Cover not available
Part of
Discourse-oriented Syntax
Edited by Josef Bayer, Roland Hinterhölzl and Andreas Trotzke
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 226] 2015
► pp. 93–120

Italian adverbs and discourse particles

Between recategorization and ambiguity

| University of Florence
In Italian and its dialects, there is no evidence that lexical items functioning as discourse particle correspond to specialized functional heads, or that they have a truncated internal structure, making them into weak categories. Rather they have the syntactic distribution of adverbs, with which they coincide lexically. Therefore ‘discourse particle’ is the name of a special interpretation of adverbs, which also have a conventional temporal/aspectual/manner interpretation – to be captured by a scope(-like) mechanism at the LF interface. Temporal/aspectual/manner modifiers take events as their arguments – while discourse particles take the entire assertion (or command, question) as their argument, relating it to the store of propositional contents shared by speaker and hearer.
Published online: 16 December 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.226.05man
References (47)
References
Arsenijević, Boban. 2009. Clausal complementation as relativization. Lingua 119: 39-50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baroni, Marco, Bernardini, Silvia, Comastri, Federica, Piccioni, Lorenzo, Volpi, Alessandra, Aston, Guy & Mazzoleni, Marco. 2004. Introducing the "la Repubblica" corpus: A large, annotated, TEI(XML)-compliant corpus of newspaper Italian. In Proceedings of LREC 2004 , 1771-1774. Lisbon: ELDA.
Bayer, Josef. 2001. Two grammars in one: Sentential complements and complementizers in Bengali and other South Asian languages. In The Yearbook of South Asian Languages: Tokyo Symposium on South Asian Languages - Contact, Convergence and Typology, Peri Bhaskarorao & Karumuri V. Subbarao (eds), 11-36. New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
. 1999. Final complementizers in hybrid languages. Journal of Linguistics 35: 233-271. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Belletti, Adriana. 2008. Structures and Strategies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Blakemore, Diane. 2002. Relevance and Linguistic Meaning: The Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse Markers. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna. 2011. German and Italian modal particles and clause structure. The Linguistic Review 28: 493–531. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna & Starke, Michal. 1999. The typology of structural deficiency: A case study of the three classes of pronouns. In Clitics in the Languages of Europe, Henk van Riemsdijk (ed.), 145-233. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cheng, Lisa. 1991. On the Typology of Wh-questions. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo & Rizzi, Luigi. 2008. The cartography of syntactic structures. Studies in Linguistics 2: 42-58 (Università di Siena).Google Scholar
Coniglio, Marco. 2008. Modal particles in Italian. University of Venice Working Papers in Linguistics 18: 91–129 (Università di Venezia).Google Scholar
Culicover, Peter & Jackendoff, Ray. 2005. Simpler Syntax. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Donald. 1997 [1968]. On saying that. In Readings in the Philosophy of Language, Peter Ludlow (ed.), 817-832. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Déchaine, Rose-Marie & Wiltschko, Martina. 2002. Decomposing Pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 33: 409-442. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles. 1968. The case for case. In Universals in Linguistic Theory, Emmon Bach & Robert Harms (eds), 1-88. New York NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Giannakidou, Anastasia. 1998. Polarity Sensitivity as (Non-)veridical Dependency [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 23]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halle, Morris & Marantz, Alec. 1993. Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In The View from Building 20, Ken Hale & Samuel J. Keyser (eds), 111-176. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Harris, James. 1994. The syntax-phonology mapping in Catalan and Spanish clitics. In Papers on Phonology and Morphology [MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 21], Andrew Carnie, Heidi Harley & Tony Bures (eds). Cambridge MA: MITWPL.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard. 1976. French relative “que”. In Current Studies in Romance Linguistics, Fritz Hensey & Marta Luján (eds), 255–299. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
. 1984. Connectedness and Binary Branching. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
. 1994. The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2010. Comparisons and Contrasts. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Laka, Itziar. 1990. Negation in Syntax: On the Nature of Functional Categories and Projections. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Larson, Richard. 1987. “Missing prepositions” and the analysis of English free relative clauses. Linguistic Inquiry 18: 239-266.Google Scholar
Ledgeway, Adam. 2005. Moving through the left periphery: The dual complementiser system in the dialects of Southern Italy. Transactions of the Philological Society 103: 339-96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manzini, M. Rita. 2014. Grammatical categories: Strong and weak pronouns in Romance. Lingua 150: 171-201. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manzini, M. Rita & Savoia, Leonardo. 2003. The nature of complementizers. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 28: 87-110.Google Scholar
. 2005. I dialetti italiani e romanci. Morfosintassi generativa, Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso, 3 vols.Google Scholar
. 2007. A Unification of Morphology and Syntax. Studies in Romance and Albanian Varieties. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2011. Grammatical Categories. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Munaro, Nicola & Poletto, Cecilia. 2003. Ways of clausal typing. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 27: 87–105.Google Scholar
Partee, Barbara. 1984. Nominal and temporal anaphora. Linguistics and Philosophy 7: 243-286 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Poletto, Cecilia. 2000. The Higher Functional Field. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Poletto, Cecilia & Vanelli, Laura. 1995. Gli introduttori delle frasi interrogative nei dialetti italiani settentrionali. In Italia settentrionale: Crocevia di idiomi romanzi, Emanuele Banfi, Giovanni Bonfadini, Patrizia Cordin & Maria Iliescu (eds), 145-158. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Portner, Paul. 2007. Imperatives and modals. Natural Language Semantics 15: 351–383. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281-337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. On the position "Int(errogative)" in the left periphery of the clause. In Current Studies in Italian Syntax, Guglielmo Cinque & Giampaolo Salvi (eds), 287-296. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi & Shlonsky, Ur. 2007. Strategies of subject extraction. In: Interfaces + Recursion = Language? Chomsky’s Minimalism and the View from Syntax-Semantics, Uli Sauerland & Hans-Martin Gärtner (eds), 115-160. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian & Roussou, Anna. 2003. Syntactic Change. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sperber, Dan & Wilson, Deirdre. 1986. Relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Stalnaker, Robert. 1978. Assertion. In Pragmatics, Peter Cole (ed.), 315-332. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Starke, Michal. 2009. Nanosyntax: A short primer to a new approach to language. Nordlyd (Tromsoe University Working Papers in Language and Linguistics) 36: 1-6.Google Scholar
de Swart, Henriëtte. 1993. Adverbs of Quantification. New York NY: Garland.Google Scholar
Szabolcsi, Anna. 1984. The Possessor that ran away from home. The Linguistic Review 3: 89-102.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, Malte. 2008. Discourse particles in the left periphery. In Dislocated Elements in Discourse: Syntactic, Semantic, and Pragmatic Perspectives, Benjamin Shaer, Philippa Cook, Werner Frey & Claudia Maienborn (eds), 200-231. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2011. Discourse particles. In Semantics, Claudia Maienborn, Klaus von Heusinger & Paul Portner (eds), 2011–2038. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cited by (17)

