References
Adger, David
2007Three domains of finiteness: A minimalist perspective. In Finiteness Theoretical and Empirical Foundations. , Irina Nikolaeva (ed.), 23-58. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Authier, Jean-Marc
2013Phase-edge features and the syntax of polarity particles. Linguistic Inquiry 44(3): 345-89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barbiers, Sjef, Bennis, Hans, De Vogelaer, Gunther, Devos, Magda & van der Ham, Margreet
2005Syntactic Atlas of the Dutch Dialects, Vol. I: Commentary. Amsterdam: AUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna
1997Subjects and clause structure. In The New Comparative Syntax, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 33-63. London: Longman.Google Scholar
2004Towards a cartography of subject positions. In The Structure of CP and IP [The Cartography of Syntactic Structures 2], Luigi Rizzi (ed.), 115-165. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1993A minimalist program for linguistic theory. In The View from Building 20. Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, Kenneth Hale & Samuel Jay Keyser (eds), 1-52. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
1995The Minimalist Program. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
1999Adverbs and functional heads. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Cowper, Elizabeth
This volume. Finiteness and pseudofiniteness.
van Craenenbroeck, Jeroen
2002 Van as a marker of dissociation: Microvariation in Dutch. In Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 53], C. Jan-Wouter Zwart & Werner Abraham (eds), 41-68. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010Ellipsis in Dutch dialects. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
van Craenenbroeck, Jeroen & Haegeman, Liliane
2007The derivation of subject-initial V2. Linguistic Inquiry 38(1):167-178. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culbertson, Jennifer
2010Convergent evidence for categorial change in French: from subject clitic to agreement marker. Language 86(1):85-132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Schutter, Georges & Taeldeman, Johan
1986Assimilatie van stem in de zuidelijke Nederlandse dialekten. In Vruchten van z’n akker: opstellen van (oud-) medewerkers en oud-studenten voor Prof. V.F. Vanacker, Magda Devos & Johan Taeldeman (eds), 91–133. Ghent: Seminaire voor Nederlands Taalkunde.Google Scholar
De Vogelaer, Gunther
2005Subjectsmarkering in de Nederlandse en Friese Dialecten. PhD dissertation, Ghent University.
De Vogelaer, Gunther & van der Auwera, Johan
2010When typological rara generate rarissima: Analogical extension of verbal agreement in Dutch dialects. In Rara & Rarissima. Collecting and Interpreting Unusual Characteristics of Human Language, Jan Wohlgemuth & Michael Cysouw (eds), 47-73. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Devos, Magda
1986Het persoonlijk voornaamwoord 2e pers enk in het Westvlaams. Geografie en historiek. In Vruchten van z’n akker: opstellen van (oud-) medewerkers en oud-studenten voor Prof. V.F. Vanacker, Magda Devos & Johan Taeldeman (eds), 167-189. Ghent: Seminaire voor Nederlands Taalkunde.Google Scholar
Devos, Magda & Vandekerckhove, Reinhild
2005Taal in stad en land. West-vlaams. Tielt: Lannoo.Google Scholar
Eide, Kristin Melum
2009Finiteness: the haves and the have-nots. In Advances in Comparative Germanic Syntax [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 141], Artemis Alexiadou, Jorge Hankamer, Thomas McFadden, Justin Nuger & Florian Schäfer (eds), 357-90. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane
1990Subject pronouns and subject clitics in West-Flemish. The Linguistic Review 7(4): 333-364. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1996Verb second, the split CP and null subjects in early Dutch finite clauses. GenGenP. [URL]
Haegeman, Liliane & van Koppen, Marjo
2012Complementizer agreement and the relation between C° and T°. Linguistic Inquiry 43(3): 441–454. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane & Weir, Andrew
2015The cartography of yes and no in West Flemish. In Discourse-oriented Syntax [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 226], Josef Bayer, Roland Hinterhölzl & Andreas Trotzke (eds), 175-210. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoeksema, Jack
2006Hij zei van niet, maar knikte van ja: Distributie en diachronie van bijwoorden van polariteit ingeleid door van . Tabu 35(3-4):135-158.Google Scholar
2008Van + bijwoord van polariteit: Een geval van verplichte PP extrapositie? Tabu 37(1-2):69-74.Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders
