Cover not available
Part of
Structures, Strategies and Beyond: Studies in honour of Adriana Belletti
Edited by Elisa Di Domenico, Cornelia Hamann and Simona Matteini
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 223] 2015
► pp. 17–46

Notes on labeling and subject positions

This paper investigates aspects of the “halting problem” for subject movement: under what conditions is it obligatory? Where must it stop, giving rise to freezing effects? I will first introduce a particular implementation of the labeling approach presented in Chomsky (2013), and illustrate its explanatory power in connection with freezing effects. Then, I will use this approach to address subject-object asymmetries in extraction contexts. The freezing properties of subjects will be illustrated both for the preverbal subject position and for the special focal position in the low periphery of the clause analyzed in Belletti (2001b, 2004). A brief discussion of the consequences of labeling for the possibility of moving specifiers and complements will conclude the paper.
Keywords: focus, freezing, labeling, Relativized Minimality, subject positions
Published online: 27 August 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.223.02riz
References (74)
References
Adger, David. 2012. A Syntax of Substance. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Belletti, Adriana. 1988. The case of unaccusatives. Linguistic Inquiry 19: 1–34.Google Scholar
. 2001a. Agreement projections. In Handbook of Generative Syntax, Mark Baltin & Chris Collins (eds). Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001b. Inversion as focalization. In Subject Inversion in Romance and the Theory of Universal Grammar, Aafke Hulk & Jean-Yves Pollock (eds), 60–90. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. Aspects of the low IP area. In The Structure of CP and IP: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 2, Luigi Rizzi (ed.), 16–51. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. Structures and Strategies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Belletti Adriana, Bennati, Elisa & Sorace, Antonella. 2007. Theoretical and developmental issues in the syntax of subjects: Evidence from near native Italian. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25(4): 657–689. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Belletti, Adriana. To appear. The Focus map of clefts: Extraposition and predication. In Beyond Functional Sequence, Ur Shlonsky (ed.). Oxford: OUP.
Belletti, Adriana & Rizzi, Luigi. 1988. Psych-verbs and Theta Theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6(3): 291–352. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. Moving verbal chunks in the low functional field. In Functional Heads – The Cartography of Syntactic Structures 7, Laura Brugè, Anna Cardinaletti, Giuliana Giusti, Nicola Munaro & Cecilia Poletto, 129–137. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benincà, Paola & Poletto, Cecilia. 2004. Topic, Focus and V2: Defining the CP sublayers. In The Structure of CP and IP: The Cartography of Syntactic StructuresVol. 2, Luigi Rizzi (ed.), 52–75. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Bianchi, Valentina, Bocci, Giuliano & Cruschina, Silvio. Forthcoming. Mirative Focus. Ms, University of Siena, University of Geneva, University of Vienna.
Bianchi, Valentina & Chesi, Cristiano. 2012. Subject islands and the subject criterion. In Enjoy Linguistics! Papers Offered to Luigi Rizzi on the Occasion of his 60th Birthday, Valentina Bianchi & Cristiano Chesi (eds), 25–53. Siena: CISCL Press.Google Scholar
Bianchi, Valentina & Frascarelli, Mara. 2010. Is Topic a root phenomenon? Iberia 2: 43–88.Google Scholar
Boeckx, Cedric. 2008. Bare Syntax. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bošković, Želiko. 1997. The Syntax of Non-finite Complementation: An Economy Approach. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. On the operator freezing effects. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 26: 455–496. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borer, Hagit. 2005. In Name Only. Structuring Sense, Vol. I. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bowers, John. 2010. Arguments as Relations. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brandi, Luciana & Cordin, Patrizia. 1989. Two Italian dialects and the null subject parameter. In The Null Subject Parameter, Osvaldo Jaeggli & Ken Safir (eds), 111–142. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bresnan, J. 1977. Variables in the Theory of Transformations. In Formal Syntax, P. Culicover, et al. (eds), New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Calabrese, Andrea. 1986. Some properties of the Italian pronominal system: An analysis based on the notion of thema as subject of predication. In Tema-Rema in Italiano, Harro Stammerjohann (ed.), 25–36. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna. 2004. Towards a cartography of subject positions. In The Structure of CP and IP, Luigi Rizzi (ed.), 115–165. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Cecchetto, Carlo & Donati, Caterina. 2010. On labeling: Principle C and head movement. Syntax 13(3): 241–273. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chao, Wynn. 1980. Pro drop languages and non-obligatory control. Ms, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Chomsky, Noam. 1976. Conditions on rules of grammar. Linguistic Analysis 2: 303–351.Google Scholar
. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. On phases. In Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory. Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, Robert Freidin, Carlos P. Otero & Maria Luisa Zubizarreta (eds), 291–321 Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Problems of projection. Lingua 130: 33–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross – Linguistic Perspective. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Collins, Chris. 2005. A smuggling approach to the passive in English. Syntax 8(2): 81–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Danckaert, Lieven & Haegeman, Liliane. 2014. Speculations on subject extraction and wh agreement in English. Paper presented at IGG 2014, University of Trento.
