Part of
Discourse-oriented Syntax
Edited by Josef Bayer, Roland Hinterhölzl and Andreas Trotzke
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 226] 2015
► pp. 1340
Abraham, Werner
1991Discourse particles in German: How does their illocutive force come about? In Discourse Particles: Descriptive and Theoretical Investigations on the Logical, Syntactic and Pragmatic Properties of Discourse Particles in German [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 12], Werner Abraham (ed.), 203-252. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ackema, Peter & Neeleman, Ad
2004Beyond Morphology: Interface Conditions on Word Formations. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barbiers, Sjef
2014Syntactic doubling and deletion as a source of variation. In Linguistic Variation in the Minimalist Framework, M. Carme Picallo (ed.), 197-223. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bayer, Josef
1984Comp in Bavarian syntax. The Linguistic Review 3: 209-274. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1996Directionality and Logical Form: On the Scope of Focusing Particles and Wh-in-situ. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1999Bound focus or how can association with focus be achieved without going semantically astray? In The Grammar of Focus [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 24], Georges Rebuschi & Laurice Tuller (eds), 55-82. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001Asymmetry in emphatic topicalization. In Audiatur Vox Sapientiae: A Festschrift for Arnim von Stechow, Caroline Féry & Wolfgang Sternefeld (eds), 15-47. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar
2012From modal particle to interrogative marker: A study of German denn . In Functional Heads, Laura Brugé, Anna Cardinaletti, Giuliana Giusti, Nicola Munaro & Cecilia Poletto (eds), 13-28. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna
This volume. Italian verb-based discourse particles in a comparative perspective. In Discourse-oriented Syntax, Josef Bayer, Roland Hinterhölzl & Andreas Trotzke (eds) Amsterdam John Benjamins
Bayer, Josef & Dasgupta, Probal
In press. Emphatic Topicalization and the structure of the left periphery: Evidence from German and Bangla. Syntax.
Bayer, Josef & Obenauer, Hans-Georg
2011Discourse particles, clause structure, and question types. The Linguistic Review 28: 449-491. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Behaghel, Otto
1932Deutsche Syntax: Eine geschichtliche Darstellung, Vol. IV. Heidelberg: Carl Winters Universitätsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar
Bellert, Irena
1977On semantic and distributional properties of sentential adverbs. Linguistic Inquiry 8: 337-350.Google Scholar
Bierwisch, Manfred
1966Regeln für die Intonation deutscher Sätze. Untersuchungen über Akzent und Intonation im Deutschen: Studia Grammatica 7: 99-199.Google Scholar
Bobaljik, Jonathan
1995Morphosyntax: The Syntax of Verbal Inflection. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Büring, Daniel & Hartmann, Katharina
2001The syntax and semantics of focus-sensitive particles in German. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 19: 229-281. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna
2011German and Italian modal particles and clause structure. The Linguistic Review 28: 493-531. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carrilho, Ernestina
2008Beyond subject doubling: Expletive constructions in European Portuguese dialects. In Microvariation in Syntactic Doubling, Sjef Barbiers, Olaf Koeneman, Marika Lekakou & Margreet van der Ham (eds), 301-324. Bingley: Emerald. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caudal, Patrick & Nicolas, David
2005Types of degrees and types of event structures. In Event Arguments: Foundations and Applications, Claudia Maienborn & Angelika Wöllstein (eds), 277-300. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1995The Minimalist Program. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
1999Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Coleman, H.O
1914Intonation and emphasis. Miscellanea Phonetica 1: 6-26.Google Scholar
Coniglio, Marco
2011Die Syntax der deutschen Modalpartikeln: Ihre Distribution und Lizensierung in Haupt- und Nebensätzen. Berlin: Akademie Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cruschina, Silvio
