Part of
Discourse-oriented Syntax
Edited by Josef Bayer, Roland Hinterhölzl and Andreas Trotzke
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 226] 2015
► pp. 175210
References
Authier, Jean-Marc
2013Phase-edge features and the syntax of polarity particles. Linguistic Inquiry 44: 345-89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barbiers, Sjef, Bennis, Hans, de Vogelaer, Gunther, Devos, Magda & van der Ham, Margreet
2005Syntactic Atlas of the Dutch Dialects, Vol. I: Commentary. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna
1997Subjects and clause structure. In The New Comparative Syntax, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 33-63. London: Longman.Google Scholar
2004Towards a cartography of subject positions. In The Structure of CP and IP, Luigi Rizzi (ed.), 115-165. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1993A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory [MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 1]. Cambridge MA: MITWPL.Google Scholar
1995The Minimalist Program. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Culbertson, Jennifer
2010Convergent evidence for categorial change in French: From subject clitic to agreement marker. Language 86: 85-132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Schutter, Georges & Taeldeman, Johan
1986Assimilatie van stem in de zuidelijke Nederlandse dialekten. In Vruchten van z’n akker: opstellen van (oud-) medewerkers en oud-studenten voor Prof. V. F. Vanacker, Magda Devos & Johan Taeldeman (eds), 91-133. Ghent: Seminaire voor Nederlands Taalkunde.Google Scholar
de Vogelaer, Gunther & van der Auwera, Johan
2010When typological rara generate rarissima: Analogical extension of verbal agreement in Dutch dialects. In: Rara & Rarissima. Collecting and Interpreting Unusual Characteristics of Human Language, Jan Wohlgemuth & Michael Cysouw (eds), 47-73. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Devos, Magda
1986Het persoonlijk voornaamwoord 2e pers enk in het Westvlaams. Geografie en historiek. In Vruchten van z’n akker: opstellen van (oud-) medewerkers en oud-studenten voor Prof. V. F. Vanacker, Magda Devos & Johan Taeldeman (eds), 167-189. Ghent: Seminaire voor Nederlands Taalkunde.Google Scholar
Devos, Magda & Vandekerckhove, Reinhild
2005Taal in Stad en Land. West-vlaams. Tielt: Lannoo.Google Scholar
Farkas, Donka F. & Bruce, Kim B
2010On reacting to assertions and polar questions. Journal of Semantics 27: 81-118. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gribanova, Vera
2014Discourse-driven head movement, VSO and ellipsis in Russian. Presentation at NELS 45 , MIT, October 31.
Haegeman, Liliane
1991Subject pronouns and subject clitics in West-Flemish. The Linguistic Review 7: 333-364.Google Scholar
1996Verb second, the split CP and null subjects in early Dutch finite clauses. GenGenP. [URL]Google Scholar
2002West Flemish negation and the derivation of SOV order in West Germanic. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 25: 154-189. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hardt, Daniel
1993Verb Phrase Ellipsis: Form, Meaning, and Processing. PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Hoeksema, Jack
2006Hij zei van niet, maar knikte van ja: Distributie en diachronie van bijwoorden van polariteit ingeleid door van . Tabu 35: 135-158.Google Scholar
2008 Van + bijwoord van polariteit: Een geval van verplichte PP extrapositie? Tabu 37: 69-74.Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders
2001The syntax of yes and no in Finnish. Studia Linguistica 55: 141-175. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007Null subjects and polarity focus. Studia Linguistica 61: 212-236. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013The syntax of answers to polar questions in English and Swedish. Lingua 128: 31-50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kramer, Ruth & Rawlins, Kyle
2011Polarity particles: An ellipsis account. In Proceedings of NELS 39, Suzi Lima, Kevin Mullin, & Brian Smith (eds). Amherst MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred
2013Response particles as propositional anaphors. In Proceedings of SALT 23, Todd Snider (ed.), 1-18. Ithaca NY: CLC Publications.Google Scholar
Laka, Itziar
1990Negation in English: On the Nature of Functional Categories and Projections. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Lobeck, Anne
1995Ellipsis: Functional Heads, Licensing and Identification. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Merchant, Jason
