Part of
Morphological Metatheory
Edited by Daniel Siddiqi and Heidi Harley
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 229] 2016
► pp. 461478
References (42)
References
Allan, Keith 1986. Linguistic Meaning, Vol 1. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Apresjan, Ju. D. 1974. Regular polysemy. Linguistics 142: 5–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Laurie 1990. Be-heading the word. Journal of Linguistics 26: 1–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008a. Dvandva. Word Structure 1: 1–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008b. Exocentric compounds. Morphology 18: 51–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010. The typology of exocentric compounding. In Cross-disciplinary Issues in Compounding [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 311], Sergio Scalise & Irene Vogel (eds),167–175. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Laurie & Huddleston, Rodney 2002. Lexical word-formation. In The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language, Rodney Huddleston & Geoffrey K. Pullum (eds), 1621–1721. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie, Lieber, Rochelle & Plag, Ingo. 2013. The Oxford Reference Guide to English Morphology. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Behrens, Leila 2002. Structuring of word meaning II: Aspects of polysemy. In Lexicologie/Lexicology, Vol 1, D. Alan Cruse, Franz Hundsnurscher, Michael Job & Peter Rolf Lutzeier (eds), 319–337. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Benczes, Réka 2006. Creative Compounding in English. The Semantics of Methaphorical and Metonymical Noun-noun Combinations [Human Cognitive Processing 9]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Booij, Geert 2007. The Grammar of Words, 2nd edn. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009. Compounding and construction morphology. In The Oxford Handbook of Compounding, Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds), 201–216. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam 1970. Remarks on nominalization. In Readings in English Transformational Grammar, Roderick A. Jacobs & Peter Rosenbaum (eds), 184–221. Waltham MA: Ginn.Google Scholar
Coseriu, Eugene 1977. Inhaltliche Wortbildungslehre (am Beispiel des Typs coupe-papier). In Perspektiven der Wortbildungsforschung, Herbert E. Brekle & Dieter Kastovsky (eds), 46–61. Bonn: Grundmann.Google Scholar
Cruse, D.Alan, 1992. Monosemy and polysemy. Linguistics 30: 577–599.Google Scholar
Cuyckens, Hubert & Zawada, Britta (eds). 2001. Polysemy in Cognitive Linguistics [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 177]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deane, Paul D. 1988. Polysemy and cognition. Lingua 75: 325–361. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fabb, Nigel 1998. Compounding. In The Handbook of Morphology, Andrew Spencer & Arnold M. Zwicky (eds), 66–83. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Geeraerts, Dirk 1993. Vagueness’s puzzle, polysemy’s vagaries. Cognitive Linguistics 4: 223–272. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gragg, Gene B. 1984. Polysemy and derivation: areal-diachronic perspectives. In Papers from the Parasession on Lexical Semantics, David Testen, Veena Mishra & Joseph Drogo (eds), 131–142. Chicago IL: Chicago Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin 2002. Understanding Morphology. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
von Heusinger, Klaus & Schwarze, Christoph. 2013. Italian V+N compounds, inflectional features and conceptual structure. Morphology 23: 325–350. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, Roman 1936. Beitrag zur allgemeinen Kasuslehre: Gesamtbedeutungen der russischen Kasus. Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague 6: 240–288.Google Scholar
Kastovsky, Dieter 1982. Wortbildung und Semantik. Duesseldorf: Bagel & Bern: Francke.Google Scholar
Katamba, Francis & Stonham, John 2006. Morphology, 2nd edn. Houndmills: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Kenesei, István 2013. The role of creativity in the cognitive turn in linguistics. International Review of Pragmatics 5: 271–292. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kinder, John & Savini, Vincenzo M. 2004. Using Italian. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koskela, A. & Murphy, M. Lynne. 2006. Polysemy and homonymy. In Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, Vol. 9, Keith Brown (ed.), 742–744. Oxford: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehrer, Adrienne 1990. Polysemy, conventionality and the structure of the lexicon. Cognitive Linguistics 1–2: 207–246. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003. Polysemy in derivational affixes. In Trends in Linguistics: Polysemy. Flexible Patterns of Meaning in Mind and Language, Brigitte Nehrlich, Zazie Todd, Vimala Herman & David D. Clarke (eds), 217–232. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lieber, Rochelle 2004. Morphology and Lexical Semantics. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Love, Catherine E. 1985. Collins Giunti Marzocco Concise Italian- English English-Italian Dictionary. Firenze: Giunti & Glasgow: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Lyons, John 1977. Semantics. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Maiden, Martin & Robustelli, Cecilia. 2000. A Reference Grammar of Modern Italian. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Murphy, M. Lynne 2010. Lexical Meaning. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan. 1972. A Grammar of Contemporary English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Ruhl, Charles. 1989. On Monosemy: A Study in Linguistic Semantics. Albany NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Scalise, Sergio & Bisetto, Antonietta. 2009. The classification of compounds. In The Oxford Handbook of Compounding, Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds), 34–53. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Scalise, Sergio & Fábregas, Antonio. 2010. The head in compounding. In Cross-disciplinary Issues in Compounding [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 311], Sergio Scalise & Irene Vogel (eds), 109–125. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scalise, Sergio & Vogel, Irene. 2010. Why compounding? In Cross-disciplinary Issues in Compounding [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 311], Sergio Scalise & Irene Vogel (eds), 1–18. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spencer, Andrew 2013. Lexical Relatedness. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tuggy, David 1993. Ambiguity, polysemy, and vagueness. Cognitive Linguistics 4: 273–290. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (40)

Cited by 40 other publications

Koutsoukos, Νikos & Angela Ralli
2023. Zero suffixes in Modern Greek derived adjectival formations with alpha privative. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 42:1  pp. 87 ff. DOI logo
Aarts, Bas
2020. Syntactic Argumentation. In The Oxford Handbook of English Grammar,  pp. 21 ff. DOI logo
Asudeh, Ash
2020. Grammar and Meaning. In The Oxford Handbook of English Grammar,  pp. 523 ff. DOI logo
Borsley, Robert D.
