Cover not available
Part of
Discourse-oriented Syntax
Edited by Josef Bayer, Roland Hinterhölzl and Andreas Trotzke
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 226] 2015
► pp. 121–158

Is particle a (unified) category?

 | University of Patras
The aim of this paper is to identify the syntactic status of so-called modal particles in Greek, bearing in mind their relation with complementizers, their interaction with modality and the left periphery, and to show that they belong to the repertoire of grammatical categories independently attested. It is argued that their ‘discourse’ linking is related to their presence in the left periphery. The Greek particles under consideration are next shown to have a grammatical function and to fall into two basic categories, verbal (tha, as) and nominal (na, mi). As such they occupy (extended-) projections associated with the verb and its argument structure respectively.
Published online: 16 December 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.226.06rou
References (80)
References
Abraham, Werner. 2012. Illocutive force is speaker and information source concern. What type of syntax does the representation of speaker deixis require? Templates vs. derivational structure? In Modality and Theory of Mind Elements across Languages, Werner Abraham & Elisabeth Leiss (eds), 67-108. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aelbrecht, Lobke, Haegeman, Liliane & Nye, Rachel (eds). 2012. Main Clause Phenomena: New Horizons [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 190]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Agouraki, Yoryia. 1991. A Modern Greek complementizer and its significance for UG. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 3: 1–24.Google Scholar
Baker, Mark C. 2003. Lexical categories: Verbs, nouns, and adjectives. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Laurie. 1983. English Word-formation. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bayer, Josef. 2010. Discourse particles in questions. Proceedings of GLOW in Asia VII 2009. Hyderabat: EFL University Press.
Bayer, Josef & Obenauer, Hans-Georg. 2011. Discourse particles, clause structure and question types. The Linguistic Review 28: 449-491. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Camaj, Martin. 1984. Albanian Grammar with Exercises, Chrestomathy and Glossaries, collaborated and translated by Leonard Fox. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrasowitz.Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna. 2011. German and Italian modal particles and clause structure. The Linguistic Review 28: 493-531. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna & Giusti, Giuliana. 2000. “Semi-lexical” motion verbs in Romance and Germanic. University of Venice, Working Papers in Linguistics 10: 1-43.Google Scholar
Chatzopoulou, Katerina. 2012. Negation and Non-veridicality in the History of Greek. PhD dissertation, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
. 2013. The history of the Greek NEG2: Two parameter resets linked to a syntactic status shift. Journal of Historical Syntax 2: 1-48.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1982. Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 1986. Knowledge of Language. New York NY: Praeger.Google Scholar
. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A Life in Language, Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), 1-52. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chondrogianni, Maria. 2011. The pragmatics of the Modern Greek modal particles θα, να, μη(ν) and ας. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Greek Linguistics (ICGL10), University of Chicago. <[URL]>
Christidis, Anastasios Ph. 1985. Το δεικτικό να . Studies in Greek Linguistics 6: 221-241.Google Scholar
. 1990. On the categorial status of particles: The case of ‘holophrasis’. Lingua 82: 53-82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 2006. Restructuring and Functional Heads. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Clairis, Christos & Babiniotis, George. 2005. Γραμματική της Νέας Ελληνικής. Athens: Ellinika Grammata.Google Scholar
Coniglio, Marco. 2008. Modal particles in Italian. University of Venice, Working Papers in Linguistics 18: 91-129.Google Scholar
den Besten, Hans. 1983. On the interaction of root transformations and lexical deletive rules. In On the Formal Syntax of Westgermania [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 3], Werner Abraham (ed.), 47-132. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Efthimiou, Angeliki. 2008. Negative morphemes in Modern Greek: The case of a- and mi . In La raison morphologique, B. Fradin (ed.), 55-68. Amsterdam: John Benjamims. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fox, Danny & Katzir, Roni. 2011. On the characterization of alternatives. Natural Language Semantics 19: 87-107. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Emonds, Joseph. 1970. Root and Structure-preserving Transformations. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Giannakidou, Anastasia. 1998. Polarity Sensitivity as (Non)veridical Dependency [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 23]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. Only, emotive factives, and the dual nature of polarity dependency. Language 82: 575-603. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. The dependency of the subjunctive revisited: Temporal semantics and modality. Lingua 120: 1883-1908. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane. 2002. Anchoring to speaker, adverbial clauses and the structure of CP. Georgetown University Working Papers in Theoretical Linguistics 2: 117-180.Google Scholar
. 2014. West Flemish verb-based discourse markers and the articulation of the Speech Act layer. Studia Linguistica 68: 116-139. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane & Hill, Virginia. 2013. The syntacticization of discourse. In Syntax and its Limits, Rafaella Folli, Christian Sevdali & Roberts Truswell (eds), 370-390. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hale, Ken & Keyser, Samuel J. 1993. On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations. In The View from Building 20, Ken Hale & Samuel J. Keyser (eds), 53-109. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hamblin, Charles L. 1958. Questions. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 36: 159-168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heycock, Caroline. 2006. Embedded root phenomena. In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Vol. II, Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds), 174-219. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hill, Virginia. 2007. Romanian adverbs and the pragmatic field. The Linguistic Review 24: 61-86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holton, David, Mackridge, Peter & Philippaki-Warburton, Irene. 1997. Greek: A Comprehensive Grammar of the Modern Greek Language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Horn, Larry. 1989. A Natural History of Negation. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Janda, Richard & Joseph, Brian. 1999. The Modern Greek mi(n) as a morphological constellation. Greek Linguistics 97 (Proceedings of ICGL3) , 341-351. Athens.
