References
Biermann, S. & Heil, P
2000Parallels between timing of onset responses of single neurons in cat and of evoked magnetic fields in human auditory cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology 84(5): 2426-2439.Google Scholar
Böcker, K.B.E, Brunia, C.H.M. & van den Berg-Lenssen, M.M.C
1994A spatiotemporal dipole model of the stimulus preceding negativity prior to feedback stimuli. Brain Topography 7(1): 71-88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boersma, P. & Weenink, D
2010Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer [Computer program], Version 5.2. [URL]Google Scholar
Calabrese, A
2011Metaphony in Romance. In The Blackwell Companion to Phonology, Vol. 5, M. van Oostendorp, C.J. Ewen, E. Hume & K. Rice (eds), 2631-2661. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Chang, E.F., Rieger, J.W, Johnson, K., Berger, M.S., Barbaro, N.M., Knight, R.T
2010Categorical Speech Representation in Human Superior Temporal Gyrus. Nature 13(11): 1428–1432. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diesch, E., Eulitz, C., Hampson, S. & Ross, B
1996The neurotopography of vowels as mirrored by evoked magnetic field measurements. Brain Language 53: 143-168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diesch, E. & Luce, T
1997Magnetic fields elicited by tones and vowel formants reveal tonotopy and nonlinear summation of cortical activation. Psychophysiology 34: 501-510. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000Topographic and temporal indices of vowel spectral envelope extraction in the human auditory cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 12: 878–893. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eulitz, C., Diesch, E., Pantev, C., Hampson, S. & Elbert, T
1995Magnetic and electric brain activity evoked by the processing of tone and vowel stimuli. Journal of Neuroscience 15: 2748-2755.Google Scholar
Eulitz, C., Eulitz, H. & Elbert, T
1997Differential outcomes from magneto-and electroencephalography for the analysis of human cognition. Neuroscience Letters 227(3): 185-188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eulitz, C., Obleser, J. & Lahiri, A
2004Intra-subject replication of brain magnetic activity during the processing of speech sounds. Cognitive brain research 19(1): 82-91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferrero, F.E., Magno-Caldognetto, E., Vagges, K. & Lavagnoli, C
1978Some acoustic characteristics of the Italian vowels. Journal of Italian Linguistics 3(1): 87-96.Google Scholar
Gage, N., Poeppel, D., Roberts, T.P.L. & Hickok, G
1998Auditory evoked M100 reflects onset acoustics of speech sounds. Brain Research 814(1): 236-239. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gage, N., Roberts, T.P.L & Hickok, G
2006Temporal resolution properties of human auditory cortex: Reflections in the neuromagnetic auditory evoked M100 component. Brain Research 1069(1): 166-171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grimaldi, M
2003Nuove ricerche sul vocalismo tonico del Salento meridionale. Analisi acustica e trattamento fonologico dei dati. Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso.Google Scholar
2009Acoustic correlates of phonological microvariations. The case of unsuspected highly diversified metaphonetic processes in a small area of Southern Salento (Apulia). In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2006. Selected papers from ‘Going Romance’, Amsterdam 7-9 December 2006 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 303], D. Torck & W.L. Wetzels (eds), 89-109. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halle, M
2002From Memory to Speech and Back: Papers on Phonetics and Phonology 1954–2002. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hickok, G. & Poeppel, D
2004Dorsal and ventral streams: A framework for understanding aspects of the functional anatomy of language. Cognition 92(1): 67-99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007The cortical organization of speech processing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 8(5): 393-402. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Inui, K., Okamoto, H., Miki, K., Gunji, A. & Kakigi, R
2006Serial and parallel processing in the human auditory cortex: A magnetoencephalographic study. Cerebral Cortex 16(1): 18-30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaas, J.H. & Hackett, T.A
2000Subdivisions of auditory cortex and processing streams in primates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 97(22): 11793-11799. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kodera, K., Hink, R.F., Yamada, O. & Suzuki, J.-I
1979Effects of rise time on simultaneously recorded auditory-evoked potentials from the early, middle and late ranges. International Journal of Audiology 18: 395-402. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maddieson, I. & Precoda, K
1990Updating upsid. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 74: 104-111.Google Scholar
Manca, A.D
Di Russo, F., Sigona, F. & Grimaldi, M. Submitted. Electrical brain responses mirror tonochrony, phonemotopic and hierarchical organization of auditory cortex.