2020. Phrase Structure. In The Oxford Handbook of English Grammar,  pp. 301 ff. DOI logo
Bowie, Jill & Gergana Popova
2020. Grammar and Discourse. In The Oxford Handbook of English Grammar,  pp. 554 ff. DOI logo
Depraetere, Ilse & Anastasios Tsangalidis
2020. Tense and Aspect. In The Oxford Handbook of English Grammar,  pp. 396 ff. DOI logo
Dorgeloh, Heidrun & Anja Wanner
2020. Genre Variation. In The Oxford Handbook of English Grammar,  pp. 654 ff. DOI logo
Duffley, Patrick
2020. Clause Structure, Complements, and Adjuncts. In The Oxford Handbook of English Grammar,  pp. 358 ff. DOI logo
Egan, Thomas
2020. Subordination and Coordination. In The Oxford Handbook of English Grammar,  pp. 439 ff. DOI logo
Hellmuth, Sam & Ian Cushing
2020. Grammar and Phonology. In The Oxford Handbook of English Grammar,  pp. 504 ff. DOI logo
Herbst, Thomas
2020. Dependency and Valency Approaches. In The Oxford Handbook of English Grammar,  pp. 124 ff. DOI logo
Hilpert, Martin
2020. Constructional Approaches. In The Oxford Handbook of English Grammar,  pp. 106 ff. DOI logo
Hollmann, Willem B.
2020. Word Classes. In The Oxford Handbook of English Grammar,  pp. 281 ff. DOI logo
Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey K. Pullum
2020. Modern and Traditional Descriptive Approaches. In The Oxford Handbook of English Grammar,  pp. 201 ff. DOI logo
Hundt, Marianne
2020. Change in Grammar. In The Oxford Handbook of English Grammar,  pp. 580 ff. DOI logo
Jeffries, Lesley
2020. Literary Variation. In The Oxford Handbook of English Grammar,  pp. 673 ff. DOI logo
Kaltenböck, Gunther
2020. Information Structure. In The Oxford Handbook of English Grammar,  pp. 461 ff. DOI logo
Keizer, Evelien
2020. Noun Phrases. In The Oxford Handbook of English Grammar,  pp. 335 ff. DOI logo
Kortmann, Bernd
2020. Global Variation in the Anglophone World. In The Oxford Handbook of English Grammar,  pp. 630 ff. DOI logo
König, Ekkehard
2020. Clause Types and Speech Act Functions. In The Oxford Handbook of English Grammar,  pp. 375 ff. DOI logo
Lohndal, Terje & Liliane Haegeman
2020. Generative Approaches. In The Oxford Handbook of English Grammar,  pp. 153 ff. DOI logo
Mackenzie, J. Lachlan
2020. Functional Approaches. In The Oxford Handbook of English Grammar,  pp. 180 ff. DOI logo
Schönefeld, Doris
2020. Grammar and Lexis. In The Oxford Handbook of English Grammar,  pp. 484 ff. DOI logo
Siemund, Peter
2020. Regional Varieties of English. In The Oxford Handbook of English Grammar,  pp. 604 ff. DOI logo
Spencer, Andrew
2020. Inflection and Derivation. In The Oxford Handbook of English Grammar,  pp. 242 ff. DOI logo
Spencer, Andrew
2020. Theoretical Approaches to Morphology. In The Oxford Handbook of English Grammar,  pp. 222 ff. DOI logo
Sprouse, Jon & Carson Schütze
2020. Grammar and the Use of Data. In The Oxford Handbook of English Grammar,  pp. 40 ff. DOI logo
Taylor, John R
2020. Cognitive Linguistic Approaches. In The Oxford Handbook of English Grammar,  pp. 86 ff. DOI logo
Thomas, Margaret
2020. Conceptualizations of Grammar in the History of English Grammaticology. In The Oxford Handbook of English Grammar,  pp. 2 ff. DOI logo
Wallis, Sean
2020. Grammar and Corpus Methodology. In The Oxford Handbook of English Grammar,  pp. 59 ff. DOI logo
Ziegler, Debra
2020. Mood and Modality. In The Oxford Handbook of English Grammar,  pp. 418 ff. DOI logo
Bas Aarts, Jill Bowie & Gergana Popova
2019. The Oxford Handbook of English Grammar, DOI logo
Bauer, Laurie
2018. Conversion as metonymy. Word Structure 11:2  pp. 175 ff. DOI logo
Bauer, Laurie
2020. Compounds. In The Oxford Handbook of English Grammar,  pp. 262 ff. DOI logo
Bauer, Laurie
2020. Compounds and Minor Word‐Formation Types. In The Handbook of English Linguistics,  pp. 463 ff. DOI logo
BAUER, LAURIE
2021. Blackbirds and blue whales: stress in English A+N constructions. English Language and Linguistics 25:3  pp. 581 ff. DOI logo
Bauer, Laurie
2022. Exocentricity yet again: A response to Nóbrega and Panagiotidis. Word Structure 15:2  pp. 138 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. List of figures and tables. In The Oxford Handbook of English Grammar,  pp. x ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. Copyright Page. In The Oxford Handbook of English Grammar,  pp. iv ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.