Part of
Discourse-oriented SyntaxEdited by Josef Bayer, Roland Hinterhölzl and Andreas Trotzke
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 226] 2015
► pp. 13–40
Edited by Josef Bayer, Roland Hinterhölzl and Andreas Trotzke
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 226] 2015
► pp. 13–40
The derivation and interpretation of left peripheral discourse particles
German discourse particles are known to appear in clause-medial position and to resist displacement to the left or to the right. Nevertheless, there seems to be an exception: discourse particles in interrogatives can be moved to the left as a consequence of forming a constituent with a wh-phrase. In this paper, we focus on such cases of co-constituency of discourse particles and wh-elements in German wh-questions. We propose a successive-cyclic movement account for their distribution. Relying on the combination of key aspects of the Minimalist Program, we present a derivational model that also accounts for cases of stacked particles as they may appear in the left clausal periphery. We then turn to the interpretation of these configurations. In comparison with constructions in which the particle stays in situ, we notice an interpretive distinctness that requires the notion of emphasis for intensity to account for the extra pragmatic effect that these left peripheral structures convey.
References (80)
Abraham, Werner. 1991. Discourse particles in German: How does their illocutive force come about? In Discourse Particles: Descriptive and Theoretical Investigations on the Logical, Syntactic and Pragmatic Properties of Discourse Particles in German [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 12], Werner Abraham (ed.), 203-252. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 
Ackema, Peter & Neeleman, Ad. 2004. Beyond Morphology: Interface Conditions on Word Formations. Oxford: OUP.
Barbiers, Sjef. 2014. Syntactic doubling and deletion as a source of variation. In Linguistic Variation in the Minimalist Framework, M. Carme Picallo (ed.), 197-223. Oxford: OUP.
Bayer, Josef. 1984. Comp in Bavarian syntax. The Linguistic Review 3: 209-274.
. 1996. Directionality and Logical Form: On the Scope of Focusing Particles and Wh-in-situ. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
. 1999. Bound focus or how can association with focus be achieved without going semantically astray? In The Grammar of Focus [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 24], Georges Rebuschi & Laurice Tuller (eds), 55-82. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2001. Asymmetry in emphatic topicalization. In Audiatur Vox Sapientiae: A Festschrift for Arnim von Stechow, Caroline Féry & Wolfgang Sternefeld (eds), 15-47. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.
. 2012. From modal particle to interrogative marker: A study of German denn
. In Functional Heads, Laura Brugé, Anna Cardinaletti, Giuliana Giusti, Nicola Munaro & Cecilia Poletto (eds), 13-28. Oxford: OUP.
Cardinaletti, Anna. This volume. Italian verb-based discourse particles in a comparative perspective. In Discourse-oriented Syntax, Josef Bayer, Roland Hinterhölzl & Andreas Trotzke (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bayer, Josef & Dasgupta, Probal. In press. Emphatic Topicalization and the structure of the left periphery: Evidence from German and Bangla. Syntax.
Bayer, Josef & Obenauer, Hans-Georg. 2011. Discourse particles, clause structure, and question types. The Linguistic Review 28: 449-491.
Behaghel, Otto. 1932. Deutsche Syntax: Eine geschichtliche Darstellung, Vol. IV. Heidelberg: Carl Winters Universitätsbuchhandlung.
Bellert, Irena. 1977. On semantic and distributional properties of sentential adverbs. Linguistic Inquiry 8: 337-350.
Bierwisch, Manfred. 1966. Regeln für die Intonation deutscher Sätze. Untersuchungen über Akzent und Intonation im Deutschen: Studia Grammatica 7: 99-199.
Bobaljik, Jonathan. 1995. Morphosyntax: The Syntax of Verbal Inflection. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Büring, Daniel & Hartmann, Katharina. 2001. The syntax and semantics of focus-sensitive particles in German. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 19: 229-281.
Cardinaletti, Anna. 2011. German and Italian modal particles and clause structure. The Linguistic Review 28: 493-531.
Carrilho, Ernestina. 2008. Beyond subject doubling: Expletive constructions in European Portuguese dialects. In Microvariation in Syntactic Doubling, Sjef Barbiers, Olaf Koeneman, Marika Lekakou & Margreet van der Ham (eds), 301-324. Bingley: Emerald.
