen Pafel & Susanne Trissler (eds), 133–189. Universität Tübingen.
Müller, Stefan. 1999. An HPSG-analysis for free relative clauses in German. Grammars 2(1): 53–105.
Nissenbaum, Jonathan. 2000. Investigations of Covert Phrase Movement [MITWPL]. Cambridge MA: Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT.
Pittner, Karin. 1995. The case of German relatives. Linguistic Review 12: 197–231.
Reinhart, Tanya. 1983. Anaphora and Semantic Interpretation. London: Croom Helm.
Richards, Marc. 2012. No phase is an island (?): An attempt to constrain internal ‘Free Merge’ via the edge feature. Ms, University of Frankfurt.
Roberts, Ian. 2004. The C-system in Brythonic Celtic languages, V2, and the EPP. In The Structure of CP and IP, Luigi Rizzi (ed.), 297–328. Oxford: OUP.
Ross, John Robert. 1967. Constraints on Variables in Syntax. PhD dissertation, MIT.
von Stechow, Arnim & Sternefeld, Wolfgang. 1988. Bausteine syntaktischen Wissens. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
Trutkowski, Ewa. 2011. Topic drop at the syntax-semantics-pragmatics interface. Ms, University of Potsdam.
Weiß, Helmut. 1998. Syntax des Bairischen. Studien zur Grammatik einer natürlichen Sprache. Tübingen: Niemeyer.