Manca A.D., Di Russo F. & Grimaldi M
In press. Orderly organization of vowels in the auditory brain: The neuronal correlates of the Italian vowels. In Proceedings of the XI Convegno Nazionale Associazione Italiana Scienze della Voce, AISV . Il farsi e il disfarsi del linguaggio. Bologna.
Malmivuo, J., Suihko, V. & Eskola, H
1997Sensitivity distributions of EEG and MEG measurements. IEEE Transactions of Biomedical Engineering 44: 196-208. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mäkelä, A.M., Alku, P. & Tiitinen, H
2003The auditory N1m reveals the left-hemispheric representation of vowel identity in humans. Neuroscience Letters 353: 111-114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
May, P.J.C. & Tiitinen, H
2010Mismatch negativity (MMN), the deviance‐elicited auditory deflection, explained. Psychophysiology 47(1): 66–122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mcdonald, J.J., Teder-Sälejärvi, W.A., Di Russo, F. & Hillyard, S.A
2003Neural substrates of perceptual enhancement by crossmodal spatial attention. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 15(1): 10-19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Näätänen, R. & Picton, T
1987The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: A review and analysis of the component structure. Psychophysiology 24: 375-425. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Näätänen, R
1990The role of attention in auditory information processing as revealed by the event-related potentials and other brain measures of cognitive function‖. Behavioural Brain Science 13: 201–288. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Obleser, J., Elbert, T., Lahiri, A. & Eulitz, C
2003aCortical representation of vowels reflects acoustic dissimilarity determined by formant frequencies. Cognitive Brain Research 15(3): 207-213. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Obleser, J., Lahiri, A. & Eulitz, C
2003bAuditory-evoked magnetic field codes place of articulation in timing and topography around 100 milliseconds post syllable onset. Neuroimage 20(3): 1839-1847. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004aIntra-subject replication of brain activity during the processing of speech sounds. Cognitive Brain Research 19: 82-91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004bMagnetic brain response mirrors extraction of phonological features from spoken vowels. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 16(8): 31-39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Obleser, J., Scott, S.K. & Eulitz, C
2006Now you hear it, now you don’t: Transient traces of consonants and their nonspeech analogues in the human brain. Cerebral Cortex 16(8): 1069-1076. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Obleser, J. & Eisner, F
2009Pre-lexical abstraction of speech in the auditory cortex. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 13(1): 14-19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ohl, F.W. & Scheich, H
1997Orderly cortical representation of vowels based on formant interaction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U.S.A . 94: 9440-9444.
