Electroencephalographic evidence of vowels computation and representation in human auditory cortex
Mirko Grimaldi | Centro di Ricerca Interdisciplinare sul Linguaggio (CRIL) x University of Salento, Lecce, ItalyDepartment of Human Movement, Social and Health Sciences, University of Rome “Foro Italico”, Rome, ItalyIRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, Rome Italy
Anna Dora Manca | Centro di Ricerca Interdisciplinare sul Linguaggio (CRIL) x University of Salento, Lecce, ItalyDepartment of Human Movement, Social and Health Sciences, University of Rome “Foro Italico”, Rome, ItalyIRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, Rome Italy
Francesco Sigona | Centro di Ricerca Interdisciplinare sul Linguaggio (CRIL) x University of Salento, Lecce, ItalyDepartment of Human Movement, Social and Health Sciences, University of Rome “Foro Italico”, Rome, ItalyIRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, Rome Italy
By exploiting the N1 component of the auditory event related potentials we aimed to measure and localize the processing involving the spectro-temporal and the abstract featural representation. We investigated the electroencephalography patterns of 11 Salento Italian speakers discriminating their native five stressed vowels [i, ε, a, ɔ, u]. Findings showed two distinct N1 sub-components: the N1a peaking at 125–135 ms, localized in the bilateral primary auditory cortex (BA41), and the N1b peaking at 145–155 ms, localized in the superior temporal gyrus (BA22) with a strong leftward lateralization. Crucially, while high vowels elicited higher amplitudes than non-high vowels both in the N1a and N1b, back vowels generated later responses than non-back vowels in the N1b only. Overall, these findings suggest a hierarchical processing where from the N1a to the N1b the acoustic analysis shift progressively toward the computation and representation of phonological features.
References (63)
References
Biermann, S. & Heil, P. 2000. Parallels between timing of onset responses of single neurons in cat and of evoked magnetic fields in human auditory cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology 84(5): 2426-2439.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Böcker, K.B.E, Brunia, C.H.M. & van den Berg-Lenssen, M.M.C. 1994. A spatiotemporal dipole model of the stimulus preceding negativity prior to feedback stimuli. Brain Topography 7(1): 71-88. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Boersma, P. & Weenink, D. 2010. Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer [Computer program], Version 5.2. < [URL]>![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Calabrese, A. 2011. Metaphony in Romance. In The Blackwell Companion to Phonology, Vol. 5, M. van Oostendorp, C.J. Ewen, E. Hume & K. Rice (eds), 2631-2661. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chang, E.F., Rieger, J.W, Johnson, K., Berger, M.S., Barbaro, N.M., Knight, R.T., 2010. Categorical Speech Representation in Human Superior Temporal Gyrus. Nature 13(11): 1428–1432. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Diesch, E., Eulitz, C., Hampson, S. & Ross, B. 1996. The neurotopography of vowels as mirrored by evoked magnetic field measurements. Brain Language 53: 143-168. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Diesch, E. & Luce, T. 1997. Magnetic fields elicited by tones and vowel formants reveal tonotopy and nonlinear summation of cortical activation. Psychophysiology 34: 501-510. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Diesch, E. & Luce, T. 2000. Topographic and temporal indices of vowel spectral envelope extraction in the human auditory cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 12: 878–893. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eulitz, C., Diesch, E., Pantev, C., Hampson, S. & Elbert, T. 1995. Magnetic and electric brain activity evoked by the processing of tone and vowel stimuli. Journal of Neuroscience 15: 2748-2755.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eulitz, C., Eulitz, H. & Elbert, T. 1997. Differential outcomes from magneto-and electroencephalography for the analysis of human cognition. Neuroscience Letters 227(3): 185-188. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eulitz, C., Obleser, J. & Lahiri, A. 2004. Intra-subject replication of brain magnetic activity during the processing of speech sounds. Cognitive brain research 19(1): 82-91. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ferrero, F.E., Magno-Caldognetto, E., Vagges, K. & Lavagnoli, C. 1978. Some acoustic characteristics of the Italian vowels. Journal of Italian Linguistics 3(1): 87-96.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gage, N., Poeppel, D., Roberts, T.P.L. & Hickok, G. 1998. Auditory evoked M100 reflects onset acoustics of speech sounds. Brain Research 814(1): 236-239. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gage, N., Roberts, T.P.L & Hickok, G. 2006. Temporal resolution properties of human auditory cortex: Reflections in the neuromagnetic auditory evoked M100 component. Brain Research 1069(1): 166-171. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grimaldi, M. 2003. Nuove ricerche sul vocalismo tonico del Salento meridionale. Analisi acustica e trattamento fonologico dei dati. Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Halle, M. 2002. From Memory to Speech and Back: Papers on Phonetics and Phonology 1954–2002. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hickok, G. & Poeppel, D. 2004. Dorsal and ventral streams: A framework for understanding aspects of the functional anatomy of language. Cognition 92(1): 67-99. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hickok, G. & Poeppel, D. 2007. The cortical organization of speech processing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 8(5): 393-402. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Inui, K., Okamoto, H., Miki, K., Gunji, A. & Kakigi, R. 2006. Serial and parallel processing in the human auditory cortex: A magnetoencephalographic study. Cerebral Cortex 16(1): 18-30. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kaas, J.H. & Hackett, T.A. 2000. Subdivisions of auditory cortex and processing streams in primates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 97(22): 11793-11799. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kodera, K., Hink, R.F., Yamada, O. & Suzuki, J.-I. 1979. Effects of rise time on simultaneously recorded auditory-evoked potentials from the early, middle and late ranges. International Journal of Audiology 18: 395-402. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Maddieson, I. & Precoda, K. 1990. Updating upsid. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 74: 104-111.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Manca, A.D., Di Russo, F., Sigona, F. & Grimaldi, M. Submitted. Electrical brain responses mirror tonochrony, phonemotopic and hierarchical organization of auditory cortex.
