Cover not available
Part of
Finiteness Matters: On finiteness-related phenomena in natural languages
Edited by Kristin Melum Eide
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 231] 2016
► pp. 287–308

The influence of phonological factors on the expression of finiteness by children learning Dutch as their first and second language

ORCID logo | Utrecht University
| University of Amsterdam
Previous research has indicated that children learning a first language (L1) and children learning a second language (L2) make errors with finiteness marking, even when they master the syntactic and morphological properties of finiteness marking in the target language. This study investigates whether such residual errors with finiteness marking are caused by phonological properties of the verb form. Three groups participated in the study: a Turkish L1 – Dutch L2 group (mean age = 7), an age-matched Dutch L1 group, and a younger Dutch L1 group (mean age = 5) that matched the L2 group on Dutch proficiency. All children took part in an elicited production task and a non-word repetition task. The results confirm the role of phonological properties of verb forms, in particular composition of the coda cluster. Accuracy was high across all groups, but the L2 children and age-matched L1 children performed slightly better than the younger L1 children. This observation suggests that L2 children can make use of L1 experience in the domain of verb inflection.
Keywords: acquisition, child L1 and L2, Dutch, finiteness, phonology
Published online: 25 August 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.231.10blo
References (58)
References
Baauw, Sergio, de Roo, Esteralla & Avrutin, Sergey. 2002. Determiner omission in language acquisition and language impairment: Syntactic and discourse factors. In BUCLD 26: Proceedings of the 26th annual Conference on Language Acquisition and Development, Barbora Skarabela, Sarah Fish & Anna H.-J. Do (eds.), 24-35. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Blom, Elma. 2003. From Root Infinitive to Finite Sentence. The Acquisition of Verbal Inflections and Auxiliaries. PhD dissertation, Utrecht University.
. 2007. Modality, infinitives and finite bare verbs in Dutch and English child language. Language Acquisition 14(1): 75-113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. Testing the domain-by-age model: Inflection and placement of Dutch verbs. In Current Trends in Child Second Language Acquisition: A Generative Perspective [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 46], Belma Haznedar & Elena Gavruseva (eds.), 271-300. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blom, Elma & van Geert, Paul. 2004. Signs of a developing grammar: Subject drop and inflection in early child Dutch. Linguistics 42(1): 195 – 234. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blom, Elma, Polišenská, Daniela & Weerman, Fred. 2006. Effects of age on the acquisition of agreement inflection. Morphology 16: 313–336. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blom, Elma & Baayen, Harald. 2013. The impact of verb form, sentence position, home language and L2 proficiency on subject-verb agreement in child L2 Dutch. Applied Psycholinguistics 34(4): 777-811 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blom, Elma, Paradis, Johanne & Sorenson-Duncan, Tamara. 2012. Effects of input properties, vocabulary size and L1 on the development of third person singular –s in child L2 English. Language Learning 62(3): 965-994. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blom, Elma & Paradis, Johanne. 2013. Past tense production by English second language learners with and without language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 56: 281-294. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blom, Elma & Vasić, Nada. 2011. The production and processing of determiner-noun agreement in child L2 Dutch. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 1(3): 265-290. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blom, Elma, Vasić, Nada & de Jong, Jan. 2014. Production and processing of subject-verb agreement in monolingual Dutch children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 57: 952-965. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brun, Dina, Avrutin, Sergey & Babyonyshev, Maria. 1999. Aspect and its temporal interpretation during the optional infinitive stage in Russian. In BUCLD 23: Proceedings of the Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development 23, Annabel Greenhill, Heather Littlefield & Cheryl Tano (eds.), 120-131. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 2001. Phonology and Language Use. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chatterjee, Samprit & Hadi, Ali. 2006. Regression Analysis by Example, 4th edn. New York NY: Wiley. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, Harald, Eisenbeiss, Sonja & Penke, Martina. 1996. Underspecification and lexical learning in early child grammars. In Generative Approaches to First and Second Language Acquisition. Empirical Findings, Theorectical Consideration and Crosslinguistic Comparisons [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 14], Harald Clahsen (ed.), 129-159. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clements, Nick. 1990. The role of the sonority cycle in core syllabification. In Papers in Laboratory Phonology I, John Kingston & Mary Beckman (eds.), 283—333. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Haan, Ger. 1987. A theory-bound approach to the acquisition of verb placement in Dutch. In Formal Parameters of Generative Grammar: OTS Yearbook 1987, Ger de Haan & Wim Zonneveld (eds.). Dordrecht: ICG.Google Scholar
den Besten, Hans. 1989. Studies in West Germanic Syntax. PhD dissertation, KUB Tilburg.