Caudal, Patrick & Nicolas, David. 2005. Types of degrees and types of event structures. In Event Arguments: Foundations and Applications, Claudia Maienborn & Angelika Wöllstein (eds), 277-300. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Oxford: OUP.
Coleman, H.O. 1914. Intonation and emphasis. Miscellanea Phonetica 1: 6-26.
Coniglio, Marco. 2011. Die Syntax der deutschen Modalpartikeln: Ihre Distribution und Lizensierung in Haupt- und Nebensätzen. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
Cruschina, Silvio. 2012. Discourse-related Features and Functional Projections. Oxford: OUP.
den Dikken, Marcel & Giannakidou, Anastasia. 2002. From hell to polarity: 'Aggressively non-D-linked' wh-phrases as polarity items. Linguistic Inquiry 33: 31-61.
Ernst, Thomas. 2007. On the role of semantics in a theory of adverb syntax. Lingua 117: 1008-1033.
Fanselow, Gisbert. 2002. Quirky subjects and other specifiers. In More Than Words, Ingrid Kaufmann & Barbara Stiebels (eds), 227-250. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
. 2003. Surprising specifiers and cyclic spellout. Generative Linguistics in Poland 5: 29-46.
Frey, Werner. 2010. Ā-Movement and conventional implicatures: About the grammatical encoding of emphasis in German. Lingua 120: 1416-1435.
Gallego, Ángel J. 2010. Phase Theory [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 152]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Gutzmann, Daniel & Turgay, Katharina. 2015. Expressive intensifiers and external degree modification. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 17: 185-228.
Hartmann, Katharina. 2008. Focus and emphasis in tone and intonational languages. In The Discourse-Potential of Underspecified Structures, Anita Steube (ed.), 389-411. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Hinterhölzl, Roland & Munaro, Nicola. This volume. On the interpretation of modal particles in non-assertive speech acts in German and Bellunese. In Discourse-oriented Syntax, Josef Bayer, Roland Hinterhölzl & Andreas Trotzke (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hornstein, Norbert & Nunes, Jairo. 2014. Minimalism and control. In The Routledge Handbook of Syntax, Andrew Carnie, Yosuke Sato & Daniel Siddiqi (eds), 239-263. London: Routledge.
Jacobs, Joachim. 1983. Fokus und Skalen: Zur Syntax und Semantik der Gradpartikeln im Deutschen. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Kandybowicz, Jason. 2013. Ways of emphatic scope-taking: From emphatic assertion in Nupe to the grammar of emphasis. Lingua 128: 51-71.
Kennedy, Christopher & McNally, Louise. 2005. Scale structure, degree modification, and the semantics of gradable predicates. Language 81: 345-381.
Kiefer, Ferenc. 1967. On Emphasis and Word Order in Hungarian. The Hague: Mouton.
Kleemann-Krämer, Anja. 2010. On apparent NP-internal focus particles in German. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 13: 1-29.
Klein, Wolfgang & Geyken, Alexander. 2010. Das Digitale Wörterbuch der Deutschen Sprache (DWDS). Lexicographica: International Annual for Lexicography 26: 79-96.
Kratzer, Angelika. 2012. Modals and Conditionals: New and Revised Perspectives. Oxford: OUP.
Lebeaux, David. 1991. Relative clauses, licensing, and the nature of the derivation. In Perspectives on Phrase Structure: Heads and Licensing, Susan Rothstein (ed.), 209-239. San Diego CA: Academic Press.
Manzini, M. Rita. This volume. Italian adverbs and discourse particles. In Discourse-oriented Syntax, Josef Bayer, Roland Hinterhölzl & Andreas Trotzke (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
May, Robert. 1985. Logical Form: Its Structure and Derivation. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
McDaniel, Dana. 1986. Conditions on Wh-Chains. PhD dissertation, CUNY.
Meibauer, Jörg. 1991. Existenzimplikaturen bei rhetorischen W-Fragen. In Fragen und Fragesätze, Marga Reis & Inger Rosengren (eds), 223-242. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
. 1994. Modaler Kontrast und konzeptuelle Verschiebung: Studien zur Syntax und Semantik deutscher Modalpartikeln. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Meyer, Marie-Christine & Sauerland, Uli. 2009. A pragmatic constraint on ambiguity detection. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 27: 139-150.
