Cover not available
Part of
Structures, Strategies and Beyond: Studies in honour of Adriana Belletti
Edited by Elisa Di Domenico, Cornelia Hamann and Simona Matteini
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 223] 2015
► pp. 47–66

On a PP/DP asymmetry in extraction

Preverbal subject DPs in English seem to allow for the extraction of a PP complement, but not of a DP complement stranding the preposition of. Assuming a top-down computation, we argue that an extracted PP cannot be re-merged within a criterial preverbal subject (in the sense of Rizzi 2006), but it can be re-merged within a non-criterial subject that has undergone full reconstruction. This ‘delayed remerge’ implies that in the preverbal position, the selectional requirement of the N head for a PP complement is not computed yet. This immediately accounts for the impossibility of P-stranding within a preverbal subject: the presence of the preposition implies that the computation of the N’s selectional requirement has not been delayed.
Keywords: categorical, extraction, pied piping, P-stranding, subject islands, thetic, top-down computation
Published online: 27 August 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.223.03bia
References (24)
References
Bianchi,Valentina & Chesi, Cristiano. 2014. Subject islands, reconstruction, and the flow of the computation. Linguistic Inquiry 45(4): 525–569. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bianchi, Valentina & Chesi, Cristiano. 2006. Phases, left branch islands, and computational nesting. UPENN Working Papers in Linguistics 12(1): 15–28.Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna. 2004. Toward a cartography of subject positions. In The Structure of CP and IP, Luigi Rizzi (ed.), 115–165. New York-Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chesi, Cristiano. 2012. Competence and Computation: Toward a Processing Friendly Minimalist Grammar. Padova: Unipress. (Revised version of 2004 doctoral dissertation).Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Barriers. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. On phases. In Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory, Robert Freidin, Carlos P. Otero & Maria Luisa Zubizarreta (eds), 133–166. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1990. Types of A¢-dependencies. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diesing, Molly. 1992. Indefinites. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
É. Kiss, Katalin 1996. Two subject positions in English. The Linguistic Review 13: 119–142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grimshaw, Jane. 1990. Extended projection. Ms, Brandeis University.
Guéron, Jacqueline. 1980. On the syntax and semantics of PP extraposition. Linguistic Inquiry 11(4): 637–678.Google Scholar
Hofmeister, Philip & Sag, Ivan A. 2010. Cognitive constraints and island effects. Language 86: 366–415. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huang, C.T. James. 1982. Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Jurka, Johannes. 2010. The Importance of Being a Complement. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Maryland.
Kluender, Robert & Kutas, Marta. 1993. Subjacency as a processing phenomenon. Language and Cognitive Processes 8: 573–633. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ladusaw, William. 1994. Thetic and categorical, stage and individual, weak and strong. Proceedings of SALT 4.
Levine, Robert & Sag, Ivan. 2003. Some empirical issues in the grammar of extraction. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, Stefan Müller (ed.), 236–256. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Longobardi, Giuseppe. 1991. Extraction from NP and head government. In The Syntax of Noun Phrases, Alessandra Giorgi & Giuseppe Longobardi, 57–112. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 2006. On the form of chains: Criterial positions and ECP effects. In Wh-movement: Moving on, Lisa Cheng & Norbert Corver (eds), 97–133. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ross, John Robert. 1967. Constraints on Variables in Syntax. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Stepanov, Arthur. 2007. The end of CED? Minimalism and extraction domains. Syntax 10: 80–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Takahashi, Daiko. 1994. Minimality of Movement. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Connecticut.
Truswell, Robert. 2007. Extraction from adjuncts and the structure of events. Lingua 117: 1355–1377. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Acker, Frederik. 2007. Online Survey Creator 7.4 for Windows. Ms., [URL]
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Gavarró, Anna
2020. Child Relativized Minimality and Grammaticality Judgement. Frontiers in Psychology 11 DOI logo
Wiślicki, Jan
2018. Quotation as a challenge for feature-driven phases: An argument for Zwart’s merge. The Linguistic Review DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.