2012Discourse-related Features and Functional Projections. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
den Dikken, Marcel & Giannakidou, Anastasia
2002From hell to polarity: 'Aggressively non-D-linked' wh-phrases as polarity items. Linguistic Inquiry 33: 31-61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ernst, Thomas
2007On the role of semantics in a theory of adverb syntax. Lingua 117: 1008-1033. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fanselow, Gisbert
2002Quirky subjects and other specifiers. In More Than Words, Ingrid Kaufmann & Barbara Stiebels (eds), 227-250. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
2003Surprising specifiers and cyclic spellout. Generative Linguistics in Poland 5: 29-46.Google Scholar
Frey, Werner
2010Ā-Movement and conventional implicatures: About the grammatical encoding of emphasis in German. Lingua 120: 1416-1435. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gallego, Ángel J
2010Phase Theory [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 152]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gutzmann, Daniel & Turgay, Katharina
2015Expressive intensifiers and external degree modification. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 17: 185-228. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hartmann, Katharina
2008Focus and emphasis in tone and intonational languages. In The Discourse-Potential of Underspecified Structures, Anita Steube (ed.), 389-411. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hinterhölzl, Roland & Munaro, Nicola
This volume. On the interpretation of modal particles in non-assertive speech acts in German and Bellunese. In Discourse-oriented Syntax, Josef Bayer, Roland Hinterhölzl & Andreas Trotzke (eds) Amsterdam John Benjamins DOI logo
Hornstein, Norbert & Nunes, Jairo
2014Minimalism and control. In The Routledge Handbook of Syntax, Andrew Carnie, Yosuke Sato & Daniel Siddiqi (eds), 239-263. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Joachim
1983Fokus und Skalen: Zur Syntax und Semantik der Gradpartikeln im Deutschen. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kandybowicz, Jason
2013Ways of emphatic scope-taking: From emphatic assertion in Nupe to the grammar of emphasis. Lingua 128: 51-71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, Christopher & McNally, Louise
2005Scale structure, degree modification, and the semantics of gradable predicates. Language 81: 345-381. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kiefer, Ferenc
1967On Emphasis and Word Order in Hungarian. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Kleemann-Krämer, Anja
2010On apparent NP-internal focus particles in German. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 13: 1-29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klein, Wolfgang & Geyken, Alexander
2010Das Digitale Wörterbuch der Deutschen Sprache (DWDS). Lexicographica: International Annual for Lexicography 26: 79-96.Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika
2012Modals and Conditionals: New and Revised Perspectives. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lebeaux, David
1991Relative clauses, licensing, and the nature of the derivation. In Perspectives on Phrase Structure: Heads and Licensing, Susan Rothstein (ed.), 209-239. San Diego CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Manzini, M. Rita
This volume. Italian adverbs and discourse particles. In Discourse-oriented Syntax, Josef Bayer, Roland Hinterhölzl & Andreas Trotzke (eds) Amsterdam John Benjamins DOI logo
May, Robert
1985Logical Form: Its Structure and Derivation. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
McDaniel, Dana
1986Conditions on Wh-Chains. PhD dissertation, CUNY.Google Scholar
Meibauer, Jörg
1991Existenzimplikaturen bei rhetorischen W-Fragen. In Fragen und Fragesätze, Marga Reis & Inger Rosengren (eds), 223-242. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994Modaler Kontrast und konzeptuelle Verschiebung: Studien zur Syntax und Semantik deutscher Modalpartikeln. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meyer, Marie-Christine & Sauerland, Uli
2009A pragmatic constraint on ambiguity detection. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 27: 139-150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Müller, Stefan
2002aComplex Predicates: Verbal Complexes, Resultative Constructions, and Particle Verbs in German. Stanford CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