Müller, Stefan. 2002a. Complex Predicates: Verbal Complexes, Resultative Constructions, and Particle Verbs in German. Stanford CA: CSLI Publications.
. 2002b. Syntax or morphology: German particle verbs revisited. In Verb-Particle Explorations, Nicole Dehé, Ray Jackendoff, Andrew McIntyre & Silke Urban (eds), 119-140. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
. 2003. Mehrfache Vorfeldbesetzung. Deutsche Sprache 31: 29-62.
. 2013. Datensammlung zur scheinbar mehrfachen Vorfeldbesetzung. Ms, FU Berlin. <[URL]>
Munaro, Nicola & Obenauer, Hans-Georg. 1999. On underspecified wh-elements in pseudo-interrogatives. University of Venice Working Papers in Linguistics 9: 181-253.
Niebuhr, Oliver. 2010. On the phonetics of intensifying emphasis in German. Phonetica 67: 170-198.
Nunes, Jairo. 1995. The Copy Theory of Movement and Linearization of Chains in the Minimalist Program. PhD dissertation, University of Maryland.
. 2004. Linearization of Chains and Sideward Movement. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
. 2012. Sideward movement: Triggers, timing, and outputs. In Ways of Structure Building, Myriam Uribe-Etxebarria & Vidal Valmala (eds), 114-142. Oxford: OUP.
Obenauer, Hans-Georg. 2004. Nonstandard wh-questions and alternative checkers in Pagotto. In The Syntax and Semantics of the Left Periphery, Horst Lohnstein & Susanne Trissler (eds), 343-383. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Pesetsky, David. 1987. Wh-in-situ: Movement and unselective binding. In The Representation of (In)Definiteness, Eric J. Reuland & Alice G. Ter Meulen (eds), 98-129. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Poletto, Cecilia & Zanuttini, Raffaella. 2013. Emphasis as reduplication: Evidence from sì che/no che sentences. Lingua 128: 124-141.
Reis, Marga. 2005. On the syntax of so-called focus particles in German: A reply to Büring and Hartmann 2001. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 23: 459-483.
Rett, Jessica & Murray, Sarah E. 2013. A semantic account of mirative evidentials. Proceedings of SALT 23: 453-472.
Rizzi, Luigi. 2014. Syntactic cartography and the syntacticisation of scope-discourse semantics. In Mind, Values, and Metaphysics, Anne Reboul (ed.), 517-533. Dordrecht: Springer.
Rooth, Mats. 1992. A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 1: 75-116.
Sauerland, Uli & Heck, Fabian. 2003. LF-intervention effects in pied piping. In Proceedings of NELS 33, Makoto Kadowaki & Shigeto Kawahara (eds), 347-366. Amherst MA: GLSA.
Stepanov, Arthur. 2001. Late adjunction and minimalist phrase structure. Syntax 4: 94-125.
Sternefeld, Wolfgang. 2006. Syntax: Eine morphologisch motivierte generative Beschreibung des Deutschen, 2 Vols. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.
Stroik, Thomas S. 2009. Locality in Minimalist Syntax. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Thurmair, Maria. 1989. Modalpartikeln und ihre Kombinationen. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Trotzke, Andreas & Quaglia, Stefano. In press. Particle topicalization and German clause structure. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics.
Trotzke, Andreas, Quaglia, Stefano & Wittenberg, Eva. 2015. Topicalization in German particle verb constructions: The role of semantic transparency. Linguistische Berichte 244: 409–426.
Trotzke, Andreas & Turco, Giuseppina. 2015. The grammatical reflexes of emphasis: Evidence from German wh-questions. Lingua 168: 37–56.
Trotzke, Andreas & Zwart, Jan-Wouter. 2014. The complexity of narrow syntax: Minimalism, representational economy, and simplest Merge. In Measuring Grammatical Complexity, Frederick J. Newmeyer & Laurel B. Preston (eds), 128-147. Oxford: OUP.
Umbach, Carla. 2004. On the notion of contrast in information structure and discourse structure. Journal of Semantics 21: 1-21.
Uriagereka, Juan. 1999. Multiple spell-out. In Working Minimalism, Samuel D. Epstein & Norbert Hornstein (eds), 109-135. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
. 2011. Derivational cycles. In Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Minimalism, Cedric Boeckx (ed.), 239-259. Oxford: OUP.