Manca A.D., Di Russo F. & Grimaldi M. In press. Orderly organization of vowels in the auditory brain: The neuronal correlates of the Italian vowels. In
Proceedings of the XI Convegno Nazionale Associazione Italiana Scienze della Voce, AISV
. Il farsi e il disfarsi del linguaggio. Bologna.
Malmivuo, J., Suihko, V. & Eskola, H. 1997. Sensitivity distributions of EEG and MEG measurements. IEEE Transactions of Biomedical Engineering 44: 196-208. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mäkelä, A.M., Alku, P. & Tiitinen, H. 2003. The auditory N1m reveals the left-hemispheric representation of vowel identity in humans. Neuroscience Letters 353: 111-114. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
May, P.J.C. & Tiitinen, H. 2010. Mismatch negativity (MMN), the deviance‐elicited auditory deflection, explained. Psychophysiology 47(1): 66–122. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mcdonald, J.J., Teder-Sälejärvi, W.A., Di Russo, F. & Hillyard, S.A. 2003. Neural substrates of perceptual enhancement by crossmodal spatial attention. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 15(1): 10-19. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Näätänen, R. & Picton, T. 1987. The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: A review and analysis of the component structure. Psychophysiology 24: 375-425. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Näätänen, R. 1990. The role of attention in auditory information processing as revealed by the event-related potentials and other brain measures of cognitive function‖. Behavioural Brain Science 13: 201–288. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Obleser, J., Elbert, T., Lahiri, A. & Eulitz, C. 2003a. Cortical representation of vowels reflects acoustic dissimilarity determined by formant frequencies. Cognitive Brain Research 15(3): 207-213. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Obleser, J., Lahiri, A. & Eulitz, C. 2003b. Auditory-evoked magnetic field codes place of articulation in timing and topography around 100 milliseconds post syllable onset. Neuroimage 20(3): 1839-1847. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Obleser, J., Lahiri, A. & Eulitz, C. 2004a. Intra-subject replication of brain activity during the processing of speech sounds. Cognitive Brain Research 19: 82-91. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Obleser, J., Lahiri, A. & Eulitz, C. 2004b. Magnetic brain response mirrors extraction of phonological features from spoken vowels. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 16(8): 31-39. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Obleser, J., Scott, S.K. & Eulitz, C. 2006. Now you hear it, now you don’t: Transient traces of consonants and their nonspeech analogues in the human brain. Cerebral Cortex 16(8): 1069-1076. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Obleser, J. & Eisner, F. 2009. Pre-lexical abstraction of speech in the auditory cortex. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 13(1): 14-19. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ohl, F.W. & Scheich, H. 1997. Orderly cortical representation of vowels based on formant interaction. Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences
U.S.A
. 94: 9440-9444.