2001The syntax of yes and no in Finnish. Studia Linguistica 55(2):141-175. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007Null subjects and polarity focus. Studia Linguistica 61(3):212-236. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013The syntax of answers to polar questions in English and Swedish. Lingua 128: 31-50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kramer, Ruth & Rawlins, Kyle
2011Polarity particles: an ellipsis account. In Proceedings of NELS 39, Suzi Lima, Kevin Mullin & Brian Smith (eds). Amherst MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred
2013Response particles as propositional anaphors. In Proceedings of SALT 23, Todd Snider (ed.), 1-18. Ithaca NY: CLC Publications.Google Scholar
Landau, Idan
2004The scale of finiteness and the calculus of control. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22: 811-77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lobeck, Anne
1995Ellipsis: Functional Heads, Licensing and Identification. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Mensching, Guido
2000Infinitive Constructions with Specified Subjects: A Syntactic Analysis of the Romance Languages. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Merchant, Jason
2001The Syntax of Silence. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2004Fragments and ellipsis. Linguistics and Philosophy 27(6):661-738. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Muysken, Pieter
1982Parameterizing the notion ‘head’. Journal of Linguistic Research 2: 57-75.Google Scholar
Muysken, Pieter & van Riemsdijk, Henk
1986Projecting features and featuring projections. In Features and Projections, Pieter Muysken & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds), 1-30. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Paardekooper, Piet C
1993Jaak/neenik enz. Tabu 23(3):143-173.Google Scholar
Pollock, Jean-Yves
1989Verb movement, Universal Grammar, and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry 20(3): 365-424.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
1982Issues in Italian Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1997The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar, Liliane Haegeman (ed.). Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006On the form of chains: Criterial positions and ECP effects. In Wh-movement: Moving on, Lisa Lai-shen Cheng & Norbert Corver (eds), 97-133. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi & Shlonsky, Ur
2006Satisfying the subject criterion by a non-subject: English locative inversion and heavy NP shift. In Phases of Interpretation, Mara Frascarelli (ed.), 341-361. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007Strategies of subject extraction. In Interfaces + Recursion = Language? Chomsky's Minimalism and the View from Syntax-semantics, Hans-Martin Gärtner & Uli Sauerland (eds), 115-160. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Roberts, Craige
(2012/1996) Information structure in discourse: Towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics. Semantics & Pragmatics 5:1-69. Originally published in OSU Working Papers in Linguistics 49: Papers in semantics , Jae-Hak Yoon & Andreas Kathol (eds). Columbus OH: The Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian
2004The C-system in Brythonic Celtic languages, V2, and the EPP. In The structure of CP and IP: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 2, Luigi Rizzi (ed.), 297-328. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Servidio, Emilio
2014Polarity Particles in Italian: Focus, Fragments, Tags. PhD dissertation, University of Siena.
Simon, Ellen
2010Phonological transfer of voicing and devoicing rules: Evidence from L1 Dutch and L2 English conversational speech. Language Sciences 32(1): 63–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smessaert, Hans
1995Morfo-syntaxis van het Westvlaamse bè-jaa-k-gie . Tabu 25(1):45-60.Google Scholar
Szabolcsi, Anna
2005Overt infinitival subjects (if that’s what they are). Organizing Grammar: Linguistic Studies in Honor of Henk van Riemsdijk, Hans Broekhuis, Norbert Corver, Riny Huybregts, Ursula Kleinhenz & Jan Koster (eds), 618-25. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Taraldsen, Knut Tarald
2001Subject extraction, the distribution of expletives and stylistic inversion. In Subject Inversion in Romance and the Theory of Universal Grammar, Aafke Hulk & Jean-Yves Pollock (eds), 163-182. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Travis, Lisa
(1984) Parameters and Effects of Word Order Variation. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Wurmbrand, Susi
2014Tense and aspect in English infinitives. Linguistic Inquiry 45: 403-447. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Karen De Clercq, Liliane Haegeman, Terje Lohndal & Christine Meklenborg
2023. Adverbial Resumption in Verb Second Languages, DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 may 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.