2002bSyntax or morphology: German particle verbs revisited. In Verb-Particle Explorations, Nicole Dehé, Ray Jackendoff, Andrew McIntyre & Silke Urban (eds), 119-140. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003Mehrfache Vorfeldbesetzung. Deutsche Sprache 31: 29-62.Google Scholar
2013Datensammlung zur scheinbar mehrfachen Vorfeldbesetzung. Ms, FU Berlin. [URL]Google Scholar
Munaro, Nicola & Obenauer, Hans-Georg
1999On underspecified wh-elements in pseudo-interrogatives. University of Venice Working Papers in Linguistics 9: 181-253.Google Scholar
Niebuhr, Oliver
2010On the phonetics of intensifying emphasis in German. Phonetica 67: 170-198. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nunes, Jairo
1995The Copy Theory of Movement and Linearization of Chains in the Minimalist Program. PhD dissertation, University of Maryland.Google Scholar
2004Linearization of Chains and Sideward Movement. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2012Sideward movement: Triggers, timing, and outputs. In Ways of Structure Building, Myriam Uribe-Etxebarria & Vidal Valmala (eds), 114-142. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Obenauer, Hans-Georg
2004Nonstandard wh-questions and alternative checkers in Pagotto. In The Syntax and Semantics of the Left Periphery, Horst Lohnstein & Susanne Trissler (eds), 343-383. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pesetsky, David
1987Wh-in-situ: Movement and unselective binding. In The Representation of (In)Definiteness, Eric J. Reuland & Alice G. Ter Meulen (eds), 98-129. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Poletto, Cecilia & Zanuttini, Raffaella
2013Emphasis as reduplication: Evidence from sì che/no che sentences. Lingua 128: 124-141. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reis, Marga
2005On the syntax of so-called focus particles in German: A reply to Büring and Hartmann 2001. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 23: 459-483. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rett, Jessica & Murray, Sarah E
2013A semantic account of mirative evidentials. Proceedings of SALT 23: 453-472. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
2014Syntactic cartography and the syntacticisation of scope-discourse semantics. In Mind, Values, and Metaphysics, Anne Reboul (ed.), 517-533. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Rooth, Mats
1992A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 1: 75-116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sauerland, Uli & Heck, Fabian
2003LF-intervention effects in pied piping. In Proceedings of NELS 33, Makoto Kadowaki & Shigeto Kawahara (eds), 347-366. Amherst MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Stepanov, Arthur
2001Late adjunction and minimalist phrase structure. Syntax 4: 94-125. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sternefeld, Wolfgang
2006Syntax: Eine morphologisch motivierte generative Beschreibung des Deutschen, 2 Vols. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
Stroik, Thomas S
2009Locality in Minimalist Syntax. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thurmair, Maria
1989Modalpartikeln und ihre Kombinationen. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trotzke, Andreas & Quaglia, Stefano
In press. Particle topicalization and German clause structure. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics.
Trotzke, Andreas, Quaglia, Stefano & Wittenberg, Eva
2015Topicalization in German particle verb constructions: The role of semantic transparency. Linguistische Berichte 244: 409–426.Google Scholar
Trotzke, Andreas & Turco, Giuseppina
2015The grammatical reflexes of emphasis: Evidence from German wh-questions. Lingua 168: 37–56. DOI logo
Trotzke, Andreas & Zwart, Jan-Wouter
2014The complexity of narrow syntax: Minimalism, representational economy, and simplest Merge. In Measuring Grammatical Complexity, Frederick J. Newmeyer & Laurel B. Preston (eds), 128-147. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Umbach, Carla
2004On the notion of contrast in information structure and discourse structure. Journal of Semantics 21: 1-21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Uriagereka, Juan