Pantev, C., Bertrand, O., Eulitz, C., Verkindt, C., Hampson, S., Schuierer, G. & Elbert, T
1995Specific tonotopic organizations of different areas of the human auditory cortex revealed by simultaneous magnetic and electric recordings. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 94(1): 26-40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Picton, T.W., Woods, D.L. & Proulx, G.B
1978Human auditory sustained potentials, I: The nature of the response. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 45(2): 186-197. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Poeppel, D., Phillips, C., Yellin, E., Rowley, H.A., Roberts, T.P.L & Marantz, A
1997Processing of vowels in supratemporal auditory cortex. Neuroscience Letters 221: 145-148. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Poeppel, D., Idsardi, W.J. & van Wassenhove, V
2009Speech perception at the interface of neurobiology and linguistics. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 363(1493): 1071-1086. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rauschecker, J.P. & Scott, S.K
2009Maps and streams in the auditory cortex: Nonhuman primates illuminate human speech processing. Nature Neuroscience 12(6): 718-724. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, T.P.L. & Poeppel, D
1996Latency of auditory evoked M100 as a function of tone frequency. NeuroReport 7: 1138-1140. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, T.P.L., Ferrari, P. & Poeppel, D
1998Latency of evoked neuromagnetic M100 reflects perceptual and acoustic stimulus attributes. NeuroReport 9: 3265-3269. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, T.P.L., Ferrari, P., Stufflebeam, S.M. & Poeppel, D
2000Latency of the auditory evoked neuromagnetic field components: Stimulus dependence and insights toward perception. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology 17: 114-129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, T.P.L., Flagg, E.J. & Gage, N.M
2004Vowel categorization induces departure of M100 latency from acoustic prediction. NeuroReport 15: 1679-1682. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Romani, G.L., Williamson, S.J. & Kaufman, L
1982Tonotopic organization of the human auditory cortex. Science 216: 1339-1340. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saenz, M. & Langers, D.R.M
2014Tonotopic mapping of human auditory cortex. Hearing Research 307: 42-52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scharinger, M., Idsardi, W.J. & Poe, S
2011A comprehensive three-dimensional cortical map of vowel space. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 23(12): 3972-3982. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scott, S.K. & Johnsrude, I.S
2003The neuroanatomical and functional organization of speech perception. Trends in Neurosciences 26(2): 100-107. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scott, S.K. & McGettigan, C
2013Do temporal processes underlie left hemisphere dominance in speech perception? Brain & Language 127: 36-45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shestakova, A., Brattico, E., Soloviev, A., Klucharev, V. & Huotilainen, M
2004Orderly cortical representation of vowel categories presented by multiple exemplars. Cognitive Brain Research 21: 342-350. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stevens, K.N
2002Toward a model for lexical access based on acoustic landmarks and distinctive features. Journal of Acoustical Society of America 111(4): 1872-1891. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Talavage, T.M., Sereno, M.I., Melcher, J.R., Ledden, P.J., Rosen, B.R. & Dale, A.M
2004Tonotopic organization in human auditory cortex revealed by progressions of frequency sensitivity. Journal of neurophysiology 91(3): 1282-1296. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Teder-Sälejärvi, W.A., McDonald, J.J., Di Russo, F. & Hillyard, S.A
2003An analysis of audio-visual crossmodal integration by means of event related potential (ERP) recordings. Cognitive Brain Research 14(1): 106-114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Teder-Sälejärvi, W., Di Russo, F., McDonald, J.J. & Hillyard, S.A
2005Effects of spatial congruity on audio-visual multimodal integration. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 17(9): 1396-1409. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vihla, M. & Eulitz, C
2003Topography of the auditory evoked potential in humans reflects differences between vowels embedded in pseudo-words. Neuroscience Letters 338(3): 189-192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Virtanen, J., Ahveninen, J., Ilmoniemi, R.J., Näätänen, R. & Pekkonen, E
1998Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 108: 291-298. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wolpaw, J.R. & Kiffin Penry, J
1975A temporal component of the auditory evoked response. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 39: 609-620. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wood, C.C. & Wolpaw, J.R
1982Scalp distribution of human auditory evoked potentials. II. Evidence for overlapping sources and involvement of auditory cortex. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 54(1): 25-38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Woods, D.L
1995The component structure of the N1 wave of the human auditory evoked potential. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology-Supplements Only 44: 102-109.Google Scholar
Woods, D.L., Herron, T., Kang, X., Cate, A.D. & William Yund, E
2011Phonological processing in human auditory cortical fields. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 5(00042): 1-15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Grimaldi, Mirko
2023. Neurocomputational Properties of Speech Sound Perception and Production. In Language Electrified [Neuromethods, 202],  pp. 389 ff. DOI logo
Whitten, Allison, Alexandra P. Key, Antje S. Mefferd & James W. Bodfish
2020. Auditory event-related potentials index faster processing of natural speech but not synthetic speech over nonspeech analogs in children. Brain and Language 207  pp. 104825 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 may 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.