Frascarelli, M. & R. Hinterhölzl. 2007. Types of Topics in German and Italian. In On Information Structure, Meaning and Form, S. Winkler and K. Schwabe (eds), 87–116. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Friedmann, Naama, Belletti, Adriana & Rizzi, Luigi. 2009. Relativized relatives. Lingua 119: 67–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greco, Ciro. 2014. Subjects and Arguments in A¢-Syntax. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Milano-Bicocca.
Haegeman, Liliane (ed.). 2012. Adverbial Clauses, Main Clause Phenomena, and the Composition of the Left Periphery. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 8. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kayne, Richard. 1994. The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kenstowicz, Michael. 1989. The null subject parameter in Modern Arabic dialects. In The Null Subject Parameter, Osvaldo Jaeggli & Ken Safir (eds), 263–277. Dordrecht:Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krapova, Ilyiana & Cinque, Guglielmo. 2008. On the order of wh-phrases in Bulgarian multiple wh-fronting. In Formal Description of Slavic Languages: The Fifth Conference, Gerhild Zybatow, Luka Szucsich, Uwe Junghanns & Roland Meyer (eds), 318–336. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Kuroda, Siege-Yuki. 1972. The categorical and the thetic judgment. Foundations of Language 9: 153–185.Google Scholar
Ladusaw, William. 1994. Thetic and categorical, stage and individual, weak and strong. In Proceedings of the 4th Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference (SALT 4), Mandy Harvey & Lynn Santelmann (eds), 220–229. ásemanticsarchives.netñGoogle Scholar
Lasnik, Howard & Saito, Mamoru. 1992. Move Alpha. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lohndal, Terje. 2011. Freezing effects and objects. Journal of Linguistics 47: 163–199. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Longobardi, Giuseppe. 1985. Su alcune proprietà della sintassi e della forma logica delle frasi copulari. In Sintassi e morfologia della lingua italiana d’uso. Teorie e applicazioni descrittive. Atti del XVII Congresso Internazionale SLI, Leonardo M. Savoia & Annalisa Franchi De Bellis (eds), 213–223. Roma: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
Manzini, M. Rita & Savoia, Leonardo M. 2005. I dialetti italiani e romanci. Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso.Google Scholar
Marantz, Alec. 2013. Verbal argument structure: Events and participants. Lingua 130: 152–168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCloskey, James. 1997. Subjecthood and subject positions. In Elements of Grammar, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 197–236. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Menuzzi, Sergio. 2000. That-trace effects in Portuguese. Forum Lingüístico 2(1): 13–39. Florianópolis: UFSC.Google Scholar
Moro, Andrea. 1997. The Raising of Predicates. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000. Dynamic Antisymmetry. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nicolis, M. 2005. On Pro Drop. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Siena.
Perlmutter, D. 1971. Deep and Surface Structure Constraints in Syntax. New York NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Poletto, Cecilia. 2000. The Higher Functional Field. Evidence from Northern Italian Dialects. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Postal, P. 1974. On Raising. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1982. Issues in Italian Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1990. Relativized Minimality. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1991. Residual verb second and the wh criterion. In Geneva Working Papers on Formal and Computational Linguistics, republished in Rizzi, Luigi, 2000, Comparative Syntax and Language Acquisition, 213–240, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 1993. Argument/Adjunct (A)symmetries. Proceedings of NELS 22, 365–381. Amherst MA.Google Scholar
. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. Locality and left periphery. In Structures and Beyond. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol.3, Adriana Belletti (ed.), 223–251. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 2006. On the form of chains: Criterial positions and ECP effects. In On Wh Movement, Lisa Cheng & Norbert Corver (eds), 97–133. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2010. On some properties of criterial freezing. In The Complementizer Phase: Subjects and Operators, E. Phoevos Panagiotidis (ed.), 17–32. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. Some locality principles and Italian syntax. Ms, University of Siena. To be published in The Syntax of Italian, Giuseppe Longobardi, (ed.). Cambridge: CUP.