2001The Syntax of Silence. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2003Subject-auxiliary inversion in comparatives and PF output constraints. In The Interfaces: Deriving and Interpreting Omitted Structures [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 61], Kerstin Schwabe & Susanne Winkler (eds), 55-77. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004Fragments and ellipsis. Linguistics and Philosophy 27: 661-738. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miyagawa, Shigeru
2013Agreements that occur mainly in the main clause. In Main Clause Phenomena: New Horizons [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 190], Lobke Aelbrecht, Liliane Haegeman & Rachel Nye (eds), 79-112. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Muysken, Pieter
1982Parameterizing the notion ‘head’. Journal of Linguistic Research 2: 57-75.Google Scholar
Muysken, Pieter & van Riemsdijk, Henk
1986Projecting features and featuring projections. In Features and Projections, Pieter Muysken & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds), 1-30. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Paardekooper, Piet C
1993Jaak/neenik enz. Tabu 23: 143-173.Google Scholar
Pollock, Jean-Yves
1989Verb movement, Universal Grammar, and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry 20: 365-424.Google Scholar
Progovac, Ljiljana
1993Negative polarity: Entailment and binding. Linguistics and Philosophy 16: 149-180. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994Negative and Positive Polarity. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
1982Issues in Italian Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1997The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar: Handbook in Generative Syntax, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006On the form of chains: Criterial positions and ECP effects. In Wh-Movement: Moving on, Lisa Cheng & Norbert Corver (eds), 97-133. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi & Shlonsky, Ur
2006Satisfying the subject criterion by a non-subject: English locative inversion and heavy NP shift. In Phases of Interpretation, Mara Frascarelli (ed.), 341-361. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007Strategies of subject extraction. In Interfaces + Recursion = Language? Chomsky's Minimalism and the View from Syntax-Semantics, Hans-Martin Gärtner & Uli Sauerland (eds), 115-160. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian
2010Agreement and Head Movement: Clitics, Incorporation, and Defective Goals. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Servidio, Emilio
2014Polarity Particles in Italian: Focus, Fragments, Tags. PhD dissertation, University of Siena.Google Scholar
Simon, Ellen
2010Phonological transfer of voicing and devoicing rules: Evidence from L1 Dutch and L2 English conversational speech. Language Sciences 32: 63–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smessaert, Hans
1995Morfo-syntaxis van het Westvlaamse bè-jaa-k-gie . Tabu 25: 45-60.Google Scholar
Taraldsen, K. Tarald
2001Subject extraction, the distribution of expletives and stylistic inversion. In Subject Inversion in Romance and the Theory of Universal Grammar, Aafke Hulk & Jean-Yves Pollock (eds), 163-182. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Van Craenenbroeck, Jeroen
2002 Van as a marker of dissociation: Microvariation in Dutch. In Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 53], C. Jan-Wouter Zwart & Werner Abraham (eds), 41-68. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010Ellipsis in Dutch Dialects. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Van Craenenbroeck, Jeroen & Haegeman, Liliane
2007The derivation of subject-initial V2. Linguistic Inquiry 38: 167-178. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Davidse, Kristin, Ngum Meyuhnsi Njende & Gerard O’Grady
2023. Existential there versus Demonstrative there. In Specificational and Presentational There-Clefts,  pp. 41 ff. DOI logo
Karen De Clercq, Liliane Haegeman, Terje Lohndal & Christine Meklenborg
2023. Adverbial Resumption in Verb Second Languages, DOI logo
Shyu, Shu-ing & Lio̍k-san N̂g
2022. Non-veridical kaN in Taiwanese Southern Min. In New Explorations in Chinese Theoretical Syntax [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 272],  pp. 479 ff. DOI logo
Vasilescu, Andra
2023. Yes(Rom.Da). Usages and functions in L2 proficiency examinations. Language and Dialogue 13:3  pp. 427 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 may 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.