Eisenbeiss, Sonja. 2009. Generative approaches to language learning. Linguistics 47(2): 273–310. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eyer, Julia & Leonard, Laurence. 1994. Learning past tense morphology with specific language impairment: A case study. Child Language Teaching and Therapy 10: 127-138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gillis, Steven. 2003. A case study of the early acquisition of verbs in Dutch. In Development of Verb Inflection in First Language Acquisition: A Cross-linguistic Perspective, Dagmar Bittner, Wolfgang Dressler & Marianne Kilani-Schoch (eds.), 171-203. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane. 1994. Root infinitives, tense and truncated structures. Language Acquisition 4(3): 205-255. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halle, Morris. 1997. Distributed morphology: Impoverishment and fission. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 30: 425-449.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris & Marantz, Alec. 1993. Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In The View from Building 20. Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, Kenneth Hale & Samuel Jay Keyser (eds.), 111-176. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Haznedar, Belma. 2001. The acquisition of the IP system in child L2 English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 23: 1-39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haznedar, Belma & Schwartz, Bonnie. 1997. Are there optional infinitives in child L2 acquisition? In BUCLD 21: Proceedings of the 21st Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, Elizabeth Hughes, Mary Hughes & Annabel Greenhill (eds.), 257–268. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Ionin, Tania & Wexler, Kenneth. 2002. Why is 'is' easier than 's'? Acquisition of tense/agreement morphology by child L2-English learners. Second Language Research 18(2): 95-136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Bonnie & Morris, Sherril. 2007. Clinical implications of the effects of lexical aspect and phonology on children’s production of the regular past tense. Child Language Teaching and Therapy 23: 287-306. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jordens, Peter. 1990. The acquisition of verb placement. Linguistics 28: 1407-1448. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2002. Finiteness in early child Dutch. Linguistics 40: 687-765. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keuleers, Emmanuel, Brysbaert, Marc & New, Boris. 2010. SUBTLEX-NL: A new frequency measure for Dutch words based on film subtitles. Behavior Research Methods 42(3): 643-650. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koster, Jan. 1975. Dutch as an SOV Language. Linguistic Analysis 1: 111-136.Google Scholar
Leonard, Laurence, Davy, Jennifer & Deevy, Patricia. 2007. Phonotactic probability and past tense use by children with specific language impairment and their typically developing peers. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 21(10): 747–758. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Geoffrey. 1967. Turkish grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, Brian. 2010. The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk, WEB manual.Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Marinis, Theodoros & Chondrogianni, Vasiliki. 2010. Production of tense marking in successive bilingual children: When do they converge with their monolingual peers? International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 12(1): 19-28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marshall, Chloe & van der Lely, Heather. 2007. The impact of phonological complexity on past tense inflection in children with Grammatical-SLI. Advances in Speech-Language Pathology 9: 191-203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meisel, Jürgen. 2004. The bilingual child. In The Handbook of Bilingualism, Tej Bathia & William Ritchie (eds.), 91-113. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mobaraki, Mohsen, Vainikka, Anne & Young-Scholten, Martha. 2008. The status of subjects in early child L2 English. In Current trends in Child Second Language Acquisition, Belma Haznedar & Elena Gavruseva (eds.), 209-236. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morelli, Frida. 1999. The Phonotactics and Phonology of Obstruent Clusters in Optimality Theory. Doctoral Dissertation University of Maryland.
Oetting, Janna & Horohov, Janice. 1997. Past tense marking by children with and without specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 40: 62–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paradis, Johanne. (2011). Individual differences in child English second language acquisition: Comparing child-Internal and child-external factors. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism. 1:3, 213-237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paradis, Johanne, Rice, Mabel, Crago, Martha & Marquis, Janet. 2008. The acquisition of tense in English: Distinguishing child second language from first language and specific language impairment. Applied Psycholinguistics 29: 689-722. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pierce, Amy. 1989. On the Emergence of Syntax: A Cross-linguistic Study. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Poeppel, David & Wexler, Kenneth. 1993. The full competence hypothesis of clause structure in early German. Language 69(1): 1-33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Polišenská, Daniela. 2010. Dutch Children’s Acquisition of Verbal and Adjectival Inflection. PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam <[URL]>.
Prévost, Philippe. 2003. Truncation and missing surface inflection in initial L2 German. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 25, 65-97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1993-1994. Some notes on linguistic theory and language development: The case of root infinitives. Language Acquisition 3: 371-393. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schlichting, Liesbeth & Lutje Spelberg, Henk. 2002. Lexilijst NL. Amsterdam: Pearson Assessment and Information.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth. 1984. On the major class features and syllable theory. In Mark Aronoff & Richard Oehrle (eds.)., Language Sound Structures, 107-136. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Song, Jae Yung, Sundara, Megha & Demuth, Katherine. 2009. Phonological constraints on children’s production of English third person singular –s. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 52, 623-642 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vainikka, Anne & Young-Scholten, Martha. 2010. All acquisition begins with the projection of a bare verb phrase. Applied Psycholinguistics 31(2): 332-339. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vasić, Nada & Blom, Elma. 2011. Production and processing of determiners in Turkish-Dutch L2 children. In BUCLD 35: Proceedings of the 35th annual Conference on Language Acquisition and Development, Nick Danis, Kate Mesh & Hyunsuk Sung (eds), 616-627. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Verhoeven, Ludo & Vermeer, Anne. 2001. Taaltest Alle Kinderen (TAK) (Language Assessment all Children). Arnhem: CITO.Google Scholar
Wexler, Kenneth. 1998. Very early parameter setting and the unique checking constraint: A new explanation of the optional infinitive stage. Lingua 106: 23-79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
White, Lydia. 2003. Second language acquisition and Universal Grammar. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wijnen, Frank. 1998. The temporal interpretation of Dutch children's root infinitives: The effect of eventivity. First Language 18(3): 379-402. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000. Input, intake and sequence of syntactic development. In From Sound to Sentence, Mieke Beers, Beppie van den Bogaerde, Gerard Bol, Jan de Jong & Carola Rooijmans (eds.). Groningen: Center for Language and Cognition Groningen.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Levy-Forsythe, Zarina & Aviya Hacohen
2022. Finiteness marking in Russian-speaking children with Specific Language Impairment. First Language 42:1 ► pp. 124 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.