Joseph, Brian. 1981. On he synchrony and diachrony of na. Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies 7: 139-154.Google Scholar
. 1983. The Synchrony and Diachrony of the Balkan Infinitive. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
. 2002. Balkan insights into the syntax of *mē in Indo-European. In Indo-European Perspectives, Mark Southern (ed.),103-120. Washington DC: Institute for the Study of Man.Google Scholar
Joseph, Brian & Philippaki-Warburton, Irene. 1987. Modern Greek. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard. 1982. Predicate and arguments, verbs and nouns. GLOW Newsletter 8. Tilburg.Google Scholar
Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics, Vol. 2. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Makri, Maria-Margarita. 2013. Expletive Negation beyond Romance. Clausal Complementation and Epistemic Modality. MA dissertation, University of York.Google Scholar
Manzini, M. Rita. & Savoia, Leonardo M. 2007. A Unification of Morphology and Syntax: Investigations into Romance and Albanian Dialects. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Manzini, M. Rita & Savoia, Leonardo M. 2011. Grammatical Categories: Variation in Romance Languages. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. On the lexical/functional divide: The case of negation. In Functional Heads, Laura Brugè, Anna Cardinaletti, Giuliana Giusti, Nicola Munaro & Cecilia Poletto (eds), 338-350. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Markantonatou, Stella & Tambouratzis, George. 2000. Μερικές ποσοτικές παρατηρήσεις για τη χρήση της γραμματικής άρνησης στη νέα ελληνική. Studies in Greek Linguistics 21: 436-447.Google Scholar
Markopoulos, Theodore. 2009. The Future in Greek: From Ancient to Medieval. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Munaro, Nicola & Poletto, Cecilia. 2003. Ways of clausal typing. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 27: 87-105.Google Scholar
Pangalos, George. 1955. Περί του γλωσσικού ιδιώματος της Κρήτης. Athens.Google Scholar
Philippaki-Warburton, Irene. 1994. The subjunctive mood and the syntactic status of the particle na in Modern Greek. Folia Linguistica 28: 297-328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1998. Functional categories and Modern Greek syntax. The Linguistic Review 15: 159–186 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rivero, M.-L. 1994. Clause structure and V-movement in the languages of the Balkans. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 12: 63-120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rivero, Maria-Luisa & Terzi, Arhonto. 1995. Imperatives, V-movement, and logical mood. Journal of Linguistics 31: 301-332. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281-337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi & Shlonsky, Ur. 2007. Strategies of subject extraction. In Interfaces + Recursion = Language? Chomsky’s Minimalism and the View from Syntax-Semantics, Hans-Martin Gärtner & Uli Sauerland (eds), 115-160. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian & Roussou, Anna. 2003. Syntactic Change: A Minimalist Approach to Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rooth, Mats. 1984. Association with Focus. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Rooth, Matts. 1992. A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 1: 75-116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rosenbaum, Peter S. 1967. The Grammar of English Predicate Complement Constructions. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Roussou, Anna. 2000. On the left periphery: Modal particles and complementizers. Journal of Greek Linguistics 1: 65-94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. In the mood for control. Lingua 119: 1811-1836. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010a. Selecting complementizers. Lingua 120: 582-603. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010b. Subjects on the edge. In The Complementizer Phase: Subjects and Operators, Phoevos Panagiotidis (ed.), 76-116. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roussou, Anna & Tsangalidis, Anastasios. 2010. Modal particles reconsidered. Journal of Greek Linguistics 10: 45-73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Speas, Margaret & Tenny, Carol. 2003. Configurational properties of point-of-view roles. In Asymmetry in Grammar, Vol.1: Syntax and Semantics [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 57], Anna-Maria Di Sciullo (ed.), 315-344. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomić, Olga. 2004. The syntax of the Balkan Slavic future tenses. Lingua 114: 517-542. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsangalidis, Anastasios. 1999. A Comparative Study of the Category Future. Thessaloniki: University Studio Press.Google Scholar
Tsimpli, Ianthi M. & Roussou, Anna. 1996. Negation and polarity items in Modern Greek. The Linguistic Review 13: 49-81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsoulas, George. 1993. Remarks on the structure and interpretation of na-clauses. Studies in Greek Linguistics. 191-206. Thessaloniki.Google Scholar
Turano, Giuseppina. 2000. On clitics and negation in Albanian. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 25: 81-117.Google Scholar
Tzartzanos, Achilleas. 1946 [1989]. Νεοελληνική Σύνταξις. Thessaloniki.Google Scholar
Veloudis, Ioannis. 1982. Negation in Modern Greek. PhD dissertation, University of Reading.Google Scholar
. 2001. Νά και να. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Greek Linguistics (ICGL4) , 243-250. Thessaloniki: University Studio Press.
Yoon, Suwon. 2010. ‘Not’ in the Mood. The Syntax, Semantics and Pragmatics of Evaluative Negation. PhD dissertation, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Zanuttini, Rafaella. 2008. Encoding the addressee in the syntax: Evidence from English imperative subjects. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 26: 185-218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold. 1985. Clitics and particles. Language 61: 283-305. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Badan, Linda
2020. Italian Discourse Markers: The Case ofGuarda te*. Studia Linguistica 74:2 ► pp. 303 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.