1999Multiple spell-out. In Working Minimalism, Samuel D. Epstein & Norbert Hornstein (eds), 109-135. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2011Derivational cycles. In Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Minimalism, Cedric Boeckx (ed.), 239-259. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Van Craenenbroeck, Jeroen
2005Averbial modification under sluicing. In Ellipsis in Minimalism: Proceedings of the Seventh Seoul International Conference on Generative Grammar, Kiyong Choi & Changguk Yim (eds), 77-102. Seoul: Hankook.Google Scholar
Zeller, Jochen
2001Particle Verbs and Local Domains [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 41]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zifonun, Gisela, Hoffmann, Ludger & Strecker, Bruno
1997Grammatik der deutschen Sprache, 3 Vols. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zimmermann, Malte
2008Contrastive focus and emphasis. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 55: 347-360. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 23 other publications

Abraham, Werner
2017. Chapter 6. Modal particles and Verum focus. In Pragmatic Markers, Discourse Markers and Modal Particles [Studies in Language Companion Series, 186],  pp. 171 ff. DOI logo
Abraham, Werner
2020. Modality in Syntax, Semantics and Pragmatics, DOI logo
Alshamari, Murdhy
2023. Cartographic architecture of DP. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 59:3  pp. 493 ff. DOI logo
Bayer, Josef, Jana Häussler & Markus Bader
2016. A New Diagnostic for Cyclic Wh-Movement: Discourse Particles in German Questions. Linguistic Inquiry 47:4  pp. 591 ff. DOI logo
Beltrama, Andrea & Andreas Trotzke
2019. Conveying emphasis for intensity: Lexical and syntactic strategies. Language and Linguistics Compass 13:7 DOI logo
Jarrah, Marwan & Ekab Al-Shawashreh
2022. Remnant-movement analysis of questions with final wh-words in Jordanian Arabic. In Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics XXXIII [Studies in Arabic Linguistics, 11],  pp. 147 ff. DOI logo
López, Laura González & Andreas Trotzke
2021. ¡Mira!The grammar-attention interface in the Spanish left periphery. The Linguistic Review 38:1  pp. 5 ff. DOI logo
Modicom, Pierre-Yves
2022. Chapter 10. Modal particles in questions and wh-sensitivity. In Particles in German, English, and Beyond [Studies in Language Companion Series, 224],  pp. 269 ff. DOI logo
Monforte, Sergio
2020. Galdera partikulak euskaraz. Fontes Linguae Vasconum :130 DOI logo
Monforte, Sergio
2020. Chapter 11. Modal particles in Basque. In Information-Structural Perspectives on Discourse Particles [Studies in Language Companion Series, 213],  pp. 278 ff. DOI logo
Murdhy, Alshamari, Al-Ghamdi Naimah & Jeroen van de Weijer
2021. Multi-Functionality of the Discourse Marker haweɪh in Ghamdi Dialect of Hijazi Arabic: Interaction of CP-Features? – A Minimalist-Cartographic Account. Cogent Arts & Humanities 8:1 DOI logo
Schoonjans, Steven
2017. On the relation between (verbal and kinesic) downtoning and illocution type. Yearbook of the Poznan Linguistic Meeting 3:1  pp. 25 ff. DOI logo
Trotzke, Andreas
2018. DP‐Internal Modal Particles: A Case Study of German JA. Studia Linguistica 72:2  pp. 322 ff. DOI logo
Trotzke, Andreas
2020. Constructions in Minimalism: A Functional Perspective on Cyclicity. Frontiers in Psychology 11 DOI logo
Trotzke, Andreas
2020. How cool is that! A new ‘construction’ and its theoretical challenges. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 23:3  pp. 327 ff. DOI logo
Trotzke, Andreas
2023. Non-Canonical Questions, DOI logo
Trotzke, Andreas, Ermenegildo Bidese & Manuela Caterina Moroni
2020. German discourse particles in the second language classroom. Pedagogical Linguistics 1:2  pp. 184 ff. DOI logo
Trotzke, Andreas & Liliane Haegeman
Trotzke, Andreas & Sergio Monforte
2019. Basque question particles. Linguistic Variation 19:2  pp. 352 ff. DOI logo
Viesel, Yvonne & Constantin Freitag
2019. Wer kanndenn schon jasagen?. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 38:2  pp. 243 ff. DOI logo
Witzenhausen, Elisabeth
2019. Von Negation zu Domänensubtraktion. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur 141:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Özsoy, A. Sumru
2019. Derivation of Fronting in Turkish. In Word Order in Turkish [Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 97],  pp. 139 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 may 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.