Cited by 17 other publications

Corr, Alice
2022. Introduction. In The Grammar of the Utterance, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Corr, Alice
2022. The expression of affect. In The Grammar of the Utterance, ► pp. 157 ff. DOI logo
Corr, Alice
2022. A grammar for the utterance. In The Grammar of the Utterance, ► pp. 15 ff. DOI logo
Corr, Alice
2022. Conclusions. In The Grammar of the Utterance, ► pp. 299 ff. DOI logo
Corr, Alice
2022. Vocatives. In The Grammar of the Utterance, ► pp. 51 ff. DOI logo
Corr, Alice
2022. Interjections and particles. In The Grammar of the Utterance, ► pp. 99 ff. DOI logo
Corr, Alice
2022. Utterances without commitment. In The Grammar of the Utterance, ► pp. 203 ff. DOI logo
Corr, Alice
2022. The Grammar of the Utterance, DOI logo
Corr, Alice
2022. The grammar of dialogue. In The Grammar of the Utterance, ► pp. 251 ff. DOI logo
Corr, Alice
2022. Doing things with utterance grammar. In The Grammar of the Utterance, ► pp. 135 ff. DOI logo
Modicom, Pierre-Yves
2022. Chapter 10. Modal particles in questions and wh-sensitivity. In Particles in German, English, and Beyond [Studies in Language Companion Series, 224], ► pp. 269 ff. DOI logo
Cognola, Federica & Silvio Cruschina
2021. Between Time and Discourse A Syntactic Analysis of Italianpoi. Annali di Ca’ Foscari. Serie occidentale :55 DOI logo
Munaro, Nicola
2019. On the syntactic encoding of lexical interjections in Italo-Romance. In Italian Dialectology at the Interfaces [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 251], ► pp. 185 ff. DOI logo
Bayer, Josef & Andreas Trotzke
2015. The derivation and interpretation of left peripheral discourse particles*. In Discourse-oriented Syntax [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 226], ► pp. 13 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. List of Abbreviations. In The Grammar of the Utterance, ► pp. xi ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. General Preface. In The Grammar of the Utterance, ► pp. vii ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. Copyright Page. In The Grammar of the Utterance, ► pp. iv ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.