. 2013. Focus, Topic and the cartography of the left periphery. In The Bloomsbury Companion to Syntax, Cristina Parodi & Silvia Luraghi (eds), 436–451. London: Bloomsbury. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. Some consequences of criterial freezing: Asymmetries, anti- adjacency and extraction from cleft sentences. In Functional Structure from Top to Toe. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 9, Peter Svenionius (ed.), 19–45. Oxford:OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. Cartography, criteria, and labeling. In Beyond Functional Sequence, Ur. Shlonsky (ed.), 314–338. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi & Shlonsky, Ur. 2007. Strategies of subject extraction. In Interfaces + Recursion = Language? Chomsky’s Minimalism and the View from Syntax-Semantics, Hans Martin Gärtner & Uli Sauerland (eds), 115–160. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruwet, Nicolas. 1975. Les phrases copulatives en français. Recherches Linguistiques, Université de Paris VIII, 143–191.Google Scholar
Salulessa, Salulessa. 2004. The Structure of Relative Clauses in Lingala: A Comparative Study in Bantu Word Order Variation and Left Periphery. MA thesis, University of Geneva.
Shlonsky, Ur. 2014. Subject positions, subject extraction, EPP and the subject criterion. In Locality, Enoch Aboh, Maria Teresa Guasti & Ian Roberts (eds), 58–85. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sobin, Nicolas. 2002. The comp-trace effect, the adverb effect and minimal CP. Journal of Linguistics 38: 527–560. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sportiche, Dominique. 1988. A theory of floating quantifiers and its corollaries for constituent structure. Linguistic Inquiry 19(3): 425–449.Google Scholar
Starke, Michal. 2001. Move Dissolves into Merge. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Geneva.
Cited by (13)

Cited by 13 other publications

Hu, Yaqing & Andrew Simpson
2024. Floating quantifiers, specificity and focus in Lalo Yi. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 33:1 ► pp. 71 ff. DOI logo
Shlonsky, Ur
2024. From Bantu subject-object reversal to inverted copular sentences. In Rich Descriptions and Simple Explanations in Morphosyntax and Language Acquisition, ► pp. 438 ff. DOI logo
Samo, Giuseppe
2022. Criterial V2: ModP as a Locus of Microvariation in Swiss Romansh Varieties. Probus 34:1 ► pp. 143 ff. DOI logo
Yip, Ka-Fai & Tommy Tsz-Ming Lee
2022. Modal movement licensed by focus. In New Explorations in Chinese Theoretical Syntax [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 272], ► pp. 165 ff. DOI logo
Quarezemin, Sandra
2020. Cartography, Left Periphery and Criterial Positions: an interview with Luigi Rizzi. DELTA: Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada 36:1 DOI logo
Radford, Andrew
2019. Relative Clauses, DOI logo
Reeve, Matthew
2019. An agreement-based analysis of extraction from nominals. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 37:1 ► pp. 263 ff. DOI logo
Ishii, Toru
2018. On so-called “gapless” constructions in Japanese. Journal of Japanese Linguistics 34:2 ► pp. 173 ff. DOI logo
OMUNE, JUN
2018. REFORMULATING PAIR-MERGE OF HEADS. ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 34:2 ► pp. 266 ff. DOI logo
Zyman, Erik
2018. Quantifier float as stranding. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 36:3 ► pp. 991 ff. DOI logo
Rizzi, Luigi & Giuliano Bocci
2017. Left Periphery of the Clause: Primarily Illustrated for Italian. In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Second Edition, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Rizzi, Luigi
2016. EPP and ECP revisited. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 10 [Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory, 10], ► pp. 211 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. A Criterial Approach to the Cartography of V2 [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 257], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.