Van Craenenbroeck, Jeroen. 2005. Averbial modification under sluicing. In Ellipsis in Minimalism: Proceedings of the Seventh Seoul International Conference on Generative Grammar, Kiyong Choi & Changguk Yim (eds), 77-102. Seoul: Hankook.
Zeller, Jochen. 2001. Particle Verbs and Local Domains [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 41]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Zifonun, Gisela, Hoffmann, Ludger & Strecker, Bruno. 1997. Grammatik der deutschen Sprache, 3 Vols. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Zimmermann, Malte. 2008. Contrastive focus and emphasis. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 55: 347-360.
Cited by (23)
Cited by 23 other publications
Alshamari, Murdhy
2023. Cartographic architecture of DP. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 59:3 ► pp. 493 ff. 
Jarrah, Marwan & Ekab Al-Shawashreh
2022. Remnant-movement analysis of questions with final wh-words in Jordanian Arabic. In Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics XXXIII [Studies in Arabic Linguistics, 11], ► pp. 147 ff.
Modicom, Pierre-Yves
2022. Chapter 10. Modal particles in questions and wh-sensitivity. In Particles in German, English, and Beyond [Studies in Language Companion Series, 224], ► pp. 269 ff.
Trotzke, Andreas & Liliane Haegeman
2022. Chapter 11. PP-internal particles in Dutch as evidence for PP-internal discourse structure. In Particles in German, English, and Beyond [Studies in Language Companion Series, 224], ► pp. 297 ff.
López, Laura González & Andreas Trotzke
2021. ¡Mira!The grammar-attention interface in the Spanish left periphery. The Linguistic Review 38:1 ► pp. 5 ff.
Murdhy, Alshamari, Al-Ghamdi Naimah & Jeroen van de Weijer
2021. Multi-Functionality of the Discourse Marker haweɪh in Ghamdi Dialect of Hijazi Arabic: Interaction of CP-Features? – A Minimalist-Cartographic Account. Cogent Arts & Humanities 8:1
Monforte, Sergio
2020. Galdera partikulak euskaraz. Fontes Linguae Vasconum :130 ► pp. 399 ff.
Monforte, Sergio
2020. Chapter 11. Modal particles in Basque. In Information-Structural Perspectives on Discourse Particles [Studies in Language Companion Series, 213], ► pp. 278 ff.
Trotzke, Andreas, Ermenegildo Bidese & Manuela Caterina Moroni
2020. German discourse particles in the second language classroom. Pedagogical Linguistics 1:2 ► pp. 184 ff.
Beltrama, Andrea & Andreas Trotzke
2019. Conveying emphasis for intensity: Lexical and syntactic strategies. Language and Linguistics Compass 13:7
Trotzke, Andreas & Sergio Monforte
Viesel, Yvonne & Constantin Freitag
2019. Wer kanndenn schon jasagen?. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 38:2 ► pp. 243 ff.
Witzenhausen, Elisabeth
2019. Von Negation zu Domänensubtraktion. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur 141:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Özsoy, A. Sumru
2019. Derivation of Fronting in Turkish. In Word Order in Turkish [Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 97], ► pp. 139 ff.
Trotzke, Andreas
2018. DP‐Internal Modal Particles: A Case Study of German JA. Studia Linguistica 72:2 ► pp. 322 ff.
Trotzke, Andreas
2020. Constructions in Minimalism: A Functional Perspective on Cyclicity. Frontiers in Psychology 11
Trotzke, Andreas
2020. How cool is that! A new ‘construction’ and its theoretical challenges. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 23:3 ► pp. 327 ff.
Trotzke, Andreas
2023. Non-Canonical Questions,
Abraham, Werner
2017. Chapter 6. Modal particles and Verum focus. In Pragmatic Markers, Discourse Markers and Modal Particles [Studies in Language Companion Series, 186], ► pp. 171 ff.
Abraham, Werner
2020. Modality in Syntax, Semantics and Pragmatics,
Schoonjans, Steven
2017. On the relation between (verbal and kinesic) downtoning and illocution type. Yearbook of the Poznan Linguistic Meeting 3:1 ► pp. 25 ff.
Bayer, Josef, Jana Häussler & Markus Bader
2016. A New Diagnostic for Cyclic Wh-Movement: Discourse Particles in German Questions. Linguistic Inquiry 47:4 ► pp. 591 ff.
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.