Pantev, C., Bertrand, O., Eulitz, C., Verkindt, C., Hampson, S., Schuierer, G. & Elbert, T. 1995. Specific tonotopic organizations of different areas of the human auditory cortex revealed by simultaneous magnetic and electric recordings. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 94(1): 26-40. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Picton, T.W., Woods, D.L. & Proulx, G.B. 1978. Human auditory sustained potentials, I: The nature of the response. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 45(2): 186-197. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Poeppel, D., Phillips, C., Yellin, E., Rowley, H.A., Roberts, T.P.L & Marantz, A. 1997. Processing of vowels in supratemporal auditory cortex. Neuroscience Letters 221: 145-148. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Poeppel, D., Idsardi, W.J. & van Wassenhove, V. 2009. Speech perception at the interface of neurobiology and linguistics. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 363(1493): 1071-1086. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rauschecker, J.P. & Scott, S.K. 2009. Maps and streams in the auditory cortex: Nonhuman primates illuminate human speech processing. Nature Neuroscience 12(6): 718-724. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Roberts, T.P.L. & Poeppel, D. 1996. Latency of auditory evoked M100 as a function of tone frequency. NeuroReport 7: 1138-1140. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Roberts, T.P.L., Ferrari, P. & Poeppel, D. 1998. Latency of evoked neuromagnetic M100 reflects perceptual and acoustic stimulus attributes. NeuroReport 9: 3265-3269. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Roberts, T.P.L., Ferrari, P., Stufflebeam, S.M. & Poeppel, D. 2000. Latency of the auditory evoked neuromagnetic field components: Stimulus dependence and insights toward perception. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology 17: 114-129. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Roberts, T.P.L., Flagg, E.J. & Gage, N.M. 2004. Vowel categorization induces departure of M100 latency from acoustic prediction. NeuroReport 15: 1679-1682. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Romani, G.L., Williamson, S.J. & Kaufman, L. 1982. Tonotopic organization of the human auditory cortex. Science 216: 1339-1340. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Saenz, M. & Langers, D.R.M. 2014. Tonotopic mapping of human auditory cortex. Hearing Research 307: 42-52. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Scharinger, M., Idsardi, W.J. & Poe, S. 2011. A comprehensive three-dimensional cortical map of vowel space. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 23(12): 3972-3982. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Scott, S.K. & Johnsrude, I.S. 2003. The neuroanatomical and functional organization of speech perception. Trends in Neurosciences 26(2): 100-107. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Scott, S.K. & McGettigan, C. 2013. Do temporal processes underlie left hemisphere dominance in speech perception? Brain & Language 127: 36-45. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shestakova, A., Brattico, E., Soloviev, A., Klucharev, V. & Huotilainen, M. 2004. Orderly cortical representation of vowel categories presented by multiple exemplars. Cognitive Brain Research 21: 342-350. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stevens, K.N. 2002. Toward a model for lexical access based on acoustic landmarks and distinctive features. Journal of Acoustical Society of America 111(4): 1872-1891. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Talavage, T.M., Sereno, M.I., Melcher, J.R., Ledden, P.J., Rosen, B.R. & Dale, A.M. 2004. Tonotopic organization in human auditory cortex revealed by progressions of frequency sensitivity. Journal of neurophysiology 91(3): 1282-1296. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Teder-Sälejärvi, W.A., McDonald, J.J., Di Russo, F. & Hillyard, S.A. 2003. An analysis of audio-visual crossmodal integration by means of event related potential (ERP) recordings. Cognitive Brain Research 14(1): 106-114. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Teder-Sälejärvi, W., Di Russo, F., McDonald, J.J. & Hillyard, S.A. 2005. Effects of spatial congruity on audio-visual multimodal integration. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 17(9): 1396-1409. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vihla, M. & Eulitz, C. 2003. Topography of the auditory evoked potential in humans reflects differences between vowels embedded in pseudo-words. Neuroscience Letters 338(3): 189-192. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Virtanen, J., Ahveninen, J., Ilmoniemi, R.J., Näätänen, R. & Pekkonen, E. 1998. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 108: 291-298. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wolpaw, J.R. & Kiffin Penry, J. 1975. A temporal component of the auditory evoked response. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 39: 609-620. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wood, C.C. & Wolpaw, J.R. 1982. Scalp distribution of human auditory evoked potentials. II. Evidence for overlapping sources and involvement of auditory cortex. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 54(1): 25-38. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Woods, D.L. 1995. The component structure of the N1 wave of the human auditory evoked potential. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology-Supplements Only 44: 102-109.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Woods, D.L., Herron, T., Kang, X., Cate, A.D. & William Yund, E. 2011. Phonological processing in human auditory cortical fields. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 5(00042): 1-15. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Grimaldi, Mirko
2023.
Neurocomputational Properties of Speech Sound Perception and Production. In
Language Electrified [
Neuromethods, 202],
► pp. 389 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Whitten, Allison, Alexandra P. Key, Antje S. Mefferd & James W. Bodfish
2020.
Auditory event-related potentials index faster processing of natural speech but not synthetic speech over nonspeech analogs in children.
Brain and Language 207
► pp. 104825 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.